Connect with us

National

Pennsylvania advocates differ on marriage strategy

Commonwealth among 29 states without LGBT-inclusive statewide anti-discrimination law

Published

on

Brian Sims, Pennsylvania, gay news, Washington Blade
Brian Sims, Pennsylvania, gay news, Washington Blade

Gay Pennsylvania state Rep. Brian Sims (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Some Pennsylvania advocates have begun to differ on whether they should push for marriage rights for same-sex couples without first securing statewide anti-LGBT discrimination protections.

Sue Kerr, editor of Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents, told the Washington Blade on Tuesday that the recent announcement by state Reps. Brian Sims (D-Philadelphia) and Stephen McCarter (D-Montgomery County) that they plan to introduce a same-sex marriage bill in Harrisburg seems “a little bit like putting the cart before the horse.”

A Susquehanna Polling and Research survey in May found 72 percent of Pennsylvanians back two bills — House Bill 300 and Senate Bill 300 — in the state legislature that would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity and expression in the state. A Franklin and Marshall College poll released during the same month found 54 percent of respondents support same-sex marriage.

“House Bill 300 helps everyone — every single person in our community,” Kerr said. “It’s not defined by our relationships. It’s defined by who we are as citizens, residents of the state.”

Pennsylvania is among the states without an LGBT-inclusive statewide non-discrimination law.

Neighboring New York, Maryland and Delaware are among the 11 states and D.C. in which same-sex couples are currently able to legally marry. A federal judge in Ohio on Monday ordered the state to recognize the marriage of a gay couple that tied the knot at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport on July 11.

The American Civil Liberties Union on July 9 filed a lawsuit against the Keystone State’s statutory same-sex marriage ban.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane announced two days later she would not defend the law in court.

Josh Shapiro, chair of the Montgomery County Commissioners, on Tuesday announced the suburban Philadelphia county would issue a marriage license to a lesbian couple.

The women, whom the Times Herald newspaper identified as Loreen M. Bloodgood and Alicia A. Terrizzi of Pottstown, wed earlier on Wednesday. They are the first same-sex couple in Pennsylvania to receive a marriage license.

McCarter noted to the Blade that HB 300 has received roughly 20 additional co-sponsors since he and Sims announced the day after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional that they plan to introduce a same-sex marriage bill. He said he hopes HB 300 will have 102 co-sponsors, which constitutes a majority, in the House of Representatives once it reconvenes on Sept. 23.

“We know there is no state so far that has passed marriage equality without having non-discrimination passed,” McCarter said. “Momentum is growing.”

Advocates across the state acknowledged the same-sex marriage bill is unlikely to pass, at least in the short term, because Republicans control both houses of the state legislature and Gov. Tom Corbett opposes nuptials for gays and lesbians.

“There’s a limited amount of resources [that] generally are better deployed in terms of those areas where the result can realistically be achieved,” said Malcolm Lazin, executive director of the Philadelphia-based Equality Forum.

Kathy Padilla, a transgender rights advocate in Philadelphia, noted 32 municipalities in Pennsylvania have passed LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination ordinances. Philadelphia adopted the state’s first gay-inclusive measure in the late 1970s, while the city of Harrisburg enacted Pennsylvania’s first trans-inclusive anti-discrimination resolution in 1983.

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter in May signed a measure that many activists have described as one of the country’s most expansive anti-LGBT discrimination laws.

“As we don’t have a statewide non-discrimination bill, pursuing judicial relief here doesn’t close off legislative opportunities or split communities in the same way as other states at all,” Padilla told the Blade, referring to the ACLU’s same-sex marriage lawsuit. “It leaves us all working for these same goals at the same time in different venues — together.”

Ted Martin, executive director of Equality Pennsylvania, a statewide LGBT advocacy group, told the Blade that HB 300 remains a “top priority” for his organization.

He said a Pennsylvania hotel could still legally deny a same-sex couple a room on their wedding night. Martin noted a gay or lesbian Pennsylvanian could still be fired from their job if he or she places a picture of their husband or wife on their desk.

The commonwealth also lacks statewide protections for LGBT Pennsylvanians in housing.

