Local
Archbishop O’Brien defends traditional marriage
Predicts the Md. marriage bill will fail
Edwin OāBrien, the Archbishop of Baltimore who will soon be Cardinal, denounced the effort to secure marriage equality in Maryland. His speech from Jan. 25, shown on the Catholic Review website (http://www.catholicreview.org/) ridicules the notion that opposing the bill amounts to discrimination.
OāBrien injected race into his comments.
āRacial discrimination is discrimination because of the pigment of the skin and it can’t be tolerated,ā he said. āBut marriage goes far deeper than the pigment of the skin. It goes to the very roots of our culture. And we are in it ā for keeps.ā
He predicted that the coalition that opposes the measure will succeed in derailing the marriage bill.
Maryland
Delivery driver found not guilty of murder in fatal shooting of Bel Air trans woman
Meghan Lewis shot two days after Christmas
By CLARA LONGO DE FREITAS | A food delivery driver who fatally shot a trans woman in the parking lot of her Bel Air apartment community last year was found not guilty on Wednesday of first- and second-degree murder.
Brian Delen, 48, of Bel Air, was convicted in Harford County Circuit Court of second-degree assault and use of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence following a trial during which his attorneys argued he acted out of fear and in self-defense when he shot Meghan Lewis.
The rest of this article can be read on the Baltimore Banner’s website.
Maryland
Seven Salisbury University students arrested, charged in hate crime investigation
Suspects reportedly used Grindr to target victim
Seven Salisbury University students have been arrested and charged in an alleged attack on a gay man that police are investigating as a hate crime.
Salisbury Police said the seven men, ages 18 to 20, used a social media account to invite a man to an apartment complex near the university on Oct. 15 āunder false pretensesā and then attacked the man, whom they said was targeted for his sexual orientation.
The rest of this article can be read on the Baltimore Banner’s website.
District of Columbia
D.C. voters approve controversial Initiative 83
Proponents hope measure will allow more minority votes to be heard
It’s ironic that the city that is home to the federal government gets almost no say in how the federal government is run.
From license plates that display the phrase āNo Taxation Without Representationā to countless ā51st Stateā stickers seen everywhere, the residents of Washington are well aware that their vote carries less weight than other Americans.
Despite this, one group in Washington is attempting to expand residentsā electoral power through Initiative 83. The group āYes On 83ā has been the driving force behind the measure. They have put up signs across the city, handed out flyers, and spoken to people about what the initiative would change. Ā
āInitiative 83 is a two-part ballot initiative,ā said Porter Bowman, the volunteer communications director for Yes On 83. āIt does two things. One, would implement ranked choice voting in primaries and general elections in D.C., as well as let independents vote in the primary of their choosing.ā
On Tuesday after the polls closed, the Yes on 83 team gathered at Crush Dance Bar on 14th Street for an election watch party. There, groups of purple wearing volunteers gathered on the dance floor to celebrate their work and watch election results trickle in.
One of those volunteers is Ruby Coleman, the student engagement coordinator for the Yes On 83 campaign and an American University student who was passionate about the measure. She explained this is a win for Washington voters, regardless of how they voted on the measure.
āIt will hold our politicians accountable,ā Coleman said as her co-volunteers danced behind her. āRanked choice voting will make it easier to vote out politicians who do not work for us, since they need the 50% threshold, it’ll make it a lot easier for us to vote them out.ā
In ranked choice voting, 51% is the golden number. The way ranked choice voting works is voters rank their preferred candidates in order of preference (first, second, third). Then, only the first choices of voters are counted. If a candidate wins more than 50% of the vote they win the race.
If no candidate reaches that 51% threshold, then the person with the least number of votes is eliminated and everyone who voted for the now eliminated candidate has their second option vote counted. This process of eliminating the lowest supported candidate continues until one of the candidates reaches above 50% of the vote.
This in theory encourages voters to research all the potential candidates’ platforms and ideas, as well as provide more balanced voting by eliminating āspoilerā votes where similar candidates split the vote causing neither to win.
In addition to ranked choice voting, Initiative 83 also allows for independents, or those not registered to any party, to vote in Washington’s primary elections. Washington has formerly only allowed registered partisan voters to partake in primary votes. Ā
There are many reasons why residents may not register under a major party. Some people feel party platforms donāt reflect their ideas, others, like journalists and high-level federal workers, may not register to avoid appearing partisan.
At about 10:15 p.m. on Tuesday, the Yes On 83 group celebrated a premature victory. At this point, approximately 55% of Washingtonians’ votes had been counted. The ‘Yes’ vote for Initiative 83 held a strong lead, with 72% in favor, while the ‘No’ vote trailed at less than 30%.
Lisa D. T. Rice, the proposer of the initiative, was beaming on Crushās stage as she addressed the volunteers on the dance floor.Ā
āAfter a full, tiring, but momentous day, I’m especially proud and looking over the sea of faces, I know what an amazing team we have here,ā Rice said to start her nearly eight-minute-long speech. āAs a native Washingtonian woman of persistence, I proposed Initiative 83 here in my hometown to put voters first. I love this city, and I think we deserve a political system where politicians have to work harder to earn our votes.ā
Proponents of Initiative 83 have said the ranked choice system will allow for more voices to be heard, including those of the LGBTQ community.
āIn ranked choice voting, you have the opportunity to vote based on your values and not necessarily strategically,ā Coleman told the Blade. āThat means that you can vote for someone who you want to win over someone who you think is going to win.ā
āA very easy example of this is if you’re looking at the presidential election and you want to vote third party, but you think the Democratic candidate might win, you can still vote third party first and put the Democratic candidate second,ā Coleman continued. āYou’re not losing any votes. You’re not wasting your votes. And so that’s the same minority candidates, including LGBTQ candidates. Studies have shown that ranked choice voting elects women, minority candidates, and candidates of color at a higher rate because people are not afraid to vote for them, to put them first.ā
Opponents of ranked choice voting have said the process is too complicated and will lead to voter confusion, a longer counting process, and may not reflect the true majority preference.
Despite this opposition, Washington has approved the initiative; 186,277 (or around 72%) of Washington voters said yes to the initiative, while 70,045 (27%) voters said no.
āRanked choice voting is a proven system to hold politicians accountable to a majority of voters, and letting independents like me, independents like me, vote in these taxpayer funded primaries, is just the right thing to do,ā Rice continued in her victory speech. āWe built a strong coalition of voters across the district, all wards, backgrounds, races, classes and political ideologies, who realized it’s time to make politicians work harder for us. Thank you to those who believed in us and joined us on this journey.ā
-
Politics1 day ago
A message from organizations committed to advancing LGBTQ freedom beyond the 2024 elections
-
Politics1 day ago
LGBTQ voters moved away from Trump as other Americans embraced him
-
Politics1 day ago
Kamala Harris addresses country after Trump victory
-
Opinions3 days ago
Our existence is non-negotiable: A call to action for trans rightsĀ