Connect with us

Local

Va. candidate calls conversion therapy ban, trans student policies ‘overreach’

Republican Bob Frizzelle is running against Del. Karrie Delaney

Published

on

Bob Frizzelle (Screen capture via YouTube)

The Republican who is seeking to unseat Virginia state Del. Karrie Delaney (D-Fairfax County), challenged her on social media for supporting a law that bans so-called conversion therapy for minors and efforts to protect transgender students from bullying and harassment.

Bob Frizzelle tweeted on Sept. 28 a video stating Virginiaā€™s ā€œnew progressive lawsā€ limit parents’ right to know if their child ā€œchanges their gender in schoolā€ or their right to take their child to ā€œgender counseling.ā€

On Instagram and Facebook, Frizzelle criticized what he later told the Washington Blade was ā€œoverreachā€ by the state, and called out Delaney for supporting legislation that he felt stood between parents and their duty to ensure their childrenā€™s wellbeing.

ā€œYou have a minor child under the care and guidance of their parents until they reach 18 and the state steps in and decides what is allowed and not allowed in terms of gender counseling,ā€ Frizzelle said.

ā€œIt seems conversion therapy is an exercise in cruelty and torture, and Iā€™m not advocating that either, I wouldnā€™t want that,ā€ he said. ā€œBut this is about counseling and parents being the main authority over what is best for their child instead of the state.ā€

The American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association and a host of therapeutic professional organizations oppose the use conversion therapy, stating it is ineffective, harmful and not evidence-based.

Currently, 20 states and numerous localities, including D.C., ban the use of this discredited practice.

Delaney voted for House Bill 386, sponsored by state Del. Patrick Hope (D-Arlington County), and helped make Virginia the first Southern state to ban conversion therapy for minors.

ā€œFor the record, Iā€™m proud to have taken that vote,ā€ Delaney told the Blade. ā€œItā€™s a debunked, unethical practice that is proven to harm children.ā€

ā€œIn my view, itā€™s akin to fraud,” added Sasha Buchert, senior attorney for Lambda Legal’s D.C. office. ā€œTheyā€™re attempting to implement a practice that has been shown not to provide effective treatment and is grounded not in science and medicine but in ideology.ā€

But, contrary to Frizzelleā€™s claim, parents can still take their children to LGBTQ counseling.

Both Delaney and Buchert emphasized the conversion therapy ban does not prevent parents from taking their children to a licensed therapist if they are struggling with understanding their gender identity or sexual orientation. They agreed that therapy must be evidence-based and proven, not abusive, or according to Buchert, ā€œtorture.ā€

According to a lawsuit filed in New Jersey in 2015 in which victims successfully shut down a religious organization practicing conversion therapy despite the stateā€™s ban, ā€œtherapyā€ sessions involved ā€œhumiliatingā€ acts, including reliving past abuse and enduring homophobic slurs as part of ā€œtalk therapy.ā€

ā€œRemember, weā€™re talking about children,ā€ Delaney said. ā€œHearing from some of those survivors, itā€™s pretty horrific.ā€

Last year, Delaney was one of four Democrats who killed House Bill 966, sponsored by state Del. Wendell Walker (R-Lynchburg), that would have allowed conversion therapy for minors if counseling involved ā€œnothing more than ā€˜talk therapy.ā€™ā€

ā€œAnyone with any experience in this field knows it doesnā€™t have to be a physical type of therapy to do harm,ā€ Delaney said. ā€œā€˜Talkā€™ is a powerful tool. We license professions if there is harm that can be done. That applies to therapists in Virginia.ā€

Frizzelle also challenged Delaneyā€™s support for the Virginia Department of Education model policies for protecting trans students from bullying and harassment in school. 

He said the policies enable schools to change a student’s information in their records, such as their pronouns, without notifying parents.

ā€œI havenā€™t read the trans statute,ā€ Frizzelle admitted candidly. ā€œBut I think the school may tell the parents only if it wants to. The school then gets to decide to tell parents, if it wants to, if there is a significant event regarding their child. Should the school have this discretion?”

However, nothing in the governing statute passed last year prevents parents from receiving information about their child, according to Delaney, who was one of the House billā€™s numerous sponsors.

ā€œThis bill does not take away any parental rights,ā€ Delaney said. ā€œParents are not barred from having access to information about their students. Thereā€™s nothing in this law that says parents cannot be informed about their student.ā€

Delaney pointed out the purpose of the statute is to direct the state Department of Education and local school boards to develop policies that, according to its text, ā€œaddress common issues regarding transgender students in accordance with evidence-based best practices.ā€

The text also states school policies are to protect trans students in ā€œcompliance with applicable nondiscrimination laws.ā€

ā€œThe purpose of these policies is to maintain a safe and supportive learning environment that is free from harassment so these kids can learn,ā€ Delaney said.

Buchert added that LGBTQ youth reported ā€œin study after studyā€ high rates of harassment, bullying and discrimination from other students, teachers and administrators, particularly if they also were students of color.

ā€œIt leads you to missing school, it makes you not want to come to your gym class, it makes you fearful and leaves you pushed out into the school-to-prison pipeline,ā€ she said.

Buchert also looked at the student privacy aspect of the law as necessary to protect LGBTQ students until they are ready to come out to their friends and family.

She said part of protecting students is giving them a safe space to learn more about themselves and who they are in the world, instead of forcing them out of the closet before they are ready.

ā€œYour family may not be prepared or well-suited to help you navigate those unique struggles,ā€ Buchert said, pointing out that while some parents are understanding and supportive, others might push the child out of the home to fend for themselves.

ā€œAnd thatā€™s why the LGBTQ youth homeless rate is so high,ā€ Buchert said. ā€œForcibly outing them before they or their families are ready can be extremely harmful. The things Frizzelle is supporting would cause serious harm to LGBTQ youth and their families.ā€

Both Virginiaā€™s conversion therapy ban and trans student protections passed with bipartisan support, and Delaney said they were examples of legislators doing their job to protect vulnerable children in the commonwealth.

But Frizzelle was still uncomfortable with how he perceived rights were balanced in these bills.

ā€œI think this is such a thorny issue because you want to treat everyone with respect,ā€ Frizzelle told the Blade. ā€œAnd the reason I made the video and I have the objection is Iā€™m uncomfortable with parents being separated from their childrenā€™s care by the state like this. I think that is not the proper function of the state.ā€

Delaney pointed it this in fact is the proper role of the state: To protect children whom studies have shown to be vulnerable targets of harassment, discrimination and abuse.

ā€œWhat weā€™re trying to do as a legislature is protect these children,ā€ Delaney said. ā€œAnd Frizzelle is dividing parents over a problem that is manufactured and not based in fact, and that is very sad.ā€

Equality Virginia Executive Director Vee Lamneck agreed that the government has the authority and the duty to protect vulnerable people from harm. They also stated the government has the additional responsibility of ensuring everyone can benefit equally from public goods, such as receiving an education free from harassment.

“The government has the authorityā€”and is supposed to use itā€”to protect vulnerable people from harm,ā€ Lamneck said. ā€œLaws that ensure transgender students can benefit from public education, and that LGBTQ young people are not subjected to practices that are known to cause lasting psychological damage, fall squarely within that authority and obligation.ā€

ā€œNo one, including parents, should be permitted to endanger the health and wellbeing of children in the ways prohibited by those laws,” added Lamneck.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Maryland

What Anne Arundel County school board candidates think about book bans

State lawmakers passed Freedom to Read Act in April

Published

on

Parents in some Maryland school districts have organized campaigns to restrict the kinds of books allowed in school libraries. (Photo by Kylie Cooper/Baltimore Banner)

BY ROYALE BONDS | Parentsā€™ efforts to restrict content available to students in school libraries has become a contentious issue in Maryland. Conservative parent groups, such as Moms for Liberty, have been working to get books they believe are inappropriate removed from libraries in Carroll and Howard counties, sparkingĀ protests, new policies, and even aĀ state law.

The Freedom to Read Act, passed in April, sets standards that books cannot be removed from public and school libraries due to an authorā€™s background. Library staff that uphold the standard are protected under this act. The law, however, does not prohibit removing books deemed ā€œsexually explicit,ā€ the stated reason local Moms for Liberty chapters challenged school library books.

The rest of this article can be read on the Baltimore Banner website.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

D.C. Council member proposes change for Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs

Parker also seeks increased funding for LGBTQ programs in FY 2025 budget

Published

on

D.C. Council member Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5) (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C. Council member Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5), the Councilā€™s only LGBTQ member, has asked his fellow Council members to support a proposal to change the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs to become a ā€œstand-alone entity outside the Executive Office of the Mayor to allow for greater transparency and accountability that reflects its evolution over the years.ā€

In an April 30 letter to each of his 12 fellow Council members, Parker said he plans to introduce an amendment to the cityā€™s Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Support Act to make this change for the LGBTQ Affairs Office.

His letter also calls for adding to the cityā€™s FY 2025 budget two specific funding proposals that local LGBTQ activists submitted to D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser that the mayor did not include in her budget proposal submitted to the Council. One calls for $1.5 million to fund the completion of the build out and renovation for the D.C. Center for the LGBTQ Communityā€™s new building in the cityā€™s Shaw neighborhood and $300,000 in subsequent years to support the LGBTQ Centerā€™s operations.

Parkerā€™s second budget proposal calls for what he said was about $450,000 to fund 20 additional dedicated LGBTQ housing vouchers as part of the cityā€™s existing program to provide emergency housing support for LGBTQ residents and other residents facing homelessness.

ā€œThe Office of LGBTQ+ Affairs currently manages about 90 vouchers across various programs and needs,ā€ Parker said in his letter to fellow Council members. ā€œAdding an additional 20 vouchers will cost roughly $450,000,ā€ he wrote, adding that dedicated vouchers “play a crucial role in ensuring LGBTQ+ residents of the District can navigate the complex process of securing housing placements.ā€

In her proposed FY ā€™25 budget, Bowser calls for a 7.6 percent increase in funding for the Office of LGBTQ Affairs, which amounts to an increase of $132,000, bringing the officeā€™s total funding to $1.7 million.

ā€œTo be clear, I support the strong work and current leadership of the Office of LGBTQ+ Affairs,ā€ Parker says in his letter to fellow Council members. ā€œThis push for change is in recognition of the officeā€™s notable achievements and the significant demands being placed on it, which require a greater level of accountability.ā€

Parker told the Blade in an April 30 telephone interview that he believes Japer Bowles, the current director of the Office of L|GBTQ Affairs is doing an excellent job in operating the office, but he believes the office would be able to do more for the LGBTQ community under the change he is proposing.

ā€œMaking it a stand-alone office versus it being clustered within the Community Affairs division of the mayorā€™s office, it will get more attention,ā€ Parker told the Blade. ā€œThe leadership will have greater flexibility to advocate for the interest of LGBTQ residents, And we will be able to conduct greater oversight of the office,ā€ he said, referring to the Councilā€™s oversight process.

Parker noted that other community constituent offices in the mayorā€™s office, including the Office of Latino Affairs and the Office of Veterans Affairs are stand-alone offices that he hopes to bring about for the LGBTQ Affairs Office. He said Council member Brianne Nadeau, who chairs the Council committee that has oversight for the LGBTQ Affairs Office, has expressed support for his proposal.

Also expressing support for Parkerā€™s proposal to make the LGBTQ Affairs Office a stand-alone office is the D.C. Advisory Neighborhood Commission Rainbow Caucus. Vincent Slatt, the caucusā€™s chairperson, submitted testimony last week before the D.C. Council Committee on Public Works and Operations, which is chaired by Nadeau, calling for making the LGBTQ Affairs Office a stand-alone office outside the Executive Office of the Mayor.

Slatt also stated in his testimony that the office has a ā€œchronic staffing shortageā€ and recommended that at least three additional staff members be assigned to the office.

Daniel Gleick, the mayorā€™s press secretary, told the Blade the mayorā€™s office is reviewing Parkerā€™s budget proposals, including the proposed change for the Office of LGBTQ Affairs.

But in testimony at a May 1, D.C. Council budget hearing before the Councilā€™s Committee on Executive Administration and Labor, Lindsey Parker, Mayor Bowserā€™s Chief of Staff, appeared to express skepticism over making the LGBTQ Affairs office a stand-alone office. Lindsey Parker expressed her thoughts on the proposed change when asked about it by Councilmember Anita Bonds (D-At-Large), who chairs the committee that held the hearing.

ā€œI would proffer that it doesnā€™t matter whether the agency is within the EOM [Executive Office of the Mayor] or not,ā€ Lindsey Parker told Bonds. ā€œThey will still be reporting up into one would argue the most important agency in the D.C. government, which is the one that supports the mayor,ā€ Lindsey Parker said. ā€œSo, itā€™s the closest to the mayor that you can get,ā€ she said ā€œSo, you could pull it out and have a different budget chapter. I actually think thatā€™s confusing and convoluted.ā€

Lindsey Parker added, ā€œThe Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, with their six FTEs right now, if they were a stand-alone function they wouldnā€™t have all the non-personnel services in order to operate. They need to be under sort of the shop of the EOM in order to get those resources.ā€Ā 

By FETs Lindsey Parker was referring to the term Full Time Equivalent employees. Ā 

Continue Reading

Rehoboth Beach

Former CAMP Rehoboth official sentenced to nine months in prison

Salvator Seeley pleaded guilty to felony theft charge for embezzlement

Published

on

Salvator Seeley (Photo courtesy CAMP Rehoboth)

Salvator ā€œSalā€ Seeley, who served as an official with the Rehoboth Beach, Del., CAMP Rehoboth LGBTQ community center for 20 years, was sentenced on April 5 by a Sussex County Superior Court judge to nine months in prison and to pay $176,000 in restitution to the organization.

The sentencing took place about five weeks after Seeley pleaded guilty to a charge of Theft in Excess of $50,000 for allegedly embezzling funds from CAMP Rehoboth, a spokesperson for the Delaware Department of Justice told the Washington Blade.

Seeley’s guilty plea came shortly after a grand jury, at the request of prosecutors, indicted him on the felony theft charge following an investigation that found he had embezzled at least $176,000 from the nonprofit LGBTQ organization.

ā€œSalvatore C. Seeley, between the 27th day of February 2019 and the 7th day of September 2021, in the County of Sussex, State of Delaware, did take property belonging to CAMP Rehoboth, Inc., consisting of United States currency and other miscellaneous property valued at more than $50,000, intending to appropriate the same,ā€ the indictment states.

ā€œThe State recommended a sentence of two years of incarceration based on the large-scale theft and the impact to the non-profit organization,ā€ Delaware Department of Justice spokesperson Caroline Harrison told the Blade in a statement.

ā€œThe defense cited Seeleyā€™s lack of a record and gambling addiction in arguing for a probationary sentence,ā€ the statement says. ā€œSeeley was sentenced in Superior Court to a nine-month prison term and to pay a total of $176,000 in restitution for the stolen funds,ā€ Harrison says in the statement.

Neither Seeley nor his attorney could immediately be reached for comment.

At the time of Seeleyā€™s indictment in February, CAMP Rehoboth released a statement saying it first discovered ā€œfinancial irregularitiesā€ within the organization on Sept. 7, 2021, ā€œand took immediate action and notified state authorities.ā€ The statement says this resulted in the investigation of Seeley by the state Department of Justice as well as an internal investigation by CAMP Rehoboth to review its ā€œfinancial control policiesā€ that led to an updating of those policies.

ā€œAs we have communicated from day one, CAMP Rehoboth has fully cooperated with law enforcement,ā€ the statement continues. ā€œAt its request, we did not speak publicly about the investigation while it was ongoing for fear it would jeopardize its integrity,ā€ according to the statement. ā€œThis was extremely difficult given our commitment to transparency with the community about day-to-day operations during the recent leadership transition.ā€

The statement was referring to Kim Leisey, who began her job as CAMP Rehobothā€™s new executive director in July of 2023, while the Seeley investigation had yet to be completed, following the organizationā€™s process of searching for a new director. It says Seeley left his job as Health and Wellness Director of CAMP Rehoboth in September of 2021 after working for the organization for more than 20 years.

ā€œMr. Seeleyā€™s actions are a deep betrayal to not only CAMP Rehoboth but also the entire community we serve,ā€ the statement says.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular