Local
From the ashes, a new Blade
1 year later, details emerge in former parent company’s collapse

Blade publisher Lynne Brown, with mic, speaks at a Blade re-launch party in April. Co-owner and editor Kevin Naff is at left. The paper had continued publishing since it was shuttered last November but used the name DC Agenda for a few months. (Blade file photo)
The U.S. Small Business Administration filed a court motion last December giving its approval of a bankruptcy filing by Window Media, the company that owned the Washington Blade, resulting in the shutdown of the Blade after a 40-year run as an LGBT newspaper, according to court documents.
But in an unexpected turn of events, the dissolution of Window Media through its Chapter 7 bankruptcy wiped out its enormous debt to creditors, clearing the way for Blade employees to form a new company that purchased the Blade’s name and remaining assets from the bankruptcy court debt-free and at a bargain price.
One year after the Blade shutdown on Nov. 16, 2009, and six months after its resurrection, court documents and new information disclosed by sources familiar with Window and its parent company, Avalon Equity Fund, provide a dramatic glimpse into the final days of a collapsing gay media conglomerate.
Among the revelations was the dismaying discovery by the Blade’s new owners that the paper’s electronic archives — which made all of its content going back to about 2001 accessible online — were erased after Window stopped paying its bills to a company that stored the data on rented servers.
“Like any customer, they were delinquent in their payment,” said Kevin Soendker, chief operating officer of the Natick, Mass., based Inet Services. “The service was cancelled and the servers were repurposed,” he said, acknowledging that the data was erased.
The Blade’s new owner, Brown Naff Pitts Omnimedia, Inc., announced this week that it is launching non-profit foundation to raise money to pay for digitizing all back issues of the Blade and to make them accessible to the public.
Although the electronic archives were erased, all printed copies of the Blade going back to its first issue in October 1969 have been preserved and are in the Blade’s possession.
Also emerging within the past week are separate accounts by a top SBA official and Window’s former co-president and chief operating officer, Mike Kitchens, of frantic, behind-the-scenes discussions last summer and fall over whether the Blade and other newspapers owned by Window should be sold to bidders — including a group of former Blade employees — or whether the company should be dissolved in bankruptcy.
Thomas Morris, director of the SBA’s Office of Liquidation, said the SBA played no role in Window’s ultimate decision to declare bankruptcy. But he said the SBA joined Window in filing a Dec. 10, 2009 stipulated motion before a federal court in New York asking the court to retroactively agree to the bankruptcy that Window filed 20 days earlier in Atlanta.
The SBA’s involvement with Avalon and Window stems from its decision in 2008 to obtain a court order forcing Avalon Equity Fund into receivership after Avalon defaulted on $38 million in loans from the SBA. With the SBA placed in full control of Avalon through the receivership ordered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, SBA also played a key role in Window’s affairs. Avalon, then under the control of the SBA, owned 75 percent of total equity in Window Media.
U.S. District Court Judge Peter K. Leisure included in his original Avalon receivership order, which he handed down Aug. 21, 2008, a directive that neither Avalon nor any of its assets, including companies it controlled, could declare bankruptcy without the court’s advance approval. Leisure approved the Dec. 10, 2009 motion backed by the SBA, clearing the way for the Window bankruptcy to move forward.
The bankruptcy and sudden shutdown of the Blade and several other publications owned by Window Media stunned the Blade staff and the D.C. gay community. Blade publisher Lynne Brown, who is part of the group that bought the Blade’s assets from the bankruptcy court, said she and the Blade’s managers and staff learned of the Avalon receivership in August 2008.
She said SBA officials working on the Avalon receivership told her in early 2009 the SBA was taking steps to sell Avalon’s and Window’s assets and publications, including the Blade. A short time later, Brown joined the Blade’s editor, Kevin Naff and senior sales executive Brian Pitts to form a group that submitted a bid to buy the Blade out of receivership.
The SBA organized the bidding process on Window’s behalf and encouraged others to submit bids. Among those who submitted a competing bid was gay rights advocate Nicholas Benton, publisher of the Falls Church, Va., News Press.
Benton, like Brown and Naff, expressed shock and anger when Window announced on Nov. 16, 2009 that it was declaring bankruptcy and shutting down all of its operations rather than sell its papers through the SBA bidding process.
The shutdown immediately eliminated the jobs of the Blade’s 24-member staff. In a development that drew extensive media coverage, Window co-presidents Kitchens and Steve Meyers appeared at the Blade’s offices in the National Press Building on Monday morning, Nov. 16, to announce the shutdown. The two directed all employees to retrieve their personal possessions, clear out their desks, and leave the premises by 3 p.m. that day when the office was to be shuttered.
Before leaving, however, most employees joined Brown, Naff and Pitts in vowing to band together to form a new publication — with the first fledgling edition to come that Friday, just four days later, when the Blade would have hit the streets had it not been shut down.
“We wanted to show the world we weren’t going away and that we could produce a paper without missing a beat,” Naff said.

Displaced Blade staff planning an early issue of DC Agenda at temporary office space above Results on U Street last December. From left are Lou Chibbaro, former news editor Joshua Lynsen and Kevin Naff. (Blade file photo)
Not knowing if they would ever be able to obtain the Blade’s name, the staff met the following morning at a café in the National Press Building lobby to plan a new paper, which they decided to name the DC Agenda.
While Naff and the now volunteer reporters and editors planned stories for the new paper, Brown and Pitts scrambled to line up advertisers and a printer. To the surprise and acclaim of many in the LGBT community, the first edition of the eight-page newsletter-style DC Agenda appeared at many of the Blade’s distribution locations on Friday, Nov. 20.
In subsequent weeks and months, the Agenda expanded its pages and evolved into a tabloid newspaper similar to the Blade.
Meanwhile, Brown Naff Pitts Omnimedia, Inc., the company formed by the Blade’s former publisher, editor and sales executive, responded to an offer by the Window bankruptcy court for bids on the Blade’s assets, which included the Blade’s name.
“We didn’t know who or what we were up against,” Brown said.
She noted that the new company was seeking investors and advertisers but didn’t have a huge amount of capital to compete with a large company or wealthy individual that might submit a competing bid.
As it turned out, no one else submitted a bid. Media observers said the economic recession and the longstanding decline in the print media industry may have discouraged investors from seeking to buy and restart the Blade. In addition, with the Blade’s former staff having started a new D.C. LGBT community newspaper, the Agenda, the value of buying the Blade’s assets — consisting only of used office equipment, the paper’s printed archives and its name — may not have been appealing to investors or other potential buyers, according to some media industry observers.
The lack of competing bids resulted in Brown Naff Pitts Omnimedia obtaining the Blade assets for $15,000.
Morris, the SBA’s liquidation office director, disclosed this week that the Buffalo, N.Y., based M&T Bank may have been responsible for scuttling the initial plans by the SBA and Window to sell its assets rather than go the route of bankruptcy.
When the financially troubled Window defaulted on a loan of close to $1.3 million from M&T, the bank became the No. 1 secured creditor or lien holder, Morris said. In that role, M&T would not agree to a proposal by the SBA that it initiate a foreclosure on Window Media, a legal status that would allow a potential buyer of any of Window’s assets like the Blade to be free from liability for Window’s debts.
An interested party would still be allowed to buy the Blade but they would most likely decline to do so if they had to assume Window’s debt, Morris said.
“Once that fell through, we had no viable alternative plan, and without one we would not have won a challenge to the bankruptcy filing,” Morris told the Blade in an e-mail.
The SBA could have asked the receivership judge to stop the bankruptcy and, as a federal district court judge, he likely had authority to do so, Morris said.
“But our conclusion at that time was that M&T was owed more than the company was worth,” Morris said.
He said that meant that no other creditors, including Avalon, which was Window’s largest creditor, would recoup any funds through the sale of Window’s assets. Window owed Avalon close to $5 million.
Thus he said the receivership judge would most likely have rejected an SBA motion to challenge the Window bankruptcy.
Kitchens said resignations of members of Window’s board of directors resulted in just he and Window co-president Steve Meyers as the only remaining board members during the months prior to the bankruptcy filing. According to Kitchens, the company’s operating rules required at least three board members for a quorum to make any important decisions such as the sale of assets.
He said the SBA could have named someone to the board, which may have allowed the board to vote to approve the sale of the Blade and other papers to those who had submitted bids before the bankruptcy filing.
“They should have taken places on the board, but they didn’t,” he said of the SBA.
Morris disputed that assertion, noting that Kitchens and Myers managed to approve the bankruptcy. He said he is not aware of any reason why they couldn’t have found a board member to approve a sale of the assets if they wanted to pursue that option.
As the SBA proceeded with receivership, it reached out to potential buyers, including Chris Crain and William Waybourn, who founded Window Media in 1996. The two left Window Media in 2006 in a shakeup of the company by Avalon’s founder and chief operating officer David Unger, who secured full control of Window in 2001.
Crain said the SBA never responded to his and Waybourn’s request for financial information about the company; they declined to submit a bid.

Lynne Brown addresses Blade staffers in a coffee shop in downtown Washington the day after Window Media closed the paper last November. (Blade file photo by Joey DiGuglielmo)
Blade’s fate tied to Window’s rise and fall
Waybourn and Crain’s interest in returning as Blade owners would likely have created an uproar among some gay activists and media commentators, who blame the two for setting in motion the events that led to the Blade’s demise.
The two strongly dispute those claims, saying the fall of Window Media and the gay newspapers and glossy entertainment publications the company acquired over the years was due to circumstances beyond their control.
Crain, a lawyer in private practice, joined Waybourn, a gay activist and businessman, in founding Window Media in 1996. The two have said their intent was to create an LGBT newspaper chain that would strengthen LGBT publications through the economic benefit of consolidation of resources.
Critics, however, have said consolidation of LGBT publications under ownership of a single company hurt the community by eliminating a diversity of voices and independent regional news coverage.
The company’s first move was the 1997 acquisition of Southern Voice, an Atlanta gay paper. In the next few years, Window bought gay papers in Houston and New Orleans and acquired smaller gay entertainment magazines in other cities.
The Blade, which was founded as the Gay Blade in 1969 by local gay activists, evolved from a fledgling newsletter style publication put together in the homes of its volunteer editors, into what many have called the LGBT community’s newspaper of record.
Gay activist and businessman Don Michaels, who became publisher in the late 1970s, has been credited with transforming the Blade into a thriving business as well as a well-respected news publication.
Window Media bought the Washington Blade and the New York Blade, which Michaels founded in the 1990s, in 2001, when Michaels made plans to sell the papers and retire. All parties declined to disclose the sale price, but sources have said it exceeded $3 million.

Chris Crain, right, chats with Kevin Naff, left, and Lou Chibbaro in the Blade newsroom in 2009. Crain was no longer associated with the paper at the time but came to see the then-new offices at the National Press Club. (Blade file photo by Joey DiGuglielmo)
Crain said this week that although Window Media had been financed by many small investors, it hooked up with Avalon Equity Fund — a multimillion dollar investment company — to provide the main financing for the purchase of the Washington Blade and New York Blade. He said the financing arrangement made Avalon the majority shareholder in Window Media at the time of the closing of the sale of the two Blades in May 2001.
But he noted that while Avalon had legal control of Window at that time, it allowed Crain and Waybourn to run the company and make all key decisions up until January 2006, when Waybourn left the company. At that time, Avalon’s founder and managing partner, David Unger, named one of his top Avalon lieutenants, Peter Polimino, as Waybourn’s replacement as Window president.
In September 2006, Crain left the company, amid speculation that both he and Waybourn had been ousted by Unger over sharp disagreements on how the company and its newspapers should be run.
Waybourn stated at the time of his departure that he decided to retire after completing what he said was the creation and operation of a successful LGBT newspaper chain. Sources familiar with Window, however, said Waybourn left the company due to irreconcilable disagreements with Unger over Unger’s management style and plans for acquiring more publications at the risk of assuming greater debt.
Crain said it was his decision to leave the company over a dispute that arose over Avalon’s decision to abolish Crain’s position of editorial director of all the Window publications and to hire individual editors at each of the Window papers.
Waybourn, who declined to comment this week on Window’s finances, has said in the past that the company acquired more debt than it had planned for over circumstances beyond its control. He noted that the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon led to a sharp drop in advertising sales due to a slump in the economy.
He noted that a decision by Blade employees to attempt to form an employee union the week Window assumed ownership of the Blade forced Window to spend at least $100,000 to fight the union. The union effort failed after a tense campaign and employee election supervised by the National Labor Relations Board.
The union fight was followed by the start of the current economic recession that further cut into Window’s revenue from advertising sales, Waybourn said at the time.
All of this made it necessary for Window to obtain additional cash infusions from Avalon, which resulted in Avalon increasing its ownership share of Window until it reached a 75 percent equity level, company sources have said.
The sources say Waybourn insists Window remained profitable despite these developments as of the time Waybourn left the company in 2006.
Unger declined to comment for this story when contacted by the Blade.
The SBA receivership documents filed in federal court in New York, where Avalon was based, show that the multimillion dollar investment company went into financial decline due to the failure of many of the media and cable TV companies it helped to finance in the years leading to 2008, when it defaulted on a series of loans the SBA extended to it that exceeded $38 million.
Under receivership, the SBA is charged with liquidating all of Avalon’s remaining assets.
The SBA’s Morris said Unger was ousted from his position as Avalon’s CEO in August 2008, when the SBA assumed full control under the receivership. But Morris said the SBA retained Unger as a paid member of Window Media’s board of directors up until June 2009, when he resigned from that post.
Gay rights attorney Bill Dobbs of New York, a longtime observer of the LGBT press, said Window Media’s decision to file for bankruptcy and close the papers it owned had an impact on the broader LGBT community.
“Gay newspapers are not just businesses — they’re a circulatory system for news, information and political discussion,” he said. “Even in the Internet age they play a key role. Perfectly solid local newspapers were gobbled up by Window Media who claimed bigger was better. They were wrong as some of us warned,” Dobbs said. “Concentrated ownership of media in a minority community has special perils. Window/Avalon dragged all those papers down to failure — a community disaster.”
Waybourn, however, has said some of the papers Window sought to buy were faltering due to lack of resources by their community-based publishers. He said his objective — at the time he controlled Window — was to strengthen the local papers by pumping in resources.
District of Columbia
Mary’s House founder, CEO retires
Dr. Imani Woody played leading role in opening DC’s first home for LGBTQ seniors
The board of directors for Mary’s House for Older Adults, DC’s first official home dedicated to providing affordable housing for LGBTQ seniors, announced on July 7 that its founding president and CEO, Dr. Imani Woody, has retired.
Woody, who holds a PhD in Human Services, is credited with playing a leading role over many years in arranging both city and private funding needed to construct and operate the Mary’s House three-story building located at 401 Anacostia Road, S.E., in the city’s Fort Dupont neighborhood.
The house, which opened in March 2025, with a grand opening ceremony held in May 2025, includes 15 single-occupancy residential units and more than 5,000 square feet of shared communal living space.
“It is with profound gratitude and hearts full of celebration that the board of directors of Mary’s House for Older Adults, DC (MHFOA) announces the retirement of our visionary founder, Dr. Imani Woody, from her role as president and CEO,” the Mary’s House board says in a statement.
“Dr. Woody’s journey with Mary’s House began with her vision and a kitchen table gathering of women with a bold, urgent, and loving vision: to create safe, affirming, affordable housing for LGBTQ/SGL older adults in Washington, DC,” the statement says.
It adds, “What started as a dream has grown into DC’s first affordable LGBTQ+/SGL affirming communal living space for adults 60 and over, a 15-room community residence at 401 Anacostia Road in Southeast Washington.”
The statement says Woody will continue to serve on Mary’s House board.
“The board will be sharing information about the leadership transition process in the coming weeks,” the statement continues. “We are committed to honoring Dr. Woody’s legacy by ensuring Mary’s House continues to thrive and grow in faithful service to LGBTQ/SGL elders experiencing housing insecurity and isolation.”
Maryland
Va., Md., advocates brace for next fight after Supreme Court sports ruling
Neither state has statewide ban on trans student athletes
On June 30, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for states to enforce laws barring transgender students from participating on school sports teams consistent with their gender identity, a decision LGBTQ advocates say could encourage additional restrictions across the country.
While neither Maryland nor Virginia currently has a statewide ban on trans student athletes, advocates say the decision could reshape future legislative battles and school policies throughout the region.
Directly following the case, attorneys for trans student athletes spoke out about the case and how detrimental it could be to students.
“This ruling is deeply harmful for transgender women and girls who only asked for the ability to participate in sports with their peers,” said Sasha Buchert, senior attorney and director of the Nonbinary and Transgender Rights Project for Lambda Legal, in a press release from the American Civil Liberties Union.
The next step is figuring out how states will move forward, specifically in Maryland and Virginia.
As of right now, neither state has bans on trans athletes in schools. The new Supreme Court decision also does not require states to enact bans, only that bans are allowed if states or school districts choose to enforce them.
According to the ACLU, 27 states have banned trans youth from participating in school sports since 2020. Most of these states also require sex testing, which the organization says is invasive for all female athletes.
Equality Virginia Executive Director Narissa Rahaman said that while she has heard a lot of frustration following the decision, people are ready to take action.
