September 2, 2011 | by Lou Chibbaro Jr.
Solmonese to step down as head of HRC

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Joe Solmonese, who has served for more than six years as president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBT civil rights advocacy group, will step down from his job when his current contract ends on March 30, 2012, HRC officials announced last week. The news of Solmonese’s departure was first reported by Pam’s House Blend.

In a statement released Aug. 27, co-chairs of the board of directors of HRC and its sister organization, the HRC Foundation, said Solmonese will remain as head of both organizations “until the completion of his contract to ensure a smooth leadership transition.”

They also announced the formation of a search committee for Solmonese’s replacement to be co-chaired by board members Joni Madison of North Carolina and Dana Perlman of Los Angeles.

“Joe Solmonese is an outstanding leader,” said Anne Fay, who co-chairs the HRC Foundation board. “While we will miss his extraordinary leadership, we enter this next phase, thanks to Joe, in the best place the organization has ever been. Not only has our community secured historic victories, but our membership is larger and more active than any time in our history, and our financial health is secure even in these difficult economic times.”

HRC spokesperson Michael Cole-Schwartz said the combined revenue for HRC and the HRC Foundation for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011 was $39.8 million. He said the two groups have about 150 employees.

Sources familiar with HRC have speculated that several LGBT movement leaders would likely emerge as candidates for Solmonese’s replacement, including Chuck Wolfe, executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; Brian Ellner, an HRC consultant who coordinated HRC’s efforts to help pass New York’s same-sex marriage law; Chad Griffin, head of the California-based organization that initiated the lawsuit to overturn Proposition 8; and Sean Maloney, one of former President Bill Clinton’s openly gay White House aides who later worked for former New York Gov. David Paterson.

Solmonese has received mixed reviews by LGBT activists during his tenure as head of HRC, which began in 2005. Disagreements over his and HRC’s policies and activities appear to reflect divisions within the LGBT movement.

Supporters and others familiar with the group say Solmonese has worked well in navigating HRC and its LGBT rights agenda during a hostile Bush administration and during a supportive Obama administration, using behind-the-scenes political skills to prod allies in Congress and the White House to move its agenda forward.

Critics say he and HRC have been too closely aligned with the Democratic Party and Democratic congressional leaders, which they say have failed to adequately advance LGBT legislation, such as the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and LGBT-supportive immigration legislation while Democrats controlled the House of Representatives.

The statement released by the HRC board co-chairs says that under Solmonese’s leadership, HRC expanded its public outreach programs, including the start of its Healthcare Equality Index, which, among other things, assesses the sensitivity of hospitals in caring for LGBT people.

HRC and the HRC foundation launched or expanded other important programs during Solmonese’s tenure, the board statement says, in the area of outreach to religion and faith communities, schools programs promoting fair treatment of LGBT youth, and a family and children initiative to open adoption agencies to LGBT parents.

In the area of legislation, the board statement said Solmonese played a key role in steering HRC’s opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment, a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. They also note that under his tenure, Congress passed a hate crimes law with protections for LGBT people and repealed the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law barring gays from serving openly in the military.

The statement notes that during his tenure, the Obama administration put in place a number of administrative directives and policy changes favorable to LGBT people, including a policy banning discrimination against federal government workers based on gender identity.

Dana Beyer, executive director of the transgender advocacy group Gender Rights Maryland and a former HRC board member, said Solmonese alienated many in the transgender community and in the LGBT community in general in 2007 when he declined to oppose a decision by House Democratic leaders to remove protections for transgender people from ENDA.

Then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), a longtime supporter of LGBT rights, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who’s gay, said they determined at the time that ENDA couldn’t pass in the House if a transgender provision remained in the bill. The House passed a so-called “gay only” version of the bill that year over strong objections from a coalition of dozens of LGBT groups from across the country. Pelosi and Frank said they would introduce a separate bill with transgender protections at a later date, when support for such a bill could be lined up.

Solmonese said it would have put HRC in an untenable position to oppose a major gay rights bill backed by longtime LGBT rights supporters in the House. The bill died when the Senate did not bring it up for a vote.

Solmonese and HRC changed their position on the bill the following year, saying the organization would no longer support ENDA without a provision protecting transgender people from job discrimination.

But Beyer and other LGBT activists said HRC’s earlier position left deep scars within the transgender community, which felt abandoned by HRC.

Others have said the LGBT movement as a whole was divided over HRC’s position, with many in the movement – including D.C.’s Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance and the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club – supporting an incremental approach of passing a sexual orientation-only version of ENDA while continuing to push hard for adding a transgender provision as soon as possible.

Those holding that view said they favored a fully inclusive ENDA but recognized such a bill could not pass at the time.

Beyer said that in addition to the ENDA flap, many LGBT activists believe HRC is devoting too much of its resources to marriage equality, including the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, at the expense of other legislation, such as a trans-inclusive ENDA. Beyer argues that ENDA would help many more LGBT people than those interested in getting married.

“Many of us are hoping HRC will change its direction on some of these issues under a new president,” she said. “But the president is really nothing more than a reflection of the board of directors,” she said. “If the board of directors doesn’t want to change the direction of the organization, it doesn’t matter who the next president is.”

Richard Socarides, president of the national LGBT advocacy group Equality Matters, said Solmonese has performed well in advancing the LGBT agenda.

“He has been there when some very important gains took place,” he said. “And I think he did a tremendous job building the organization.”

Socarides said he disagrees with some critics who say HRC failed to do enough to push ENDA or is placing too much emphasis on marriage equality.

“I don’t think they can be blamed for the failure to pass any particular piece of legislation just as they can’t take all the credit for the legislation that has passed,” he said.

“But what I have said before is that as an organization, they have not sufficiently leveraged their power to bring about change more quickly,” Socarides said. “They are a key part of the Washington establishment but they seem to seek change within existing structures. They are very reluctant to rock the boat.”

Rick Rosendall, vice president of D.C.’s Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance, and Bob Summersgill, GLAA’s former president, each said HRC under Solmonese’s leadership has provided strong support for the efforts by D.C. activists in passing a same-sex marriage law. The two said Solmonese also arranged for HRC to devote considerable resources to fight efforts by members of Congress to attach anti-gay riders to the city’s annual appropriations bill. Congress must approve the city’s annual budget under the city’s limited home rule charter.

Summersgill and Rosendall noted that HRC, among other things, helped to line up support to defeat proposals by Republican lawmakers to ban same-sex couples from adopting children in the city.

Lateefah Williams, president of the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club, said she, too, appreciated Solmonese’s support for D.C.’s marriage equality campaign, noting that he directed HRC to provide a full-time field organizer to help local activists build support in the community for the same-sex marriage bill.

Williams said she also shares the views of some that HRC should broaden its support for transgender rights initiatives as well as efforts to support programs aimed at minorities within the LGBT community, such as blacks and Latinos, and youth.

“I wish Joe well,” she said.

News of Solmonese’s departure was first reported by the blog Pam’s House Blend last week. The blog cited unnamed sources as saying his departure may be part of a sweeping staff shakeup initiated by the HRC board and that news of his leaving came about under less than amicable circumstances.

Other sources familiar with HRC told the Blade that account was inaccurate. One source familiar with the group characterized as “complete fiction” claims of a staff shakeup as well as claims by some that HRC may already have lined up a successor for Solmonese.

“This is about as normal and straight forward as it gets,” said the source. “He’s giving them six months advance notice. They’re going to launch a replacement process. The organization will go through that and come out with a successor.”

In a letter to HRC volunteers across the country, Solmonese discussed the timing of his decision to leave the group.

“While there may never be an ideal time, this moment seems right for me and my family,” he said. “In addition to our unprecedented victories, the health and future of the Human Rights Campaign has never been more robust,” he said. “My successor will lead a thriving organization despite the recent economic challenges.”

Lou Chibbaro Jr. has reported on the LGBT civil rights movement and the LGBT community for more than 30 years, beginning as a freelance writer and later as a staff reporter and currently as Senior News Reporter for the Washington Blade. He has chronicled LGBT-related developments as they have touched on a wide range of social, religious, and governmental institutions, including the White House, Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, the military, local and national law enforcement agencies and the Catholic Church. Chibbaro has reported on LGBT issues and LGBT participation in local and national elections since 1976. He has covered the AIDS epidemic since it first surfaced in the early 1980s. Follow Lou

19 Comments
  • The “number of bloggers” was 1: Pam Spaulding of Pam’s House Blend.

  • Peter Rosenstein

    I think that all in all the Joe Solmonese era at HRC will be seen as a positive one. Many of us are not always happy with HRC but being President of that organiztion is not an easy job. I hope that HRC does go through an open search for a replacement for Joe. They haven’t always done that in the past even when they claimed too. I believe there are many people out there who could lead HRC and lead our community in the fights ahead.

    • you system of connecting newspaper copy stories to continusations on your website need to be more seamless…i was never able to find the followup of the story for Bi-national couples….. please setup the system to better able make the connections…when you revise your system, i offer to test it; if it works
      for me i’ll work for anyone… thanks

    • Here’s another issue with you, Peter. You wrote: “…I believe there are many people out there who could lead HRC and lead our community in the fights ahead…” You’re addicted to “fights,” aren’t you? I suspect you know no other way to obtain acceptance and advancement for gay people and gay rights. How about civil discourse, an approach which very well may will win you friends and allies – or is this not in your lexicon? You glorify your having met MLK in an article appearing now in The Balde. I don’t think MLK, despite his many reprehensible attributes, e.g., adultery on a critical mass scale, would have supported your notion of fights. Think about it…

      • Um, speaking of civil discourse, bringing up MLK’s private behavior and calling it reprehensible hardly helps. I agree that everything isn’t about fighting, but Peter didn’t say it was. His mentioning that we have fights ahead is simply realistic; it doesn’t say how the fights should be waged. Dr. King himself, in launching the Montgomery bus boycott, said, “And we are determined, here in Montgomery, to work and fight until justice runs down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.” He also talked about the sustained discipline needed for nonviolent resistance to succeed. But he did use the word “fight.” The effort for LGBT equality has been on multiple fronts and has used multiple strategies. That’s inevitable, given our diversity. Having said all that, some approaches are more helpful than others. It is past time for us to talk as if we understand that we have been winning, and that working within the system has worked. This means resisting the Chicken Little fundraising rhetoric as well as the phony revolutionary rhetoric of some on the left.

  • Thanks for the update. It was a small surprise when this story broke on http://www.pamshouseblend.com yesterday.

  • Now I’ll rejoin.

  • Ask Cathy Woolard or Ken Britt for comments on this “developing story” but don’t hold yer breath for any candor…

  • Think it time for another Elizabeth Birch. Just my opinion. Prehaps a person of Color would be nice

  • I think it’s kind of funny that Steamin’ Hot Pam is provoking a cat fight with Kevin Naff over who broke this story first. Kevin, I encourage you to swallow hard, plead mea culpa and tell her how much you love her, and end with a strong suggestion that she return to Hateville (she really has a tendency to hate everything; I don’t know how she can live with herself).

  • Yea, Joe did a lot, like transforming HRC into the gay political wing of the DNC while kissing the President’s ass the whole time, don’t forget your ‘Chap Stick’!

  • Ah yes, Elizabeth Birth. The HRC head who once stated that trans inclusion in ENDA would happen over her ‘dead body’ Way to turn back that clock to the HRC= trans oppression days.

  • HRC revenue was down 17% or approximately $8 million for 2010 as compared to 2009. My guess is that the 2011 financial report will answer all questions regarding the reason HRC BOD opted to not renew Solmonese’s contract. In this economy, does somebody really “voluntarily” walk away from this caliber of job?

    • My guess is that members/donors around the country started realizing that HRC doesn’t do very much, especially considering its huge staff and huge budget, AND HRC also takes most or all credit for positive developments that it has had little or nothing to do with.

  • The problem with what “you’re just saying” is the problem in general. You anonymously say crap, hoping people will believe your childish rumor-mongering, and hoping people will spread your filth. If you had any sense of decency or intellect, you would know or share the fact that almost all non-profits have seen their revenues dropped.

    Although funding to LGBT social justice advocacy groups fell 20% from 2009 to 2008, HRC fared fairly well. Because of the economy and the pocketbook strain of various state legislative battles, HRC was able to balance its budget and continues to do so.

    Lastly, if the Board was unhappy with Solmonese, would they really keep him around for seven months. Anybody with any common sense knows that that ain’t going to happen. So, here are some facts and what are you going to do to help the cause? It’s easy to post anonymous comments, but oh so cowardly.

    o  96% of LGBT adults contributed less than $35 to any of the 39 leading LGBT organizations in 2009.

    o  Only 3.4% of LGB adults have donated to a participant organization.  This, however, may be an overstatement since individuals contribute to multiple organizations.

    o  Less than 15,000 people gave $1,000-plus donations in 2009.

    o  The average organization receives almost half (48%) of its revenue from its 10 largest contributors.

    o Of total organizational expenses, 79% are spent on programs and services, 9% are spent on management and general expenses and only 12% are spent on fundraising.  These numbers more than meet the efficiency benchmarks set by the American Institute of Philanthropy and the Better Business Wise Giving Alliance.

    No wonder the Catholic Church, Focus on the Family, Traditional Values Coalition, National Organization for Marriage, to name just a few, are effectively getting their messages of hate, fear, prejudice, and bigotry out there.  

    These hate-groups have members who aren’t fighting amongst themselves and they have people who are willing to open their pocketbooks.  As a volunteer fundraiser, I found this report both fascinating and sad.  

    More importantly we have got to stop fighting amongst ourselves and we have to be willing to fund a LGBT social advocacy group or groups.  I’m not advocating for any group.  I’m just saying any group.

    • First, there is a touch of irony in “HRCSupporter” anonymously suggesting that anonymous posters are cowardly. However it doesn’t mean that the content of a post should automatically be dismissed because it was not signed, neither his/hers or mine.

      As for “HRCSupporter’s” supposition that the HRC BOD would not keep someone in place for seven months that they were unhappy with, I guess if you say it out loud enough times, you might convince yourself of its validity. However, it could just as easily be that they didn’t want another thrashing about the cost of paying out his contract similar to the one they got over Cheryl Jacques severance arrangements. Or it’s entirely possible that they might have had a contractual clause that provided for advance notice of non-renewal. His/her guess is as good as mine.

      However isn’t that really the point? That we can only guess because they aren’t offering a rationale. You’d think that 37,918,133 reasons would generate a credible explanation.

    • I stopped reading your comment at the end of the first paragraph. The manifest childishness of your overwrought raving indicated that you had nothing useful to say.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin