Opinions
D.C. now has data for nightlife reform
Nighttime economic report details fiscal importance


For the first time in D.C. history, the District government has assembled comprehensive data on the financial contribution of the nightlife business sector.
Two weeks ago, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser released a 72-page in-depth commissioned report. This impressively detailed survey, titled “Economic Impact of D.C.ās Nightlife Industry,ā is an exhaustive examination of the cityās largest local private-sector small-business category and hometown fiscal powerhouse in an attractive magazine-style format.
The numbers are startling: 65,000 jobs. 2,359 establishments, a three-fold expansion in 12 years ā with 1,276 restaurants, bars, and nightclubs holding an alcohol license and representing a net increase of 200 such venues in only the past four years. A whopping $7.1 billion annual economic contribution. $3.16 billion paid in wages and benefits. $562.3 million in direct city tax revenues alone, representing $1,789 in funds for each D.C. household, with the local revenue benefit increasing to $796 million per year when including property taxes.
The fiscal impact of the broader hospitality sector is actually even greater. Toss in hotels and add an auxiliary array of nightlife-related secondary economic contributors not included and the numbers grow from startling to staggering.
More than money, however, is the diverse cultural vitality and popular community amenities provided by the cityās nationally unique independent small-business nightlife sector. Approximately 96 percent of alcohol-licensed bars, restaurants, and nightclubs are locally originating establishments and not the franchise chains or national corporations common elsewhere. These socializing spaces enliven and define city neighborhoods. Residents clamor for the integration of dining, drinking, dancing, and entertainment venues near their homes and point with pride to those both close by and across town.
Convoluted and complex licensing and regulatory procedures, however, threaten all of that. Peppered throughout the report are stark warnings about the many variable challenges confronting nightlife businesses. Primary among them is the arcane method and manner businesses must traverse in order to open and operate, and is an embarrassment for a city striving for modern efficiency and world-class stature.
Fully half of the nearly one-in-five nightlife venues surveyed identify the byzantine regulatory approvals and alcohol licensing processes as the biggest barriers to entry and obstacles to success. The tight-margin engines of local employment, city revenues, and community life face extraordinary costs and delays in licensing protocols. Competitive disadvantages resulting from arbitrary operating limitations due to an out-of-balance community approval scheme is the cause.
Advisory neighborhood commissions now broadly attempt to impose small-area specific restrictions inconsistent with common licensing benefits. They no longer even pretend to offer rationale, merely pumping out paper forms with nothing more than checked boxes of presumptive problems not in evidence. Incredibly, itās an abuse of legal intentions tolerated by the ABC Board and city alcohol agency.
Among many egregious examples are those in the newly vibrant Wharf area of ANC-6D and the long-established U Street nightlife area of ANC-1B. Like others, these advisory commissions have adopted a policy of filing protests opposing both new license applications and venue renewals unless able to coerce cookie-cutter limitations contrary to equitable citywide rules and resulting in competitive disadvantages. ANCs, so-called ācitizens associations,ā and ad-hoc groups of merely five-or-more random residents know businesses refusing to succumb incur huge costs and long delays.
The displaced operators of Town nightclub seeking to open a new location faced protests by six entities. Despite recognized stature as respected long-time nightlife professionals, they finally won a high-profile licensing battle six weeks ago that spanned a half-year and cost tens of thousands of dollars ā so they can make a major neighborhood investment in restoring a derelict abandoned building.
Mayor Bowser, her administrationās year-old nightlife liaison office, and the D.C. Council must conjure up the courage to challenge and constrain these anti-business bullies and act to reform and repair the regulatory process. If they fail to do so, the cityās next nightlife report will detail the diminishment of the enterprise this one celebrates.
Mark Lee is a long-time entrepreneur and community business advocate. Follow on Twitter: @MarkLeeDC. Reach him at [email protected].
Opinions
U.S. should create path to citizenship for āstatelessā people like me
On Holocaust Remembrance Day, a reminder of those in limbo

It’s International Holocaust Memorial Day on Jan. 27. As an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor I’m grateful to be among those still here to mourn. This year, I’m also grateful as a bisexual man to have finally recovered my green card after years as a “stateless” person. I hope the Biden administration and Congress do all they can to help more than 200,000 other Americans who are also stateless like I have been since the 1960s.
The Nazis took my parents against their will to a forced labor camp in Germany from Poland and I was born in Germany in 1940. After surviving World War II, my family remained in Germany until 1951 when we immigrated to the U.S.
Then, I became stateless after losing my green card in the 1960s. I spent more than half a century in that legal limbo, unable to travel outside the U.S. or claim Social Security. The U.S. wanted to deport me but no country would claim me as a citizen so I lived in an uncertain and anxious world for most of my life. All stateless people have a different story. But I would like to make sure that nobody else has to go through the kind of anxiety I did. I am very lucky people have been so generous and helped me when I was in need. I could easily have ended up out on the street.
Now I live in Silver Spring, Md. Luckily, in 2019, I began working with my lawyer, Jayesh Rathod, a professor with the Immigrant Justice Clinic at American Universityās Washington College of Law. He’s been helping me after years of uncertainty as a stateless person. He and his students helped me get my deportation case from the 1960s reopened and dismissed. Soon after, they helped me reapply for my green card, and it came through last July. Since then, I’ve been able to breathe a sigh of relief. I find myself very emotional, often. I was under a lot of strain for a long time.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom also phoned me last July to tell me he was pardoning me. I was convicted in 1967 on a charge of lewd conduct after I was caught having sex with another man in a car parked in a secluded area in Long Beach. A security guard caught us, telling us we had gone against āGod and nature.’ He turned us in to the police. I pleaded guilty to a lewdness charge in exchange for the dropping of a āsex perversionā charge. Gov. Newsom pardoned me along with 16 other people last summer because we were subjected to “stigma, bias, and ignorance.”
I’ve been lucky to meet other stateless people through a new organization called United Stateless. We’re trying to spread the word about the legal condition so that more people understand their options. I went to a conference last year and met other stateless people. I thought I was the only one going through this situation, but we’ve started a community now. We’ve found each other and we’re advocating for things to change. It is nice to feel like our voices have power and we are connecting with each other. I felt pretty powerless for a long time.
Only Congress can ensure that other people donāt have similar experiences. Two members of Congress, U.S Sen. Ben Cardin and Rep. Jamie Raskin, have taken action. Their newly introduced Stateless Protection Act would resolve the status of stateless people in the U.S. It could change thousands of lives, including mine. The bill, if passed into law, will give people like me a legal pathway to citizenship. We could practice our human right to a nationality. And we could all get on with living more productive lives. On Holocaust Remembrance Day, we can ensure that people who have been rejected by their countries because of their race or religion arenāt left in limbo indefinitely into the future.
Henry Pachnowski is a Holocaust survivor and member of United Stateless. He lives in Silver Spring, Md.
Opinions
Trans people are in the midst of a second Lavender Scare
Legislative attacks becoming more numerous and draconian

To be trans in the U.S. is to know fear. It is a companion that travels with us constantly: from the moment we realize we are trans, to coming out, to transitioning, and now into our lives long past the point where we should have faded away into anonymity in days past.
We are in the midst of a second Lavender Scare, and in many ways this is far more dangerous: even Christine Jorgensen wasnāt barred from receiving hormones or being within 2,500 feet of children simply for being transgender.Ā
I have been called a doomsayer who profits from prognosticating an inevitable end. This is not precisely true: there is hope, if precious little of it. We can all clearly see the situation deteriorating rapidly in red states, with (at best) spotty resistance from the Democratic Party as a whole. We can see the effects of this deterioration as transgender people not only ask how to flee, but actively do soĀ now. But most in a poverty-stricken community, however, lack the money or resources to flee.
Thereās an eerie similarity to 1933, when people sold everything they owned, with no job waiting for them, just to get away from what they saw happening and coming. Others look at what it will take to get to another country, even as those countries are not yet ready to grant trans people asylum or refugee status. Most can only tell you that itās getting bad, and that theyāre afraid of what their government is preparing to do to them, even if they donāt know exactly what that will be. However, with nowhere to go, and no country particularly wanting transgender people, I find myself dreading another S.S. St. LouisĀ moment in history.
Thereās an authoritarian party in permanent power in half of the U.S. Theyāre making it clear that they intend to seize permanent federal control and bring their vision of a shiny, godly America to the rest of the country by any means necessary. Theyāre ready to destroy the Union and our democracyĀ to save it from āwokeness.ā And they have sold their base on the idea that the No. 1 threat that the country must be saved fromĀ is transgender people.
State level anti-transgender bills are becoming both more numerous and draconian year after year.Ā The Overton Window of anti-trans legislation keeps shifting further and further to the right. For example, first they wanted to ban transition-related health care for everyone under the age of 18. Then the bills started putting the age at 21. Then, this year, we saw OklahomaĀ propose banning it for anyone under 26. Texas followed by passing a resolution condemning it for people of all ages.Ā
Now Oklahoma has proposed a lawĀ that would ban providers who take state or federal money of money of any sort (e.g. Medicare or Medicaid) from providing transition-related care to anyone of any age. This means thousands of people who transitioned years ago will no longer be able to refill their prescriptions. Access to medical care will become a right that exists in theory but not in practice, like suffrage in the Jim Crow South.Ā
Itās not just medical care. Itās sports, bathrooms, birth certificates, driverās licenses, bans on ādragā, required misgendering, and forced outing. The creativity of this performative cruelty seems endless. Of these though, the ādragā bans are the most devastating. These laws are deliberately written as to be so vague and overly broad that a symphony orchestra with a transgender 2ndĀ clarinet, or a family with a trans child doing a sing-along in the car would be considered obscene. In West Virginia, SB252 and 278 single out transgender people (and not just drag performers) to declare that their mere presence in public is obscene.
Not only are the scope of laws increasing; the sheer number is growing exponentially. In 2018, there were 19 anti-trans bills proposed in state legislatures. By 2020 it was 60. Last year it was 155. Now, in 2023, we surpassed the 2022 total by the middle of January and are well on our way to more than 200. Even so, these numbers donāt tell the full tale.
In years past, only perhaps 10% of these bills would pass, usually after opposition and debate. Now, weāre seeing bills introduced, sent to committee, debated, and sent to the floor in 24 hours. There is simply so much happening so fast that trans people cannot put together opposition in time to speak against these bills, whereas conservative legislators coordinating with religious legal groups always have āexpertsā lined up and ready, since they know exactly when and where the bills will be heard ahead of time. The result is that in a year where a record number of anti-transgender bills are introduced, a record percentage, and a record total, will be passed.
Trans people are not doomed, but weāre clearly on an accelerating trajectory to the end of the community in at least half of the U.S. Reversing these trends, and preventing a nationwide destruction of the community, requires numerous highly improbable things to happen. This includes Republicans moving on from the moral panic about trans people, deciding that theyāve gone far enough already with their oppression at the state level, or the courts overturning anti-trans laws. None of these seems likely.
Additionally, there remains the fear that even states with sanctuary laws, like California, will not remain safe forever. Republicans in Congress have made it clear that should they take power in 2024, they intend to pass nationwide laws similar to those at the state level. The odds of the GOP taking full control are frighteningly high: the Senate map in 2024 for Democrats is very bad, Bidenās net approval is where Trumpās was in 2020, and gerrymandering makes taking back the House difficult.
Masha Gessenās rules for surviving autocracy state that āyour institutions will not save you.ā This is true for trans people now in several ways: neither courts, the Democratic Party, nor the media seem prepared to stand up for us as the situation goes from hostile to non-survivable. Thereās the open question of whether the courts will uphold sanctuary laws. When Texas demands the arrest and extradition of trans people (or parents of trans youth) who have fled to a sanctuary state, it seems unlikely that the current Supreme Court will do anything but what their Christian nationalist masters tell them to. Itās also unknown whether a state like California would defy the courts and break the union over trans people or women seeking an abortion.
Then thereās the news media, the fifth estate that is supposed to be the light of truth shining on darkness. Instead, half of the media ecosystem is leading the charge to brand transgender people as an existential threat to women, children, and society. The other half, like Reuters, the New York Times, and The Atlantic, produce poorly thought out āboth-sideismā and concern troll pieces that amplify and reinforce the narratives of the side that believes the ideal number of transgender people in the U.S. is zero.
Trans people have precious few people that they know will go to the mattresses for them. Weāre already seeing who on the left and center is stepping aside, or even joining in, to let self-proclaimed Christian fascists like Matt Walsh have their way. Not only can it happen here, but it is happening now, at this very instant, to the sound of deafening silence from the people who swore without irony ānever again.ā
The American public, for their part, either doesnāt know or doesnāt care. Itās just happening to āthose people.ā Most trans people cannot enunciate all the factors that have them afraid, and why they form an interlocking system of failures that make recovery from the trajectory weāre on improbable. They just know that things are getting worse, and they donāt see how it will get better. Like animals before an earthquake, they know something is very wrong, even if they canāt explain why, or get anyone to listen.
All they know is that they cannot get out, the unstoppable power of the government is coming, and no one is coming to the rescue. For those who cannot flee, and cannot survive the laws about to be passed, the end comes soon. Drums, drums in the deep.
Brynn Tannehill is a senior analyst at a D.C-area think-tank and author of āAmerican Fascism: How the GOP is Subverting Democracy.ā
Opinions
D.C. Council passes questionable legislation
Some of our elected officials are surely overreaching

The D.C. Council is passing some questionable legislation. I donāt question their good intentions, most of the time, but some legislation recently passed is not ready for prime time. Two examples are the overhaul of the D.C. Criminal Code, and the Non-Citizen Voting Act.
In passing these bills, neither fully thought out, the Council is challenging Congress to use its legislative oversight authority. The GOP has already announced it will fight the Non-Citizen Voting Rights bill. With the mayorās recent veto of the Criminal Code overhaul, the Council is looking to blame her for possible negative action by Congress on that bill. The mayor was absolutely right. Lowering the maximum possible penalties for burglaries, carjackings (now at their highest) and robberies, while residents are seeing a crime wave, is irresponsible and wonāt make the city safer. If Congress takes action on these bills, the Council must accept the full blame. While Congress shouldnāt interfere with D.C. government (I have long advocated for budget and legislative autonomy for the District) we donāt have it yet.Ā
There are other instances where the Council, with good intentions, is passing legislation that could create budget problems. Recent legislation making all bus rides in the District free is a great idea. However, the mayor was right in suggesting it is a budget issue and we should be talking to Maryland and Virginia first, urging them to join us. Under this legislation their residents, working and commuting, can get on a bus here for free and the District picks up the tab, estimated at $42 million annually. Council members suggested it will get cars off the roads yet studies donāt prove that. āA 2016 studyĀ in the journalĀ International Journal of TransportationĀ shows peopleās decisions about what mode of transport to use are impacted by accessibility more than price. Researchers found eliminating fares in European transit systems increased ridership 13-fold, but had only a āmarginalā impact on vehicle traffic since most riders switched from walking or cycling.ā So, letās look at how we help people based on need. There are clearly ways to help people in need without passing bills giving money to those who donāt need it.Ā
Recently, my Council member Brooke Pinto, proposed a bill that would give huge rebates to those buying e-bikes. For poorer citizens paying up to a third, or $1,200 for an expensive bike. For others up to $400. I am all for bike lanes and doing all we can to get people out of their cars. But proposing to spend up to $2 million on this may be unrealistic. Who asked for this bill and who will benefit the most? Those who sell e-bikes? Then we need to do the appropriate additional legislation regarding e-bikes and scooters keeping keep them off sidewalks where pedestrians are now dodging them. Then we are looking at another good idea, giving D.C. residents up to $100 a month to pay for Metro (could include Metro busses) ā an idea that needs a lot of thought on how it would be implemented and letās hope the Council doesnāt get ahead of itself on this one.
We know the windfall of federal money that came into the District through appropriations Congress passed during the pandemic is coming to an end. D.C. will again have to rely on the taxes it collects from its residents and we know the population has gone down during the pandemic. Rebuilding the tax base will take time. The mayor is proposing a number of excellent programs to bring more residents into D.C., especially downtown, including turning empty commercial buildings into residences. So, as we look at our budgets in the coming years, we need to determine what our priorities are and the Council shouldnāt be making long-term commitments that maybe canāt be funded. It is all too easy to come up with expensive ideas.
The current Council apparently wants to lead the nation in being progressive, which is fine. But much work and deep thought need to go into all legislation. I recognize with a bill like the Criminal Code overhaul, it took many years to formulate. But standing behind it and overriding the mayorās veto despite both the past and current chairs of the Public Safety Committee agreeing it will need amendments, was surprising.
I want to see legislation that promotes equality, and gives help to those in the District who need it the most. I also agree we need to get more cars off the streets and promote programs in response to climate change. Yet it appears like Republicans in Congress, some of our Council members are surely overreaching. Ā
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.
-
World3 days ago
Ukrainian ambassador to U.S. highlights support of LGBTQ, intersex rights
-
National4 days ago
Memphis police release Tyre Nichols arrest, fatal beating video
-
Obituary2 days ago
Bachelor’s Mill bar owner, D.C. philanthropist David Lewis dies at 65
-
Africa2 days ago
Congolese rebel group displaces transgender people
-
Politics2 days ago
State and local LGBTQ elected officials detail how they battle hate
-
Sports2 days ago
New York Rangers forgo Pride jerseys and stick tape for team Pride night
-
News3 days ago
PEPFAR marks 20th anniversary
-
Europe4 days ago
LGBTQ Holocaust victims remembered on International Holocaust Memorial Day