“Families, parents and youth have lived through disappointing changes to the Virginia Department of Education’s model policies for the treatment of transgender students, and the Virginia High School League’s decades-old policy that allowed transgender students an opportunity to play sports with their friends,” Rahaman said in a statement to the Washington Blade.
She believes they are not ready to give up this fight quite yet.
As of now, trans and nonbinary students are protected under Virginia law, and Rahaman wants that to continue.
“This ruling will likely embolden right-wing members of the General Assembly to pursue trans athlete bans, and we will continue to defeat every bill like we have the past five legislative sessions. Now is our time to be proactive,” Rahaman said.
She also calls upon Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger to defend trans youth in Virginia from what she describes as bullies and to continue to stand up to federal attacks on the trans community in general.
For trans students, Rahaman wants to ensure that they continue to know that they belong and have a place in school sports.
“To the transgender young people watching this decision unfold: you belong on your team, in your school, in your community, and here in Virginia. This ruling does not change that. A single Supreme Court decision cannot define your worth or your future,” Rahaman said.
For people who may be outside the community but want to help, she encourages them to speak with trans and nonbinary people in their community, befriend the families of youth to show their support, and continue to speak up on these issues when needed.
According to ACLU of Virginia, high schooler Eliza Munshi was told she could not compete on the girls’ track team because she was trans. To prove a point, she decided to compete with the boys.
She had previously competed on the girls’s track team before her Virginia school decided to enforce the ban demanded by President Donald Trump. With pink hair and pink makeup, she decided to continue her love for the sport alongside boys. According to Munshi, her entire community rallied for her.
“I did it to prove a point. I knew I could do it. I knew it wouldn’t phase me. My gender itself and that label has been the least important part of my transition: I want to look how I want to look. I want to dress how I want to dress. If you don’t like that, then that’s not my business,” Munshi said.
DOE has launched Title IX probe against Md. school districts
In the weeks leading up to the ruling, multiple Maryland school districts were included in a Title IX probe stating that not enforcing sex-based protections guaranteed by federal law. Currently, there have been no updates on the lawsuit or the district’s decisions.
According to the U.S. Department of Education, the federal probe is based on parent complaints that the school districts were violating a specific Trump-Vance administration addition to Title IX, stating it aligned the sex-based protections “with biological reality, not ideological fantasy.”
According to FreeState Justice, an LGBTQ advocacy group in Maryland, while this is a disappointing ruling to see, they will continue to fight for trans student-athletes in Maryland and want trans youth to know that they belong.
“Every young person deserves the opportunity to participate in school and community life without being singled out because of who they are. These decisions send a harmful message to transgender youth that they are somehow less deserving of that opportunity,” said Phillip Westry, the group’s executive director.
Westry wants to make sure the community knows that their commitment to the organization has not changed and will continue to provide the same legal services they have prior and to advance policy solutions, to ensure “every LGBTQ+ Marylander can live with dignity, safety, and equal opportunity.”
Another issue brought up by trans advocates is the issue of testing women to determine whether they are biologically female or not.
According to Human Rights Watch, as of 2023, World Athletics required cis women with increased testosterone levels to undergo medical procedures to have it reduced to avoid advantages. Other forms of “sex verification” may include genetic testing, screenings of an athlete’s anatomy or chromosomes.
However, this can become detrimental because not all women have ovaries, a uterus, or XX chromosomes, meaning cisgender women could potentially be included in these bans, depending on how the specific state plans to enforce them.
Maryland
Eastern Shore school board wants an 18-and-over rule for young adult books
Classics like ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ and ‘Little Women’ might be off limits to most students
By LIZ BOWIE | Somerset County’s school board is considering barring students under the age of 18 from reading any young-adult literature in school libraries, essentially restricting all but 12th graders from checking out books written for teens and tweens.
The proposed policy also calls for the superintendent to discipline librarians if “adult” reading material appears in the children’s section.
The policy defines young adult as students over 18. “Young adults are not minors and books suitable for young adults shall be placed on a separate Young Adults library section to reflect age-appropriate literature,” a draft of the policy says.
The rest of this article can be read on the Baltimore Banner’s website.
-
Real Estate3 days agoUnder-the-radar Delaware beach towns smart buyers are targeting
-
Theater3 days ago‘My Favorite Sociopath’ debuts at Shepherdstown’s CATF
-
Politics2 days agoIn Trump’s divided America, Michael Weinstein’s AHF responds
-
Turkey2 days agoTurkish authorities refuse to allow gay cruise to dock in country