“We have to look honestly at the complete picture,” Martin said. “The heat and conversation around marriage will really allow us to take a good look at how we treat LGBT Pennsylvanians.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Federal Government

Gay Venezuelan man ‘forcibly disappeared’ to El Salvador files claim against White House

Andry Hernández Romero had asked for asylum in US

Published

on

Andry Hernández Romero (Photo courtesy of the Immigrant Defenders Law Center)

A gay Venezuelan asylum seeker who the U.S. “forcibly disappeared” to El Salvador has filed a claim against the federal government.

Immigrant Defenders Law Center, who represents Andry Hernández Romero, on Friday announced their client and five other Venezuelans who the Trump-Vance administration “forcibly removed” to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, filed “administrative claims” under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The White House on Feb. 20, 2025, designated Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang, as an “international terrorist organization.”

President Donald Trump less than a month later invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which the Associated Press notes allows the U.S. to deport “noncitizens without any legal recourse.” The White House then “forcibly removed” Hernández, who had been pursuing his asylum case in the U.S., and more than 250 other Venezuelans to El Salvador.

Immigrant Defenders Law Center disputed claims that Hernández is a Tren de Aragua member.

Hernández was held at El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, a maximum-security prison known by the Spanish acronym CECOT, until his release on July 18, 2025. Hernández, who is back in Venezuela, claims he suffered physical and sexual abuse while at CECOT.

“As a Venezuelan citizen with no criminal record anywhere in the world, I would like to tell not only the government of the United States but governments everywhere that no human being is illegal,” said Hernández in the Immigrant Defenders Law Center press release. “The practice of judging whole communities for the wrongdoing of a single individual must end. Governments should use their power to help every person in the nation become more aware and informed, to strengthen our cultures and build a stronger generation with principles and values — one that multiplies the positive instead of destroying unfulfilled dreams and opportunities.” 

Immigrant Defenders Law Center filed claims on behalf of Hernández and the five other Venezuelans less than three months after American forces seized then-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, at their home in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital.

Maduro and Flores have pleaded not guilty to federal drug charges. Delcy Rodríguez, who was Maduro’s vice president, is Venezuela’s acting president.

‘Due process and accountability cannot be optional’

Immigrant Defenders Law Center on Friday also made the following demands: 

  • The Trump administration must officially release the names of all people the United States sent to CECOT to ensure that everyone has been or will be released. 
  • The federal government must clear the names of the 252 men wrongfully labeled as criminal gang members of Tren de Aragua.  
  • DHS (Department of Homeland Security) must end the practice of outsourcing torture through third‑country removals, restore humanitarian parole, and rebuild a functioning, humane asylum system.  
  • DHS must reinstate Temporary Protected Status for all individuals who cannot safely return to their home countries, halt mass deportations and unlawful raids and arrests, and guarantee due process for everyone navigating the immigration system.  
  • Congress must pass the Neighbors Not Enemies Act, which would repeal the Alien Enemies Act.   

“In all my years as an immigration attorney, I have never seen a client simply vanish in the middle of their case with no explanation,” said Immigration Defenders Legal Fund Legal Services Director Melissa Shepard. “In court, the government couldn’t even explain where he was — he had been disappeared.” 

“When the government detains and transfers people in secrecy, without transparency or access to the courts, it tears at the basic protections a democracy is supposed to guarantee,” added Shepard. “What this experience makes painfully clear is that due process and accountability cannot be optional. They are the only safeguards standing between people and the kind of lawlessness our clients suffered. We must end third country transfers, restore the asylum system, and humanitarian parole, and reinstate temporary protective status so this nightmare never happens again.” 

Continue Reading

The White House

Trump proclamation targets trans rights as State Dept. shifts visa policy

Recent policy actions from the White House limit transgender rights in sports, immigration visas, and overarching federal policy.

Published

on

President Donald Trump stands in the Roosevelt Room in December 2025. (Washington Blade Photo by Joe Reberkenny)

In a proclamation issued by the Trump White House Thursday night, the president said he would, among other things, “restore public safety” and continue “upholding the rule of law,” while promoting policies that restrict the rights of transgender people.

“We are keeping men out of women’s sports, enforcing Title IX as it was originally written, and ensuring colleges preserve — and, where possible, expand — scholarships and roster opportunities for female athletes,” the proclamation reads. “At the same time, we are restoring public safety and upholding the rule of law in every city so women, children, and families can feel safe and secure.”

