- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-
White House Pride reception set for June 13
-
Puerto Rico House approves non-discrimination bill
-
Lesbian EEOC commissioner re-nominated for 2nd term
-
Obama praises Boy Scouts, but hopes for more change
-
Boy Scouts of America vote to partially end gay ban
-
Lesbian elected to AAPA board
-
Summer sex and alcohol
New partnership to combat hate crimes
Mayor Vincent Gray is encouraging local LGBT residents to submit impact statements in hate crime cases. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)
D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray announced earlier this month that his Office of GLBT Affairs will encourage members of the LGBT community to submit community impact statements to judges in cases where criminals are convicted of committing anti-LGBT hate crimes.
In what Gray called a partnership between the GLBT Affairs Office and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the mayor said the GLBT Affairs Office would help prosecutors line up LGBT people to submit community impact statements. Court observers say such statements submitted by people sympathetic to crime victims often prompt judges to hand down more stringent sentences.
A statement released by the mayor’s office said the GLBT Affairs Office, headed by Sterling Washington, would also consider on a case-by-case basis whether to recruit LGBT people to submit community impact statements for cases that have not been designated officially as hate crimes but that involve crimes against LGBT people.
LGBT activists have complained that the U.S. Attorney’s Office often does not designate as hate crimes cases that activists believe should be so classified. One such case was the murder one year ago of transgender woman Deoni Jones. Jones’ parents and friends said at a one-year anniversary vigil commemorating Jones’ death two weeks ago that the U.S. Attorney’s office was remiss in not listing the murder as a hate crime.
Gray, who attended the vigil, said he planned to ask the city’s Attorney General to discuss the matter with the U.S. Attorney’s office. Gray used the occasion of the vigil to announce his plans for the partnership between the GLBT Affairs Office and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
“The U.S. Attorney’s Office is deeply committed to prosecuting hate crimes against members of the LGBT community,” said U.S. Attorney spokesperson William Miller in a statement. “Community impact statements are an important tool for informing judges at sentencing about the effects of a crime that go beyond the direct victim,” he said.
Miller added, “We are pleased that the Office of GLBT Affairs has offered to solicit community impact statements in appropriate cases and look forward to working with them to ensure that the LGBT community is heard at sentencing in hate crime cases.”
Tagged with Deoni Jones, District of Columbia, hate crimes, Office of GLBT Affairs, Sterling Washington, U.S. Attorney, Vincent Gray, William Miller
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.
view print edition
“The U.S. Attorney’s Office is deeply committed to prosecuting hate crimes against members of the LGBT community,” said U.S. Attorney spokesperson William Miller in a statement. “Community impact statements are an important tool for informing judges at sentencing about the effects of a crime that go beyond the direct victim,” he said.
********************
This is a fine initiative between USAO and GLBTAO. And it will help secure tougher sentencing– which is on the BACK end of the criminal justice ‘conveyor belt’– if you will. But it is simply a fact that what one ‘knows’ is the motive for a crime may be very different than what one can prove– beyond a reasonable doubt– in a court of law.
The mayor and GLBTAO should be more honest in stating that reality of our justice system. That reality, however, makes community impact statements all the more important when a hate/bias motive can not reasonably be prosecuted, but some permitted evidence of hate/bias can still inform a judge’s sentencing. I don’t think our major problem is with USAO.
However, we do need far greater scrutiny of MPD and the reasons behind Chief Lanier’s stonewalling rhetoric and non-cooperation stance against Human Rights Watch for its report of MPD mistreatment of rape and sexual assault victims in DC when those crimes are reported to MPD.
We should be far more concerned about the failure of the mayor to effectively address– or even express concern for rape and sexual assault victims intimidated, insulted and ignored by his MPD’s mistreatment when those rape and sex assault victims reported the crimes to MPD.
That’s an outrage. And it’s an outrage Mayor Gray hasn’t spoken out about it.
According to last month’s Human Rights Watch report, MPD intimidation and mistreatment occurred in about a third of cases HRW investigated.
I’m guessing HRW would have found similar discriminatory results by MPD had they studied anti-LGBT hate crimes as well.
[Translate]