Connect with us

Local

Dozens testify at Md. House hearing on marriage bill

Backers fear needed support may be eroding; referendum threat looms

Published

on

Dozens of witnesses testified for and against a same-sex marriage bill before a committee of the Maryland House of Delegates in Annapolis on Friday as the billā€™s sponsors cautioned supporters not to become complacent.

Among the first to testify for the bill were the five lesbian members and one gay male member of the House of Delegates, who gave personal accounts of how they and their partners are considered ā€œstrangersā€ under the current Maryland law that bars same-sex couples from marrying.

Many of the same-sex marriage billā€™s opponents, while testifying against that measure, testified in favor of a separate bill under consideration at the hearing that was introduced by Del. Don Dwyer (R-Anne Arundel County). Dwyerā€™s bill calls for a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

The Civil Marriage Protection Act, which would legalize marriage for gay and lesbian couples, was approved one day earlier in the Maryland Senate by a vote of 25-21, prompting LGBT activists to celebrate what they called a historic victory.

But officials with the statewide LGBT advocacy group Equality Maryland expressed concern that an expected vote on the bill in the House of Delegates within the next two weeks appears much closer than originally expected.

Backers said that as of this week, the number of delegates who have publicly declared their support for the bill was just short of the 71 votes needed in the 141-member House.

ā€œThereā€™s an effort to derail this bill like none Iā€™ve seen before,ā€ said gay State Sen. Richard Madaleno (D-Montgomery County), the author and one of the lead sponsors of the marriage equality bill in the Senate.

In a telephone news briefing on Friday, Madaleno said the mainstream media have repeatedly reported an earlier assumption that support for the bill was greater in the House than in the Senate, and approval of the measure in the Senate guaranteed its passage in the House.

With opponents, including the Maryland Catholic Conference and the New Jersey-based National Organization for Marriage, applying enormous pressure on wavering delegates, Madaleno and Equality Maryland officials said support in the House might be in jeopardy.

A warning signal that support in the House could diminish surfaced earlier in the week when Del. Melvin Stukes (D-Baltimore City), a co-sponsor of the marriage bill for the past four years, withdrew his sponsorship.

Stukes told the Baltimore Sun he thought the bill would have given same-sex couples the right to obtain civil unions rather than marriage. Once he realized the measure would allow gays to marry he determined he made a mistake, he told the Sun.

ā€œIā€™m very sorry that I got on the bill,ā€ he said.

Activists said privately that they were baffled over Stukesā€™ change of heart on the bill because he represents a progressive-leaning district in Baltimore where the majority of residents would not object to his support for allowing gays to marry.

Del. Heather Mizeur (D-Montgomery County), one of the Houseā€™s five lesbian members, said concern over possible erosion of support among delegates prompted supporters to scrap an earlier strategy calling for bringing the bill up for a vote at the very end of the House of Delegates session in April.

Doing that would shorten the time opponents have for gathering petition signatures needed to place the bill before voters in a referendum, making it more difficult to pull off a referendum.

Under Marylandā€™s referendum law, the clock begins for obtaining petitions when a bill is passed by both houses and the governor signs it. The state constitution sets the deadline for turning in the required number of petition signatures ā€” 3 percent of the registered voters in the state ā€” by June 1 following the adjournment of the legislature, which usually takes place at the end of April.

Thus by passing the marriage bill in the House in early March, as supporters now hope to do, opponents could get more than a month of additional time to obtain the petition signatures than if the bill passed at the end of the session in late April. Gov. Martin Oā€™Malley has said he would sign the bill if it reaches him.

If opponents succeed in gathering the required number of valid petition signatures, the bill is put on hold. It would not become law unless voters defeat the referendum question submitted by opponents, which would call for defeating the bill and defining marriage in the state as a union only between a man and a woman.

ā€œMomentum is important,ā€ said Mizeur, in discussing the decision to put the marriage bill on a fast track in the House. ā€œIf we had the luxury of 83 public commitments to voting on this instead of 69 of the 71 that we need, sure, we could wait. But at this stage of the game, we need to just get it passed and worry about the referendum later.ā€

Backers of the same-sex marriage bill also expressed concern about an e-mail that Dwyer sent to churches and religious groups that included an attached pamphlet called ā€œWhat-same-sex ā€˜marriageā€™ has done to Massachusetts.ā€ The pamphlet describes a series of school-related programs and discussions for elementary and high school students touching on same-sex marriage that LGBT activists in Massachusetts say are distorted and sensationalized to draw opposition to same-sex marriage.

A second pamphlet that Dwyer attached to his e-mail, called ā€œLittle Black Book: V 2.0 Queer in the 21st Century,ā€ was prepared by an AIDS group and funded in part by the Massachusetts Department of Heath as a safe-sex and ā€œcoming outā€ guide for gay youth. It includes graphic drawings of how to put on a condom and describes the level of risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases for various sexual acts.

The first pamphlet calls the ā€œBlack Bookā€ pamphlet a ā€œhideous work of obscene pornographyā€ that the first pamphletā€™s author, Brian Camenker, says was a result of the pro-homosexual climate created by the legalization of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.

Similar to a hearing on the bill three weeks ago before a Senate panel, more than 100 witnesses signed up to testify before Fridayā€™s hearing by the House Judiciary Committee. Also similar to the Senate hearing, House committee officials did not release the list of witnesses and their affiliations on the day of the hearing. The number of opponents appeared to outnumber the supporters by a small margin.

Like the earlier hearing, different religious advocates and clergy members testified on both sides of the issue. Many opponents argued that the bill lacked sufficient exceptions to allow individuals and businesses to refuse to provide services and accommodations related to a same-sex wedding if doing so violates their religious beliefs.

Several witnesses testifying before the House panel, such as Maggie Gallagher, president of the National Organization of Marriage, also testified at the Senate hearing.

ā€œNone of us have the right to redefine marriage,ā€ Gallagher testified on Friday. ā€œYou need to bring together male and female to keep the human race going.”

Derrick McCoy, president of the Maryland Family Alliance, said he would not object to providing same-sex couples with the same benefits that married couples receive, but the benefits should be given through a means other than marriage.

ā€œThis is not a civil rights issue,ā€ he said.

At least a half-dozen witnesses testifying against the marriage bill identified themselves as ex-gays who left the gay ā€œlifestyleā€ through counseling and embracing God. Among them was Anthony Falzarano, a former D.C. resident who helped found Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays.Ā Ā He said he now lives in West Palm Beach, Fla., where he formed a new group called Parents and Fiends Ministries.

Del. Mary Washington (D-Baltimore City), who won election to the House last November as an open lesbian, testified as part of a panel at the start of Fridayā€™s hearing with the five other out lesbian or gay House members.

Washington, who is black, said she views the campaign for the right to marry for lesbians and gays as being no different than the civil rights campaigns waged by other groups in earlier years, including the black civil rights movement.

The other lesbian or gay delegates that testified were Mizeur; Anne Kaiser and Bonnie Cullison, both Democrats from Montgomery County; and Maggie McIntosh and Luke Clippinger, both Democrats from Baltimore City. Each said marriage equality for lesbians and gays would strengthen families and end a longstanding form of discrimination against same-sex couples.

Clippinger, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, walked from the witness table to the dais to join fellow committee members and Del. Joseph Vallario (D-Prince Georgeā€™s County), the committee chair. He presided over part of the hearing.

Morgan Meneses-Sheets, Equality Marylandā€™s executive director, was among those testifying for the same-sex marriage bill. Others testifying for the bill included parents of gays and lesbians, ministers, and lesbian and gay couples.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

New D.C. LGBTQ+ bar Crush set to open April 19

An ā€˜all-inclusive entertainment haven,ā€™ with dance floor, roof deck

Published

on

Crush (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s newest LGBTQ+ bar called Crush is scheduled to open for business at 4 p.m. on Friday, April 19, in a spacious, two-story building with a dance floor and roof deck at 2007 14th St., N.W. in one of the cityā€™s bustling nightlife areas.

A statement released by co-owners Stephen Rutgers and Mark Rutstein earlier this year says the new bar will provide an atmosphere that blends ā€œnostalgia with contemporary nightlifeā€ in a building that was home to a popular music store and radio supply shop.

Rutgers said the opening comes one day after Crush received final approval of its liquor license that was transferred from the Owl Room, a bar that operated in the same building before closing Dec. 31 of last year. The official opening also comes three days after Crush hosted a pre-opening reception for family, friends, and community members on Tuesday, April 16.

Among those attending, Rutgers said, were officials with several prominent local LGBTQ organizations, including officials with the DC Center for the LGBTQ Community, which is located across the street from Crush in the cityā€™s Reeves Center municipal building. Also attending were Japer Bowles, director of the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, and Salah Czapary, director of the Mayorā€™s Office of Nightlife and Culture.  

Rutgers said Crush plans to hold a grand opening event in a few weeks after he, Rutstein and the barā€™s employees become settled into their newly opened operations.

ā€œStep into a venue where inclusivity isnā€™t just a promise but a vibrant reality,ā€ a statement posted on the Crush website says. ā€œImagine an all-inclusive entertainment haven where diversity isnā€™t just celebrated, itā€™s embraced as the very heartbeat of our venue,ā€ the statement says. ā€œWelcome to a place where love knows no bounds, and the only color or preference that matters is the vibrant tapestry of humanity itself. Welcome to Crush.ā€

The website says Crush will be open Tuesdays and Wednesdays from 4 p.m. to 12 a.m., Thursdays from 4 p.m. to 2 a.m., Fridays from 4 p.m. to 3 a.m., Saturdays from 2 p.m. to 3 a.m., and Sundays from 2 p.m. to 12 a.m. It will be closed on Mondays.

Crush is located less than two blocks from the U Street Metro station.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Reenactment of first gay rights picket at White House draws interest of tourists

LGBTQ activists carry signs from historic 1965 protest

Published

on

About 30 LGBTQ activists formed a picket line in front of the White House April 17. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

About 30 LGBTQ activists formed a circular picket line in front of the White House Wednesday afternoon, April 17, carrying signs calling for an end to discrimination against ā€œhomosexualsā€ in a reenactment of the first gay rights protest at the White House that took place 59 years earlier on April 17, 1965.

Crowds of tourists looked on with interest as the activists walked back and forth in silence in front of the White House fence on Pennsylvania Avenue. Like the 1965 event, several of the men were dressed in suits and ties and the women in dresses in keeping with a 1960s era dress code policy for protests of the Mattachine Society of Washington, D.C., the cityā€™s first gay rights group that organized the 1965 event.

Wednesdayā€™s reenactment was organized by D.C.ā€™s Rainbow History Project, which made it clear that the event was not intended as a protest against President Joe Biden and his administration, which the group praised as a strong supporter of LGBTQ rights.

ā€œI think this was an amazing event,ā€ said Vincent Slatt, the Rainbow History Project official who led efforts to put on the event. ā€œWe had twice as many that we had hoped for that came today,ā€ he said.

“It was so great to see a reenactment and so great to see how far we’ve come,” Slatt said. “And also, the acknowledgement of what else we still need to do.”

Slatt said participants in the event who were not carrying picket signs handed out literature explaining the purpose of the event.

A flier handed out by participants noted that among the demands of the protesters at the 1965 event were to end the ban on homosexuals from working in the federal government, an end to the ban on gays serving in the military, an end to the denial of security clearances for gays, and an end of the government’s refusal to meet with the LGBTQ community. 

ā€œThe other thing that I think is really, really moving is some of the gay staff inside the White House found out this was happening and came out to greet us,ā€ Slatt said. He noted that this highlighted how much has changed since 1965, when then President Lyndon Johnsonā€™s White House refused to respond to a letter sent to Johnson from the Mattachine Society explaining its grievances. 

ā€œSo now to have gay people in the White House coming out to give us their respects and to say hello was especially meaningful to us,ā€ Slatt said. ā€œThat was not expected today.ā€

Among those walking the picket line was longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is the only known surviving person who was among the White House picketers at the April 1965 event. Kuntzler said he proudly carried a newly printed version of the sign at Wednesdayā€™s reenactment event that he carried during the 1965 protest. It stated, ā€œFifteen Million Homosexuals Protest Federal Treatment.ā€  

Also participating in the event was Japer Bowles, director of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowserā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs. Bowles presented Slatt with a proclamation issued by Bowser declaring April 17, 2024, Mattachine Society Day in Washington, D.C.

ā€œWhereas, on April 17, 1965, the Mattachine Society of Washington courageously held the nationā€™s inaugural picket for gay rights, a seminal moment in the ongoing struggle for LGBTQIA+ equality in the United States, marking the genesis of public demonstrations advocating for those rights and paving the way for Pride Marches and Pride celebrations worldwide,ā€ the proclamation states.

About 30 minutes after the reenactment event began, uniformed Secret Service agents informed Slatt that due to a security issue the picketers would have to move off the sidewalk in front of the White House and resume the picketing across the street on the sidewalk in front of Lafayette Park. When asked by the Washington Blade what the security issue was about, one of the Secret Service officers said he did not have any further details other than that his superiors informed him that the White House sidewalk would have to be temporarily cleared of all people.

Participants in the event quickly resumed their picket line on the sidewalk in front of Lafayette Park for another 30 minutes or so in keeping with the 1965 picketing event, which lasted for one hour, from 4:20 p.m. to 5:20 p.m., according to Rainbow  History Projectā€™s research into the 1965 event.

Although the LGBTQ picketers continued their procession in silence, a separate protest in Lafayette Park a short distance from the LGBTQ picketers included speakers shouting through amplified speakers. The protest was against the government of Saudi Arabia and organized by a Muslim group called Al Baqee Organization.

A statement released by the Rainbow History Project says the reenactment event, among other things, was a tribute to D.C.-area lesbian rights advocate Lilli Vincenz, who participated in the 1965 White House picketing, and D.C. gay rights pioneer Frank Kameny, who founded the Mattachine Society of Washington in the early 1960s and was the lead organizer of the 1965 White House protest. Kameny died in 2011 and Vincenz died in 2023.

The picket signs carried by participants in the reenactment event, which were reproduced from the 1965 event, had these messages:

ā€¢ ā€œDISCRIMINATION Against Homosexuals is as immoral as Discrimination Against Negroes and Jews;ā€

ā€¢ ā€œGovernment Should Combat Prejudice NOT PROMOTE ITā€

ā€¢ ā€œWhite House Refuses Replies to Our Letters, AFRAID OF US?

ā€¢ ā€œHOMOSEXUALS Died for their Country, Tooā€

ā€¢ ā€œFirst Class Citizenship for HOMOSEXUALSā€

ā€¢Ā ā€œSexual Preference is Irrelevant to Employmentā€

ā€¢Ā ā€œFifteen Million U.S. Homosexuals Protest Federal Treatmentā€

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Organizers announce details for D.C. Black Pride 2024

Most events to take place Memorial Day weekend at Westin Downtown

Published

on

Black Pride 2024 details were announced this week. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The Center for Black Equity, the organizer of D.C. Black Pride, the nationā€™s first and one of the largest annual African-American LGBTQ Pride celebrations, announced this yearā€™s event will take place Memorial Day Weekend from May 24-27.

The announcement, released April 16, says that most 2024 D.C. Black Pride events will take place at the Westin Washington, D.C. Downtown Hotel at 999 9th St, N.W.

ā€œWith the theme Black Pride Forever, the event promises a weekend filled with vibrant celebrations, empowering workshops, and a deep exploration of Black LGBTQIA+ history and culture,ā€ the announcement says.

It says events will include as in past years a ā€œRainbow Rowā€ vendor expo at the hotel featuring ā€œorganizations and vendors created for and by the LGBTQIA+ communityā€ offering products and services ā€œthat celebrate Black excellence.ā€

According to the announcement, other events include a Health and Wellness Festival that will offer workshops, demonstrations, and activities focused on ā€œholistic well-being;ā€ a Mary Bowman Poetry Slam ā€œshowcasing the power and beauty of spoken word by Black LGBTQIA+ artists;ā€ the Black Pride Through the Decades Party, that will celebrate the ā€œrich history of the Black LGBTQIA+ movement;ā€ and an Empowerment Through Knowledge series of workshops that ā€œdelve into various topics relevant to the Black LGBTQIA+ community.ā€

Also, as in past years, this yearā€™s D.C. Black Pride will feature its ā€œOpening Night Extravaganzaā€ reception and party that will include entertainment and live performances.

The announcement notes that D.C.ā€™s annual Black Pride celebration, started in 1991 as a one-day outdoor event at Howard Universityā€™s Banneker Field, has inspired annual Black LGBTQ Pride events across the United States and in Canada, United Kingdom, Brazil, Africa, and the Caribbean. More than 300,000 people attend Black LGBTQ Pride events each year worldwide, the announcement says.

Full details, including the official schedule of events, can be accessed at dcblackpride.org.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular