Florida
Sharply divided 11th Circuit upholds Fla. school district bathroom policy
Judges in 7-4 decision upheld regulation
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week ruled, in a 7-4 vote, that a Florida school district did not violate the U.S. Constitution nor federal civil rights laws by requiring students to use bathrooms corresponding to their biological sex as listed on their birth records.
All seven judges in the majority were appointed by Republican presidents, including six by former President Donald Trump, while the four dissenting judges were Democratic appointees.
Because other federal appellate courts have issued previous rulings allowing a student to chose to use bathrooms based on their gender identity, an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is likely.
In June 2021, the high court declined to hear arguments in the earlier appeals court ruling of a former high school student who challenged his Virginia school district’s bathroom policy.
Gavin Grimm was a sophomore at Gloucester County High School when he filed a federal lawsuit against the Gloucester County School District’s policy that prohibited students from using bathrooms and locker rooms that did not correspond with their “biological gender.”
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond in 2016 ruled in Grimm’s favor.
The Biden administration had urged the 11th Circuit to strike down the Florida school board’s policy. The White House had no immediate comment in regard to Friday’s ruling.
The suit was brought by Drew Adams, a transgender man who sued in 2017 after being barred from using the boys’ bathroom when he attended the Allen D. Nease High School in Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.
“This is an aberrant ruling that contradicts the rulings of every other circuit to consider the question across the country,” Tara Borelli, a lawyer with Lambda Legal representing Adams, said in a statement. “We will be reviewing and evaluating this dangerous decision over the weekend.”
In the suit Reuters reported that Adams contended that the high school’s bathroom policy violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and Title IX, which bars sex discrimination in education.
Writing for the majority, Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa disagreed, saying the school board had an important interest in protecting students’ privacy, and calling it “wrong” to suggest it relied on illegal stereotypes of transgender people.
The Trump appointee also said Title IX allows separate bathrooms based on biological sex, citing “the plain and ordinary meaning of ‘sex’ in 1972” when that law took effect.
She also warned that ruling for Adams could “transform schools’ living facilities, locker rooms, showers, and sports teams into sex-neutral areas and activities. Whether Title IX should be amended to equate ‘gender identity’ and ‘transgender status’ with ‘sex’ should be left to Congress — not the courts.”
Circuit Judge Jill Pryor, an appointee of Barack Obama, countered in dissent that by forcing Adams to use gender-neutral bathrooms, the St. Johns (County) School Board branded him with a “badge of inferiority” by deeming him “unfit” for equal protection.
“The Constitution and laws of the United States promise that no person will have to wear such a badge because of an immutable characteristic,” Pryor wrote. “The majority opinion breaks that promise.”
A legal analyst told the Washington Blade the 11th Circuit’s ruling is a victory for anti-LGBTQ activists and so-called family focused conservatives who continue to push anti-LGBTQ and anti-trans legislation, including trans bathroom ban measures across the country.
Last May, Oklahoma Senate Bill 615 passed the Oklahoma legislature and was quickly signed into law by Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt. The law requires all pre-K through 12th grade public schools and public charter schools to restrict the use of multiple occupancy restrooms and other facilities at school based on the sex listed on an individual’s original birth certificate.
Provisions in the language of the law requires schools to adopt disciplinary procedures to punish students who do not comply and allows parents and guardians to take legal action against any school that does not comply with the new law.
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Oklahoma Foundation, Lambda Legal and pro-bono co-counsel Covington and Burling LLP filed a lawsuit this past September alleging that SB 615 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, by discriminating on the basis of sex, gender identity, and trans status.
Cuba
Marytriny, la emperatriz del transformismo
Miami celebrará figura querida el 5 de septiembre, su cumpleaños
El próximo 5 de septiembre, el arte del transformismo en Miami celebra a una de sus figuras más queridas: Alexis Fernández, conocido en el escenario como Marytriny, la emperatriz del transformismo. Su cumpleaños no es solo una fecha en el calendario: es un recordatorio de que la vida, cuando se vive con entrega y disciplina, se convierte en celebración colectiva. Su historia es testimonio, es lucha y es inspiración.
Marytriny nunca actuó en Cuba en sus inicios, pues su personaje nació en Miami, tierra de libertad. No fue hasta el 2014 cuando, por primera vez, tuvo la oportunidad de presentarse en la isla, como si el destino hubiera conspirado a su favor. Alexis viajó entonces a Cuba en medio de un momento político marcado por el acercamiento entre Barack Obama y La Habana. Su madre estaba enferma y aquel viaje coincidió con una invitación del maestro Raúl de la Rosa al Teatro América.
Al finalizar el espectáculo, en el que Marytriny dio vida a la Guarachera de Cuba, la queridísima Celia Cruz, uno de los directivos del teatro se le acercó y le comentó que su interpretación se sintió como si la misma Celia se hubiera presentado en ese escenario. Vale recordar que, desde su salida en 1960, Celia Cruz nunca volvió a Cuba, salvo durante la crisis de los balseros, cuando cantó a los cubanos que permanecían en la Base Naval de Guantánamo.
En esa ocasión única, Marytriny encarnó a Celia como un acto de rebeldía y de búsqueda personal. Fue la primera y única vez que subió a un escenario en la isla, llevando consigo la fuerza de un arte que en Cuba había sido prohibido y silenciado.
Desde sus primeros pasos en Azúcar Night Club en Miami, Marytriny se convirtió en referencia cultural, ícono de comunidad y símbolo de resistencia. Y aquí surge la primera pregunta: ¿Cómo recuerdas esos primeros pasos en Miami, cuando Marytriny empezaba a nacer bajo las luces de la libertad?
La respuesta de Marytriny refleja la autenticidad de su camino.
“Los primeros momentos fueron duros… era todo desconocido para mí, encontrando un espacio para conectar con un público nuevo. Pero entregué toda mi cubanía, alegría y nostalgia de llegar a un país multicultural como esta ciudad de Miami. Fui yo, auténtico, y de pronto la magia de las risas y el aplauso. Fue como un amor a primera vista entre el público y yo. Ya son 26 años y ese amor a lo que hago sigue igual… la gente lo necesita y agradece. Surge el amor incondicional de este arte”.
La disciplina y la entrega lo llevaron más allá del cabaret.
En Telemundo protagonizó la serie “Decisiones”. En América TV formó parte de la novela de larga duración “La Flor de Hialeah”. También trabajó en el cine y en documentales, entre ellos producciones que narraron la vida de Celia Cruz, confirmando que su talento no conoce fronteras. Y entonces aparece la segunda pregunta: ¿Qué significó para ti abrirte paso en la televisión y el cine, y cómo lograste llevar el espíritu de Marytriny más allá de los escenarios nocturnos?
Su voz, firme y reveladora, responde:
“A medida que fue creciendo mi personaje de Marytriny, su voz fue más fuerte, auténtica y llena de verdades silenciadas. Es la voz de muchos que no saben cuál es el camino para encontrar sus libertades y, sobre todo, a quererse y a liberarse de los prejuicios para recuperar esa libertad que nos arrancaron. Difícil hacerlo desde mi personaje… a pesar del tiempo sigue siendo difícil, sobre todo por muchos conservadores que nos siguen atacando. Pero aquí estamos”.
En 2023, la vida lo enfrentó con un reto inesperado: un diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata. Con la transparencia que lo caracteriza, Alexis lo compartió públicamente. Su comunidad respondió con amor y solidaridad, acompañándolo en cada paso. Tras la cirugía, una rosa blanca en su casa se convirtió en símbolo de fe y renacimiento.
En 2024, dio un paso determinante al participar en “Ser Trans”, una producción de TV Martí que expuso la transfobia en Cuba y recuperó las voces que por décadas habían sido silenciadas. Ese mismo año, la obra fue reconocida con un Suncoast Regional Emmy, un galardón que se convirtió en algo más que un premio: fue la constatación de que esas historias tenían un valor innegable y que ya no podían ser relegadas al silencio.
Y entonces llega la tercera pregunta: ¿Qué aprendiste de ti mismo durante la enfermedad y qué mensaje de esperanza quieres dejar a quienes luchan con sus propias batallas?
Marytriny responde con la fuerza de quien ha vencido la tormenta:
“La vida te pone pruebas duras, pero Dios escoge sus guerreros. Esta enfermedad me sirvió para cambiar mi vida y mi forma de pensar, y para ayudar a otros a tomar conciencia, encontrar la fe y dejar un legado de amor. Tolerancia y disciplina son el camino para lograrlo todo… Por eso digo ¡gracias!, y amor con amor se paga”.
Aunque aún faltan algunos días para la celebración de su cumpleaños, desde ya queremos comenzar a celebrar la vida de Alexis Fernández, un artista con más de dos décadas de trayectoria, mentor, voz y presencia de comunidad. Cada vez que Marytriny aparece en escena, no vemos solo a un personaje: vemos a un hombre que convirtió su arte en un canto de libertad, en una afirmación de identidad y en un motivo de orgullo para quienes lo rodean.
El próximo 5 de septiembre, cuando sople las velas, su cumpleaños no pertenecerá solo a él, sino también a todos los que alguna vez rieron, lloraron o se reconocieron en Marytriny. Porque su vida no es solo espectáculo: es un acto de amor y de resistencia. Y cuando caiga el telón, quedará claro que hemos sido testigos de algo más grande que un show: la vida misma de una emperatriz que brilla más que las estrellas.
Florida
Federal judge blocks Fla. trans health care ban and restrictions
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis plans to appeal ruling
BY JACKIE LLANOS | Florida’s ban on puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy for transgender minors and restrictions for adults are both unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle, who presided over the case in Tallahassee, sided with the plaintiffs in the class action — parents of trans minors and trans adults — who argued the measure violated the U.S. Constitution because it solely targeted trans people.
“The federal courts have a role to play in upholding the constitution and laws. The state of Florida can regulate as needed but cannot flatly deny transgender individuals safe and effective medical treatment — treatment with medications routinely provided to others with the state’s full approval so long as the purpose is not to support the patient’s transgender identity,” Hinkle wrote.
Those restrictions came into place following Gov. Ron DeSantis’ approval of Senate Bill 254 in May 2023 and promulgation of rules from the Florida Board of Medicine and Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine enacting that law. Those boards and Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo were named as defendants.
The measures banned minors’ use of puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy, common treatments for gender dysphoria. Additionally, the law said only physicians, psychologists, and psychiatrists could treat adults seeking gender-affirming care, with the added requirements of frequent in-person visits, tests, and authorization through a consent form that contained false information about the harms of hormone replacement therapy.
However, the law didn’t impose the same restrictions on cisgender women needing to take testosterone or cisgender men needing to take estrogen.
Appeal incoming
The state plans to appeal the ruling, said Jeremy Redfern, press secretary to DeSantis. An appeal would go to the 11th U.S. Court of Appeals.
“Through their elected representatives, the people of Florida acted to protect children in this state, and the court was wrong to override their wishes,” Redfern wrote in a statement to Florida Phoenix.
“We disagree with the court’s erroneous rulings on the law, on the facts, and on the science. As we’ve seen here in Florida, the United Kingdom, and across Europe, there is no quality evidence to support the chemical and physical mutilation of children. These procedures do permanent, life-altering damage to children, and history will look back on this fad in horror.”
Redfern wrote that the state would continue to “fight to ensure children are not chemically or physically mutilated in the name of radical, new age ‘gender ideology.’”
In his 105-page ruling, Hinkle noted that “there were no complaints from patients, no adverse results in Florida, just a political issue.”
However, the ruling does not lift the state ban on gender-affirming surgery for minors and restrictions on surgery for adults. That’s because the plaintiffs didn’t challenge the statutes relating to surgery for minors, and the adult plaintiff had not sought surgery and so lacked standing to challenge those restrictions.
Relief for plaintiffs
Plaintiff Gloria Goe (they used pseudonyms to protect the privacy of their children) is the mother of an 8-year-old (at the opening of the case) trans boy. During the opening day of the trial on Dec. 13, she testified that she feared her son would be swallowed by depression if forced to go through puberty without medical treatment.
“This ruling lifts a huge weight and worry from me and my family, knowing I can keep getting Gavin the care he needs, and he can keep being the big-hearted, smiling kid he is now. I’m so grateful the court saw how this law prevented parents like me from taking care of our children,” Goe wrote in a press release.
Attorneys with GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders, Human Rights Campaign Foundation, National Center for Lesbian Rights, Southern Legal Counsel, and the Lowenstein Sandler law firm represented the plaintiffs.
Hinkle compared the discrimination trans people face nowadays to racism and misogyny.
“Some transgender opponents invoke religion to support their position, just as some once invoked religion to support their racism or misogyny,” Hinkle wrote. “Transgender opponents are of course free to hold their beliefs. But they are not free to discriminate against transgender individuals just for being transgender. In time, discrimination against transgender individuals will diminish, just as racism and misogyny have diminished.”
Editor’s note:
In a statement made to the Los Angeles Blade after Tuesday’s rule, Shannon Minter, the legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights said:
“This decision is important because is the first federal court to rule on a law restricting healthcare for transgender adults and because it finds that Florida’s laws are plainly based on anti-transgender bias, not science. This victory shows that we can and must keep fighting these dangerous laws, notwithstanding the deeply flawed rulings of some conservative appellate courts.
Judge Hinkle ruled in favor of the transgender plaintiffs in this case even after the negative 11th Circuit ruling that reversed our initially successful challenge to a similar ban in Alabama. He was able to do so because the evidence showing that these laws have no medical justification and are rooted in false stereotypes and bias was so strong. This is a huge victory, and one that shows that we can win these battles even in red states.”
******************************************************************************************

Jackie Llanos is a recent graduate of the University of Richmond. She has interned at Nashville Public Radio, Virginia Public Media, and Virginia Mercury.
******************************************************************************************
The preceding article was previously published by The Florida Phoenix and is republished with permission.
The Phoenix is a nonprofit news site that’s free of advertising and free to readers. We cover state government and politics with a staff of five journalists located at the Florida Press Center in downtown Tallahassee.
We’re part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
Florida
Homeless transgender woman murdered in Miami Beach
Andrea Doria Dos Passos attacked while she slept
Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert, 53, who was out on probation, is charged with the second-degree murder of 37-year-old Andrea Doria Dos Passos, a transgender Latina woman who was found deceased in front of the Miami Ballet company facility by a security guard this past week.
According to a Miami Beach Police spokesperson the security guard thought Dos Passos was sleeping in the entranceway around 6:45 a.m. on April 23 and when he went to wake her he discovered the blood and her injuries and alerted 911.
She was deceased from massive trauma to her face and head. According to Miami Beach police when video surveillance footage was reviewed, it showed Dos Passos lying down in the entranceway apparently asleep. WFOR reported: In the early morning hours, a man arrived, looked around, and spotted her. Police said the man was dressed in a black shirt, red shorts, and red shoes.
At one point, he walked away, picked up a metal pipe from the ground, and then returned. After looking around, he sat on a bench near Dos Passos. After a while, he got up and repeatedly hit her in the head and face while she was sleeping, according to police.
“The male is then seen standing over her, striking her, and then manipulating her body. The male then walks away and places the pipe inside a nearby trash can (the pipe was found and recovered in the same trash can),” according to the arrest report.
Police noted that in addition to trauma on her face and head, two wooden sticks were lodged in her nostrils and there was a puncture wound in her chest.
Victor Van Gilst, Dos Passos’s stepfather confirmed she was trans and experiencing homelessness.
“She had no chance to defend herself whatsoever. I don’t know if this was a hate crime since she was transgender or if she had some sort of interaction with this person because he might have been homeless as well. The detective could not say if she was attacked because she was transgender,” said Van Gilst.
“She has been struggling with mental health issues for a long time, going back to when she was in her early 20s. We did everything we could to help her. My wife is devastated. For her, this is like a nightmare that turned into reality. Andrea moved around a lot and even lived in California for a while. She was sadly homeless. I feel the system let her down. She was a good person,” he added.

The Miami Police Department arrested Gibert, collected his clothing, noting the red shorts were the same type in the video and had blood on them. Blood was also found on his shoes, according to police. He was taken into custody and charged.
“The suspect has an extensive criminal record and reportedly was recently released from custody on probation for prior criminal charges. Police apprehended the suspect in the city of Miami and the investigation is currently ongoing. This case is further evidence that individuals need to be held accountable for prior violent crimes for the protection of the public. We offer our sincere condolences to the family and friends of the victim,” Miami Beach Mayor Steve Meiner said in a statement.
Joe Saunders, senior political director with LGBTQ rights group Equality Florida, told the Miami Herald that “whenever a transgender person is murdered, especially when it is with such brutality, the question should be asked about whether or not this was a hate-motivated crime.”
-
Politics4 days agoPro-trans candidates triumph despite millions in transphobic ads
-
Opinions4 days agoDemocratic Socialism won’t win the whole country
-
National4 days agoUS bishops ban gender-affirming care at Catholic hospitals
-
Maryland5 days agoSalisbury, Md. rainbow crosswalk removed on Veterans Day


