Connect with us

Commentary

Nazi-era rage against gays emerges at Leipzig Pride event

We must not normalize or ignore what occurred

Published

on

A scene from Leipzig Central Station just before the 2024 Leipzig Cristopher Street Day Parade. (Screen capture via euronews/YouTube)

Imagine marching with the diverse thousands in Washington, D.C.’s Pride parade, then suddenly you are confronted by hundreds of men, mostly blonde, wearing black, shouting in your face to disrupt the march. Separating you from them are helmeted riot police with German Shepherds. You blink your eyes in disbelief. You hear the anti-gay epithets shouted in German. You recoil at obscene placards depicting stick figures locked in sex with a red prohibition slash. The black, white and red colors of the Reich flash; there is another flag with an Iron Cross. “Proud-German-National,” one sign says. 

1933? Welcome to Christopher Street Day, 2024 in Leipzig, Germany. Named in homage to the site of the Stonewall Riots, Christopher Street Day (CSD) is the oldest Pride event in what was East Germany, formed in 1992, three years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. This year, CSD Leipzig has never held such significance, not just in Germany but for us all.

At the Leipzig CSD, there was an overwhelming number of friends and allies, facing some 700 neo-Nazis at the barricades, but the political significance is impossible to ignore. In recent days, the German far-right extremist group Alternative for Germany (AfD) won the most seats in Thuringia and nearly won the most seats in Saxony. The rhetoric was about immigration and nationalism, but on CSD the target was Pride with a shocking re-emergence of Nazi-era rage against homosexuals. The determination of the marchers on Christopher Street Day was inspirational, in the face of this violent hostility from AfD’s thugs.

But this has happened before. In 1922, a young gay veteran and survivor of World War I, Bruno Vogel, broke with his family and left home while he was attending the University of Leipzig. He formed a same-sex “friendship league” for homosexuals that would meet regularly in a restaurant for community and discussion about homosexual human rights and justice.  Discovered by Magnus Hirschfeld, a German Jewish doctor and researcher who founded the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin, Vogel’s friendship league blossomed both in Leipzig and in Berlin where he went to work for Hirschfeld. In 1929, Vogel wrote an openly gay and pacifist novel “Alf” about two college preparatory school students Alf and Felix and their love ending with Felix’s death in the trenches of World War I. Magnus Hirschfeld assembled the largest library on sexuality, gender and homosexuality in the world. His library, including “Alf”, along with thousands of volumes was ransacked and burned by Nazis in a public bonfire. The Minister of Nazi propaganda Joseph Goebbels wrote in 1933, “No to decadence and moral corruption! Yes to decency and morality in family and state!…..You do well to commit to the flames the evil spirit of the past.” Vogel left Germany before the bonfire, later to write about it all and be interviewed in London before he passed away. Otherwise, the name of his friendship league in Leipzig may have been lost to history.  It was “Wir,” the German word for “we” or “us.”

In 2002, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum mounted a historic exhibition entitled “Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals, 1933-1945.” This was the first time the Holocaust Memorial Museum focused on this targeted community. According to the exhibition’s materials, “Concerned that ‘degeneracy’ carried in the male ‘Aryan’ blood would weaken the ‘masculine discipline’ of the German nation,” the Nazis launched their violent assault against suspected queer Germans. The Museum’s exhibition was both courageous and groundbreaking built upon years of research in archives across Germany including the Federal Archives of Germany (Bundesarchiv Koblenz), accessing newly opened Nazi records. 

The museum’s archival research team discovered hundreds of photographs, many of them the booking shots of gay men dragged from their lives in Berlin to prisons and camps. The Holocaust Museum discovered to a degree never before achieved the archival, evidentiary history of more than 100,000 men arrested for homosexuality, one third of whom were convicted and sentenced to prison. Hundreds more were interned in concentration camps to face brutal conditions, torture, and even castration. As recently as 2016, the German parliament, the Bundestag, enacted legislation to compensate the 5,000 surviving victims of this violence, and to expunge the records of some 50,000 men jailed because of their crime: homosexuality.  This is the historic — and contemporary — context of Christopher Street Day ’24.

We cannot normalize or ignore what happened in Leipzig. Every other party in Germany has refused to enter into a coalition government with AfD, for good reason. Indeed, we must widen the frame. From Germany’s AfD to Viktor Orban’s Fidez Party in Hungary; to Marine Le Pen’s National Rally in France; to Prime Minister Georgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy Party, LGBTQ citizens are strategic, political targets of the European far-right nationalist parties. “Hands off our children,” they shout in Hungary, while deleting same-sex parents’ names from birth certificates in Italy. Depending upon the outcome of the coming presidential election, they are poised to export their political strategy to the United States. What happened in Leipzig is happening to “wir”, all of us, and we must be prepared for the right wing to ratchet up its assault on our community.

Charles Francis is president of the Mattachine Society of Washington, D.C., and author of ‘Archive Activism: Memoir of a ‘Uniquely Nasty’ Journey.’ Jeff Trammell was a member of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Advisory Committee for the Gay & Lesbian Remembrance Project; and was senior adviser for LGBTQ matters in the Gore and Kerry presidential campaigns.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

Protecting the trans community is not optional for elected allies and candidates

One of oldest political tactics is blaming vulnerable group for societal woes

Published

on

rotester stands outside Children's National Hospital in Northwest D.C. on Feb. 2, 2025. (Washington Blade photo by Linus Berggren)

Being an ally to the trans community is not a conditional position for me, nor should it be for any candidate. My allyship doesn’t hinge on polling, focus groups, or whether courage feels politically convenient. At a time when trans people, especially trans youth of color, are under coordinated attack, elected officials and candidates must do more than offer quiet support. We must take a public and solid stand.

History shows us how these moments begin. One of the oldest political tactics is to single out the most vulnerable and blame them for society’s anxieties — not because they are responsible, but because they are easier to blame than those with power and protection. In Nazi Germany, Jewish people were primarily targeted, but they were not the only demographic who suffered elimination. LGBTQ people, disabled people, Romani communities, political dissidents, and others were also rounded up, imprisoned, and killed. Among the earliest acts of fascistic repression was the destruction of Berlin’s Institute for Sexual Science, a pioneering center for gender-affirming care and LGBTQ research. These books and medical records were among the first to be confiscated and burned. It is not a coincidence that these same communities are now the first to suffer under this regime, they are our canaries in the coal mine signaling what’s to come. 

Congress, emboldened by the rhetoric of the Donald Trump campaign, recently passed HR 3492 to criminalize healthcare workers who provide gender-affirming healthcare with fines and imprisonment. This bill, sponsored by celebrity politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene, puts politics and headlines over people and health outcomes. Healthcare that a number of cis-gendered people also benefit from byway of hair regeneration and surgery, male and female breast augmentation, hormone replacement therapy etc. Even when these bills targeting this care do not pass, they do real damage. They create fear among patients, legal uncertainty for providers, and instability for clinics that serve the most marginalized people in our communities.

Here in D.C., organizations like Planned Parenthood and Whitman-Walker Health are lifelines for many communities. They provide gender-affirming care alongside primary care, mental health services, HIV treatment, and preventative medicine. When healthcare is politicized or criminalized, people don’t wait for court rulings — they delay care, ration medication, or disappear from the system entirely.

As a pharmacist, I know exactly what that means. These are life-saving medications. Continuity of care matters. Criminalizing and politicizing healthcare does not protect children or families — it puts lives at risk.

Instead of centering these realities, political discourse has been deliberately diverted toward a manufactured panic about trans women in sports. Let me be clear: trans women deserve to be protected and allowed to compete just like anyone else. Athletics have always included people with different bodies, strengths, and abilities. Girls and women will always encounter competitors who are stronger or faster — that is not a gender or sports crisis, it is the nature of competition.

Sports are meant to teach fairness, mutual respect, and the shared spirit of competition — not suspicion or exclusion. We should not police young people’s bodies, and we should reject attempts to single out trans youth as a political distraction. Families and doctors should be the authority on sex and gender identity.

This narrative has been cynically amplified by the right, but too often Democrats have allowed it to take hold rather than forcefully rejecting it. It is imperative to pay attention to what is happening — and to push back against every attempt to dehumanize anyone for political gain.

Trans people have always been part of our communities and our democracy. Protecting the most vulnerable is not radical — it is the foundation of a just society. My work is grounded in that commitment, and I will not waver from it. I’m proud to have hired trans political team Down Ballot to lead my campaign for DC Council At Large. We need more ally leaders of all stages to stand up for the LGBTQ+ community. We must let elected detractors know that when they come for them, then they come for all of us. We cannot allow Fox News and social media trolls to create a narrative that scares us away from protecting marginalized populations. We must stand up and do what’s right.

Anything less is not leadership.

Rep. Oye Owolewa is running for an at-large seat on the D.C. Council.

Continue Reading

Commentary

America is going in the wrong direction for intersex children

Lawmakers are criminalizing care for trans youth, while permitting irreversible harm to intersex babies

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

I live with the consequences of what America is willing to condone in the name of “protecting children.”

When I was young, doctors and adults made irreversible decisions about my body without my informed consent. They weren’t responding to an emergency. They were responding to discomfort with innate physical differences and the social and medical pressure to make a child’s body conform to a rigid female-male binary. That’s the part people like to skip over when they talk about “child welfare”: the harm didn’t begin with my identity. It started with adults deciding my healthy body needed fixing.

That’s why the hypocrisy unfolding right now from statehouses to Capitol Hill feels so familiar, and so dangerous. 

While harmful medical practices on intersex children, the nearly 2 percent born with differences in one or more of their physical sex characteristics, have been ongoing in the U.S. for decades, until recently, there was no law specifically condoning it. 

This month, House Republicans passed one of the most extreme anti-trans bills in modern American history, advancing legislation that would criminalize gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and threaten doctors with severe penalties for providing evidence-based treatment. The bill is framed as a measure to “protect children,” but in reality, it weaponizes the criminal legal system against families and providers who are trying to support young people in surviving adolescence.

At the same time, the administration has proposed hospital and insurance policies designed to choke off access to affirming care for trans youth nationwide by making providers fear loss of federal funding, regulatory retaliation, or prosecution. This is a familiar strategy: don’t just ban care outright; instead, make it so risky that hospitals stop providing it altogether. The result is the same everywhere. Young people lose access to care that major medical associations agree can be lifesaving.

All of this is happening under the banner of preventing “irreversible harm.”

But if America were genuinely concerned about irreversible harm to minors, the first thing lawmakers would address is the medically unnecessary, nonconsensual surgeries still performed on intersex infants and young children, procedures that permanently alter healthy tissue, often without urgent medical need, and long before a child can meaningfully participate in the decision. Human rights organizations have documented for years how these interventions are justified not by medical necessity, but by social pressure to make bodies appear more typically “female” or “male.” 

Here is the uncomfortable truth: all of the state laws now banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth explicitly include exceptions that allow nonconsensual and harmful intersex surgeries to continue.

A recent JAMA Health Forum analysis found that 28 states have enacted bans on gender-affirming care for minors that carve out intersex exceptions, preserving doctors’ ability to perform irreversible “normalizing” procedures on intersex children even while prohibiting affirming care for trans adolescents.

This contradiction is not accidental. It reveals the real priority behind these laws.

If the goal were truly to protect children from irreversible medical interventions, intersex kids would be protected first. Instead, these policies target one group of children, transgender youth, while continuing to permit permanent interventions on another group whose bodies challenge the same rigid sex and gender binary that lawmakers are trying to enforce.

Intersex people are routinely erased from American policy debates, except when our bodies are invoked to justify harmful laws, warning that intersex children are being used as legal loopholes rather than protected as human beings. This “protect the children” rhetoric is routinely deployed to justify state control over bodies, while preserving medical practices that stripped intersex children like me of autonomy, good health, and choice. Those harms are not theoretical. They are lifelong.

What makes this moment even more jarring is that the federal government had finally begun to recognize intersex people and attempt to address the harms suffered.

In 2024, at the very end of his term, the Biden administration released the first-ever intersex health equity report — a landmark admission that intersex people have been harmed by the U.S. health care system. Issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, the report documents medically unnecessary interventions, lack of informed consent, and systemic erasure and recommends delaying irreversible procedures until individuals can meaningfully participate in decisions about their own bodies.

This should have been a turning point. Instead, America is moving in the opposite direction.

On day one, President Trump issued an executive order defining “sex” in a way attempting to delegitimize the existence of transgender Americans that also erased the existence of many intersex people. 

When medicine is used to erase difference, it is called protection, while care that supports self-understanding is treated as a threat. This is not about medicine. It is about control.

You cannot claim to oppose irreversible harm to children while legally permitting surgeries that intersex adults and human rights experts have condemned for decades. You cannot claim to respect bodily autonomy while denying it selectively, based on whose bodies make lawmakers uncomfortable.

Protecting children means protecting all children, transgender, intersex, and cisgender alike. It means delaying irreversible interventions when they are not medically necessary. It means trusting and supporting young people and families over politicians chasing culture-war victories.

America can continue down the path of criminalizing care for some children while sanctioning harm to others, or it can finally listen to the people who have lived the consequences.

Intersex children deserve laws that protect their bodies, not politics that hurt and erase them.

Kimberly Zieselman is a human rights advocate and the author of “XOXY: A Memoir”. The author is a co-author of the JAMA Health Forum article cited, which examined state laws restricting gender-affirming care.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Stand with displaced queer people living with HIV

Dec. 1 is World AIDS Day

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Today, on World AIDS Day, we honor the resilience, courage, and dignity of people living with HIV everywhere especially refugees, asylum seekers, and queer displaced communities across East Africa and the world.

For many, living with HIV is not just a health journey it is a journey of navigating stigma, borders, laws, discrimination, and survival.

Yet even in the face of displacement, uncertainty, and exclusion, queer people living with HIV continue to rise, thrive, advocate, and build community against all odds.

To every displaced person living with HIV:

• Your strength inspires us.

• Your story matters.

• You are worthy of safety, compassion, and the full right to health.

• You deserve a world where borders do not determine access to treatment, where identity does not determine dignity, and where your existence is celebrated not criminalized.

Let today be a reminder that:

• HIV is not a crime.

• Queer identity is not a crime.

• Seeking safety is not a crime.

• Stigma has no place in our communities.

• Access to treatment, care, and protection is a human right.

As we reflect, we must recommit ourselves to building systems that protect not punish displaced queer people living with HIV. We must amplify their voices, invest in inclusive healthcare, and fight the inequalities that fuel vulnerability.

Hope is stronger when we build it together.

Let’s continue to uplift, empower, and walk alongside those whose journeys are too often unheard.

Today we remember.

Today we stand together.

Today we renew hope.

Abraham Junior lives in the Gorom Refugee Settlement in South Sudan.

Continue Reading

Popular