Connect with us

News

¿Quién es Juan García Rodríguez, el nuevo cardenal cubano, y qué piensa de la comunidad LGBTI+?

El arzobispo de La Habana no ha hecho declaraciones sobre los derechos LGBTI+

Published

on

En 2018 el nuevo cardenal cubano, Juan García Rodríguez (camisa azul), firmó una carta colectiva que criticaba la intención de definir el matrimonio como “la unión de dos personas”. (Foto tomada de santegidio.org)

Nota del editor: Tremenda Nota es el medio socio del Washington Blade en Cuba. Esta nota salió originalmente en su sitio web el 1 de septiembre de 2019.

El papa Francisco anunció este domingo en la plaza de San Pedro que próximamente se crearán 13 cardenales y uno de ellos será el cubano Juan de la Caridad García Rodríguez, arzobispo de San Cristóbal de La Habana desde 2016. 

El nuevo cardenal tiene 71 años y nació en Camagüey, sede arzobispal que desempeñó como titular desde 2002, antes de sustituir a Jaime Ortega Alamino en el arzobispado habanero. 

García Rodríguez se contará por su edad entre los más de 100 cardenales menores de 80 años que participarían en un cónclave para la elección de otro papa si fuera necesario. 

Tres años atrás, cuando sustituyó a Ortega, el arzobispo dijo a la prensa que esperaba aumentar los diálogos con el gobierno cubano y contribuir así a que la iglesia católica participara en la educación y los medios de comunicación, además de tener más acceso a las prisiones. 

Al menos en los primeros años de su episcopado no ha conseguido cumplir estas aspiraciones, aunque García Rodríguez mantiene la posición amigable de su predecesor hacia la política cubana que controla el Partido Comunista de Cuba con exclusión de otros grupos. 

El pasado mes de julio, por citar un ejemplo de cautela en su relación con el gobierno, el arzobispado de La Habana prefirió no pronunciarse sobre las acciones de las autoridades para impedir que laicos católicos y periodistas independientes participaran en los funerales del cardenal Ortega. 

Jaime Ortega Alamino, a quien los medios llamaron “el cardenal del deshielo” por su papel mediador en el acercamiento que tuvieron los gobiernos de Cuba y Estados Unidos en 2014, calificó de “antiguos delincuentes, sin nivel cultural, algunos con trastornos psicológicos” a un grupo de disidentes que ocuparon un templo y fueron desalojados por la policía, a solicitud del prelado, días antes de la visita de Benedicto XVI a la Isla en 2012.

Ortega también había negado, en declaraciones realizadas en 2015, que existieran presos políticos en Cuba. 

García Hernández, en cambio, ha evitado declararse sobre estos temas en los últimos años. 

“Por su discreción y centrismo, es la persona menos comprometida en las luchas intestinas de la Iglesia cubana”, dijo el intelectual laico Lenier González Mederos al periodista Mario J. Pentón en los días que tomó posesión el actual arzobispo. 

García Hernández tampoco se pronunció el año pasado sobre la polémica alrededor del matrimonio igualitario que sí generó declaraciones de varios colegas suyos como Dionisio García Ibáñez, arzobispo de Santiago de Cuba, para rechazar el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo/género y atribuírselo al “imperialismo cultural”, o Wilfredo Pino Estévez, arzobispo de Camagüey, a favor de implementar una unión civil para parejas LGBTI+. 

El nuevo cardenal sí figura entre los firmantes de un mensaje publicado por los obispos cubanos acerca del proyecto de Constitución que presentó el parlamento en 2018. En el documento se criticó la intención de definir el matrimonio como “la unión de dos personas” y se calificó este concepto de “mal fundado y erróneo”. 

Los obispos aseguraron en el texto que no deseaban “menospreciar la dignidad de ninguna persona” y que su posición a favor del matrimonio tradicional “no significa[ba] discriminación”. 

Finalmente, el parlamento modificó la redacción del artículo y optó por una redacción más técnica y neutra que fue rechazada por gran parte de la comunidad LGBTI+, incluso entre los grupos favorables al discurso oficial. 

Durante los debates populares previos al referéndum de la actual Carta Magna cubana, la diputada Mariela Castro Espín, directora del Centro Nacional de Educación Sexual (Cenesex) y activista por los derechos LGBTI+, dijo a la prensa del País Vasco: “Fundamentalistas religiosos están tratando de ‘chantajear al Gobierno cubano con que no van a votar a favor de la Constitución si se deja el artículo relativo al matrimonio entre dos personas'”.

Castro Espín parecía referirse a las iglesias protestantes que dirigieron varias cartas públicas a la Plaza de la Revolución contra el matrimonio igualitario. 

No hay evidencias de que la Iglesia Católica haya intentado influir sobre la redacción final del artículo relacionado con el matrimonio, aunque es probable que sostuviera conversaciones con el gobierno cubano sobre el tema, si se toman en cuenta los antecedentes de mediación política que desempeñó el arzobispado de La Habana en la persona de Jaime Ortega.

El nombramiento de un nuevo cardenal con sede en La Habana, anunciado solo a un mes de la muerte de Ortega, también expresa la voluntad que tiene El Vaticano de mantener su influencia en futuros diálogos con el gobierno cubano.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Local

Comings & Goings

David Reid named principal at Brownstein

Published

on

David Reid

The Comings & Goings column is about sharing the professional successes of our community. We want to recognize those landing new jobs, new clients for their business, joining boards of organizations and other achievements. Please share your successes with us at [email protected]

The Comings & Goings column also invites LGBTQ+ college students to share their successes with us. If you have been elected to a student government position, gotten an exciting internship, or are graduating and beginning your career with a great job, let us know so we can share your success. 

Congratulations to David Reid on his new position as Principal, Public Policy, with Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck. Upon being named to the position, he said, “I am proud to be part of this inaugural group of principals as the firm launches it new ‘principal, public policy’ title.”

Reid is a political strategist and operative. He is a prolific fundraiser, and skilled advocate for legislative and appropriations goals. He is deeply embedded in Democratic politics, drawing on his personal network on the Hill, in governors’ administrations, and throughout the business community, to build coalitions that drive policy successes for clients. His work includes leading complex public policy efforts related to infrastructure, hospitality, gaming, health care, technology, telecommunications, and arts and entertainment.

Reid has extensive political finance experience. He leads Brownstein’s bipartisan political operation each cycle with Republican and Democratic congressional and national campaign committees and candidates. Reid is an active member of Brownstein’s pro-bono committee and co-leads the firm’s LGBT+ Employee Resource Group.

He serves as a Deputy National Finance Chair of the Democratic National Committee and is a member of the Finance Committee of the Democratic Governors Association, where he previously served as the Deputy Finance Director.

Prior to joining Brownstein, Reid served as the Washington D.C. and PAC finance director at Hillary for America. He worked as the mid-Atlantic finance director, for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and ran the political finance operation of a Fortune 50 global health care company.

Among his many outside involvements, Reid serves on the executive committee of the One Victory, and LGBTQ Victory Institute board, the governing bodies of the LGBTQ Victory Fund and Institute; and is a member of the board for Q Street. 

Congratulations also to Yesenia Alvarado Henninger of Helion Energy, president; Abigail Harris of Honeywell; Alex Catanese of American Bankers Association; Stu Malec, secretary; Brendan Neal, treasurer; Brownstein’s David Reid; Amazon’s Suzanne Beall; Lowe’s’ Rob Curis; andCornerstone’s Christian Walker. Their positions have now been confirmed by the Q Street Board of Directors. 

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

D.C. pays $500,000 to settle lawsuit brought by gay Corrections Dept. employee

Alleged years of verbal harassment, slurs, intimidation

Published

on

Deon Jones (Photo courtesy of the ACLU)

The D.C. government on Feb. 5 agreed to pay $500,000 to a gay D.C. Department of Corrections officer as a settlement to a lawsuit the officer filed in 2021 alleging he was subjected  to years of discrimination at his job because of his sexual orientation, according to a statement released by the American Civil Liberties Union of D.C.

The statement says the lawsuit, filed on behalf of Sgt. Deon Jones by the ACLU of D.C. and the law firm WilmerHale, alleged that the Department of Corrections, including supervisors and co-workers, “subjected Sgt. Jones to discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment because of his identity as a gay man, in violation of the D.C. Human Rights Act.”

Daniel Gleick, a spokesperson for D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, said the mayor’s office would have no comment on the lawsuit settlement. The Washington Blade couldn’t immediately reach a spokesperson for the Office of the D.C. Attorney General, which represents the city against lawsuits.

Bowser and her high-level D.C. government appointees, including Japer Bowles, director of the Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, have spoken out against LGBTQ-related discrimination.   

“Jones, now a 28-year veteran of the Department and nearing retirement, faced years of verbal abuse and harassment from coworkers and incarcerated people alike, including anti-gay slurs, threats, and degrading treatment,”  the ACLU’s statement says.

“The prolonged mistreatment took a severe toll on Jones’s mental health, and he experienced depression, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and 15 anxiety attacks in 2021 alone,” it says.

“For years, I showed up to do my job with professionalism and pride, only to be targeted because of who I am,” Jones says in the ACLU  statement. “This settlement affirms that my pain mattered – and that creating hostile workplaces has real consequences,” he said.  

He added, “For anyone who is LGBTQ or living with a disability and facing workplace discrimination or retaliation, know this: you are not powerless. You have rights. And when you stand up, you can achieve justice.”

The settlement agreement, a link to which the ACLU provided in its statement announcing the settlement, states that plaintiff Jones agrees, among other things, that “neither the Parties’ agreement, nor the District’s offer to settle the case, shall in any way be construed as an admission by the District that it or any of its current or former employees, acted wrongfully with respect to Plaintiff or any other person, or that Plaintiff has any rights.”

Scott Michelman, the D.C. ACLU’s legal director said that type of disclaimer is typical for parties that agree to settle a lawsuit like this.

“But actions speak louder than words,” he told the Blade. “The fact that they are paying our client a half million dollars for the pervasive and really brutal harassment that he suffered on the basis of his identity for years is much more telling than their disclaimer itself,” he said.

The settlement agreement also says Jones would be required, as a condition for accepting the agreement, to resign permanently from his job at the Department of Corrections. Michelman said Jones has been on leave from work for a period of time, but he did not know how long.  Jones couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

“This is really something that makes sense on both sides,” Michelman said of the resignation requirements. “The environment had become so toxic the way he had been treated on multiple levels made it difficult to see how he could return to work there.”

Continue Reading

Virginia

Spanberger signs bill that paves way for marriage amendment repeal referendum

Proposal passed in two successive General Assembly sessions

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Virginians this year will vote on whether to repeal a state constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger on Friday signed state Del. Laura Jane Cohen (D-Fairfax County)’s House Bill 612, which finalized the referendum’s language.

The ballot question that voters will consider on Election Day is below:

Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to: (i) remove the ban on same-sex marriage; (ii) affirm that two adults may marry regardless of sex, gender, or race; and (iii) require all legally valid marriages to be treated equally under the law?

Voters in 2006 approved the Marshall-Newman Amendment.

Same-sex couples have been able to legally marry in Virginia since 2014. Former Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who is a Republican, in 2024 signed a bill that codified marriage equality in state law.

Two successive legislatures must approve a proposed constitutional amendment before it can go to the ballot.

A resolution to repeal the Marshall-Newman Amendment passed in the General Assembly in 2025. Lawmakers once again approved it last month.

“20 years after Virginia added a ban on same-sex marriage to our Constitution, we finally have the chance to right that wrong,” wrote Equality Virginia Executive Director Narissa Rahaman on Friday in a message to her group’s supporters.

Virginians this year will also consider proposed constitutional amendments that would guarantee reproductive rights and restore voting rights to convicted felons who have completed their sentences.

Continue Reading

Popular