The statement comes amid a broader series of actions by the Trump administration targeting transgender people across multiple federal policy areas, including education, health care, and immigration. A nearly complete list of policies the current administration has put forward can be found on KFF.org.

One day before the proclamation was issued, the U.S. State Department announced changes to visa regulations that could impact transgender and gender-nonconforming people seeking entry into the United States.

The policy, published March 11 and scheduled to take effect April 10, introduces changes to the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program, commonly known as the “DV Program.” The rule is framed by the department as an effort to strengthen oversight and prevent fraud within the visa lottery system, which allocates a limited number of immigrant visas annually to applicants from countries with historically low rates of immigration to the United States.

However, the updated language also standardizes the use of the term “sex” in federal regulations in place of “gender,” a change that LGBTQ advocates say could create additional barriers for transgender and gender-diverse applicants.

The policy states: “The Department of State (‘Department’) is amending regulations governing the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program (‘DV Program’) to improve the integrity of, and combat fraud in, the program. These amendments require a petitioner to the DV Program to provide valid, unexpired passport information and to upload a scan of the biographic and signature page in the electronic entry form or otherwise indicate that he or she is exempt from this requirement. Additionally, the Department is standardizing and amending its regulations to add the word ‘shall’ to simplify guidance for consular officers; ensure the use of the term ‘sex’ in lieu of ‘gender’; and replace the term ‘age’ in the DV Program regulations with the phrase ‘date of birth’ to accurately reflect the information collected and maintained by the Department during the immigrant visa process.”

Advocates say the shift toward using “sex” rather than “gender” in federal immigration rules reflects a broader push by the administration to roll back recognition of transgender identities in federal policy.

According to the National Center for Transgender Equality, an estimated 15,000 to 50,000 undocumented transgender immigrants currently live in the United States, with many entering the country to seek refuge from persecution and hostile governments in their home countries.

Continue Reading

Florida

Fla. House passes ‘Anti-Diversity’ bill

Measure could open door to overturning local LGBTQ rights protections

Published

on

(Photo by Catella via Bigstock)

The Florida House of Representatives on March 10 voted 77-37 to approve an “Anti-Diversity in Local Government” bill that opponents have called an extreme and sweeping measure that, among other things, could overturn local LGBTQ rights protections.

The House vote came six days after the Florida Senate voted 25-11 to pass the same bill, opening the way to send it to Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who supports the bill and has said he would sign it into law.

Equality Florida, a statewide LGBTQ advocacy organization that opposed the legislation, issued a statement saying the bill “would ban, repeal, and defund any local government programming, policy, or activity that provides ‘preferential treatment or special benefits’ or is designed or implemented with respect to race, color, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identity.”

The statement added that the bill would also threaten city and county officials with removal from office “for activities vaguely labeled as DEI,” with only limited exceptions.

“Written in broad and ambiguous language, the bill is the most extreme of its kind in the country, creating confusion and fear for local governments that recognize LGBTQ residents and other communities that contribute to strength and vibrancy of Florida cities,” the group said in a separate statement released on March 10.

The Miami Herald reports that state Sen. Clay Yarborough (R-Jacksonville), the lead sponsor of the bill in the Senate, said he added language to the bill that would allow the city of Orlando to continue to support the Pulse nightclub memorial, a site honoring 49 mostly LGBTQ people killed in the 2016 mass shooting at the LGBTQ nightclub.

But the Equality Florida statement expresses concern that the bill can be used to target LGBTQ programs and protections.

“Debate over the bill made expressly clear that LGBTQ people were a central target of the legislation,” the group’s statement says. “The public record, the bill sponsors’ own statements, and hours of legislative debate revealed the animus driving the effort to pressure local governments into pulling back from recognizing or resourcing programs targeting LGBTQ residents and other historically marginalized communities,” the statement says.

But the statement also notes that following outspoken requests by local officials, sponsors of the bill agreed to several amendments “ensuring local governments can continue to permit Pride festivals, even while navigating new restrictions on supporting or promoting them.”     

The statement adds, “Florida’s LGBTQ community knows all too well how to fight back against unjust laws. Just as we did, following the passage of Florida’s notorious ‘Don’t Say Gay or Trans’ law, we will fight every step of the way to limit the impact of this legislation, including in the courts.”

Continue Reading

Popular