Connect with us

National

LGBT groups assail decision in Ferguson shooting

Lack of indictment in Michael Brown case described as ‘disgusting’

Published

on

Ferguson, gay news, Washington Blade
Ferguson, gay news, Washington Blade

Michael Brown was shot and killed in August.

FERGUSON, Mo. — LGBT advocacy organizations on Nov. 24 sharply criticized a grand jury’s decision not to indict a white police officer who shot a black teenager to death in August.

Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin in a statement said Michael Brown’s family and the American people “deserve to have this case fully adjudicated in a public trial.”

GetEQUAL’s response to the grand jury’s decision was more blunt.

“Tonight’s news from Ferguson is disgusting and outrageous,” said the group. “The profiling and murder of Michael Brown — and the violation of the human and civil rights of Ferguson residents that has followed and that still continues — shine a light into the deep racism and criminalization that many Americans experience every day.”

Darren Wilson, an officer with the Ferguson Police Department, fatally shot Brown on Aug. 8.

The shooting sparked widespread protests in the predominantly black St. Louis suburb. The Associated Press reported several local businesses were looted and set on fire in the hours after St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Bob McCulloch announced the grand jury’s decision.

The National Black Justice Coalition, the National LGBTQ Task Force and the National Center for Transgender Equality are among the organizations that signed onto an Aug. 12 letter expressing support for Brown’s family.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Anonymous

    November 26, 2014 at 6:36 pm

    dem·a·gogue
    noun ˈde-mə-ˌgäg

    : a political leader who tries to get support by making false claims and promises and using arguments based on emotion rather than reason

    =====================================

    We must all guard against demagoguery and rushes to judgment based upon little or no facts. Both are too often an assault on our human rights and civil liberties.

  2. Gordon White

    November 27, 2014 at 3:38 pm

    The support of the LGBT groups, mentioned here, demonstrate how out of touch they are with the mainstream gay and lesbian community.

    Mr. Brown was, as evidenced by the video of him robbing and assaulting a store clerk, a bully. He not only ignored a police officer's direction to get out of the travel lane of the town's main road but then rushed the police officer's car, bashed it repeatedly with the vehicle's driver's door and the coup de grace, reached in for the officer's weapon.

    Not a single man or woman that I know would behave thusly. Yet the LGBT groups identified in this article rush to make harsh judgements upon a case that they are not witness to nor are they party to.

    Is there a problem between SOME police departments and the citizenry that they protect. YES.
    Is this case the appropriate one to choose as rallying point? NO
    Are the marches, demagoguery, and violence how you bring about change? NO

    Change comes about with patience and participation. The actions arising from Ferguson besmirch the legacy of MLK, Jr.

  3. Rj Petrucci

    November 28, 2014 at 3:24 am

    Stupid decision HRC — another decade in which you have lost my support.

  4. Duncan Henry

    November 28, 2014 at 6:57 am

    Deadly force against Americans by Americans in America is wrong. This should have gone done much differently.

  5. Calvin Townsell

    November 28, 2014 at 12:41 pm

    Well Ferguson protesters don't destroy LGBT organizations just black neighborhoods.

  6. Calvin Townsell

    November 28, 2014 at 12:41 pm

    Well Ferguson protesters don't destroy LGBT organizations just black neighborhoods.

  7. Calvin Townsell

    November 28, 2014 at 12:41 pm

    Well Ferguson protesters don't destroy LGBT organizations just black neighborhoods.

  8. Calvin Townsell

    November 28, 2014 at 12:47 pm

    hey

  9. Jeffrey Searcy

    December 6, 2014 at 8:29 pm

    GORDON, Spoken like a true white american who has never been harassed constantly by institutional power structures. GET INFORMED, BETTER YET GO AND MEET 'THOSE PEOPLE' WHICH YOU HAVE ALREADY FORMED AN OPINION ABOUT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National

Louisiana lawmakers fail to overturn Edwards veto of Trans sports bill

Edwards further said that the bill was “mean” because it targets “the most emotionally fragile children in the state of Louisiana.”

Published

on

Louisiana Democratic Governor John Bel Edwards (Photo Credit: Official state portrait)

BATON ROUGE – Louisiana lawmakers failed to override Gov. John Bel Edwards’ (D) veto last month of a bill that would have barred trans girls and women from participating on athletic teams or in sporting events designated for girls or women at elementary, secondary and postsecondary schools.

The measure, Senate Bill 156 authored by Sen. Beth Mizell titled the ‘the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act,’ in the Governor’s eyes, “was a solution in search of a problem that simply does not exist in Louisiana,” Edwards said in his veto statement;

“As I have said repeatedly when asked about this bill, discrimination is not a Louisiana value, and this bill was a solution in search of a problem that simply does not exist in Louisiana. Even the author of the bill acknowledged throughout the legislative session that there wasn’t a single case where this was an issue. 

The Republican majority state House chamber failed to override the Governor’s veto after voting 68-30 to override it, according to the state legislature’s website.

The vote narrowly missed the 70-vote threshold needed in the lower chamber to override the veto.

Two-thirds of both the House and Senate must vote to override a governor’s veto, according to the local Baton Rouge newspaper The Advocate.

The Governor reacted to the news that his veto withstood Republican efforts to overturn it in a press conference Wednesday.

Edwards noted that in his view he had “rejected a play” that had no place in Louisiana. 

“I would rather the headlines going out from today be that Louisiana did what was right and best. We rejected a play out of a national playbook that just had no place in Louisiana. That bill wasn’t crafted for our state, I mean go read it and look at the arguments that were made. None of that applies here,” Edwards said.

He further said that the bill was “mean” because it targets “the most emotionally fragile children in the state of Louisiana.” 

“We have to be better than that,” Edwards said. “We have to be better than that.” 

 

Continue Reading

National

Federal court blocks West Virginia Law banning Trans youth sports

“It hurt that the State of West Virginia would try to block me from pursuing my dreams. I just want to play.”

Published

on

Becky Pepper-Jackson (Photo credit: ACLU/Raymond Thompson)


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia ruled Wednesday that 11-year-old Becky Pepper-Jackson must be allowed to try out for the girls’ cross-country and track teams at her school, blocking West Virginia from enforcing a law that bans transgender girls and women from participating in school sports. 

The ruling came in the lawsuit challenging the ban filed by Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of West Virginia, and Cooley LLP.

“I am excited to know that I will be able to try out for the girls’ cross-country team and follow in the running shoes of my family,” said Becky Pepper-Jackson, the plaintiff in the lawsuit. “It hurt that the State of West Virginia would try to block me from pursuing my dreams. I just want to play.”

West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice signed H.B. 3293 into law at the end of April. It was one of hundreds of anti-LGBTQ bills pushed in state legislatures across the country in 2021. During legislative debate, it was not endorsed by any mainstream sporting or health organizations. A similar law in Idaho was blocked by a federal court in 2020, and a federal court in Connecticut recently dismissed a challenge to policies that allow all girls, including girls who are transgender, to participate on girls’ sports teams. Legal challenges are underway against similar laws passed in other states.

The Supreme Court recently refused to disturb Gavin Grimm’s victory at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, where he prevailed in challenging his school’s anti-transgender discrimination against him. This decision — which is binding precedent in West Virginia federal court — said that federal law protects transgender students from discrimination in schools.

“This is great news for Becky, and while our work is not done yet, today’s ruling jibes with similar rulings in other courts across the country,” said Avatara Smith-Carrington, Tyron Garner Memorial Law Fellow, Lambda Legal. “It is our hope that courts recognize and address discrimination when they see it, and nowhere is it more visible than in these stark attacks against trans youth.”

“Becky — like all students — should have the opportunity to try out for a sports team and play with her peers,” said Josh Block, senior staff attorney with the ACLU LGBTQ & HIV Project. “We hope this also sends a message to other states to stop demonizing trans kids to score political points and to let these kids live their lives in peace.” 

“We’ve said all along this cruel legislation would not survive a legal challenge, and we’re encouraged by the court’s decision today,” said ACLU-WV Legal Director Loree Stark. “We hope trans kids throughout West Virginia who felt attacked and wronged by the passage of this legislation are feeling empowered by today’s news.”

“We are extremely gratified — for Becky, and for all trans youth — at the court’s recognition that the law and the facts clearly support treating people who are transgender fairly and equally. Discrimination has no place in schools or anywhere else,” said Kathleen Hartnett of Cooley LLP.

Continue Reading

National

Conservative groups attack proposed Alabama capital city’s LGBTQ law

Allege law requires Christians to violate their religious beliefs

Published

on

Alabama State Capitol, HIV, gay news, Washington Blade
Alabama State Capitol (Blade file photo by Michael Key)

MONTGOMERY – The Alabama capital’s City Council is being urged to reject a proposed ordinance that would make sexual orientation and gender identity protected classes under the law.  Matthew Clark, the Executive Director of the conservative Alabama Center for Law and Liberty sent a letter on behalf of his group and six allied organizations asking the Council to abandon a vote implementing the ordnance.

According to the letter, the groups allege that the law would require Christians to violate their religious beliefs or face fines under certain circumstances. Prominent among the other signatures is Mathew D. Staver, Chairman of Liberty Counsel which the Southern Poverty Law Center lists as an extremist anti-LGBTQ hate group.

The SPLC, which has its headquarters in Montgomery, writes; “The Liberty Counsel has also been active in the battle against same-sex marriage and hate crimes legislation, which it claimed in a 2007 news release to be “’thought crimes’ laws that violate the right to freedom of speech and of conscience” and will “have a chilling effect on people who have moral or religious objections to homosexual behavior.” In that same release, the Liberty Counsel falsely claimed that the brutal murder of Matthew Shepard in Laramie, Wyo., had nothing to do with homosexuality, but instead was “a bungled robbery.”

In the letter Clark noted; ““As we read the ordinance, churches could be fined if they refuse to allow transgender people to use the bathroom of their choice, and they might be fined if they refused to let same-sex couples use their facilities for weddings,” Clark said. “They could also be fined if they declined to hire non-ministerial personnel, such as facility managers or secretaries, whose sexual orientation or gender identity contradicts the tenants of the church’s faith.”

“Christian schools, small business owners, and homeowners are also in the crosshairs. Schools could face liability if they decline to let transgender students use the locker rooms of their choice,” Clark said. “Small business owners like Jack Phillips [referring to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission] could face liability. And homeowners who list their homes on Airbnb could be fined if they declined to let a same-sex couple engage in sexual activities in their home that violate the tenants of their faith.”

Clark then warned the City Council that if it passes the ordinance, litigation could result and the City would likely lose.

The Montgomery Advertiser reported last month that City Mayor Steven Reed said a council vote in favor of the LGTBQ nondiscrimination ordinance that’s now being drafted in Montgomery would send a message. 

“There are signals that communities can send, and this is an important signal not only to those residents that live here right now but people all over the country that have maybe one idea of Alabama and Montgomery, and we want to show them that there’s a different reality here,” he said. 

Reed and his team have been working with the Human Rights Campaign and other advocacy groups to draft an ordinance that would expand protections for LGBTQ residents in the state’s capital city. The proposed measure, which would specifically target discrimination in government, employment and housing based on sexual orientation or gender identity the Advertiser reported.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts

Popular