Connect with us


The next step in D.C. crime fight

Mayor should call citywide meeting to address spree



health survey, gay news, Washington Blade
Muriel Bowser, tax cuts, gay news, Washington Blade

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

In response to the spike in homicides in the District of Columbia, At-Large Council member Anita Bonds brought together a diverse group of city leaders to begin a discussion on what the community thinks would be appropriate solutions to deal with this crime spree and to focus on strategies to accomplish them.

I submitted a number of questions to Bonds’ office including: Does she think this meeting should have been a citywide meeting called by the mayor? Will she urge the mayor to hold such a meeting? What does she think of the mayor’s response to the crime spree? And does she still have full confidence in Chief Cathy Lanier? I received no response to those questions.

Though there was little advance notice of the meeting according to Bonds’ office there were more than 130 ANC commissioners and civic leaders from every ward in attendance. Also there were members of the mayor’s cabinet and representatives from the MPPD and the attorney general’s office. Participating were DCPS Chancellor Kaya Henderson, Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Kevin Donahue, Assistant Chief of Police Diane Groomes, Department of Employment Services Director Deborah Carroll, DC Housing Authority Director Adrianne Todman, Commander Robin Hoey, Assistant Attorney General for Public Safety Michael Aniton, and Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Associate Director Cedric Hendricks.

Bonds opened the meeting saying, “We all have an important role to play in our city’s safety. By working together with elected officials, civic leaders, residents, and business owners and employees, we will have a unified community approach to combat the rise in community violence.” D.C. Council Chair Phil Mendelson and Council member Elissa Silverman also made remarks.

Attendees were asked to break into smaller discussion groups in which ANC commissioners and community leaders shared their ideas with other government officials on a variety of topics including: Building Positive Youth Behavior; Safe Housing and Community; Job Training, Placement and Mentoring; Law Enforcement Strategies in Neighborhoods; Legislative Initiatives; and Healthy Productive Lifestyles (mental health, substance abuse treatment, nutrition). After the small group meetings each group presented their recommendations. Following the meeting, Bonds said she would be compiling a report on all the recommendations that came out of the meeting. The question we need to ask is: What will happen with that report?

Bonds deserves our gratitude for calling this meeting. She has spent many years working on issues of importance to people in D.C. and has turned into an activist Council member. This meeting is a good beginning to getting community input on what they believe needs to be done to fight this crime spree. But one question to which there is no answer yet is why it was left to one Council member to call such a meeting.

While I applaud the mayor for her efforts and proposed new initiatives, the time has come for the mayor, attorney general and Council chair to cooperate and invest city funds and the planning needed to hold a citywide town hall to create more synergy in response to the escalation of crime in the District. We have had such citywide meetings at the Convention Center in the past and thousands have come together to share their thoughts and set an agenda to work on a broad spectrum of issues. The time is right to host such a meeting focusing on setting the community agenda to respond to the current crime spree. The broad range of issues brought up at the Bonds meeting, and others not mentioned there, deserve exploration and surely there are more than 130 people with ideas who can contribute to the discussion.

While we can look at statistics and know the huge spike in homicides is focused in certain parts of the District, the answers on how to deal with the root issues of this crime spree must come from every part of the District. We have a collective responsibility to make the lives of every person who lives here better. When someone commits a heinous crime against someone else in our community they are committing it against all of us. When one family mourns the loss of a son, daughter, mother, father, or lover we all mourn with them. After all, though the District is made up of eight wards and countless communities, we are one family and must take responsibility for making life better for each and every individual. We should look to the African proverb “It Takes a Village” and accept for us in the District of Columbia that village is 630,000 strong and encompasses every community and all eight wards.

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBT and Democratic Party activist.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Brian's Ions

    September 10, 2015 at 9:47 am

    The notion that politicians can stop a surge in criminal violence and killing by having civic meetings — and talking the problem away — is beyond stupid. It is fundamentally dishonest.

    And it is downright disgraceful for any mayor– no matter how new to the job– to put political, crony loyalties above peoples’ lives and public safety.

    Those are real bodies piling up on Bowser’s watch — with lots of horrific loss and agony. That’s real blood out there on DC’s public spaces– from horrific, but non-lethal injuries, too. Those are real bullets piercing residents’ windows, park spaces, school yards and streets/sidewalks of the totally innocent. They are victims too.

    The truth is, killing after killing, we’re all becoming at least psychological victims of Bowser’s bloody city. And it is all so unnecessary.

    There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Amateurs aren’t qualified to address violent crime, in any event. Mayor Bowser just needs to pull her head out of the sand– and let her failed, corrupt police chief go.

    DC has a police management whose top leadership tenure has been littered with repeated allegations of dishonesty, crime coverups and biased policing. Crime has gone up during Lanier’s tenure by 13%.

    In the NE/ Mid-Atlantic corridor, Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Norfolk, Raleigh and Charlotte are all safer than DC. Baltimore is worse than DC by 1 percentile…

    Add to that the unprecedented, near-total loss of confidence by DC’s line officers in Cathy Lanier’s amateurish leadership, and it becomes very clear what the problem is.

    Without an ethical police manager and the Community Policing America’s 6 safest cities all have, what you’re proposing is a naive, colossal waste of time.

    Fire the corrupt, unethical chief. Replace her with the proven competence– from outside of MPD’s now-corrupted management– that assures a return to the Community Policing of 2007.

    Get Charles Ramsey back here if we can. He’s a national expert on Community Policing and already knows DC well.

    Chief Tim Longo in Charlottesville is another national expert in police ethics and proven Community Policing. He commanded one of Baltimore toughest police districts before going to Charlottesville. He’s a lawyer to boot.

    Indeed, DC activist Eugene Puryear and Longo may know each other already. If Bowser puts those two heads together, they’d come up with a Community Policing model the whole city could be proud of– and have trust in.

    Re. Ramsey…

    Re. Longo…–year-mark-mostly-praise-some-panning/article_c1ee131c-c4b3-54ab-b80d-c67cbbdb2766.html

    There are two well-qualified LGBT Community Policing practitioner police chiefs, as well…

    Janee Harteau in Minneapolis…

    Chris Magnes in Richmond CA…

    PS — BTW, Peter, my recollection is that CM’s Bonds’ meeting with the ANCs was to help ANCs– especially new ANCs– better address the needs of survivors of homicide victims and violent crime victims. That’s an entirely different matter. And it was a pretty thoughtful one, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Trend of banning books threatens our freedom

‘History has taught you nothing if you think you can kill ideas’



National Book Festival, gay news, Washington Blade

I knew Helen Keller was a DeafBlind activist. But, until recently, I didn’t know that some of her books were torched.

Nearly 90 years ago, in 1933 Germany, the Nazis added “How I Became a Socialist,” by Keller to a list of “degenerate” books. Keller’s book, along with works by authors from H.G. Wells to Einstein were burned. 

The Nazi book burnings were horrific, you might think, but what does this have to do with the queer community now?

I speak of this because a nano-sec of the news tells us that book censorship, if not from literal fires, but from the removal from school libraries, is alive and well. Nationwide, in small towns and suburbs, school boards, reacting to pressure from parents and politicians, are removing books from school libraries. Many of these books are by queer authors and feature LGBTQ+ characters.

Until recently, I didn’t worry that much about books being banned. My ears have pricked up, every year, in September when Banned Books Week is observed. Growing up, my parents instilled in me their belief that reading was one of life’s great pleasures as well as a chance to learn about new ideas – especially, those we disagreed with. The freedom to read what we choose is vital to democracy, my folks taught me. 

“I don’t care if it’s ‘Mein Kampf,’” my Dad who was Jewish told me, “I’ll defend to my death against its being banned.”

“Teachers should be allowed to teach it,” he added, “so kids can learn what a monster Hitler was.”

In this country, there have always been people who wanted to ban books from “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” by writer and abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe to gay poet Allen Ginsberg’s “Howl.”

In the 1920s, in the Scopes trial, a Tennessee science teacher was fined $100 for teaching evolution. (The law against teaching evolution in Tennessee was later repealed.)

But, these folks, generally, seemed to be on “the fringe” of society. We didn’t expect that book banning would be endorsed by mainstream politicians.

Until lately.

Take just one example of the uptake in book-banning: In September, the Blade reported, Fairfax County, Virginia public school officials said at a school board meeting that two books had been removed from school libraries to “reassess their suitability for high school students.”

Both books – “Lawn Boy” a novel by Jonathan Evison and “Gender Queer: A Memoir” by non-binary author Maia Koabe feature queer characters and themes, along with graphic descriptions of sex.

Opponents of the books say the books contain descriptions of pedophilia. But, many book reviewers and LGBTQ students as well as the American Library Association dispute this false claim.

The American Library Association honored both books with its Alex Award, the Associated Press reported. The award recognizes the year’s “10 books written for adults that have special appeal to young adults ages 12 through 18.”

Given how things have changed for us queers in recent years – from marriage equality to Pete Buttigieg running for president – it’s not surprising that there’s been a backlash. As part of the blowback, books by queer authors with LGBTQ+ characters have become a flashpoint in the culture wars.

As a writer, it’s easy for me to joke that book banning is fabulous for writers. Nothing improves sales more than censorship.

Yet, there’s nothing funny about this for queer youth. My friend Penny has a queer son. “LGBTQ kids need to read about people like themselves,” she told me. “It’s horrible if queer kids can’t find these books. They could become depressed or even suicidal.”

If we allow books to be banned, our freedom to think and learn will be erased.

“History has taught you nothing if you think you can kill ideas,” Keller wrote in a letter to students in Nazi Germany.

Anti-queer officials may remove LGBTQ books from school libraries. But, our thoughts will not be unshelved.

Kathi Wolfe, a writer and a poet, is a regular contributor to the Blade.

Continue Reading


Thanksgiving is a time to share

Take a moment to think about what you can do to help others



This Thanksgiving, many of us will once again celebrate with family and friends around the dinner table. Sadly at too many tables friends and family members will be missing. They will be one of the over 766,000 Americans who lost their lives to coronavirus. May the shared grief over lost loved ones cause us to try to bridge our differences and lift each other. As those of us with plenty sit down for dinner let us not forget the many in the world not so fortunate and think of what we can do to make their lives better.

In the midst of the pandemic we defeated a president who through his words and actions tore our country apart — a president who managed to poison relationships among family and friends. We elected a president who we felt would try to unite the nation. But we know that has yet to happen and the recent reaction to the not-guilty verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial shows us that. The use of race-baiting in the recent Virginia governor’s election shows us that. We still suffer from the implicit permission the former president gave to some Americans to once again give public voice to their sexism, homophobia, racism, and anti-Semitism. That didn’t suddenly end with his loss. While we cannot pretend those feelings weren’t always there it seemed we had reached a point in American society where people understood you couldn’t voice them in public without rebuke. While it will take many years to put that genie back in the bottle we need to try if we are to move forward again. Around our Thanksgiving table is a place to begin. I am an optimist and believe we can do that even while recognizing it won’t be easy.

Thanksgiving should be a time to look within ourselves and determine who we are as individuals and what we can do to make life better for ourselves, our families, and others here in the United States and around the world.

Around our Thanksgiving table we should take a moment to think about what we can do to help feed the hungry, house the homeless, and give equal opportunity to everyone who wants to work hard. Maybe even give some thought as to how we change policies causing institutional racism to ones giving everyone a chance to succeed. It is a moment to think about how we can open up the eyes of the world to understand how racism, homophobia, and sexism hurt everyone, not just those who are discriminated against.

We must renew our efforts to heal the rifts in our own families and make an effort to try to see each other in a more positive light. If we start to do that with those closest to us we might have a fighting chance to do it with others.

I recognize my life is privileged having just returned from a 14-day transatlantic cruise. My Thanksgiving weekend will be spent with friends in Rehoboth Beach, Del., and we will remember our experiences over the past year. For many it also begins the Christmas season and the Friday of Thanksgiving weekend each year Rehoboth Beach lights its community Christmas tree. So surely we will talk about what that season means to each of us.

For me each year it means thinking about which charities I can support as the requests for end-of-year gifts arrive. It is a time to think about volunteering some precious time for a cause you care about.
Wherever you live, there are many chances to volunteer and do your part to make a difference for others. The rewards of doing so will come back to you in abundance. As anyone who has helped someone else will tell you the feeling you get for having done so is wonderful.

So wishing all my friends and those of you who I may be lucky enough to call friends in the future, a very happy Thanksgiving. May this holiday find you happy, healthy and sharing peaceful times with those you love.

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.

Continue Reading


Fighting for equality for decades, trans elders still face endless hardships

Lisa Oakley rejected by 60 long-term care facilities in Colo.



transgender, Gender Conference East, trans, transgender flag, gay news, Washington Blade
(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

November 20 will mark the 22nd International Transgender Day of Remembrance, an international event honoring and commemorating the many transgender people murdered in transphobic hate crimes every year.

Since 2013, at least 200 transgender people have been murdered in the United States alone, 80 percent being Black and Latinx women. This number is undoubtedly an underestimate, as many murders go unreported and trans victims often are misgendered by law enforcement.

These murders are not isolated crime statistics. They grow out of a culture of violence against transgender and non-binary (TGNB) people that encompasses stigma, exclusion, discrimination, poverty, and lack of access to essential resources, including health care, employment and housing. 

These challenges result in early death. In Latin America, for example, it has been reported that the average life expectancy of a transgender person is only 35 years.

This climate of stigma and transphobia is particularly challenging for TGNB older people, who face extraordinary hardships due both to the cumulative impact of lifetimes of discrimination and regular mistreatment in their elder years. Due to isolation from family and greater medical and financial needs, trans older people are more likely to require professionalized elder services and care. 

Unfortunately, these services and the facilities that provide them are often either unavailable to TGNB elders, or hostile to them. A national survey of LGBTQ+ older people by AARP found that more than 60 percent of those surveyed were concerned about how they would be treated in a long-term care setting. This includes the fear of being refused or receiving limited care, in danger of neglect or abuse, facing verbal or physical harassment, or being forced to hide or deny their identity once again. 

This is a sobering reality. In October, GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders filed a claim against Sunrise Assisted Living in Maine, which openly denied admission to an older transgender woman because of her gender identity. 

In Colorado, Lisa Oakley was, astonishingly, rejected by 60 long-term care facilities, which her caseworker ascribes to Lisa’s gender identity. One facility that agreed to admit Lisa would only house her with a male roommate. 

After waiting far too long for welcoming care, Lisa eventually got help from SAGE and other community supporters and found a home in Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley. Fortunately, Eagle Ridge has participated in specialized training to be LGBTQ+-welcoming. While Lisa feels welcomed at Eagle Ridge and has made friends, she has been forced to live far from a community she loves. 

These cases in Maine and Colorado are just the tip of the iceberg regarding the discrimination faced by TGNB elders. That’s why it’s so important that Congress pass the Equality Act, which would once and for all prohibit discrimination based on gender identity in key areas like employment, housing, and care and services.

And while legal progress is important, it’s not enough. TGNB elders need more equity in their day to day lives. Older transgender people are more likely to experience financial barriers than non-transgender elders, regardless of age, income and education.

They’re also at a higher risk of disability, general poor mental and physical health, and loneliness, compared to their cisgender counterparts.

These experiences have been part of everyday life for trans elders for far too long. We continue to see them struggle with the long-term effects of transphobia and violence every day. That’s why organizations like SAGE are stepping up our support for TGNB elders by investing $1 million to support TGNB-focused services and advocacy both in New York and nationwide.

And we are continually amazed by the resilience of TGNB elders, creating communities built on their strength and courage. 

Their resilience is nothing new. It dates back generations and was evident during the Stonewall Uprising. Over the years, trans luminaries like Marsha P. Johnson, Sylvia Rivera, Victoria Cruz—leaders of the modern LGBTQ+ civil rights movement—and countless others have repeatedly proved that they will not be invisible.  

We see this determination in so many programs and activities led by trans elders at SAGE. 

For example, the TransGenerational Theater Project brings together transgender people of all ages to create theater from their experiences and perspectives. These types of elder-driven programs serve as powerful reminders that transgender older people are leading their lives with resilience, creativity, and perseverance, despite the dangers they face. 

Transgender and non-binary elders have survived and fought for equality for decades. They are brave. They are strong. They are leaders. Here at SAGE, we will continue to walk side-by-side with them as we continue the fight to ensure TGNB elders get the respect, change, and acceptance they deserve.

Michael Adams is the CEO of SAGE, the world’s largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of LGBTQ+ elders.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts