June 3, 2015 at 12:48 pm EDT | by Michael K. Lavers
Lukewarm response to O’Malley presidential bid
Martin O'Malley, gay news, Washington Blade

Maryland’s gay lawmakers seem lukewarm to former Gov. Martin O’Malley‘s decision to run for president in 2016. (D-Md.) (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Maryland’s gay and lesbian lawmakers appear less than enthusiastic about former Gov. Martin O’Malley’s 2016 presidential campaign that he formally announced on Saturday.

State Del. Anne Kaiser (D-Montgomery County) said she admires “any citizen, politician or otherwise who has the courage to run for office, whether it be local alderman or the highest office in the land.” The Montgomery County Democrat noted to the Washington Blade that she will endorse former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who formally kicked off her 2016 presidential campaign in April.

“By announcing his candidacy, Martin is giving Democrats a choice, which is good for the party, for the citizens of this great nation and enriches democracy as a whole,” Kaiser told the Blade.

Former state Del. Heather Mizeur (D-Montgomery County) on Monday declined to comment. State Dels. Luke Clippinger (D-Baltimore City), Mary Washington (D-Baltimore City), and Bonnie Cullison (D-Montgomery County) and state Sen. Rich Madaleno (D-Montgomery County) did not return the Blade’s emails on the subject.

State Del. Maggie McIntosh (D-Baltimore City) was out of the country and could not be reached for comment.

Advocates applaud O’Malley for signing LGBT bills

O’Malley during his campaign announcement listed signing laws that extended marriage rights to same-sex couples and in-state tuition to undocumented immigrants as among the key legislative accomplishments of his two terms in office.

He played an active role in the campaign in support of the same-sex marriage law ahead of the November 2012 referendum on it, attending fundraisers and appearing at numerous events. O’Malley in May 2014 signed Maryland’s transgender rights law that took effect last October.

Jonathan Jayes-Green, a gay man from Panamá who Equality Maryland and Casa de Maryland featured in a campaign to garner additional support for the state’s same-sex marriage law and Dream Act that extended in-state tuition to undocumented immigrants, was among those who introduced O’Malley at his campaign announcement.

“We could not be more proud of Jonathan,” said Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, a statewide LGBT advocacy group. “He has become an important voice and leader in both the LGBT and immigrant communities of Maryland.”

Evans told the Blade that her organization is also “grateful for the governor’s leadership over the past few years on LGBT issues.”

“Without his passion and dedication we would not have won marriage equality in Maryland,” she said. “We know that he will carry his steadfast commitment to our issues with him as he moves into his next political chapter.”

Sharon Brackett, president of Gender Rights Maryland’s board of directors, noted that O’Malley “has an actual record on supporting and seeing legislation passed on LGBT issues” that includes signing the state’s first trans ordinance in 2002 when he was mayor of Baltimore.

“Governor O’Malley is the first presidential candidate to talk about the importance of transgender rights at his announcement,” Haley Morris, a spokesperson for O’Malley’s campaign, told the Blade on Wednesday. “He is running to make sure that the dignity of every individual is a priority for our nation as a whole.”

Marriage endorsement only came as ‘political winds shifted’

O’Malley over the years has faced criticism that he did not publicly support marriage rights for same-sex couples until it was politically advantageous for him to do so.

The former governor during a January interview with the Blade before leaving office disputed reports that he said the Maryland Court of Appeals should not interfere with the “sacraments” after it dismissed a same-sex marriage lawsuit in 2007. His full statement issued at the time read: “I look forward to reading the court’s full opinion, but as we move forward, those of us with the responsibility of passing and enforcing laws have an obligation to protect the rights of all individuals equally, without telling any faith how to define its sacraments. I respect the court’s decision.”

He told Richard Sher of WMAR in 2004 that he supported “equal civil marriage” in response to a question about then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s decision to allow gays and lesbians to marry in his city.

Dan Furmansky, who was executive director of Equality Maryland at the time, declined to comment for this story.

Michael Estève, chair of the Maryland chapter of Log Cabin Republicans, sharply criticized O’Malley over his decision not to make same-sex marriage a legislative priority until 2012.

“His endorsement of same-sex marriage in 2012 came only as the political winds shifted, and then, only in the form of a referendum in which the governor failed to persuade some of the largest Democratic voting blocs to support it,” Estève told the Blade.

Morris defended O’Malley’s record on marriage and Maryland’s trans rights law.

“In Maryland, he fought for marriage equality long before it was a national progressive priority, defended it at the ballot box, and prohibited discrimination against Marylanders based on gender identity,” Morris told the Blade.

Rev. Merrick Moise, a Baltimore pastor who works within LGBT communities of color, told the Blade on Monday that it is “laudable” that O’Malley backed marriage rights for same-sex couples in 2012 after advocates “worked tirelessly to persuade” him to reach that position.

Moise was critical of the “zero-tolerance” policy toward crime that O’Malley implemented during his mayoral tenure in Baltimore as he discussed the aftermath of the unrest that took place in several neighborhoods throughout the city in April. The former governor referenced the issue during his kick-off speech, and it has already cast a shadow over his campaign.

“The effects of zero-tolerance have been staggering,” Moise told the Blade, noting more than 100,000 people have been incarcerated for what he described as minor offenses since O’Malley implemented the policy. “Many still cannot find work because of arrest records. As a result, many are locked out of employment and locked into poverty.”

Uphill battle against Clinton, Sanders

O’Malley faces an uphill battle in the race to secure the Democratic nomination in 2016, considering that some polls indicate Clinton is 50 points ahead of the former Maryland governor. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a self-professed Democratic Socialist who entered the race last month, poses an additional challenge to O’Malley.

“His success versus Sanders won’t come down to social issues,” said Gender Rights Maryland Executive Director Dana Beyer. “Age, energy and records of overall accomplishment will be more significant.”

Somerset Mayor Jeffrey Slavin, who is vice chair of the Maryland Democratic Party, told the Blade he feels that progressive Democrats in Iowa, New Hampshire and other early caucus and primary states are “looking for a candidate who has taken a leadership” role on LGBT issues.

“I’m so proud that he’s going after that vote with that record,” he said, referring to O’Malley. “It’s sort of a litmus test for all progressive voters, how you stand and where you’ve stand on the LGBT community.”

Kaiser declined to comment on whether she feels O’Malley is likely to gain traction among LGBT voters by highlighting his efforts in support of same-sex marriage and trans rights.

“Today, the former governor garners only 3 percent support in his home state against Secretary Clinton,” said Estève. “If you’re looking for a corporate Democrat who prefers cold, numbers-driven bureaucracy to social justice, is openly hostile to small business in favor of big enterprise, and uses gay rights as little more than a political prop, you have your man in Martin O’Malley.”

Morris dismissed this claim.

“Governor O’Malley has always fought for the dignity of every human being, and gotten real results as a leader on LGBT issues,” she said.

Michael K. Lavers is the international news editor of the Washington Blade. Follow Michael

1 Comment

    In Recent TRUSTWORTHY polling
    by Rasmussen shows low levels of support for President Obama’s amnesty plan:

    A new Rasmussen Reports
    national telephone survey finds that just 34 percent of likely U.S. voters favor the president’s plan
    to allow the illegal immigrants to remain in this country legally and apply for
    jobs. That’s down only one point from April, but support has been inching down
    from a high of 40 percent just after the president announced his intentions
    last November. Most voters (55 percent) still oppose Obama’s executive action
    on immigration.

    In related Rasmussen polling,
    only 27 percent of Americans think their country is headed in the right
    direction, with two-thirds believing the nation is going in the wrong
    direction. These values are essentially unchanged since Obama took office in
    January 2009.

    Even half of Democrats
    polled think the U.S. is headed in the wrong direction
    under Obama. The ONLY people who don’t care—one way or another—are the long
    term parasites who get free benefits and live off the working taxpayer.

    As we always knew, California and American elections are filled
    with fraud and corruption. Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately
    13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or
    using phony ID’s; lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they have
    nothing to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to
    lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers.

    Could this be why real
    citizens don’t vote—the illegal aliens outvote them? Worse, in close elections
    illegal aliens can make the difference. True unadulterated Corruption? Look at
    the ballot box. In fact, they could have elected a President and Senator!

    “Since 80 percent of
    non-citizens vote Democratic, according to the study, non-citizen participation
    could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including
    Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional
    elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected
    to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote”
    to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by
    progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real

    Great news for criminals
    from foreign nations—Barack Obama wants to give you tens of thousands of
    dollars for violating our laws—as well as jobs, welfare, free education and
    health care. Honest citizens will have to work long and hard to pay for the
    Obama/illegal alien benefits.

    “Taxpayers must have
    Social Security numbers in order to claim the EITC, and illegal immigrants
    aren’t supposed to have numbers. But Mr. Obama’s new deportation amnesty grants
    illegal immigrants work permits, which are then used to obtain Social Security

    lawyers admit that once illegal immigrants get numbers, they can go back and
    re-file for up to three previous years’ taxes and claim refunds even for time
    they were working illegally.”

    It has been estimated that each illegal alien, under EITC,
    would be eligible for $25,000 a year–$75,000 in total—tax free. Sick.

    Read these disturbing
    Steve Franks report at http://www.capoliticalreview.com/

    The great initiation of a Donald
    Trump ultimatum was that he stated “I Would Build the Greatest Wall you have
    ever seen on the Mexican Border.” Trump cannot be bought like the Hillary Clintons and other
    politicians, who must be provided patron money to survive. Trump doesn’t need
    ‘Super Pacs’ money that wealthy donors use as favors to sweeten many
    politicians positions in Congress. Trump
    would be completely isolated from bribery that the People are ONLY aware of;
    that sometimes comes to light.

    It seems
    to me that a greatly successful Entrepreneur and top billionaire businessman
    Donald Trump would be a perfect choice for America as the president. With none of the
    questionable affiliation with the corruption in Washington and the power
    grabbers as the Clinton’s and Bush dynasties, whose unsavory reputation goes
    back to their earliest beginnings as for example Madam Hillary’s law office.
    Whereas Trump has exceptional abilities, to draw America out of its financial crisis and
    that he cannot be brought by insistent mega corporations.

    It would be Trumps commitment to lower the corporate tax, so
    that companies building outside the U.S; returning to manufacture their goods
    in America. By
    cutting the corporate tax rate, at least 2 Trillion dollars would find it
    returning to the U.S from tax havens, a benefit that would spiral the hiring of
    the estimated 35 million unemployed Americans and a decline in food stamps.
    Trump has a tough backbone and cannot be bribed by special interests and other
    foreign benefactors and would reject any issue, which this President and his
    minions have navigated against the American Economy. He is not beholding to the
    lobbyists and can stop them from tearing this country apart. He would stop the
    ultra Liberal zealots from changing our nation, into something Americans could
    not recognize. Click on Donald Trumps website to read his
    manifesto to return America to
    its greatness at https://www.donaldjtrump.com/

    you even noticed lately that the Left wing press has reduced commenting? I
    guess they don’t like the American people’s remarks any more, about the state
    of the Union under his majesty Obama and his Imperial

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2021. All rights reserved.