National
Carney tight-lipped on exec order barring workplace bias
Labor, Justice have reportedly cleared measure
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney declined to comment Wednesday about the status of an executive order that would require federal contractors to adopt LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination policies.
Under questioning from the Washington Blade, Carney said he had no information on whether President Obama would issue such an order.
“I unfortunately will give you the unsatisfying answer that I don’t have any information for you on any executive order that the president may or may not intend to issue in the coming months,” Carney said.
Because the measure is similar in its goal to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, the directive has sometimes been referred to as the āENDAā executive order, although the order would be more limited in scope because it only affects federal contractors. Multiple sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, have told the Blade theĀ Labor and Justice Departments have cleared such a measure.
Asked to confirm whether the order was green-lighted by those departments, Carney again deflected.
“I just don’t have any comment on executive orders that we may or may not be considering or actions that may or may not have been taken at lower levels within the administration,” Carney said.
He also declined to comment when asked to characterize discussion regarding the order among administration officials.
“I just don’t have any information for you on that, but I appreciate the question,” Carney said.
An online petition calling on President Obama to issue the executive at Change.org had 97,461 signatures as of Wednesday. The petition was created by Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, among the chief advocates of the proposal.
A transcript of the exchange between the Blade and Carney follows:
Washington Blade: Jay, I want to follow-up with you on this idea of President Obama issuing an executive order requiring federal contractors to have LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination policies. Will the administration issue this order before the end of President Obama’s first term?
Jay Carney: Chris, I unfortunately will give you the unsatisfying answer that I don’t have any information for you on any executive order that the president may or may not intend to issue in the coming months.
Blade: Multiple sources have told me that this measure has been cleared by both the Labor and Justice departments, and it’s awaiting final action at the White House. Can you tell me at least if that measure is at that stage?
Carney: Again, I just don’t have any comment on executive orders that we may or may not be considering or actions that may or may not have been taken at lower levels within the administration.
Blade: Can you at least characterize from the podium what is the level of discussion of this executive order? Is it being discussed among officials at this time?
Carney: Again, I just don’t have ā I’m sorry ā I just don’t have any information for you on that, but I appreciate the question.
State Department
State Department directive pauses most US foreign aid spending
LGBTQ, intersex rights a cornerstone of previous administration’s overseas policy
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday directed State Department personnel to stop nearly all U.S. foreign aid spending for 90 days.
A copy of the directive that Politico obtained requires State Department staffers to immediately issue “stop-work orders” on nearly all “existing foreign assistance awards.”
President Donald Trump on Jan. 20 issued an executive order that paused U.S. foreign aid “for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy.”
“All department and agency heads with responsibility for United States foreign development assistance programs shall immediately pause new obligations and disbursements of development assistance funds to foreign countries and implementing non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and contractors pending reviews of such programs for programmatic efficiency and consistency with United States foreign policy, to be conducted within 90 days of this order,” it reads. “The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) shall enforce this pause through its apportionment authority.”
Politico reported Rubio’s directive is more expansive than the executive order, although it does not stop military aid to Egypt and Israel, emergency food assistance and ālegitimate expenses incurred prior to the date of this.ā
The promotion of LGBTQ and intersex rights was a cornerstone of the Biden-Harris administration’s foreign policy.
The decriminalization of consensual same-sex sexual relations was one of the previous White House’s priorities in these efforts. The U.S. Agency for International Development in 2023 released its first-ever policy for LGBTQ- and intersex-inclusive development.
Rubio this week issued a directive that bans embassies and other U.S. diplomatic institutions from flying the Pride flag. A second directive that Rubio signed directs State Department personnel to “suspend” any passport application in which an “X” gender marker is requested.
āThis guidance applies to all applications currently in progress and any future applications,” reads the directive. “Guidance on existing passports containing an āXā sex marker will come via other channels.ā
The directive stems from a sweeping executive order ā “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” ā that Trump signed on Monday after he took office. The president in his inaugural speech noted the federal government’s “official policy” is “there are only two genders, male and female.”
National
Historic Oscar showing for āEmilia PĆ©rezā stirs controversy
Karla SofĆa GascĆ³n is first trans nominee for Best Actress
When the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences makes the annual announcement of Oscar nominations, itās always a day of divisive opinions ā but even the most divisive Oscar controversies of the past are bound to end up feeling like a pleasant chat over brunch compared with the one that has predictably erupted over yesterdayās revelation of the Academyās slate of contenders, in which āEmilia PĆ©rezā became not only the most-nominated film of the year, but the first to score a Best Actress nod for a transgender actor.
Itās a milestone that hardly comes as a surprise. The filmās star, Karla SofĆa GascĆ³n, has been considered a front-runner in the category throughout the awards season so far, already winning the Golden Globe for Best Lead Actress (Musical of Comedy) and snagging an equivalent nomination for the upcoming SAG Awards ā whose membership also happens to represent the largest percentage of Academy voters, thereby making their choices a solid indicator of how things are going to go down on Oscar night. In any other year, apart from being noted as a historic first and inevitably ruffling a few conservative feathers, GascĆ³nās inclusion in the lineup would likely otherwise feel like business as usual.
That, however, was before the return of convicted felon Donald Trump to the White House. Days after the former reality show star signed an executive order proclaiming that the United States will henceforth legally recognize only ātwo gendersā (justified in part by the invocation of āconcrete reality,ā whatever that is), it seems that Academy voters have a dissenting opinion ā and suddenly, a simple Oscar nomination feels like an act of resistance against the government itself.
For those who have yet to see the film (which is now streaming on Netflix), āEmilia PĆ©rezā is a sprawling musical drama in which GascĆ³n portrays a powerful Mexican cartel boss who enlists an idealistic lawyer (Zoe SaldaƱa, also nominated for an Oscar, as Best Supporting Actress) to facilitate a gender transition, so that she can disappear from her brutal life of violent conflict and finally live freely as the true self she has always had to keep hidden. Itās an epic-length saga, blending multiple genres into a larger-than-life, unpredictable wild ride that both celebrates traditional cinematic conventions and shatters them.
In addition to the kudos for GascĆ³n and SaldaƱa, the film ā which, though its dialogue is mostly in Spanish, was produced in France, giving it the additional distinction of earning the highest number of nominations of any non-English-language movie in Oscar history ā also earned its place among the 10 Best Picture contenders, where it competes against more traditionally styled favorites like āConclave,ā āWicked,ā and the Chalamet-as-Dylan biopic āA Complete Unknown,ā as well as āartsierā titles like āAnoraā and āThe Brutalist.ā Additionally, filmmaker Jacques Audiard is nominated as director and co-screenwriter (with Thomas Bidegain, LĆ©a Mysius, and Nicolas Livecchi, in the Adapted Screenplay category), with two nods in the Best Song category and a host of so-called ātechnicalā awards to round out its whopping total of 13 – only one nomination fewer than the three films (All About Eve,ā āTitanic,ā and āLa La Landā) currently tied at 14.
Other films on the Oscar roster also gathered a high tally; āThe Brutalist,ā Brady Corbettās critically lauded examination of the āAmerican Dreamā through the experiences of a Holocaust survivor (Adrien Brody) on his way to becoming a celebrated architect in the mid-20th-century United States, got 10, as did John M. Chuās blockbuster adaptation of āWickedā (including one each for stars Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande). Among other multiple nominees are āConclave,ā āAnora,ā and āA Complete Unknown,ā along with āThe Substance,ā which earned a Best Actress nod for previous dark horse candidate Demi Moore as one of its total.
Other nominations of note: Colman Domingo, whose well-deserved Best Actor nomination for āSing Singā gives him another shot at becoming the first openly gay person to win in that category; a pair of nominations for literary adaptation āNickel Boys,ā a story of two Black American youths at an abusive reform school in 1960s Florida; a nomination for Isabella Rossellini, daughter of three-time-Oscar winner Ingrid Bergman and Italian cinema maestro Roberto Rossellini, as Best Supporting Actress for her role in āConclaveā; and the inclusion of āMemoir of a Snail,ā a uniquely poignant Australian film which features (among other non-kid-friendly things) a pair of queer characters being subjected to conversion therapy, among the nominees for Best Animated Feature.
As always, there were snubs, too: egregiously, Daniel Craig, the star of Luca Guadagninoās āQueerā who was widely seen as a front runner, was shut out for a Best Actor nomination. Guadgnino, who also directed the bisexual tennis romance āChallengersā this year, saw both of his movies come up empty-handed; also left out was a Best Actress nod for Pamela Andersonās breathtaking comeback turn in āThe Last Showgirl,ā despite promising buzz and a strong showing at previous awards ceremonies this season.
Nevertheless, while in other years these subjectively labeled hits and misses might be fodder for plenty of debate in the public forum, none of them are even a storm in a teacup compared with the uproar around āEmilia PĆ©rezā ā which thus far (at this writing, anyway) has focused on detracting from the merits of the film itself, rather than at its transgender star. We get it: āEmilia PĆ©rezā is not a film for all tastes, so itās not surprising that many film fans are appalled at the acclaim it has received.
Even so, thanks to the atmosphere of transphobic oppression that has been forced upon us by Trump and his extremist cronies, any discussion of the film and its nominations must now be considered with all oneās critical thinking skills, because any arguments, either for or against its worthiness, might merely be a smokescreen for a deeper agenda than defending a set of cinematic aesthetics.
For our part, of course, we celebrate the film for its bold inclusivity, as well as its fantastical exploration of not only gender, but justice, corruption, politics, and all the contradictory passions that make being human what it is. We also celebrate GascĆ³nās nomination and the significant historic impact it carries ā particularly coming at this precarious moment in the American story.
As for Oscar night, we have no idea what to expect, so our only prediction about the ceremony on March 2 also serves as a bit of advice, courtesy of a quote from a previous Oscar champion: āFasten your seat belts, itās going to be a bumpy night.ā
State Department
New State Department policy bans embassies from flying Pride flag
Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed directive this week
The Washington Blade has obtained a copy of a new State Department policy that bans embassies and other U.S. diplomatic institutions from flying the Pride flag.
“Per the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act 2024, only the United States of America flag is authorized to be flown or otherwise publicly displayed at U.S. facilities, both domestic and abroad, and featured in U.S. government content,” reads directive that Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed. “No symbol or affiliation marking other than those authorized by U.S. statute, the president, or the secretary may be displayed, projected, or exhibited at any U.S. facility, both domestic and abroad.”
The policy states the U.S. flag “unites all Americans under the universal principles of justice, liberty, and democracy.”
“These values, which are the bedrock of our great country, are shared by all American citizens, past and present,” it reads. “The U.S. flag is a powerful symbol of pride and it is fitting and respectful that only the U.S. flag be flown or displayed at U.S. facilities, both domestically and abroad and in accordance with Chapter 1 of 4 U.S. C. ‘The Flag.”
The policy’s only exception is the POW/MIA flag.
The previous administration banned Pride flags from flying at U.S. embassies. (The Blade in 2018 saw the Pride flag attached to the fence that surrounds the U.S. Embassy in Havana.)
The State Department in 2021 for the first time flew the Progress Pride flag. Then-Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman and then-Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer Gina Abercrombie-Winstanley are among those who helped raise it. Then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2021 said American diplomatic installations could once again fly the Pride flag.
Former President Joe Biden last March signed a government spending bill with a provision that banned Pride flags from flying over U.S. embassies.
-
Federal Government4 days ago
Trump-Vance administration removes LGBTQ, HIV resources from government websites
-
Politics4 days ago
Trump previews anti-trans executive orders in inaugural address
-
Virginia3 days ago
Va. Senate approves resolution to repeal marriage amendment
-
National4 days ago
Metaās policy changes āputting us back in the dark agesā