- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-
Anti-gay slurs used during Md. stabbing
-
Baltimore mayor to marry couples at Pride
-
NYC march against anti-gay attacks draws thousands
-
Leahy withholds amendments for gay couples in immigration bill
-
Tensions high as Senate panel considers immigration reform
-
U.K. House of Commons approves marriage bill
-
Gay DC psychiatrist named head of APA
New report undermines officers’ letter supporting ‘Don’t Ask’
A number of high-ranking military officers whose names appear on a well-publicized letter supporting “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” were involved in career-ending scandals or have said the letter doesn’t represent their views, according to Servicemembers United.
The organization’s preliminary investigation of 200 names on the letter, which more than 1,100 flag and general officers signed, reveals new information that could undermine the document supporting the 1993 law barring gays from serving openly in the military.
Alex Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United, said his organization’s report “speaks to an overall lack of expertise” the signers have on the views of service members of the 21st century military.
Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center of Military Readiness, gathered the names for the letter, which was first published last year. She didn’t respond to multiple requests from DC Agenda to comment on Servicemembers United’s report.
Supporters of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” have often cited the letter as evidence of military support for keeping the law on the books. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), an opponent of repeal, held up the letter during a Senate hearing on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” last month.
“I hope you’ll pay attention to the views of over 1,000 retired flag and general officers,” McCain told Defense Secretary Robert Gates at the time regarding the study of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” that’s underway at the Pentagon.
But Servicemembers United’s report — titled, “Flag and General Officers for the Military: A Closer Look” — sheds new light on the letter. Nicholson said one of the most striking discoveries was the age of many signers.
“Only a small fraction of these officers have even served in the military during the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ period, much less in the 21st century military,” Nicholson said. “How can these flag officers honestly claim to know how accepting and tolerant 18- and 21-year-olds are today when most of them haven’t been that age themselves since the 1940s and 1950s?”
The report found the average age among is the officers is 74, the oldest living signer is 98, and several signers died in the time since the document was published.
At least one signer, Gen. Louis Menetrey, was deceased when the letter was published and didn’t sign the document himself. According to a footnote on the letter, his wife signed the document for him after his death using power of attorney — six years after Alzheimer’s disease robbed him of the ability to communicate.
Servicemembers United findings also indicate the letter doesn’t represent the viewpoints of some officers who purportedly signed it. One signer said they no longer want to be a part of the letter, writing to the organization, “I do not wish to be on any list regarding this issue.”
Others said they never agreed to sign in the first place. One general wrote, “I never agreed. To represent either side of this issue.” Another wrote, “I do not remember being asked about this issue.”
DC Agenda independently found one general who acknowledged signing the letter, but said he now believes gays should be allowed to serve in the armed forces so long as they adhere to the code of conduct.
“I do not believe there should be any limitations based on sexual orientation,” said the general, who asked not to be identified.
In addition to signers who say the letter doesn’t represent their views, others were involved in scandals tarnishing their careers. Nicholson said the number of scandals in which signers have been involved “jumps out” as a major component of the report, adding some officers made “heinous failures of judgment and leadership.”
The report identifies seven officers that were involved in such incidents:
• Brig. Gen. Eddie Cain was in the early 1990s director of the Pentagon agency in charge of the anthrax vaccine administered to troops and testified before Congress the vaccine was safe and tested. Later reports showed it was neither. Cain was revealed to have known his testimony was inaccurate, and wrote in personal e-mails that if Congress found out, he’d be “in big-time trouble.”
• Brig. Gen. David Boland in 1994 was executive director of a “boot camp” for at-risk children at Camp Wiecker, Conn., that was mired in problems and later discontinued. According to the New York Times, gang recruitment, sexual relations between students and faculty, drug use, gambling rings and widespread violence and fighting — including one fight that resulted in 14 arrests — took place at Camp Wiecker under Boland’s supervision. Boland later stepped down to “pursue other interests.”
• Rear Adm. Riley Mixson in 1993 received a career-ending letter of censure from then-Navy Secretary John Dalton for involvement in the 1991 Tailhook scandal, during which he failed to take action against allegations of sexual misconduct. According to the New York Times, “Mixson was cited for failing to take action when he saw a woman drink from a dispenser made to look like a rhinoceros’ penis and men shaving women’s legs.”
• Gen. Carl Mundy made several statements in 1993 on CBS’ “60 Minutes” that racial minority soldiers “don’t swim as well” or perform other duties as well as white troops. He also once unilaterally banned married recruits from joining the Marine Corps, a move Defense Secretary Les Aspin rescinded the following week.
• Lt. Gen. Fred McCorkle was head of Marine Corps Aviation in the late 1990s, during the design and test phase of the V-22 Osprey. He oversaw cost overruns and allegedly falsified records — all while praising the aircraft. McCorkle now works for and sits on the boards of several companies that manufacture Osprey components.
• Brig. Gen. Gary Pendleton was named in a lawsuit in 2008 for unlawfully discriminating on the basis of race against an employee in awarding her a lower annual bonus than her co-workers. Pendleton was also said to have fired the employee in retaliation for her complaints.
• Brig. Gen. Darryl Powell oversaw in 1985 a spike in malpractice lawsuits as commander of Madigan Army Medical Center. In one case, a woman was injected with formaldehyde instead of medication, killing her and her unborn child.
Nicholson said even with these scandals, the majority of the officers on the letter served with distinction. Still, he questioned whether the more than 1,100 officers who signed the letter understand the attitudes and beliefs of the young people in service today.
“It is simply unreasonable to think that any of them can be experts on the new generation [of] youth that make up the vast majority of the military today — the generation of iPhones, Facebook, and acceptance of those who are different,” he said.
Tagged with Alex Nicholson, Carl Mundy, Center of Military Readiness, Darryl Powell, David Boland, Don't Ask Don't Tell, Eddie Cain, Elaine Donnelly, Fred McCorkle, Gary Pendleton, John McCain, Louis Menetrey, Pentagon, Riley Mixson, Robert Gates, Servicemembers United
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.
-
[...] DC reporters looked more closely at the letter McCain was waving around, saying many officers supported the policy. They found the [...]
-
[...] likes to waive around as proof that the military opposes a DADT repeal? Many of those officers were involved in career-ending scandals, according to an investigation by the DC [...]
-
[...] a new Servicemembers United report severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several signers [...]
-
[...] a new Servicemembers United report severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several [...]
-
[...] a new Servicemembers United report severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several signers [...]
-
[...] list of officers McCain mentioned….. March 4, 2010 Some reporters from this outfit looked more closely at the letter McCain was waving around before Congress and the TV cameras, saying the letter had [...]
-
[...] a new Servicemembers United report severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several [...]
-
[...] arguing that DADT needs to stay around. Check out Rachel Maddow’s show last night and the DC Agenda for more info. Seems like at least one signer’s name was provided by his wife. Six years [...]
-
[...] obtained in advance by DC Agenda severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several [...]
-
[...] obtained in advance by DC Agenda severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several signers [...]
-
[...] obtained in advance by DC Agenda severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: – The average age of the officers is 74. The “oldest living signer is 98, and several [...]
-
[...] However, a new Servicemembers United report obtained in advance by DC Agenda severely undermines the legitimacy of this letter. Some of the problems: [...]


view print edition
Wow, good reporting.
[Translate]
Great reporting. It now makes sense why John McCain would use the letter or know the names on it. They are all his contemporaries.
John McCain should be embarrased about how he is conducting himself on this issue contradicting himself when he said who he would listen to for advice on the issue.
It is time to end DADT and for John McCain to retire to one of the numberous homes his wife owns whose number he can’t even remember.
[Translate]
I guess Old Man McCain can stop waving around that anti-gay propaganda sheet he likes to make use of, because its obviously tainted with lies and mistatements. Of course that probably won’t stop him and the other bigots on the committee from continuing to support DADT, but it will take away some cover from the so-called moderate Democrats like Virginia’s Senator Webb, who likewise supports the continued discrimination of DADT and plans to join a Republican filibuster to keep it from being repealed. In Webb’s Case, he also refuses to support the passage of ENDA or the Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act; ditto for Virginia’s other Democratic Senator Mark Warner. Its time for the LGBT Community to field candidates against Republicans and sell-out Dems like Webb and Warner who refuse to support equality as they claim to be moderates.
[Translate]
This is excellent investigative journalism, something that bigger papers have long since given up on.
The important thing for the military is not to appeal to tired old men like McCain and Hatch. These guys are not going to be fighting the next war for the US.
The target audience for the military are 18-22 year old men and women fresh out of high school or college to fill the ranks of new enlisted men and officers. Since the military has a constant need to replace soldiers leaving the military, they have to remain fresh and relevant to young people.
A military that bashes gays is not one that will appeal to the current and future youth of America. As such, it will fail in its primary mission to fill its rank with fit, intelligent men and women. These septuagenarians are yesterday’s US military, not tomorrow’s.
[Translate]
I just have to giggle every time I picture Elaine Donnelly “wagging her finger” accusingly at Michael Mullen about ANYTHING military. Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff… the highest ranking officer in the United States armed forces… previously Chief of Naval Operations… was the Commander of U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Commander, Allied Joint Force Command Naples.
But she’s a-gonna give him a piece-’o-her-mind! haha
[Translate]
General McCorkle — that sounds familiar…didn’t he hand-pick Rich Merrit (Secrets of a Gay Marine Porn Star) to be his personal aide-de-camp or something? That’s a little hypocritical…
[Translate]
That sounds like a good story! Either kinda spicy and delicious… or the kind of story that really demonstrates just how much sexuality has no bearing on how well someone does their job or not. Depending on the “job” of course LOL.
[Translate]
It seems that the return address of the mail that they (the retired officers) sent to Obama and congressional leaders had
the return address of Jefferson Government Relations in DC.
That lobbying firm is co-owned by Thomas R. Donnelly, Jr.
I have no idea if he is related to our friend Elaine.
[Translate]
Great reporting. When will McCain retire? The sooner the better.
[Translate]