Health
City cautious on medical marijuana
The Whitman-Walker Clinic has joined D.C. Council member David Catania (I-At Large) and city Attorney General Peter NicklesĀ in expressing caution over how and when the city should implement a 1998 law that legalizes medical marijuana in the District.
Congress last week ended its nine-year ban on allowing the law to take effect when it approved a D.C. appropriations bill that didnāt include a rider blocking the law. District voters approved the law in a 1998 ballot initiative that passed with 69 percent of the vote.
āMore than anything else, this is regarded as a very favorable turn of events,ā said Thomas Kujawski, an official with the National Association for People With AIDS.
Kujawski said recent studies have shown that marijuana is especially helpful in alleviating side effects from powerful antiretroviral drugs used by AIDS patients, such as nausea and a painful nerve condition called peripheral neuropathy.
Catania, who chairs the Councilās Committee on Health, has said he favors legal use of marijuana for medical purposes, but believes the Council and the cityās Department of Health should carefully craft implementing rules before rushingĀ to put the law into effect.
Nickles told the Washington Post last week that he has asked his staff to review whether the nine-year lag time since voters approved the law would prevent it from withstanding a legal challenge.
On a separate issue, Nickles and D.C. Council Chair Vincent Gray (D-At Large) said the cityās Home Rule charter requires the city to submit the law to Congress for a required review of 30 legislative days, just as all new D.C. laws must be subjected to such a review.
But D.C. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), disputed that view, saying Congressās decision to lift its hold on the law amounted to a tacit approval, and the 30-day review would be an unnecessary redundancy. Congress blocked the law, known as Ballot Initiative 59, before the city had a chance to submit it for the normal congressional review.
Other city hall observers noted that while Gray and Norton hash out whether to send the law to Capitol Hill for congressional review, city officials were quietly expressing concern over whether the city government or private non-profit groups should take the lead in cultivating and distributing marijuana for medical purposes.
According to the text of Initiative 59, āAll seriously ill individuals have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposesā when a licensed physician determines itās necessary for treatment and prescribes its use.
The law says that residents of the city āmay organize and operate non-for-profit corporations for the purpose of cultivating, purchasing, and distributing marijuana exclusively for the medical use of patients.ā It says the director of the D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs shall arrange for such non-profit corporations to be exempt from taxes that for-profit corporations normally must pay.
When asked if the Whitman-Walker Clinic, which serves as the cityās largest treatment facility for people with HIV and AIDS, would consider prescribing medical marijuana for its patients, Clinic spokesperson Chip Lewis told DC Agenda that it was too soon to make such a decision.
āWhitman-Walker Clinic believes that everyone living with HIV/AIDS or other chronic conditions should have access to legal medications under a physicianās care,ā Lewis said. āIf this law does take effect, we will have to do some thoughtful and careful planning, looking at current standards of care, before we could implement any program.ā
Currently, medical marijuana is legal in Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington state.
Kujawski pointed to a study reported in the February 2007 edition of the medical journal Neurology, which found that smoked marijuana was āwell toleratedā and āeffectively relieved chronic neuropathic pain from HIV-associated sensory neuropathy.ā
He said the condition typically causes tingling or burning sensations in the limbs of AIDS patients. Experts arenāt sure if the condition is caused by HIV itself or is brought on by various antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV.
āAnything that is going to result in improved health outcomes for individuals and/or anything thatās going to help support their adherence to their medical treatment regimens, weāre highly supportive of,ā he said.
D.C. gay and AIDS activist Wayne Turner and his late domestic partner, Steve Michael, who died of AIDS months before Initiative 59 came before voters, have been credited with starting efforts to place the issue on the ballot. Turner was among the lead campaign organizers for the initiative.
He praised the Democratic controlled Congress for removing its hold on the law and has called on the city government to put the law in place as soon as possible.
Health
Too afraid to leave home: ICEās toll on Latino HIV care
Heightened immigration enforcement in Minneapolis is disrupting treatment
Uncloseted Media published this article on March 3.
This story was produced in collaboration with Rewire News Group, a nonprofit publication reporting on reproductive and sexual health, rights and justice.
This story was produced with the support of MISTR, a telehealth platform offering free online access to PrEP, DoxyPEP, STI testing, Hepatitis C testing and treatment and long-term HIV care across the U.S. MISTR did not have any editorial input into the content of this story.
By SAM DONNDELINGER and CAMERON OAKES | For two weeks, AlbĆ© Sanchez didnāt leave their house in South Minneapolis.
ā[I was] forced into survival mode,ā Sanchez told Uncloseted Media and Rewire News Group (RNG). āI felt like there was an invisible wall [to the outside world] that I couldnāt cross unless I really wanted to put myself in a place where there was a chance that I might not be able to come back.ā
Queer and Mexican American, Sanchez was afraid of being targeted by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement presence in their neighborhood, even though they are a U.S. citizen.
āEvery day is a risk,ā they say, adding that even if they have paperwork, if they fit the profile, they are a target, making it scary to go even to work or the grocery store.
Sanchez, a 30-year-old sexual health care educator, has been taking oral PrEP, the daily preventive medication for HIV, for over a decade. But the mounting stress of ICE raids has made it harder to keep up with dosing.
āA missed dose here and there pushed me to make the appointment [for something more sustainable],ā they say.
Sanchez says they felt like somebody would have their back at their local clinic. It was only a 10-minute drive from where they worked, they knew its staff from previous visits and community outreach, and they could count on finding Spanish-speaking staff and providers of Latino heritage. But not everybody has had that same experience accessing care.
Since ICEās Operation Metro Surge began in early December, an increasing number of Latino patients in Minnesota are delaying or canceling what can be lifesaving care for the prevention and treatment of HIV.
These findings are particularly alarming for Latino communities, who, as of 2023, areĀ 72 percent more likelyĀ than the general U.S. population to be diagnosed with HIV. And while overall infections have decreased, cases among Latinos increased byĀ 24 percent between 2010 and 2022.
āIām very concerned that there is going to be a sharp uptick in transmission,ā says Alex Palacios, a community health specialist in the Minneapolis area.
In a January 2026 declaration as part of a lawsuit seeking to end Operation Metro Surge in the days following Renee Nicole Goodās killing, the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health said HIV testing among Latino populations has ādropped dramaticallyā and that āalthough grantee staff continue to go into the community to promote and provide testing, people are not showing up.ā
Local clinics are reporting the same thing. The Aliveness Project, a community wellness center in Minneapolis specializing in HIV care, told Uncloseted Media and RNG they have seen more than a 50 percent decrease in new clients. The clinic serves a large number of Latino and undocumented clients, and while it usually sees 750 people walk through their door each week, according to providers, it reported seeing 100 fewer people each week since December.
Red Door, Minnesotaās largest STI and HIV clinic, has had a āmodest uptickā in no-shows and missed appointments since December.
What happens when treatment stops
Today, there are multiple medications available that work to prevent HIV and dozens that treat it once a person tests positive. Many people who consistently take their medication have such low levels of the virus that they canāt transmit it through sex. But becoming undetectable requires patients to stay on their medication; otherwise, the virus replicates and mutates, weakening the immune system and increasing the risk of life-threatening infections.
āIf patients arenāt on their medicines consistently, HIV can learn about the medication and becomeĀ resistant to them. When this happens, theĀ medicine will not workĀ for the patient, and the new resistant virus could potentially be passed on to others,ā says George Froehle, a physician assistant and provider at Aliveness Project. āMedication adherence is one of the most important aspects of HIV care.ā
To maintain care and prevent dangerous, untreatable strains from spreading in Minnesota, providers at Aliveness Project have begun delivering medication to patients when possible, offering telehealth when they can, and pausing routine lab work to limit in-person appointments.
āThe most important thing we can do from a public health perspective is to keep people undetectable so they donāt transmit HIV,ā Froehle says, adding that providers in other cities targeted by ICE will need to make plans for missed injection visits, pivot to telehealth and prepare their teams for the ātrauma that can occur.ā
Sanchez understands the risks of inconsistent treatment, which is why they opted for the injectable preventative medication.
āI have a lot of risk [to HIV in my community],ā Sanchez says. āWith so much uncertainty about the future and whether HIV care will remain stable, I realized I couldnāt let this opportunity pass.ā
But injectable HIV treatments are commonly dosed at two weeks to six months apart, and the medication must be administered in a clinic ā a setting many patients are avoiding, according to providers.
āThey have a two-week windowā to get their shots, according to Froehle, who added that because patients are afraid to come in person, they have had to transition people off of their injectable HIV treatments. This has caused patients to return to oral HIV treatments without the testing they would normally receive had ICE not been in Minneapolis. ā[Oral treatments] werenāt super successful [for these patients] to begin with and thatās why they were on injectables.ā
Oral HIV medications, too, must be taken consistently to work. In response, providers have urged patients to have their pills with them at all times in case they get deported or detained.
The caution is not unfounded. Federal immigration facilities have aĀ historyĀ of denying adequate medical care to people living with HIV,Ā despite internal standards that require them to comply. Since 2025, at least two men living with HIV have been denied access to their medication in a Brooklyn jail,Ā according to lawsuits obtained by THE CITY.Ā One man said he was only given his medication after his lips broke open and he developed an open pustule on his leg. And in January 2025, anotherĀ man diedĀ of HIV complications while in ICE custody in Arizona.
Beyond being detained without proper medication, patients are at risk of being deported to countries with limited access to HIV care, likeĀ HondurasĀ andĀ Venezuela, experts say.
āA lot of men [from Venezuela] told me they left because it wasnāt safe to be gay there and because they struggled to access HIV care,ā says Froehle. āItās a little heartbreaking to see new folks not only face the threat of deportation, but to places where they didnāt feel safe medically or identity-wise.ā
āSome of these patients will die in their home country,ā says Anna Person, the chair of the HIV Medicine Association. āItās a death sentence.ā
A ācascading disasterā
While ICEās presence is threatening the infrastructure of HIV care that Minneapolis has built over decades, experts say there has always been a blind spot in HIV care for the cityās Latino community.
Vincent Guilamo-Ramos, executive director of the Institute for Policy Solutions at the Johns Hopkins University of Nursing, describes HIV in Latino communities as a ācascading disaster,ā the result of years of compounding inequities.
āThereās been an invisible crisis among Latinos that hasnāt gotten traction,ā he says. āThe numbers have consistently gone up in terms of new infections, while nationally theyāve gone down. ⦠That should be a big alarm.ā
Numbers are rising because structural barriers and stigma are preventing Latinos from receiving care. A 2022 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that between 2018 and 2020, nearly 1 in 4 Hispanic people living with HIV reported experiencing discrimination in health care settings. Lack of representation among providers, language barriers and deep-rooted medical mistrust further complicate access to care, according to Guilamo-Ramos.
Beyond the medical system, stigma within Latino communities can be equally damaging. According to Human Rights Campaign data, more than 78 percent of Latino LGBTQ youth reported experiencing homophobia or transphobia within the Latino community in 2024.
Sanchez agrees that stigma and bias are already massive barriers to care, citing the strict gender norms and Catholic beliefs many Latino communities hold. They say ICEās presence is threatening already delicate access to HIV care.
āThis has caused so much damage to people,ā Sanchez says. āNot being able to access your health care appointments is such a stab in the side. ⦠Being able to navigate any of these things in normal circumstances already has so much difficulty to it.ā
Palacios, who is Afro-Latine and living with HIV, says the heightened ICE presence is worsening barriers that have long undermined the Latino communityās access to HIV care.
āThe horizon has always been stark and dim,ā they say. āAnd this just feels like one more thing to address and to fight back against.ā
Sliding backwards
Navigating HIV care is becoming more difficult across the board, as the federal government has decimated HIV funding, compromising decades of progress made in the fight against the virus since Donald Trump retook office just over a year ago.
In February 2026, three months into Operation Metro Surge, the Trump-Vance administration proposed slashing $600 million in HIV-related grants, targeting four blue states, including $42 million forĀ Minnesota programs. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the cuts.
āThis would completely decimate and gut all of our HIV prevention,ā says Dylan Boyer, director of development at Aliveness Project. āThatās the reality that we live in.ā
āWe have all the tools, and yet we are staring down this rollback of infrastructure and research dollars, prevention efforts, treatment efforts, that are going to put us squarely back in the 1980s,ā says Person, a national HIV expert who grew up in Minnesota. ā[There] seems to be no other rationale for that besides cruelty, to be quite frank, since thereās no scientific reason for it.ā
Repair and representation
Jenny Harding, director of advancement at a Minneapolis-area supportive housing program for people living with HIV, says thatĀ while ICEās presence is lessening in the Twin Cities, the ādamage is done.ā
Person says that this mending will take time, especially between the medical community and patients, since HIV providers can have a āvery fragileā relationship with their clients.
āIt takes, sometimes, years to build that level of trust. And I do worry that folks are just going to say, āI donāt feel safe here anymore. The system does not have my best interest at heart, and Iām not coming back,āā she says. āThis is not something that you can flip a switch and everything will go back to normal.ā
āWe need to hold our federal government accountable, particularly HHS, [and] we need to ensure that HIV funding remains intact,ā Guilamo-Ramos says, adding that in order to lower rates of HIV in the Latino community, there should be more specialized efforts: such as bilingual and culturally aligned health care providers, community-based outreach programs co-located where risk is highest, trust-building initiatives to address medical mistrust, mobile clinics, and targeted programs to re-engage patients who have fallen out of care.
Aliveness Projectās patient numbers have increased in the last few weeks as the ICE operation has waned, but the clinic staff is keeping āa watchful eyeā and is having ādifficulty reaching folks who are understandably scared.ā
āOur biggest focus right now is reconnecting with people through our outreach so no one has a lapse in their HIV medications or prevention care,ā Boyer, of Aliveness Project, says.
For Sanchez, seeing providers who speak Spanish and are of Latin heritage at Aliveness Project built enough trust for them to reach out and make an appointment despite the risks. Sanchez feels optimistic about their new injectable prevention strategy with the support of their clinic.
āThereās many places where you can receive care here in the Twin Cities where you might not see your skin tone. ⦠Thereās still a lot of health care professionals that unfortunately carry bias. ⦠Aliveness is the opposite of that,ā they say. āSeeing that representation and knowing someone has that cultural context of how to meet you in moments of sensitivity, itās crucial.ā
District of Columbia
Trans activists arrested outside HHS headquarters in D.C.
Protesters demonstrated directive against gender-affirming care
Authorities on Tuesday arrested 24 activists outside the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services headquarters in D.C.
The Gender Liberation Movement, a national organization that uses direct action, media engagement, and policy advocacy to defend bodily autonomy and self-determination, organized the protest in which more than 50 activists participated. Organizers said the action was a response to changes in federal policy mandated by Executive Order 14187, titled āProtecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.ā
The order directs federal agencies and programs to work toward āsignificantly limiting youth access to gender-affirming care nationwide,ā according to KFF, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that provides independent, fact-based information on national health issues. The executive order also includes claims about gender-affirming care and transgender youth that critics have described as misinformation.
Members of ACT UP NY and ACT UP Pittsburgh also participated in the demonstration, which took place on the final day of the public comment period for proposed federal rules that would restrict access to gender-affirming care.
Demonstrators blocked the buildingās main entrance, holding a banner reading āHANDS OFF OUR āMONES,ā while chanting, āHHSāRFKāTRANS YOUTH ARE NO DEBATEā and āNO HATEāNO FEARāTRANS YOUTH ARE WELCOME HERE.ā
āWe want trans youth and their loving families to know that we see them, we cherish them, and we wonāt let these attacks go on without a fight,ā said GLM co-founder Raquel Willis. āWe also want all Americans to understand that Trump, RFK, and their HHS wonāt stop at trying to block care for trans youth ā theyāre coming for trans adults, for those who need treatment from insulin to SSRIs, and all those already failed by a broken health insurance system.ā
āIt is shameful and intentional that this administration is pitting communities against one another by weaponizing Medicaid funding to strip care from trans youth. This has nothing to do with protecting health and everything to do with political distraction,ā added GLM co-founder Eliel Cruz. āThey are targeting young people to deflect from their failure to deliver for working families across the country. Instead of restricting care, we should be expanding it. Healthcare is a human right, and it must be accessible to every person ā without cost or exception.ā

Despite HHSās efforts to restrict gender-affirming care for trans youth, major medical associations ā including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society ā continue to regard such care as evidence-based treatment. Gender-affirming care can include psychotherapy, social support, and, when clinically appropriate, puberty blockers and hormone therapy.
The protest comes amid broader shifts in access to care nationwide.
NYU Langone Health recently announced it will stop providing transition-related medical care to minors and will no longer accept new patients into its Transgender Youth Health Program following President Donald Trumpās January 2025 executive order targeting trans healthcare.
Health
CMS moves to expand HIV-positive organ transplants
HIV/AIDS activists welcome potential development
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is pushing forward a proposed rule that would make it not only easier for people with HIV in need to get organ transplants from HIV-positive donors, but also make it a priority where there was often a barrier.
The Washington Blade sat down with people familiar with this topic ā from former heads of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to HIV activists and to the first HIV-positive person to donate an organ ā about what this proposed change could mean.
HIV is a virus that attacks the bodyās immune system, particularly targeting the body’s T-cells, which makes it harder to fight off infection and disease. If left untreated, HIV can become AIDS. Without treatment, AIDS can lead to death within a few months or years. The virus is spread through direct contact with bodily fluids ā often through sex, unclean needles, or from mother to baby during pregnancy.
According to HIV.gov, a website managed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, approximately 1.2 million people in the U.S. were living with HIV in 2022. Of those 1.2 million, 13 percent donāt know they have it.
The virus disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men and people of color.
The CDCās statistics show men are most affected, making up almost 80 percent of diagnoses, with gay and bisexual men accounting for the majority. Racial disparities also are present ā Black people make up 38 percent of diagnoses. The World Health Organization estimates that around 44.1 million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses globally as of 2024.
Since the virus was first detected 45 years ago, scientists have been working on ways to treat and prevent its spread. In 1987, the first breakthrough in fighting HIV came as the U.S. approved the first HIV medication, AZT ā marking the beginning of antiretroviral therapy. This medicine ā and later descendants of it, like todayās widely prescribed Biktarvy ā stop the HIV virus from reproducing and allow the body to keep its T-cells.
Then in 2012, another big step toward minimizing the scope of the potentially fatal disease came as the CDC approved the first HIV prevention medication, Truvada, more commonly known as PrEP. As of 2024, nearly 600,000 people in the U.S. are using PrEP, according to AIDSVu, which uses data from Gilead Sciences (manufacturers of Truvada and Biktarvy) and is compiled by researchers at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University.
The following year, in 2013, the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act was signed into law, enabling the use of organs from HIV-positive donors for transplants into HIV-positive recipients, overturning a 1988 ban.
There are an estimated 123,000 people waiting for organ transplants in the U.S. The number of HIV-positive people on that list is estimated to be smaller, harder to precisely quantify, but they are still in dire need.
A study from the New England Journal of Medicine, published in 2024, analyzed the outcomes of 198 kidney transplantations to people with HIV at 26 medical centers across the U.S. from 2018 to 2021.
Results from the study showed that for kidney transplants performed using organs from 99 donors with HIV and 99 without HIV, one-year survival rates for HIV-positive recipients were nearly identical (94 percent and 95 percent, respectively). Three-year survival rates were also similar (85 percent and 87 percent). Organ rejection rates were also numerically on par after three years (21 percent and 24 percent). Other measures for surgical outcomes, including the number of side effects that occurred, were also roughly the same for both groups.
This shows that, overall, HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive transplants are nearly identical in outcome to transplants between HIV-negative donors and recipients.
Where we are now
Now in 2026, CMS is pushing past the clinical trial testing phase it has been in, making HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive organ transplants more widespread and more accessible.
Adrian Shanker, the former deputy assistant secretary for health policy and senior advisor on LGBTQ health equity at HHS, explained to the Blade that the HOPE Act was a step in the right direction, but this policy change from CMS will expand the ability to help HIV-positive patients in need.
āThe original HOPE Act asked for scientific research,ā Shanker explained. āThere were 10 years of clinical trials. The Biden administration promulgated a rule that removed clinical trial requirements for kidney and liver transplants between people living with HIV. This proposed rule is further implementation on the CMS side with the organ procurement organizations to ensure theyāre carrying out the stated intent of the HOPE Act law. Itās building on consensus that has existed through multiple administrations.ā
The proposed change would go into effect on July 1, and, according to Shanker, would help everyone in need of an organ ā not just HIV-positive people.
āPeople living with HIV, their ability to receive organs from other people living with HIV in a more streamlined way means that the overall organ waitlist is sped up as well,ā he added. āSo it benefits everyone on the waitlist.ā
Shanker, who was also a member of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, spoke about how this is a rare moment of bipartisanship.
āThere’s no secret that the Trump administration has been quite adversarial to LGBTQI plus health, and to the health of people living with HIV/HIV prevention resources as well … From destabilizing PEPFAR to shutting down one of the primary implementation partners, which is USAID, to firing almost the entire staff of the Office of Infectious Disease and HIV Policy at HHS … But what this is is a glimmer of hope that we can have bipartisan solutions that improve quality of life for people living with HIV.ā
Harold Phillips, the CEO of NMAC, a national HIV/AIDS organization that pushes policy education and public engagement to end the HIV epidemic, and an HIV-positive American, sees this as a huge gain for the HIV-positive community.
āFor a number of years, we were excluded from that pool of potential donors,ā Phillips said. āMany people living with HIV were excluded from being able to get organ transplants. So this opens up that door. This is a positive step forward that will help save lives.ā
That āopen door,ā Phillips said, does more than just provide life-saving organs to people in the most need. It provides a sense of being able to support their community.
āI remember when I was no longer able to check that box on my driverās license,ā Phillips recalled during his interview with the Blade. āI remember what that meant ā that my organs might not be able to save a life. The potential that now they could is really exciting for me.ā
āTo think about people living with HIV donating their organs to other people living with HIV and helping extend their health and well-being ā thatās an exciting moment in our history. It reinforces that HIV is not a death sentence anymore.ā
Human Rights Campaign Senior Public Policy Advocate Matt Rose also sat down with the Blade to explain the realities of HIV-positive people in the U.S. right now who are looking for a transplant.
āIf youāre HIV positive and on the waitlist for an organ right now, your chance of getting one is slim to nil,ā Rose said. āThis at least gives you a real shot.ā
He went on to explain that while the HOPE Act started to move in the right direction, it hasnāt done enough for HIV-positive people in dire need.
āThis bill [HOPE] was supposed to fix that ā and it never really has. But every administration, we keep chipping away at the next hurdle,ā he said. āThis latest move will drastically expand the ability for someone who is HIV positive to donate an organ.ā
That slow chipping away, in addition to the non-stop trials being done to prove the efficacy and ability for HIV-positive peopleās bodies to accept organ donation, is part of the broader push to normalize this practice and remove outdated restrictions.
Shanker elaborated, explaining all that time was necessary to figure out the efficacy of HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive organ transplants but now that the data has been collected ā its time to expand the availability.
āThere were over a decade of clinical trials between the original HOPE Act law being signed by President Obama and our rule being promulgated at the end of the Biden administration. It was to allow those clinical trials to run their course,ā Shanker said.
Nina Martinez is the first HIV-positive person to donate an organ to another person with HIV.
She explained that the stigma and lack of understanding from the general public is another hurdle that those working to improve the quality of life for people living with HIV have to deal with.
āPeople donāt generally understand that treatment works,ā Martinez said, who became the first person to undergo HIV-positive organ donation in 2019. āWhen you have access to antiretroviral therapy, it lowers the virus in your bloodstream to levels so low that lab tests canāt detect it. Clinically, that correlates to good health and an inability to transmit HIV sexually. I was healthy enough to pass the same evaluation as any other living donor without HIV.ā
She continued explaining:
āJust by having a diagnosis of HIV, theyāre labeling donors as medically complex, and thatās not accurate. Every donor with HIV has to pass the same evaluation as donors without HIV,ā she said. āIf someone passes that evaluation and still isnāt allowed to donate, thatās discrimination. If a patient is willing to accept that organ and you block it because of preconceived notions, youāre denying someone care based on disability. That runs counter to basic fairness.ā
When asked about her decision to become a donor and what message she hopes it sends, Martinez emphasized that the choice should remain personal.
āI didnāt undertake this endeavor to say that people with HIV should donate. This is a community thatās been through a lot and has contributed to science ā we have served. But for people who wanted a way to leave a legacy, and that is what I wanted, they should be supported in that. There shouldnāt be arcane scientific perceptions and myths getting in the way of that.ā
National Donor Day, which raises awareness of organ donation, is on Feb. 14. To become an organ donor, visit registerme.org.
-
Florida4 days agoFla. Senate passes āAnti-Diversityā bill that could repeal local LGBTQ protections
-
Uganda5 days agoUgandan activist named Charles F. Kettering Foundation fellow
-
Celebrity News4 days agoLiza Minnelli makes surprise appearance at GLAAD Media Awards
-
Opinions4 days agoCapital Pride must be transparent about sexual misconduct investigation
