Connect with us

Local

D.C. Council reprimands Graham, strips him of committee duties

Gay Councilman expected to seek re-election next year

Published

on

Jim Graham, Democratic Party, Ward 1, Washington D.C., Washington Blade, gay news
Jim Graham, Democratic Party, Ward 1, Washington D.C., Washington Blade, gay news

D.C. Council member Jim Graham (D-Ward 1) (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The D.C. Council voted 11 to 2 on Monday to reprimand gay Council member Jim Graham (D-Ward 1) on grounds that he violated a Council ethics rule in 2008 by improperly intervening in a contract approval process.

In a separate action, the Council voted 10 to 2, with one member voting ā€œpresent,ā€ to strip Graham of his committee responsibilities over the cityā€™s alcoholic beverage regulatory agency and liquor law policy.

The reprimand and sanction against Grahamā€™s committee responsibilities were approved in the form of separate resolutions introduced by Council Chair Phil Mendelson (D-At-Large). Mendelson argued that action against Graham was needed to maintain the confidence of the pubic in the ā€œintegrityā€ the Council and the city government.

ā€œIt is time to move on,ā€ Graham said in a statement released after the Council session adjourned.

ā€œI have very important responsibilities as chairman of the human services committee and all the responsibility of representing Ward 1,ā€ he said. ā€œGoing forward, I will continue to represent the people who elected me to serve with the same passion and fervor as I have from my first day in office.ā€

Graham and Council member Marion Barry (D-Ward 8) were the only two of the 13 Council members to vote against the two resolutions. Council member Vincent Orange (D-At-Large) voted for the reprimand resolution but voted “present,” which is considered a form of abstention, on the resolution taking away Graham’s committee duties on liquor law matters.

Rick Rosendall, president of the Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance, who attended Mondayā€™s Council session, said he is uncertain whether the Councilā€™s action and the ethics board opinion that Graham violated city ethics rules would have a harmful impact on Grahamā€™s longtime support from LGBT voters.

ā€œThis is not about LGBT issues,ā€ Rosendall said. ā€œJim has been a strong and committed ally on that.ā€

Rosendall, as did Mendelson, also noted that the ethics related allegations against Graham do not involve a breach in the cityā€™s criminal laws and no one has accused Graham of such an allegation.

Some political observers note that Council member David Grosso (I-At-Large), who defeated incumbent Council member Michael Brown (I-At-Large) last November following a campaign that attacked Brown on ethics related issues, won in nearly all of the cityā€™s precincts with large numbers of LGBT residents.

At Mondayā€™s Council session, Grosso said he would favor more stringent sanctions against Graham, noting that large numbers of his constituents urged him to push for a censure rather than a reprimand against Graham.

Graham has been highly popular in Ward 1, where he has been credited with playing a key role in improving neighborhoods and boosting economic development, especially in the Columbia Heights neighborhood that has become one of the cityā€™s popular retail and entertainment centers.

The Councilā€™s vote for the reprimand and committee sanction came after a 40 minute debate in which Barry, a former D.C. mayor, was the only member to speak against the two resolutions.

Marion Barry, Jim Graham, D.C. Council, gay news, Washington Blade

Council member Marion Barry (D-Ward 8) speaks with his colleague, Graham, before the session. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

ā€œIā€™m arguing that Jim Graham has not been given due process,ā€ Barry said, adding that he believes Graham was denied his constitutional right of due process under the law because both the Council and the D.C. Board of Ethics and Government Accountability didnā€™t hold hearings to allow Graham to dispute the allegations against him.

Mendelson and Council member Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), a law professor at George Washington University Law School, disputed Barryā€™s argument, saying Graham was given an opportunity to present his case against the allegations during deliberations of three separate entities that have investigated the allegations.

Mendelson said he was prompted to introduce the reprimand and committee sanction resolutions after the ethics board issued an opinion saying it found a ā€œsubstantial body of evidenceā€ that Graham violated the code of conduct for a city employee or official in connection with the contracting matter.

He noted that the ethics board, an investigation conducted by a private law firm on behalf of the Metro Transit board, and the cityā€™s Inspector General each looked into the matter.

All three entities concluded that Graham acted improperly by allegedly attempting to pressure businessman Warren Williams into withdrawing a bid for a Metro land development contract in exchange for Grahamā€™s support for Williams receiving a D.C. lottery contract.

Graham has denied interfering with the contract approval process. He has said he favored awarding the Metro contract to a competing businessman, but has said he did so because the other businessmanā€™s company was better qualified to carry out the terms of the contract.

Through his attorneys, Graham last week filed a lawsuit against the ethics board on grounds that it violated the city law that created it by issuing an opinion on Grahamā€™s case without holding a hearing in which Graham had the opportunity to contest the allegations and evidence used against him.

Graham told his colleagues during the Council session Monday that he plans to move forward with his lawsuit but hopes to continue working amicably with them on future Council business.

Although he declined Mendelsonā€™s offer to allow him to speak on the reprimand resolution before the Council voted on it, Graham spoke at considerable length on the resolution calling for taking away his committee responsibilities on liquor law matters.

Saying he is ā€œvery proudā€ of what he and his committee have done to improve the cityā€™s laws regulating bars, nightclubs, and restaurants, he urged his colleagues not to strip him of those responsibilities.

ā€œThere is no relationship between my reprimand and the role I play on these committee issues,ā€ he said.

Mendelson told the Blade after the Council session ended that there was ā€œno questionā€ that the decision to strip Graham of his liquor law responsibilities was a form of ā€œpunishmentā€ linked to the reprimand.

ā€œItā€™s a diminishment of his committee responsibilities and goes with the reprimand,ā€ he said. ā€œThatā€™s why they were both on the agenda today.ā€

Gay Council member David Catania (I-At-Large), who voted for both the reprimand and the committee sanction but didnā€™t speak during the Council debate, told the Blade following the Council session that he strongly disagrees with Graham and Barryā€™s claim that Graham was denied due process rights.

ā€œI thought that was nonsense,ā€ said Catania. ā€œThis is a disciplinary proceeding, not a criminal justice proceeding. And the notion of a lack of due process is laughable,ā€ he said.

ā€œCandidly, I think this whole thing could have been handled much differently at the onset if Mr. Graham would have acknowledged that, in hindsight, he perhaps was a little over zealous and perhaps went too far [in the contract matter] and apologized,ā€ Catania said. ā€˜Heā€™s been defiant all along. Had he apologized two years ago we might not be here today.ā€

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Maryland

Montgomery County police chief discusses arrest of trans student charged with planned school shooting

County executive tells news conference studentā€™s trans identity is irrelevant to criminal charge

Published

on

(Photo by jiawangkun/Bigstock)

Montgomery County, Md., Police Chief Marcus Jones joined other county and law enforcement officials at a news conference on Friday, April 19, to provide details of the police investigation and arrest of an 18-year-old high school student charged two days earlier with threats of mass violence based on information that he allegedly planed a mass shooting at the high school and elementary school he attended in Rockville, Md.

In charging documents and in a press released issued on April 18, Montgomery CountyĀ PoliceĀ identified the arrested student as ā€œAndrea Ye, of Rockville, whose preferred name is Alex Ye.ā€

One of the charging documents states that a friend of Ye, who police say came forward as a witness who played a crucial role in alerting authorities to Yeā€™s threats of a school shooting, noted that Ye told the witness that Ye identified as the transgender student he wrote about asĀ aĀ character in a 129-page manifesto outlining plans for a schoolĀ shooting. Police have said Ye told them theĀ manifestoĀ was a fictional story he planned to publish. Ā 

At the news conference on Friday, Police Chief Jones and other law enforcement officials, including an FBI official and Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich, referred to the student as Alex Ye and Mr. Ye. None of the officials raised the issue of whether Ye identified as a transgender man, seven though one of the police documents identifies Ye as a ā€œbiological female.ā€

County Executive Elrich appeared to express the views of the public officials at the news conference when one of the media reporters, during a question-and-answer period, asked Elrich why he and the others who spoke at the news conferment failed to ā€œadmit that this individual was transgender.ā€

ā€œBecause itā€™s not a lead,ā€ Elrich replied, asking if the press and law enforcement authorities should disclose that someone arrested for murder is ā€œa white Christian male whoā€™s heterosexual.ā€ Elrich stated, ā€œNo, you donā€™t ā€“ You never publish somebodyā€™s sexual orientation when we talk about this. Why you are focusing on this being a transgender is beyond me. Itā€™s not a news story. It is not a crime to  be transgender.ā€

The reporter attempted to respond but was cut off by the press conference moderator, who called on someone else to ask the next question.

In his remarks at the press conference Chief Jones praised the so far unidentified witness who was the first to alert authorities about Yeā€™s manifestoĀ appearingĀ to make threats of a mass school shooting.

ā€œNow, this is a situation that highlights  the critical importance of vigilance and community involvement in preventing potential tragedies,ā€ Jones said. ā€œI commend the collaborative efforts of the Montgomery County Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,  the Rockville City Police Department, and the Montgomery County Public Schools, as well as Montgomery County Health and Human Services,ā€ he told the gathering.

ā€œThanks to their swift action and cooperation a potentially catastrophic event was prevented,ā€ Jones said.

Jones pointed out that during the current school year, police have received reports of 140 threats to the public schools in Montgomery County. He said after a thorough investigation, none of them rose to the level where an arrest was made. Instead, police and school officials took steps to arrange for the student making the threats and their parents to take remedial action, including providing  mental health services.

ā€œBut this case is different,ā€ Jones said. ā€œThis case is entirely different that takes it to a different level. It was a concerned witness who brought this matter to light by rereporting the suspectā€™sĀ manifestoĀ to the authorities. This underscores the value of community engagement and the ā€˜see something say somethingā€™ approach,ā€ he said.

Jones mentioned at the press conference that Ye was  being held without bond since the time of his arrest but was scheduled to appear in court for a bond hearing on Friday shortly after the press conference took place to determine whether he should be released while awaiting trial or continue to be held.

In his manifesto obtained by police, Ye writes about committing a school shooting, and strategizes how to carry out the act. Ye also contemplates targeting an elementary school and says that he wants to be famous.

In charging documents reported on by WJLA 7 and WBAL 11, the 129-page document, which Ye has referred to as a book of fiction, included writings that said, in part:

“I want to shoot up a school. I’ve been preparing for months. The gun is an AR-15. This gun is going to change lives tomorrow … As I walk through the hallways, I cherry pick the classrooms that are the easiest targets. I need to figure out how to sneak the gun in. I have contemplated making bombs. The instructions to make them are surprisingly available online. I have also considered shooting up my former elementary school because little kids make easier targets. High school’s the best target; I’m the most familiar with the layout. I pace around my room like an evil mastermind. I’ve put so much effort into this. My ultimate goal would be to set the world record for the most amount of kills in a shooting. If I have time, I’ll try to decapitate my victims with a knife to turn the injuries into deaths.”

Continue Reading

Maryland

Rockville teen charged with plotting school shooting after FBI finds ā€˜manifestoā€™

Alex Ye charged with threats of mass violence

Published

on

Alex Ye (Photo courtesy of the Montgomery County Police Department)

BY BRETT BARROUQUERE | A Montgomery County high school student is charged with what police describe as plans to commit a school shooting.

Andrea Ye, 18, of Rockville, whose preferred name is Alex Ye, is charged with threats of mass violence. Montgomery County Police and the FBI arrested Ye Wednesday.

The rest of this article can be found on the Baltimore Banner’s website.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

New D.C. LGBTQ+ bar Crush set to open April 19

An ā€˜all-inclusive entertainment haven,ā€™ with dance floor, roof deck

Published

on

Crush (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s newest LGBTQ+ bar called Crush is scheduled to open for business at 4 p.m. on Friday, April 19, in a spacious, two-story building with a dance floor and roof deck at 2007 14th St., N.W. in one of the cityā€™s bustling nightlife areas.

A statement released by co-owners Stephen Rutgers and Mark Rutstein earlier this year says the new bar will provide an atmosphere that blends ā€œnostalgia with contemporary nightlifeā€ in a building that was home to a popular music store and radio supply shop.

Rutgers said the opening comes one day after Crush received final approval of its liquor license that was transferred from the Owl Room, a bar that operated in the same building before closing Dec. 31 of last year. The official opening also comes three days after Crush hosted a pre-opening reception for family, friends, and community members on Tuesday, April 16.

Among those attending, Rutgers said, were officials with several prominent local LGBTQ organizations, including officials with the DC Center for the LGBTQ Community, which is located across the street from Crush in the cityā€™s Reeves Center municipal building. Also attending were Japer Bowles, director of the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, and Salah Czapary, director of the Mayorā€™s Office of Nightlife and Culture.  

Rutgers said Crush plans to hold a grand opening event in a few weeks after he, Rutstein and the barā€™s employees become settled into their newly opened operations.

ā€œStep into a venue where inclusivity isnā€™t just a promise but a vibrant reality,ā€ a statement posted on the Crush website says. ā€œImagine an all-inclusive entertainment haven where diversity isnā€™t just celebrated, itā€™s embraced as the very heartbeat of our venue,ā€ the statement says. ā€œWelcome to a place where love knows no bounds, and the only color or preference that matters is the vibrant tapestry of humanity itself. Welcome to Crush.ā€

The website says Crush will be open Tuesdays and Wednesdays from 4 p.m. to 12 a.m., Thursdays from 4 p.m. to 2 a.m., Fridays from 4 p.m. to 3 a.m., Saturdays from 2 p.m. to 3 a.m., and Sundays from 2 p.m. to 12 a.m. It will be closed on Mondays.

Crush is located less than two blocks from the U Street Metro station.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular