Connect with us

News

‘La Biblia vuelve al Palacio’

Presidenta interina de Bolivia es antiaborto y anti-LGBTQ

Published

on

La presidenta interina de Bolivia Jeanine Áñez (Photo public domain)

LA PAZ, Bolivia — El primer acto público de Jeanine Áñez tras ser declarada presidenta interina de Bolivia fue llegar hasta el Palacio Quemado (la casa de gobierno boliviano) en La Paz levantando una Biblia. Al mismo tiempo que gritaba eufóricamente “la Biblia vuelve a Palacio”, luego de que los militares le entregaran la banda presidencial tras forzar la dimisión del expresidente Evo Morales, quién posteriormente recibió asilo político en México. “Gloria a Dios” le respondían sus seguidores mientras entraba al lugar.

“Esta Biblia es muy significativa para nosotros. Nuestra fuerza es Dios, el poder es Dios, que Dios nos bendiga queridos hermanos bolivianos”, aseguró más tarde Áñez desde un balcón del Palacio. 

La senadora opositora y segunda vicepresidenta del Senado asumió para sorpresa de muchos tras varias renuncias de políticos oficialistas en plena crisis política y social generada por los cuestionados comicios del 20 de octubre pasado. Áñez se ha perfilado como una de las políticas más conservadoras de Bolivia, en febrero de este año participó como exponente en el Congreso Iberoamericano por la Vida y la Familia en Panamá y en diferentes ocasiones se ha mostrado como una férrea opositora a la población LGBTQ, migrantes, mujeres (en especial antiaborto) e indígenas de su país. 

Desde que se autoproclamó como jefa de Estado iniciaron protestas en para exigir su salida del poder. En todos los discursos que hasta ahora ha realizado la mandataria interina se hicieron referencias a la religión y en la posesión del nuevo gabinete ministerial nueve de las 11 nuevas autoridades hicieron la señal de la cruz con la mano derecha. Nada parecido al combativo puño izquierdo levantado que predominó entre los diferentes ministros y viceministros que acompañaron a Morales.

“Juran por Dios, por la patria y por la Constitución Política del Estado”, dijo la nueva presidenta en el momento de posesionar a sus colaboradores más próximos.

Posteriormente firmó un polémico decreto para frenar las protestas en su contra.

“El personal de las Fuerzas Armadas, que participe en los operativos para el restablecimiento del orden y estabilidad pública, estará exento de responsabilidad penal cuando en cumplimiento de sus funciones constitucionales, actúen en legítima defensa o Estado de necesidad”, señala el decreto 4078.

“Es un decreto supremo que exonera a todos los militares que en función de defensa del estado, así lo llaman, puedan asesinar a las personas, eso es una orden a matar, eso es dictadura, no hay otra figura al respecto”, explicó al Washington Blade, David Aruquipa, un histórico activista LGBTQ en Bolivia.


La medida alertó a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH) condenando “el uso desproporcionado de la fuerza militar y policial”.

“El Estado tiene el deber de respetar el derecho humano a la protesta pacífica”, indicó la entidad. Mientras que la Alta Comisionada de Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos, Michelle Bachelet, señaló que “la represión puede recrudecer la situación”.



Bachelet aseveró a través de un comunicado que “urge a las autoridades a garantizar que las fuerzas de seguridad cumplan con las normas y estándares internacionales en materia de uso de la fuerza, así como a asegurar el derecho a la vida y a la integridad física de las personas que protestan”. 

Respecto al pronunciamiento de Bachelet, Aruquipa agregó que “esta señora Áñez con todo su gabinete está respaldado la violencia y las muertes. Todo esto ha generado una convulsión social, han cercado y bloqueado los caminos; las comunidades indígenas y los movimientos sociales están marchando en la ciudad de La Paz y el resto del país, esto va a desbordar en una situación que va a sumar más muertes de este gobierno de facto”.

Bolivia es uno de los pocos países del mundo que protege y sanciona la discriminación por orientación sexual e identidad de género en su Constitución. En octubre de 2011, mediante Decreto Supremo se declaró oficialmente la conmemoración del IDAHOBiT y en 2016 se promulgó una Ley de Identidad de Género que tuvo más de ocho años de debate legislativo y ejecutivo. Estos y otros avances corren peligro con Áñez en el poder. 

“Estoy semiclandestina esperando una solicitud de asilo político para salir del país, estoy con mis maletas listas para dejar con mucho dolor mi país. He sido amenazada de muerte”, confesó al Blade, Tamara Núñez del Prado, defensora de derechos humanos y activista trans del país latinoamericano. Núñez del Prado salió del closet cuando tenía 32 años mientras se desempeñaba como asesora de Teresa Morales, entonces ministra de Desarrollo y Economía en otra era de Morales.

La transición de Tamara Núñez del Prado al interior del gobierno de Evo Morales sirvió para sensibilizar a la clase política y sociedad boliviana. (Foto cedida al Washington Blade)

Núñez del Prado advirtió al Blade que “tenemos una presidenta que es parte de las plataformas que están a favor de la familia original, que está en contra de todas las políticas LGBTI, ella sostiene que existe una ideología de género, es antiaborto”.

“Inclusive dijo que iba a pedir la derogación de varias normativas que están en contra de Dios y claramente la ley de identidad de género es una de ellas”, subrayó Núñez del Prado.

Para Núñez del Prado en Bolivia hubo un golpe de estado “cuando los altos mandos policiales y militares le sugieren renunciar al Presidente, hay un vicio de nulidad que se llama violencia, los militares y policías no pueden deliberar ni debatir por ley. Entonces lo que hicieron fue intervenir en la política interna de Bolivia y tomar partido por un grupo”. 

“Si están quemando las casas de tus ministros, si están secuestrando a los familiares de tus ministros para poder desmovilizar y frenar al poder, significa que es un golpe de estado, porque el Evo les tuvo que decir renuncien para cuidar sus casas, sus vidas y sus familias, al dejarlo solo, eso se llama un golpe de estado”, aseguró al Blade. 

Rayza Torriani, excandidata a diputada y actual directora ejecutiva de gestión de proyectos para Trébol, una organización LGBTQ boliviana, comentó al Blade que “hoy podemos ir viendo con mucho miedo la situación política del país, porque está suscitando demasiada violencia, muerte, un gobierno interino que está gobernando con la primicia de la Biblia y la religión que la impone como primer eje puesto, eso nos puso en una situación de alarma porque sabemos que lamentablemente cuando se habla de religión, hablamos de retrocesos que derivan en violaciones a los derechos humanos, esta situación nos preocupa muchísimo”.

Rayza Torriani es una de las impulsoras de la Ley de Identidad de Género en su país. (Fotografía cedida al Blade)

Antes de que Áñez llegará a Palacio, Torriani había participado en las protestas que exigían la renuncia de Morales a la presidencia. Respecto a eso dijo al Blade que “yo salí a las calles a pedir la no reelección de el Evo, por la renovación de nuevos liderazgos para mi país, nunca pensé que esto terminaría con la Biblia gobernado Bolivia”. Torriani contó al Blade que “estoy esperando la confirmación de una reunión con la presidenta interina para dialogar con ella, pedir el cese de la violencia y educarla. Esa es mi forma de hacer activismo”.

Hasta el momento, ninguna organización LGBTQ de Bolivia se ha manifestado sobre la situación.

“Me preocupa que no haya un pronunciamiento público de las organizaciones y redes nacionales, las organizaciones articuladas deberían manifestarse sobre esta situation, entiendo que hay diferencias pero es importante dar una muestra sobre el impacto que está generando todo esto en los derechos nuestra población”, lamentó Aruquipa.

David Aruquipa conversó con el Washington Blade desde Colombia donde es encuentra participando de un encuentro que congregará a más de 300 activistas LGBTQ de América Latina y el Caribe. (Fotografía desde Bogotá)

“Es un momento para que el movimiento LGBTI se rearticule y nos repensemos como enfrentar esta situación, y no me cabe duda que tenemos las capacidades para hacerlo y así no permitir que la derecha fascista retome nuevamente el gobierno, porque lo que está pasando es una muestra de lo que puede pasar más adelante en las elecciones”, concluyó Aruquipa.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

India

India broadcast authority asks TV station to delete video deemed offensive to LGBTQ community

Activist Indrajeet Ghorpad filed complaint

Published

on

(YouTube screenshot)

India’s News Broadcasting and Digital Standards Authority on Feb. 28 asked a television station to delete a video that contained objectionable remarks against the LGBTQ community. 

The India Today video report’s headline was “Nudity sparks outrage at USA Pride parades: How India’s LGBTQ+ lead responsibly.” The clip reportedly contained factual inaccuracies, spread fear and demonized the LGBTQ community.

NBDSA has asked India Today to remove all hyperlinks to the video from every one of its platforms. The regulatory agency has issued guidelines for broadcasters about the LGBTQ community and asked to circulate it among all its editors and members. The broadcasting authority announced the directives after hearing a complaint that Indrajeet Ghorpad, an LGBTQ rights activist, filed.

Ghorpad said the program did not comply with the principles of “accuracy, neutrality, objectivity, good taste, decency and others.” Ghorpad also said it portrayed Pride parades in the U.S. in a negative light and unfavorably compared them with India’s LGBTQ community.

The NBDSA had received several complaints on the community’s portrayal. It issued five guidelines to sensitize and bring objectivity when covering the LGBTQ community in India, apart from the existing code of ethics and broadcasting standards.

The NBDSA on March 1 issued guidelines on how to report on issues faced by the LGBTQ community with accuracy, objectivity and sensitivity, and further said that non-sensitive and inaccurate reporting regarding the community has serious social repercussions.

The guidelines say “reporting should not sensationalize or create panic, distress or undue fear among viewers.” They also state broadcasters must avoid broadcasting any news that sensationalizes the issues related to the LGBTQ community, perpetuates stereotypes or creates fear in respect of the community.

The recommendations say broadcasters should refrain from using any expression or slur that may be construed as “hate speech” against the LGBTQ community. They also note broadcasters while covering any issue concerning the LGBTQ community must ensure their reporting does not promote homophobia or transphobia, or negative stereotypes about the LGBTQ community.

The guidelines say broadcasters must respect the privacy of LGBTQ people and not disclose personal information, including gender identity or sexual orientation of a person without their consent. The guidelines further state broadcasters should use inclusive and gender-neutral language, and respect the individuals’ preferred pronouns and names. Broadcasters, according to the guidelines, must strive for diverse representation in their coverage of the LGBTQ community and ensure voices from different segments of the LGBTQ community are provided a platform to express their views.

The incident is not a first Indian media. 

TV9 Telugu, a Telugu language television station, in 2011 did a sting operation on LGBTQ members of a gay dating site, over which the news channel faced the community’s wrath in Mumbai, India’s financial capital. The channel at that time broadcasted the operation all over the country and released profiles and pictures of the site’s users. 

The LGBTQ community protested outside the channel’s office in Mumbai by wearing condoms on their middle fingers.

NBDSA in April 2022 sanctioned TV9 Teluguand Sakshi TV, another Telugu-language 24-hour news channel, for sensationalizing a police raid in Hyderabad after neighbors complained of loud noise. The two channels broadcasted visuals of the party and individuals attending it, violating privacy and highlighting their sexual orientation without their consent.

Negha Shahin, a transgender Indian actress, told the Washington Blade that social media today has become an unsafe, toxic and hate-spreading tool with regards to trans and queer people.

“Mocking LGBTQIA+ folks is becoming a new trend. Content creators are creating content against queer folks, dangerous things are getting attention and triggering homophobia and transphobia,” said Shahin. “Meanwhile TV media like India Today is playing major part and considered as responsible news network. If they did not follow the guidelines then how will the society will follow? Journalists, politicians, actors, police, lawyers whoever addressing issues related to (the) minority community in India, should mind the glossary. They cannot be transphobic or homophobic. They cannot oppress, misgender, following stereotypes and creating false statement or news in the media.”

Shahin said news channels in India that do not following the guidelines are showing their hatred against the LGBTQ community. She said these incidents remind everyone that uprooting stereotypes and homophobia from society in every form is important.

Harish Iyer, a prominent equal rights activist in India, told the Blade that accepting different sexuality is not a Western or Indian concept, but rather a scientific one that cuts across geographies and sex.

“If channels are broadcasting this, they are not doing against gender or sexuality but against science and humanity,” said Iyer. “More than expunging and deleting the video, the corrective actions like watchdogs will ensure corrective actions are required. The guidelines are in sync with what the Supreme Court of India and the Constitution of India stand for. With a name like India Today, they stand against the very tenet of Indianism which is enshrined in the constitution that provides equal opportunity and equal protection of the law against any discrimination regardless of gender and sexuality, so I think, India Today, should not have the India in their name because that goes against the tenet of Indian constitution and the Supreme Court’s verdict as well. There should be something mandatory for the news channels, and not just the guidelines.”

India Today did not respond to the Blade’s multiple requests for comment.

Ankush Kumar is a reporter who has covered many stories for Washington and Los Angeles Blades from Iran, India and Singapore. He recently reported for the Daily Beast. He can be reached at [email protected]. He is on Twitter at @mohitkopinion. 

Continue Reading

Virginia

Arlington church seeks to offer LGBTQ-affirming senior housing

Project by Clarendon Presbyterian faces opposition from residents

Published

on

Clarendon Presbyterian Church (Washington Blade photo by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.)

Leaders and members of the Clarendon Presbyterian Church, which will celebrate its 100th anniversary on April 13, have said they decided to continue to fulfill their mission of religious faith by using the land on which their church is located in the Clarendon section of Arlington, Va., to develop a new, larger church building to include LGBTQ affordable housing for seniors along with an independently run childcare center that currently operates in the church.

“In line with the church’s deep history of supporting affordable housing, LGBTQ communities, and seniors, in 2021, the church relaunched a visioning process of how we might invest our most valuable physical resources, our church property, for the good of the community,” church leaders said in a Feb. 9, 2024, statement describing the project.

The statement says that in 2022, the congregation voted to partner with the Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing (APAH), a real estate development company that specializes in affordable housing projects. Through that partnership, the statement says, the two partners in June of 2023 applied to the Arlington County government for a zoning change that would allow the construction of a building that could accommodate as many as 92 residential apartments for seniors 55 or 62 and older.

Among other things, the project calls for demolishing the current church building and constructing a new, larger building that would include a smaller version of the church space for its religious services as well as space for 40 to 58 children ages two through six at the Clarendon Child Care Center, which has operated at the church for more than 60 years.

Rev. Alice Tewell, the current pastor at Clarendon Presbyterian Church, told the Washington Blade another important factor contributing to the decision to redevelop the church property is the high cost of maintaining a 100-year-old building and its aging infrastructure that was becoming less and less affordable for the church’s budget. And like many churches across the country, the membership of Clarendon Presbyterian Church has declined over the years, making it no longer necessary for a worship service space as large as that in the current church building, Tewell said.

The statement describing the development plan says that without a major redevelopment project, the church could no longer afford to remain in the current building, forcing it to move to another location outside of Clarendon and possibly outside of Arlington. 

According to Rev. Tewell, the redevelopment decision came after several years of internal discussion, meetings with longtime church allies, including members of the LGBTQ community and other community groups.

“And after all these conversations, we came to where we could serve Christ, which is part of our faith, and where we could be good neighbors in Arlington – would be to tear down our entire property and rebuild so it would include senior affordable housing as LGBT welcoming, a new church space, which we also plan to turn into a community space, and the new space for our preschool center,” Tewell told the Blade.

She noted that the church’s location at 1305 N. Jackson St. is walking distance to the Clarendon Metro station and many local amenities such as restaurants and retail stores, making it a convenient location for the senior residents in the redeveloped space. 

She also points out that church members have consulted with the New York-based LGBTQ seniors advocacy organization SAGE, which informed them of the great need for LGBTQ welcoming senior housing, including in Northern Virginia.

But news of the church’s redevelopment project, especially reports that it would include a proposed 92-unit apartment building, prompted many nearby residents to raise strong objections and to call on the Arlington County Board, which must make a final decision on a zoning change, to deny the zoning change request.

Most of the opposition comes from residents of single-family houses, who point out that the church is located in a largely low-density residential neighborhood with just a few nearby low-rise apartment buildings. In August of 2023, a group of nearby residents created an online petition that gathered at that time more than 1,000 signatures calling for the county to turn down the church development project.

“We, the concerned residents of Arlington, Virginia, stand united in opposition to the proposed destruction of the historic, over 100-year-old, Clarendon Presbyterian Church (CPC) and the subsequent construction of a massive 6-story apartment building having 100 units within our cherished residential neighborhood,” the petition states. “We believe that this development project will have serious detrimental effects on our community’s character, quality of life, and historic heritage,” it says.

The Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing, or APAH, the development company working in partnership with the church, submitted an official application on June 29, 2023, for a Special General Land Use Plan Study calling for the needed zoning change for the church project with Arlington County Zoning Administrator Arlova Vonhm. APAH officials have said the initial application was the first of a multi-step process seeking final approval of the project.

Garrett Jackson, APAH’s Director of Resource Development and Communications, told the Blade that APAH on behalf of the church asked the Zoning Administrator to put the application on hold while the church and APAH consider revisions for the project.

“We are currently working with our architect, engineer, and construction management team to assess the feasibility of different development options while also considering feedback we have received from the county and the community,” Jackson told the Blade in a March 15 email.

In a phone interview with the Blade on March 21, Jackson and APAH officials Mitchell Crispell and Brian Goggin, said the decision to put the project on hold did not come as a result of an informal message from the Zoning Administrator that the project was about to be turned down. 

“So, we were the ones that put it on hold,” said Crispell, APAH’s Director of Real Estate Development. “It wasn’t the county that said no to us at all. We wanted to kind of pause for a minute and consider our options, the feasibility of different options and the development plans,” he said.

Crispell noted that the decision to put the project on hold came last fall, a few months after the application was submitted in June and after strong opposition to the project surfaced by nearby residents. Crispell, Jackson, and Goggin pointed out, however, that opposition to development projects is a common phenomenon in Arlington and other jurisdictions and that ongoing dialogue between developers and concerned residents often leads to a resolution to the objections.

“We understand the back and forth that it takes to get these projects to fruition,” Jackson said. “So, you’ve got to rest assured that this is very much a part of the very thorough process that both APAH and the county go through regularly to make sure that we’re getting the absolute best product in the actual building that will go up for Clarendon Presbyterian Church and for the future residents,” Jackson points out.

Jackson and his two APAH colleagues said they couldn’t immediately predict when they will resubmit the application for the zoning change. Spokespersons for the Zoning Office, the Arlington County Board, and Arlington County Manager Mark Schwartz didn’t immediately respond to a request by the Blade for comment on the church project and the likelihood of the county approving the project.

Among those supporting the church project is James Fisher, a longtime Arlington LGBTQ rights advocate and longtime church member. Fisher and Arlington gay civic activists Jay Fisette, a former elected member of the Arlington Board, and longtime Arlington resident Bob Witeck, who support the project, told the Blade they believe many nearby residents also support the church development project.

Fisette and Witeck said they do not believe anti-LGBTQ bias is a significant factor, if a factor at all, in the opposition to the church project.

“I personally observe this as disquiet about building a larger and taller presence in a space that abuts residential neighbors unsure of the implications or stresses that might come,” Witeck said. “I’m no Pollyanna, but really believe that with time, this change will be smoother than people fear or imagine,” he said.

Fisette said the church project comes a short time after the Arlington County Board adopted an “Expanded Housing Options” policy that allows for larger residential buildings in some areas originally zoned for low-density, single-family homes. This change drew objections among many residents in areas similar to where Clarendon Presbyterian church is located.

“I would say the LGBTQ elements of the proposal are likely more of a plus than a minus,” Fisette told the Blade. “I expect 99 percent of any resistance-anxiety relates to density  and the real-feared impacts of that density,” he said.

Tewell told the Blade the church’s support for the LGBTQ community dates back to the 1980s, when church members voted in support of a then-controversial proposal to allow the D.C.-based Whitman-Walker Clinic, which had a Northern Virginia outreach, to use space in the church for a support group for people with HIV/AIDS and for HIV caregivers.

“And that started changing the church to becoming a church that was very welcoming to LGBTQ people,” she said, adding that the church subsequently opened its door for LGBTQ community events, some of which were organized by gay church member James Fisher. Among those using the church now is IMPACTO LGBT, a Spanish-speaking LGBT church that holds its worship services at Clarendon Presbyterian Church.

“This is how we are living out our faith in the world,” Tewell said. “We worked out what does God’s embodied love look like for the world? And how do we embody God’s grace, justice, and love? And we really feel that it is through housing for seniors that is welcoming to LGBTQ+ people,” she added. “And to transform our church space so it’s better equipped to welcome the community.”

Continue Reading

Obituary

Joe Lieberman dies at 82

Former senator, vice presidential nominee championed ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repeal

Published

on

Then-U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) being interviewed in his Hart Senate Office Building suite in February 2012. (YouTube screenshot)

Former U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who had served first as a longtime Democratic senator and then declared himself an independent winning reelection in 2006, died Wednesday at New York-Presbyterian Hospital due to complications from a fall. He was 82 years old.

The announcement of his death was released by Lieberman’s family and noted “his beloved wife, Hadassah, and members of his family were with him as he passed. Senator Lieberman’s love of God, his family and America endured throughout his life of service in the public interest.” 

Lieberman, who nearly won the vice presidency on the Democratic ticket with former Vice President Al Gore in the disputed 2000 election and who almost became Republican John McCain’s running mate eight years later, viewed himself as a centrist Democrat, solidly in his party’s mainstream with his support of abortion rights, environmental protection, gay rights and gun control, the Washington Post reported.

The Post added that Lieberman was also unafraid to stray from Democratic orthodoxy, most notably in his consistently hawkish stands on foreign policy.

Lieberman was first elected to the U.S. Senate as a Democrat in 1988. He was also the first person of Jewish background or faith to run on a major party presidential ticket.

In 2009 he supported the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which was passed as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 on Oct. 22, 2009, and then was signed into law on the afternoon of Oct. 28 by then-President Barack Obama.

Lieberman, who served in the Senate for more than two decades, alongside with U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), were the original co-sponsors of the legislation in the successful effort to repeal the Pentagon policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” which barred open service by gay and lesbian servicemembers in 2011.

Lieberman said the effort to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in Congress was one of the most satisfying and thrilling experiences he’s had as a senator.

“In our time, I think the front line of the civil rights movement is to protect people in our country from discrimination based on sexual orientation — all the more so when it comes to the United States military, whose mission is to protect our security so we can continue to enjoy the freedom and equal opportunity under law,” Lieberman said.

In an statement to the Washington Blade on Wednesday, Human Rights Campaign Vice President for Government Affairs David Stacy said:

“Senator Lieberman was not simply the lead Senate sponsor of the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ — he was its champion, working tirelessly to allow lesbian, gay, and bisexual people to serve in the military as their authentic selves. The nation’s first Jewish vice presidential nominee, Lieberman had a historic career and his unwavering support for lesbian, gay and bisexual military servicemembers is a powerful legacy. Our hearts go out to his family and friends as they grieve a tremendous loss.”

In September 2011, during a press conference marking the repeal of the Pentagon policy, questions emerged about how to extend greater benefits to LGBTQ service members.

In addition to the legislation that would repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” reporters asked lawmakers about legislation in the Senate known as the Respect for Marriage Act which was aimed at the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibited same-sex marriage. Collins and Lieberman weren’t co-sponsors of that legislation.

Collins had left the news conference at the start of the question-and-answer period. In response to a question from the Blade, Lieberman offered qualified support for the Respect for Marriage Act.

The Connecticut senator said he had issues with the “full faith and credit” portion of the Respect for Marriage Act enabling federal benefits to flow to married gay couples even if they live in a state that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage.

“I do support it in part — I think we’ve got to celebrate what we’ve done today — I certainly support it in regard to discrimination in federal law based on sexual orientation,” Lieberman said.

That issue became a mute point after June 26, 2015, when in a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, Obergefell v. Hodges, justices ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Lieberman by that time however, had retired from the U.S. Senate. He announced he would not seek another term on Dec. 12, 2012, and left the Senate the following year. He was succeeded by Democratic Congressman Chris Murphy.

Following his retirement from the Senate, Lieberman moved to Riverdale in the Bronx and registered to vote in New York as a Democrat. 

In 2024 Lieberman was leading the search to find a presidential candidate for the third-party group No Labels to run against former President Donald Trump and incumbent President Joe Biden, with whom he had served with in the Senate. 

In a post on X (formerly Twitter) former President Barack Obama paid tribute to Lieberman:

“Joe Lieberman and I didn’t always see eye-to-eye, but he had an extraordinary career in public service, including four decades spent fighting for the people of Connecticut. He also worked hard to repeal “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” and helped us pass the Affordable Care Act. In both cases the politics were difficult, but he stuck to his principles because he knew it was the right thing to do. Michelle and I extend our deepest condolences to Hadassah and the Lieberman family.”

Lieberman’s funeral will be held on Friday at Congregation Agudath Sholom in his hometown of Stamford, Conn. An additional memorial service will be announced at a later date.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular