Commentary
Post midterm notes: Drexel Heard, Kipp Mueller, Max Huskins and me
Knowledgeable experts to explain what it all means
I choked up Election Night. For months, every waking and sometimes dreaming moment not devoted to my job was consumed by the image of democracy slipping like water through my clenched fist.
The historical imperative of the midterm elections forecast a MAGA Republican tsunami victory akin to the tidal wave in Tea Leoniās āDeep Impact.ā
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, stripping us of our fundamental right to bodily autonomy and threatening to overturn marriage equality and recriminalize homosexuality ā which was met with the same kind of tisk-tisk reaction to decimating the Voting Rights Act ā the path ahead looked strewn with more murdered and maimed bodies of women, people of color and LGBTQ people who couldnāt fit into a gilded glass closet.
Alarmed that the Democratic Party was not reaching out to our numerous intersectional LGBTQ communities for money, engagement, and votes as they had in the past, I felt an overwhelming compulsion to do something and coaxed my equally freaked out Millennial ally friend Max Huskins to create an LGBTQ-targeted YouTube series of candidate interviews and expert political prognostications which we would produce in partnership with the Los Angeles Blade.
We didnāt know if our Race to the Midterm series would make a difference ā but at least me and Max were not doing nothing.
Weāve interviewed a range of extraordinary people who immediately grasped our mission and wanted to participate: out Los Angeles County Democratic Party Chair Mark Gonzalez; gay Palm Springs candidate Will Rollins (here and here); Equality California Executive Director Tony Hoang; major ally candidate Christy Smith (here and here); Victory Fund President Annise Parker; California Assembly candidate Rick Chavez Zbur;Ā TransLatin@ Coalition CEO Bamby Salcedo; U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.); National Black Justice Coalition Deputy Executive Director Victoria Kirby; and Black, gay, HIV+ Dallas candidate Venton Jones; gay military veteran candidates Shawn Kumagai (California Assembly) and Joseph Rocha (California Senate); and history-making U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) for closing arguments. (See our series, with additional āadvancers,ā and the Bladeās political coverage here.)
No matter the outcome, I knew we had to have knowledgeable experts to explain what it all means. I asked Drexel Heard, Black gay former executive director of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party whoās now a Democratic political strategist, and Kipp Mueller, who ran for state Senate in the Santa Clarita Valley area alongside Christy Smith in her 2020 run for Congress, to share their insights with us after the dust settled a bit.
I met Kipp while working on Senate Bill 1149, the Public Right to Know Act, which was co-sponsored by Public Justice and Consumer Reports, shepherded by attorney and Legal Ethics Professor Richard Zitrin, Kippās mentor.
Little did I know that the dust settling over the midterms was choking MAGA Republicans and allowing me, Max, Drexel and Kipp to exhale, exhale, breath deeply, exhale and laugh. By the time we recorded our Zoom session, the Democrats looked likely to retain the Senate and maybe, maybe, if California broke right ā retain the House. What the hell! HISTORY was being made in defiance of Trump cultism.
āMy honest takeaway is that the GOP is utterly lost,ā Kipps says in our final episode. āMy honest takeaway is that, despite all of the odds being in their favor, they’ve fumbled it. It’s amazing to me. And I have some unsolicited advice for the GOP: First, banish Trump. He’s a loser. He loses every time. He lost the popular vote in 2016 when he managed to win the Electoral College. And ever since then, he’s lost horribly ā every single time. And the fact that they don’t see that on the wall blows my mind. He’s a total loser.
āAnd the second,ā he continues, āis to start standing for things. To your point about what can we take from this (California Assembly) speaker negotiation and work it into. Well, I have some conditions on that. I’m open to that with Republicans. But I have some conditions ā start proposing solutions; stop being a party of bizarre fearmongering about litter boxes in school bathrooms. And because they’re not going to survive the 21st century of being a party of 20th century lunatics, what do they even want? What do they stand for ā other than tax cuts for the rich? We know who they don’t like. We know who some of them hate. But what do they even want? I can’t even answer that …
āThey’re just visionless bullies right now. And it’s only going to get worse because they might eke out a slight majority in the House, and then they’re going to have to kowtow to the likes of Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert and Trump. And they’re going to lose horribly again. So my unsolicited advice to them is ā become normal again.ā
Max opined āthat, hopefully, the future is looking brighter than expected, at least from our perspective here, because of Millennial turnout and the Gen Z turnout was pretty damn strong. Young people showed up to the polls and showed up to vote for important issues that pertain to all generations.ā
Their most pressing issue, aside from student loans and climate change?
āWomen’s rights to bodily autonomy, for sure,ā Max says. āI think that was one of the drastic social problems that we’re facing this time around, that people were motivated to go out and vote.ā
āOverturning Roe was a huge motivator for Democrats to come out, for independents to come out and vote,ā says Kipp. But (gay pollster) Nate Silver found that in the states where people felt like these rights were more protected, it less directly influenced turnout and people showing up.ā
I noted to Drexel that both Mark Gonzalez and Tony Hoang strongly advocated for Proposition One, which would codify reproductive rights in the California Constitution (it passed.)
āI think a lot of folks pushed Prop One to make a national stance because as California goes, so goes the nation,ā Drexel says. āSo, if California is making the big push, it is going to be at the forefront of votersā minds. One of the things that I have said about not just Prop One is about our Democratic messaging on since Dobbs (the case the Supreme Court used to overturn Roe and abortion rights) has been making it an economic issue, not just a reproductive freedom issue … We cannot separate Roe v. Wade from how it impacts the economy.
āWomen are a huge portion of our workforce,ā he explains. āObviously, reproductive freedom has a huge impact on how folks ā how women ā are impacted in the workforce, and not many other states have family policies like California. āI think that we box up choices. We forget how choices are impacted, not just, āHey, I’m not ready to be a parent because I’m not ready to be a parent.ā But why are you not ready to be a parent? And that is, in a lot of cases, an economic issue,ā that impacts the trajectory of a single motherās life, such as going to college or work and paying for childcare.
These are just some of the issues we tossed around in our casual, free-flowing conversation about the midterms and what might happen next. My thanks to Drexel and Kipp for the smart fun.
But after we wrapped the interviews, Max mentioned an Oregon initiative that I knew nothing about ā Measure 112, āa change to the stateās constitution, stripping language that for more than a century has allowed for slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime,ā according to opb.org.
Wait – what? But hereās the really big deal: as of Nov. 13, Measure 112 passed by 55.53 percent of the vote, compared to 44.47 percent opposed. Translation: 945,075 Oregonians voted to remove slavery language from state constitution ā but 756,779 Oregonians voted to KEEP the slavery language!
āRemoving language referencing slavery from the Oregon Constitution is a good thing and is long over due,ā state Rep. Travis Nelson (D-Portland), who won election Tuesday as stateās first Black, openly LGBTQ lawmaker, told OPB. āItās a big number … Thatās troubling to me.ā
āThis was a state that was meant to be a white utopia and was not welcoming to people who were not white,ā Nelson added. āGiven the history of Oregon, the results that have come from Measure 112 are disappointing, but not incredibly surprising.ā
āWe have conversations all the time about our Oregon values, and now we know that thereās a segment of the population that values slavery being a form of punishment,ā Jennifer Parrish-Taylor, director of advocacy and public policy at the Urban League of Portland, which backed Measure 112, told OPB. āThatās a hard conversation, but I think itās also reflective of the broader national conversation that weāre seeing just in terms of this rise of white nationalism, of racial hatred thatās happening, folks feeling further and further isolated and disconnected from each other.ā
Oregon Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley has introduced legislation that would addressed language in the U.S Constitutionās 13th Amendment that has similar exceptions for slavery as a criminal punishment. āThis horrific loophole in our Constitution is a moral abomination that launched the mass incarceration we see continuing to this day,ā Merkley said at a news conference. ā[T]here should be no exceptions to a ban on slavery.ā
I know some folks in the Deep South still love their Civil War Confederate soldier monuments. But it never occurred to me that so many Northerners would find an excuse for any exception to an outright ban on slavery.
We have so much more work to do.
Deconstructing the 2022 Midterms | Post-Election Special:
Commentary
Reflecting on interactions with President Jimmy Carter
An LGBTQ ally and devout Christian who adored his wife of 77 years
Itās September 1998, and Iām at lunch with several other journalists and a grandmother. As I sip my Coke, I hear a friendly male voice. You can tell heās smiling. āTime to shake hands now,ā he says.
Weāre at the Carter Center in Atlanta for a few days. The other reporters and I have received Rosalynn Carter Fellowships for Mental Health Journalism. The grandma sitting with us is former first lady Rosalynn Carter, and the man with the warm smile is former President Jimmy Carter. āAs soon as we get on a plane,ā Mrs. Carter says, āJimmy walks down the aisles and shakes hands with everybody. He knows they want to say hi to him.ā
Jimmy Carter died Dec. 29 in hospice care in Georgia. President Biden declared Thursday a National Day of Mourning and Carter’s funeral will take place at Washington National Cathedral that day. After the funeral, Carter and his family will return to Plains, Ga. to Maranatha Baptist Church for a private funeral and then to Carter’s private residence for interment.
Twenty-five years ago, we journos were at the Carter Center to meet with experts in mental health so we could report accurately on the issue.
The fellowship program was founded in 1996 by Rosalynn Carter. Mrs. Carter, who died in 2023 at age 96, was no mere figurehead. She knew every detail about our fellowship projects. Heaven help us, if sheād caught us asleep at the switch.
It takes nothing away from Mrs. Carter to note how essential her personal and professional partnership with her husband Jimmy Carter was to her and her work.
Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter were married in 1946. The first thing that hit you when you saw them together was how deeply they loved each other. There was nothing sappy about how they were with each other.
One morning, President Carter ambled into the conference room before our session on stigma and mental health was about to begin. Kenneth W. Starr had just delivered his report on (then) President Bill Clintonās alleged abuses and affair with Monica Lewinsky. Naturally, we, the reporters in the room, asked Jimmy Carter how he felt about Bill Clinton. We were committed to mental health journalism. But, a former president was there ā standing by the wall.
President Carter didnāt seem to want to hold back. He said he didnāt think that highly of Bill Clinton. But, before he could go on to say more, Mrs. Carter gave him a look. The look you give your spouse after decades of loving togetherness. Especially, if youāre a political couple and your mateās being grilled by scribes eager to make news. āI know,ā Jimmy Carter said, smiling, to Rosalynn Carter, his most ardent supporter and astute critic, āIām talking too much, darlinā. Iām leaving now.ā
You could tell how proud President Carter was of Mrs. Carter. At lunch or dinner, youād see him nodding approvingly at her when she spoke of her work. You could see it in how he teased her. āRosalynn talks about mental health all the time,ā Jimmy Carter said, with a laugh, one night, as he saw Mrs. Carter chatting with us about how the media reported on mental health.
What I most recall about Jimmy Carter is his generosity of spirit. āI beat Jerry Ford,ā President Carter said, ābut Rosalyn and I are good friends with the Fords now.ā
He wasnāt using the word āfriendsā in the way politicos often do. The Carters and the Fords were friends who worked together on mental health and other issues.
I hadnāt yet come out as a lesbian when I was at the Carter Center. But I didnāt feel I had to remain closeted or silent about my (then) partner. Carter was, what today likely would be an oxymoron: a born-again Christian, who welcomed everyone.
The Carter Center, which the Carters founded after his presidency, is like a theme park, where, instead of standing in line for attractions, people work to resolve conflicts and eradicate diseases.
Thank you, President Carter for your work, humanity and being an LGBTQ ally. R.I.P., Jimmy Carter.
Kathi Wolfe, a writer and poet, was a regular contributor to the Blade. She wrote this tribute just before she passed away in June 2024.
Commentary
What does Trudeau’s resignation mean for the queer community?
Be careful what you wish for
LGBTQ Global originally published this commentary. The Washington Blade is republishing it with permission.
On Monday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he was stepping down as leader of the Liberal Party, and thus as prime minister as soon as the party chooses his replacement. Thereās a lot to unpack about how we got here and what happens next, but itās important to note exactly how transformative Justin Trudeau was on LGBTQ rights in Canada.
When Trudeau came to power in 2015, he was following nearly 10 years of rule under the Stephen Harper Conservatives. Harperās Conservative Party was new force in Canadian politics, merging the old-school business-minded Progressive Conservative Party with the more radical and frequently explicitly bigoted Canadian Alliance/Reform Party. Harper was able to take advantage of Canadaās badly designed electoral system and fractured political left to win three elections with 36, 37, and 39 percent of the vote. Unbowed by the lack of majority electoral mandate, the Conservatives relished in forcing through their agenda without seeking support from other parties.
Harper immediately called a vote on repealing same-sex marriage, which had become national law only a year prior (the vote failed, which Harperās defenders like to argue was the plan all along.) He immediately slashed funding to civil rights defenders who had won a string of court victories for LGBTQ people. Arts, culture, and tourism boards were warned theyād come under scrutiny if they funded queer groups and programs. The Conservatives blocked justice reforms like equalizing the age of consent and protecting transgender people in law.
After a decade of this shit, LGBTQ Canadians and progressives were exhausted and demoralized.
Trudeau swept into office in 2015 and set about immediately changing the tone. That first year was a lot of photo ops and press statements and Cabinet appointments designed to ensure that every marginalized community felt that they were represented in the new government. Trudeau even became the first prime minister to march in a Pride parade ā something he did over and over in multiple cities.
Conservatives derisively called it all āvirtue signalingā or and relentlessly told a certain segment of the electorate that they should be offended by it all.
But for the most part, the Trudeau government delivered, especially for LGBTQ people.
Two key reforms came about in its first term: An overhaul of the Criminal Code that removed a number of laws that were still used to target queer people, including a sodomy law that included a higher age of consent and a ban on gay sex if it involved more than two people. Also removed were several obscenity and bawdy house provisions that were used to harass queer communities.
The other was the trans rights bill, C-16, which included explicit protections for trans people in federal human rights law and included them as a protected class in the hate crime and hate speech provisions of the Criminal Code. Itās genuinely astounding in retrospect how much impact this bill had given how little it actually changed. Canadian courts had already ruled that trans people were generally protected under sex discrimination laws, and in any event, the federal human rights code doesnāt really cover much in Canada. The far more important provincial human rights codes had mostly been updated to include āgender identityā years before the federal code anyway.
But the passage of C-16 was also the launching pad for one of Canadaās most notorious far-right cranks, Jordan Peterson. An obviously disturbed and disgraced former university professor, Peterson gained a global following of anti-trans weirdos and incels by spreading lies about C-16. The community that formed around Peterson is now a core constituency of the Conservative Party under opposition leader Pierre Poilievre. Indeed, Petersonās interview of Poilievre last week on YouTube was treated as some kind of Yalta Conference for cringey weirdos ā and may be why Elon Musk took a sudden interest in Poilievre this week.
But that wasnāt all Trudeau delivered for the queer community.
The Trudeau government banned conversion therapy. It restored and expanded funding to civil rights groups, queer organizations, and the arts. It drafted and implemented a strategy to promote 2SLGBTQIA+ rights and inclusion across government (yeah, that the governmentās official acronym.) It issued an historic apology, expungement, and compensation scheme for people whoād been convicted or fired from the public service under old anti-gay laws. It added an āXā gender option for federal ID (passports). It ended the ban on gay/bi blood, tissue, and semen donors.
Trudeau also guided Canada through an unprecedented series of global and national crises, including the COVID pandemic, the first Trump presidency, Russiaās invasion of Ukraine, an insurgency against the government (fully supported by the Conservatives), and a national reckoning with Canadaās shameful treatment of its Indigenous people.
But he was unable or unwilling to reckon with a series of major problems that have only been exacerbated by those crises: A soaring cost of living, a crumbling health care system, and a growing sense that nothing seems to āworkā in Canada ā from a post office that refuses to deliver packages, to parks that refuse to unlock their bathrooms, to criminals that go free because packed courts canāt hear their trials in time, to infrastructure and defense projects that drag on years beyond schedule and billions of dollars over budget.
The fact that most of these problems are under the jurisdiction of provinces that are almost entirely being mismanaged by Conservatives ā sorry, the feds have to wear Canada Post ā hasnāt blunted the peopleās decision that Trudeau is to blame for every ill in Canada. Heck, thatās basically the Conservative slogan these days.
Trudeau probably should have stepped down a few months ago, to give the party a chance to choose a successor in an orderly fashion. Instead, heās made himself a lame duck days before Trump takes office, threatening to annex Canada (and Greenland and Panama) through economic power, whatever the hell he means by any of that. The Liberal Party will soon announce rules for how a nationwide vote on the new leader will be held, and candidates are already jockeying into place. A new leader will have to be chosen by March 25, when parliament is recalled and the opposition is likely to force an early election, likely in mid-May.
According to current polls, the Liberal Party is cooked, and the Conservatives are poised to pull a near-sweep of parliament. Of course, itās also possible that a leadership contest brings a fresh appealing face to the Liberals, and theyāre able to recover some position ahead of the vote, whenever it is. Or Canadians will become concerned with the Conservative Partyās growing ties to Trump Republicans.
Poilievre, who cut his teeth in the Harper government as its most unscrupulous attack dog, is trying to position himself as the reasonable person who can unite and fix a fractured Canada. I have my doubts, given his entire public history. Heās also been notably palling around the worst anti-LGBTQ bigots in Canada and making vaguely threatening statements about banning trans women from bathrooms.
As Canadians get ready to head to the polls, itās worth remembering what Conservatives do when theyāre in power.
During the holidays, overindulging in alcohol and food is widely accepted. Throughout history, for as long as the holiday season has been celebrated in the United States, we are encouraged to have that extra drink or plate of food.
Alcohol, for instance, is widely used in excess, and this has never changed. While our knowledge about moderation and the short and long-term health impacts of alcohol have changed for the better, most Americans face the obstacle of overindulgence during the holidays, deciding whether to avoid the temptation or go with the flow.
There are countless reasons why alcohol is consumed in excess this time of year, and in many instances, people are encouraged to take part. Alcohol suppliers, liquor stores, bars, taverns, and restaurants tend to see an increase in alcohol sales. Alcohol advertising during the holidays is undoubtedly geared to play off of our emotions.
According to the American Psychological Association (APA), nine in 10 Americans say that concerns such as not having enough money, missing loved ones, and family conflict cause stress this time of year. Financial concerns were the most common reason for stress, as 58% of U.S. adults say they spend too much money or do not have enough money to spend.Ā
Unfortunately, close to two in five adults who experience stress during the holiday season said they use harmful coping mechanisms, such as alcohol or drugs. Itās well documented that sexual and gender minorities have higher rates of substance misuse and substance use disorders. People in LGBTQ communities often face more stressful and anxious situations during the holidays with family, for example, and frequently turn to alcohol to cope.Ā
According to the National Center for Drug Abuse Statistics (NCDAS), 22.5% of D.C. adults over 18 binge drink at least once per month. Binge-drinking adults in D.C. binge a median of 1.5 times monthly. The 25% most active drinkers binge 3.4 times per month. There is an average of 392 deaths in D.C. attributed to excessive alcohol use each year.Ā
Research gathered by The Trevor Project shows that more than half of LGBTQ youth used alcohol in the last year, including 47% of LGBTQ youth under the age of 21. The holiday season is a different experience for everyone, yet some individuals struggle more than others. Ā
The average person will admit that the holiday season is a pleasant and joyous time of year. However, many people struggle with addiction and mental health issues, and this becomes exacerbated because of the constant pressure to overindulge in holiday cheer and celebration.
There are strategies and resources to help. For example, the D.C. LGBTQ+ Community Center offers crisis resources for everyday safety, connection, and emotional well being. Individuals can find information for emergency shelter and housing, basic needs, mental health, substance use, and victimization support. Alternatively, you can text or call 988, the crisis lifeline, to talk to someone.
Most LGBTQ individuals who are experiencing anxiety about the holiday season and visiting family and friends need someone who will listen to how they are feeling.
During the holidays, pay attention to your feelings and develop a plan for when you are feeling stressed, sad, or lonely. Avoid alcohol and drugs; while this is easier said than done for some people, the holiday season presents challenges that can trigger the use of alcohol, for example. Itās wise to recognize these triggers and avoid alcohol.
If you are struggling, focus on practicing self-care and remaining connected with your friends, family, or local community. Feelings can amplify for some people this time of year, making it necessary to support others. Attend your local faith community, support group, community centers, or local meet-ups. Most importantly, know when to seek help. This can be especially important for anyone already struggling with a substance use disorder or mental health issues.
Donāt let the holidays become something you dread. While society tells us to indulge in certain things and throw care and caution to the wind, we can choose not to listen. Focus on the more authentic meanings of the holiday season and encourage others to do the same.
Nickolaus Hayes is a healthcare professional in the field of substance use and addiction recovery and is part of the editorial team at DRS. His primary focus is spreading awareness by educating individuals on the topics surrounding substance use.
-
Federal Government4 days ago
Trump-Vance administration removes LGBTQ, HIV resources from government websites
-
District of Columbia1 day ago
Capital Pride board member resigns, takes role as Trumpās acting Secāy of Labor
-
Virginia4 days ago
Va. Senate approves resolution to repeal marriage amendment
-
National5 days ago
Metaās policy changes āputting us back in the dark agesā