- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-
WGAY podcasts: April 26 and May 10
-
NYC officials condemn alleged anti-gay murder
-
Affleck mocks ‘ex-gay’ camps on SNL skit
-
Rehoboth Summer Kickoff Party
-
Thousands attend Puerto Rico LGBT rights march
-
Dems seeking to delay gay-inclusive immigration reform?
-
Puerto Rico Senate committee holds adoption bill hearing
Feedback: Nov. 26
The following was submitted as a letter to the editor. Go here to join the discussion.
Re: “Md. attorney gen’l: No marriage bill in 2011” (news, Nov. 11)
I am writing in response to Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler’s recent comments regarding the fight for marriage equality in the Free State. While I appreciate his leadership on preserving fair treatment for LGBT citizens under Maryland law through his groundbreaking legal opinion that has provided enhanced rights to couples with valid out-of-state marriage licenses, I must respectfully disagree with his claim that marriage for same-sex couples is not likely to win in the upcoming legislative session.
Gansler claimed that the courts are more likely to advance equal marriage rights. While we welcome the opportunity for the legal implications of discrimination against loving and committed couples to be considered in the courts, the time for equality is now.
According to a comprehensive poll released by the Washington Post in the spring, a clear majority of Marylanders support marriage equality. The State of Maryland recently updated the Employee and Retiree Health and Welfare Benefits Program to be inclusive of same-sex couples and we have seen several advances through relationship recognition laws in recent years. Furthermore, this January will see the return of a large number of pro-equality incumbents and the addition of new legislative leaders ready to stand up for fairness. The governor has also committed to signing the marriage bill when it reaches his desk.
But we are not just relying on lawmakers to do the right thing. We are working hard for every single vote. Over the past six months, we have identified thousands of new volunteers and supportive voters through our statewide postcard drive. We have built on the ground power through volunteer trainings, phone banks and our community Action Teams. We re-launched our Pride in Faith program to engage clergy and faith communities who believe in social justice.
We have also built incredibly strong partnerships with local, state and national organizations that are ready to stand with us. It is only through these types of organized, focused initiatives that we will pass the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act.
We have a plan in place through the end of the year to shore up our co-sponsors so that we kick off the session stronger than ever. We also have a detailed, comprehensive plan for every week of the session to secure the votes we will need to make marriage equality a reality.
We have what it takes to make it happen. We simply need every Marylander who believes in fairness from the attorney general to the neighbor next door to be there with us in words and in actions. —Morgan Meneses-Sheets, executive director, Equality Maryland
Tagged with Equality Maryland, gay marriage
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition