Connect with us

District of Columbia

D.C. voters’ guide: Council, school board, Initiative 83 on ballot

Harris poised to win city’s three electoral votes next week

Published

on

Longtime LGBTQ ally Vincent Gray is not seeking re-election to the Council. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

In a city whose voters, including LGBTQ voters, are overwhelmingly Democratic, D.C. Democratic elected officials – including four members of the D.C. Council and D.C. Congressional Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton – are considered the strong favorites to win re-election in the city’s Nov. 5 election.

Also expected to win is gay Ward 2 D.C. State Board of Education member Allister Chang, who is running unopposed on the ballot for re-election to a second four-year term in office.

Chang is one of two out gay members serving in a D.C. elective office other than Advisory Neighborhood Commission position. The other gay non-ANC elected official is D.C. Council member Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5), who won election to the Council in 2022.

Like all D.C. elections over the past 30 years or longer, nearly all candidates with any chance of winning have either a strong record of support for LGBTQ rights or have expressed support for the LGBTQ community.

The only exception to the city’s history of electing to office pro-LGBTQ candidates is the U.S. presidential candidates who are on the D.C. ballot every four years, including this year. Republican presidential candidates with a less than supportive record on LGBTQ issues, including Donald Trump, have won election as president, while losing by a wide margin in D.C

D.C. voters on Nov. 5 are expected to vote in overwhelming numbers for Democratic presidential contender Kamala Harris and her vice-presidential running mate Tim Walz, providing the Harris-Walz ticket with D.C.’s three electoral votes.

Also on the D.C. election ballot on Nov. 5 is Initiative 83, a controversial proposal calling for creating a ranked choice voting system in D.C. and open primaries, which would allow independents to vote in the city’s primary elections that are currently open to only registered Democrats, Republicans, and Statehood-Green Party members.

LGBTQ activists, similar to voters in general, appear to be divided over whether to support or oppose the initiative. Among its strongest supporters is longtime local gay Democratic activist Philip Pannell, who is serving as treasurer of the committee leading the campaign in support of the measure called Make All Votes Count DC.

Among the D.C. Council seats up for election on Nov. 5 are the two At-Large seats held by Democrat Robert White and independent Christina Henderson. Under the D.C. Home Rule Charter, one of the two At-Large Council seats, cannot be held by a member of the city’s majority party, which is the Democratic Party.

Robert White and Henderson have been longtime LGBTQ rights supporters. Both were endorsed this year by the Capital Stonewall Democrats, the city’s largest local LGBTQ political group. The two are being challenged by Republican Rob Simmons and Statehood-Green Party candidate Darryl Moch. Under D.C. election law, voters can vote for two candidates on the ballot for the two At-Large seats, with the highest two vote getters declared the winners.

Council members Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2) and Janeese Lewis George (D-Ward 4), who have also been strong LGBTQ community supporters, are running unopposed for re-election.

In Ward 7, Democrat Wendel Felder is running against Republican Noah Montgomery for the seat being vacated by incumbent Council member and former D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray (D), who LGBTQ activists consider one of the strongest LGBTQ supporters among city elected officials.

Similar to many city voters, LGBTQ Democrats have struggled over who to support in the Ward 8 D.C. Council race in which incumbent Trayon White (D) was indicted earlier this year on federal bribery charges. White’s indictment came after he won the Democratic primary by a wide margin. His only opponent on the Nov. 5 election ballot is Republican Nate Derenge, although five others are running against him as write-in candidates.

At an LGBTQ community candidates forum in September organized by Team Rayceen Productions and the Washington Blade, Derenge told the Blade he is generally supportive of efforts to ban discrimination against all minorities, but he opposes city government offices that he said are catering to “special interest groups.” 

Among the offices he would call for disbanding, he said, were the Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ Affairs and the other mayoral constituent offices such as the Latino, African American, Asian American, and Deaf and Hard of Hearing Affairs offices.  

The Capital Stonewall Democrats decided against making an endorsement in the Ward 8 race, with Trayon White becoming the only Democrat on the D.C. election ballot that the group has not endorsed, even though White has a record of support for the LGBTQ community. Political observers, noting White is a beloved figure in Ward 8, are predicting that White will likely win re-election, although by a smaller margin than his past election wins.

Chang, meanwhile, is among six candidates running for re-election or election to the D.C. State Board of Education, which is a nonpartisan body under the city’s Home Rule Charter.

The others running include the board’s president and Ward 7 member Eboni-Rose Thompson, who is being challenged by candidate Toni Criner; the board’s vice president and at-large member Jacque Paterson, who is also running unopposed; and Ward 4 member Frazier O’Leary, who is being challenged by candidate T. Michelle Colson.

“I will say every single one of the current members has been supportive of my efforts to push forward more inclusive LGBTQ standards, our educational standards,” Chang told the Washington Blade, referring to the incumbent members, including those running for re-election. He said Ward 8 candidate LaJoy Johnson-Law has also been a strong supporter of LGBTQ school related issues.

In the race for D.C. Congressional Delegate, longtime incumbent Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) is being challenged by Republican Myrtle Patricia Alexander, Statehood Green Party candidate Kymore Freeman, and independent candidate Michael A. Brown.

Brown, a former D.C. Council member and LGBTQ rights supporter, has said he has been a longtime admirer of Norton, and he believes she has done an excellent job representing D.C. in Congress on a wide range of issues, including LGBTQ issues. But he told the Blade he thinks a change is needed after Norton’s 33 years in office. Among other things, he said he would be more aggressive in representing D.C. interests before Congress.

Members of the Capital Stonewall Democrats, like many D.C. residents, have said Norton’s long record as a champion for D.C., including the LGBTQ community, merits that she be re-elected as D.C. Congressional Delegate.

Democrat Ankit Jain and longtime D.C. Republican candidate Nelson Rimensnyder are competing to replace Democrat Michael D. Brown as D.C. U.S. Senator, a position known as the city’s Shadow Senate seat. Incumbent U.S. Rep. Oye Owolewa, who holds the office known as the D.C. Shadow U.S. House seat, is being challenged by Republican Ciprian Ivanof.  

Jain and Owolewa, who have been endorsed by Capital Stonewall Democrats, are expected to win their races with the city’s “deep blue” Democratic electorate.

GLAA D.C, formerly known as the Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, has issued ratings this year for just four of the 10 D.C. Council candidates running in the Nov. 5 election. Under a recently adopted policy, GLAA limits its ratings to candidates that complete and return a GLAA questionnaire, which asks candidates to respond to mostly non-LGBTQ specific issues that GLAA says have an impact on LGBTQ residents like all other D.C. residents.  

But unlike GLAA, Team Rayceen Productions has conducted video interviews of nearly all the candidates on the D.C. election ballot, including D.C. Council, school board, Congressional Delegate, and shadow House and Senate candidates. 

The video interviews can be accessed at Team Rayceen’s YouTube channel. The GLAA questionnaire and candidate ratings can be accessed at glaa.org.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

Blade welcomes fall intern

Alexis McLean is student at University of North Florida

Published

on

Alexis McLean (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

The Washington Blade this week welcomed Alexis McLean as its fall intern.

Alexis is studying political science at the University of North Florida in Jacksonville, Fla. She is interning with the Blade as part of a continued partnership with the Washington Center.

“I am looking forward to spending my time in the fall with the Washington Blade, as this is a new experience for me,” said Alexis. “I have not experienced any journalist jobs in the past so this would be my first time, and I am excited to better my writing and communications skills with this internship.”

Alexis’s internship with the Blade ends in early December.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

‘People don’t see me. They see a trend’

New popularity of all things Asian warps view of multiple cultures

Published

on

Lily Brugman (Photo courtesy of Lily Brugman)

As I was growing up, my parents often shared stories about how they were bullied when they were my age, just for being Asian. My mom is Cambodian and my dad is “Wasian,” Chinese and white. Students teased them for their looks, their homemade lunches, and treated their traditional holidays as jokes.

I once asked my mom when I was little if she could pack me dumpling leftovers for lunch. “Yes,” she said with a surprised look, adding, “I would have never wanted to bring dumplings to school when I was your age because I would always get bullied for them. I’m glad times have changed.” 

At the time, I was confused. Whenever I brought a homemade Asian dish to school for lunch, I was happy to hear intriguing and curious questions from the other kids. It felt good to have my meal be popular and different from the Lunchables everyone else had.

Though times have changed, racism still continues. It just has a new face. Today, social media pretends to flatter our cultures in an insincere way trying to gain popularity just for clicks. Think anything from K-pop to Japan’s surge in international tourism. Even Starbucks has added drinks with the flavor of ube yam, native to the Philippines, onto its menu.

I feel that now when people see me, they don’t see me, they see a trend. 

For years, Asian people have been portrayed as foreign or exotic. The new embrace of foods and fashion at first felt good. Asians have never been represented as much as they’ve deserved. 

But this new popularity warps what non-Asians see. Instead of the blunt and direct racism my parents faced, everything now is a gray area, more discreetly hidden behind some TikTok video. It actually normalizes racism and stereotypes.

Whitewashing my culture 

As a 15-year-old Asian American who lives in D.C., I’ve always been one of the few Asian kids in school; my high school today counts less than 2 percent of students as being of Asian descent. I remember always being called “that one Asian girl” or some slur a kid learned from their parents. Every time I search for something related to Asian culture, such as a recipe or maybe a holiday, it’s always the same thing: some white person whitewashing my culture.

Social media is the main culprit, of course. I realized this when I entered high school and got a phone and was introduced to the internet. That is when I realized how messed up the new stereotypes around Asians are. 

One pattern I started to notice was people wanting to be Asian just because it was popular. It was hurtful, patronizing, and annoying. They made assumptions about our race and then only found us “cool” because we were trending. How can people go from hating us or finding us weird, to then only liking us because we’re popular?

There was a trend going around on TikTok called “race change to another” or RCTA.  It is this trend of people manifesting certain physical traits to change their appearance in order to change races. According to journalist Emi Tran, writing then as an intern for NBC Digital, the trend started when a white woman wanted to be Japanese. The woman began posting TikTok videos of herself wishing for different features such as monolids. Tran wrote in that 2023 article that “the overwhelming majority of the RCTA community wants to be East Asian.”

People also look up to K-pop culture, idolizing the pop groups pulled together by big entertainment companies. Most people expect all Koreans to be K-pop fans. Korean friends are asked about K-pop all the time even though they are not into the South Korean music genre.

Although I am not South Korean — I am half Cambodian and Chinese — I still get asked, almost like I’m expected, “You’re really into this group, right?” or “Can you tell me how to pronounce this member’s name?”

I was asked even worse questions during COVID-19. Suddenly, discrimination and violence were increasing specifically toward Asians everywhere. Suddenly, almost everyone was blaming Chinese people for spreading and causing COVID-19.

I remember going to school for one of the last times before quarantine had started and hearing kids whisper, “Oh, she’s going to give us the Coronavirus.” President Donald Trump had publicly posted his opinions about the situation on social media, blaming China for the pandemic, even calling it the “Chinese Virus” or the “Wuhan Virus.” According to NPR, anti-Asian hate crimes in U.S. cities surged 149 percent that year.

Lily Brugman’s parents (Photo courtesy of Lily Brugman)

The topic of Asians in the media has always been complicated. One moment people can hate us for being weird and different and the next we’re suddenly popular and cool for the same reasons. 

I feel conflicted on whether I should feel happy that we’re being represented or angry that it’s all for the wrong reason and has the wrong effects.

Lily Brugman is a sophomore at Benjamin Banneker Academic High School, one of Youthcast Media Group’s journalism class partners. She worked with YMG volunteer and Professor Emerita in journalism at American University Amy Eisman on this piece.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Gay men linked to 2006 Wone murder failing to make lawsuit settlement payment

Stabbing death of D.C. attorney in house near Dupont Circle startled community

Published

on

Robert Wone was stabbed to death 20 years ago.

The wife of D.C. attorney Robert Wone, who was found stabbed to death on Aug. 2, 2006, in the Dupont Circle area home of three gay men, has filed a complaint in court accusing two of the men of failing to make the payments they promised to make to settle a $20 million wrongful death lawsuit the wife filed against them  in 2008.

The court filings in D.C. Superior Court in May of this year by Katherine Wone provide new details of the lawsuit settlement related to a 20-year-old murder case that observers have compared to a murder mystery novel involving three gay men and the fatal stabbing of their friend whose wife insists was straight.

Court records and D.C. police reports show that Robert Wone was said to  have arrived at the townhouse of his long-time college friend Joe Price after spending all day and part of the night working late at his downtown office at Radio Free Asia.

Price, a gay rights attorney at that time associated with the LGBTQ group Equality Virginia, and his partner Victor Zaborsky and their housemate Dylan Ward – who were also friends of Wone – said later that they invited Wone to spend the night in their guest bedroom so he wouldn’t have to drive home to Oakton, Va., where he and his wife lived, before having to return to work in D.C. the next morning.

Court records show that later that night D.C. police responded to a 911 emergency call made by Zaborsky to the gay men’s house at 1509 Swann Street, N.W. and found Wone stabbed to death on what appeared to be a neatly arranged bed.

The three men told police they were certain an intruder entered the house and stabbed Wone while they were asleep in their bedrooms. But homicide detectives reported that the crime scene appeared to have been cleaned up and possible evidence tampered with.

After the investigation dragged on for more than two years, prosecutors obtained an indictment against the three men on charges of obstruction of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and evidence tampering in connection with the Wone murder. No murder-related charges were brought, prompting legal observers to conclude that authorities didn’t have sufficient evidence to charge the men with murder.

But a detailed arrest affidavit filed and released at the time the charges were brought against the three gay men startled those who knew them and created a sensation in the surrounding community, especially the LGBTQ community.

Among other things, it said autopsy findings and physical evidence indicated that Wone had been restrained or immobilized by a paralytic drug before being stabbed. It said three stab wounds on Wone’s chest and abdomen were surgical in nature, with no indication that Wone moved or tried to defend himself while being stabbed.

In addition, the affidavit said the autopsy found needle marks on Wone’s body that were not made by emergency medical technicians that arrived on the scene and examined Wone. 

At the advice of their attorneys, the three men chose to wave their right to a jury trial and requested that Superior Court Judge Lynn Leibovitz preside over the trial and render the verdict. Following testimony by expert witnesses on both sides, after the men chose not to testify, and dramatic closing arguments by prosecutors and the defense attorneys, the judge found the men not guilty on all three charges. 

In a lengthy written verdict, she read from the bench, Leibovitz said while she believed there was significant evidence implicating the defendants, there continued to be reasonable doubt on all charges against them. However, she said she did find that prosecutors established beyond probable cause that Wone was not murdered by an intruder who entered the house while the three men were asleep.

“Nevertheless, after lengthy analysis of the evidence, I conclude that the government has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the essential elements of obstruction of justice or evidence tampering,” Leibovitz said in delivering her verdict.  

While greatly relieved by the not guilty verdict, Price, Zaborsky, and Ward were still facing a $20 million wrongful death lawsuit that Katherine Wone filed against them prior to their criminal trial. As the two sides prepared for a civil trial the defense team announced the three gay men would invoke their Fifth Amendment constitutional right to refuse to testify at the civil trial on grounds that their testimony could lead to self-incrimination.

Possibly because of that or other reasons, Katherine Wone announced that she and the three men had reached an out of court monetary settlement of the lawsuit, the terms of which would not be publicly disclosed. 

In her recent court filings in May on behalf of the Estate of Robert Wone, which were filed against Price and Zaborsky but not against Ward, Katherine Wone charges the two men with failing to pay thousands of dollars as part of the settlement agreement. Separate complaints she filed against them disclose for the first time that Price had agreed to an $80,000 settlement amount in 2011 to be paid through monthly installments over the next 20 years.  

The non-payment complaint filed against Zaborsky by Wone states that he had agreed to a settlement in 2011 of $66,000 also to be paid over 20 years in 240 monthly payments. 

Although the initially filed $20 million lawsuit also named Dylan Ward as a defendant, court records do not show any complaint filing against Ward for nonpayment, leading some observers to speculate that Ward may have already paid the full sum of whatever amount Wone’s lawsuit sought from him. 

The Washington Post has reported that court filings show that as of May 29 of this year, Price owed $56,893.75 and Zaborsky owed $31,753.75 in missed payments and bounced checks plus fees and interest.

The two complaints filed by Wone against the two men also state that the settlement agreement they signed allows the Wone estate to call for the “immediate” payment of the entire amount they agreed to pay if they default on their monthly payments.  

Court records show that a “remote scheduling conference” before a debt collection judge was scheduled to take place in D.C. Superior Court on Sept. 22.           

Price, Zaborsky, and Ward have declined to respond to press inquiries including inquiries from the Washington Blade regarding the criminal trial and lawsuit. The non-payment complaints filed by  Katherine Wone show that Price’s current residence is in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. and Zaborsky now resides in Tamarac, Fla.

News of the latest complaints filed against Price and Zaborsky for nonpayment of the lawsuit settlement payments was first reported on Aug. 2 by the website called Who Murdered Robert Wone, which was created by four gay men shortly after Wone’s 2006 murder.

“We’re left to wonder if the threesome, or whoever remains of it now, will ever come clean on what they know and may have done,” Craig Brownstein, one of the men who created the website stated in the Aug. 2 posting. “The optimists will hope for a confession of some sort, an explanation, the pessimists are convinced they’ll take their secrets to the grave,” Brownstein wrote. “Time will tell.”

Continue Reading

Popular