Connect with us

Opinions

Pride 2015: Celebrating and looking ahead

Military should welcome open trans service members

Published

on

Barack Obama signs DADT repeal

President Obama signed the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ in December 2010. The repeal took effect in September 2011. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

It has been almost four years since the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Since that historic victory, much in these great United States of America has changed for the benefit of our LGBT movement. But these historic achievements are only a start. We still have a significant amount of work to do to advance equality and fairness for all LGBT people. In particular, inclusion of LGBT individuals in the Military Equality Opportunity Program (MEO) was left on the table in the wake of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

But in light of the work still to do, there is much reason to celebrate this Pride month.

Eight weeks ago, obtaining LGBT equality in the Military Equality Opportunity Program (MEO) was an uncertainty. However, with Brad Carson’s appointment as Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness, OutServe-SLDN recognized the opportunity to re-energize the push for the Department of Defense to include LGBT individuals in the MEO.

After several intense weeks of advocating and lobbying by OutServe-SLDN, the Department of Defense will now send the Military Equality Opportunity Program to Secretary of Defense Ash Carter with sexual orientation included as a protected class. The Military Equal Opportunity identifies classes of service members that should be protected from discrimination, to allow them to rise to highest possible level of responsibility.  The policy will head to Secretary Carter’s office likely this week and he is expected to sign the policy by the end of June.

This continues our progress from last year, when the DoD Human Goals Charter was updated to make, “… military service in the Department of Defense a model of equal opportunity for all regardless of race, color, sex, religion, sexual orientation, or national origin.” The Human Goals Charter is still not perfect with the absence of protections for our transgender service members, but it moved the policy ever so slightly in the right direction.

Now, the inclusion of LGBT individuals in the MEO takes us one step further toward making military service a model of equal opportunity. That is why OutServe-SLDN remains focused on and took the necessary action to advocate that DoD and the service branches continue their progress toward ensuring equal protection and opportunity for all of our LGBT service members.

Despite this moment of celebration, our mission is not completed. Sadly, although sexual orientation will be included in the MEO, and despite our best efforts for full inclusion, gender identity will not be included at this time.

Recently, the Washington Blade published an article about transgender equality in the military or lack thereof. In that article I advocated that we must include all LGBT people when we push for changes in law, policy and lobbying. Although we were not successful in adding transgender to the MEO, OutServe-SLDN will always include transgender individuals in all of our efforts because when we separate our community we do a disservice to the advancement of all of our rights. Now, some took criticism to that point but to those detractors I say, by having the conversation about transgender equality as part of our movement’s larger conversation we move the equality line just a little bit further. It will be for us a year from now to obtain transgender equality in the MEO because of the conversations we have had over the last year.

I would further advocate that there is a strong likelihood that open transgender service would be undermined in the absence of non-discrimination protections. We have experienced with the repeal of DADT that discrimination rose because service members were allowed to serve openly but were still not a protected class. Neither I, nor OutServe-SLDN, believes it beneficial to secure open transgender service without having the necessary protections in place. The MEO does not require DoD to have a medical policy, open service policies, etc., to protect transgender individuals from discrimination. Until recently, only the Army had taken steps to slow the process of discharging transgender service members.

Service members have a sworn duty to serve and protect but we, as a nation, have a duty to protect our LGBT service members from discrimination.

Our community is looking at a big celebration in a few weeks both at the Department of Defense and the United States Supreme Court, but I want to remind you that the fight is not over. We deserve full equality. “Equality” can’t allow someone to get married on Sunday, and then be fired by their boss on Monday because they are gay. It is not equality when you deny a person from serving openly because they are transgender. It is not equality when our LGBT service members protect our country, but still face homophobic and transphobic slurs while serving.

Let us celebrate this Pride month as we move equality one step further with sexual orientation in the Military Equality Opportunity Program. Let us celebrate this Pride month as we remain cautiously optimistic that the United States Supreme Court will decide that marriage is a fundamental right for all. But let us also look ahead, let us use our history, our celebration to really galvanize our community for our next battles, our next fights. If we have learned anything from other movements, those who will fight against us will always do so.

 

Matt Thorn is interim executive director of OutServe-SLDN.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Opinions

My trans daughter thrived in Chicago public schools

Washington wants to make that impossible

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

I am a Chicagoan whose daughter is transgender. But that is not the most important fact about her. My daughter loves fashion, sings in choir, is active at church, and is, by every measure, your classic American teenager. 

Yet it is her gender identity that politicians in Washington have once again decided to make their business.

She’s had the benefit of attending school in a district that affirms her, with educators who have added protections for students like her to a contract, in a city that benefits from and believes in diversity.

If the Republican-led Congress that is subpoenaeing the CEO of Chicago Public Schools truly was interested in “inappropriate content” and its impact on students, they would start with the anti-trans state legislation that increases youth suicide attempts by 72%, not the school districts making them feel safe and welcomed. Protecting these kids in school is not a culture war talking point. It is suicide prevention.

But that is not what they are doing. Instead, they are calling to question the head of a school district where Chicago’s values have made our schools safer places for students of every gender, race, and nationality.

The same administration that has yet to investigate the Epstein files but is moving the FCC to put warning labels on television shows that portray inclusive families and characters of different sexualities, is telling on itself in what they think is permissible and what they think is harmful for school-age youth. They say this is about parental rights and children’s well-being, but the parental right I care most about is the right for my daughter and all children to walk into a school building and feel safe and affirmed instead of scared and threatened.

My daughter spent 13 years in Chicago public schools. Her teachers used her chosen name. Her classmates accepted her for who she is. She wore a formal dress at choir concerts, landed a female lead in the school musical, and used the women’s bathroom without anyone batting an eye. When she went to a school dance, her teachers celebrated her like any other student, gushing over her dress, cheering her on. Nobody treated her like a problem to be managed.

That is not luck. That is Chicago. It’s the result of educators who fought hard for these protections. While MAGA has moved other states to bar teachers from even acknowledging LGBTQ+ students, the Chicago Teachers Union ratified a contract that does the opposite. It puts gender support coordinators in every network, codifies protections for chosen names and pronouns, and incorporates CPS guidelines for transgender students into the collective bargaining agreement itself. 

Those are not bureaucratic details. They are what stands between a child like mine and the bully who, without them, could decide she does not deserve dignity and hurt her without consequence.

Chicago believes every student, including LGBTQ+ children, belongs in school and deserves to feel safe there. Our city has grit and resolve and a deep sense of pride in the diversity that makes it what it is. I believe that is exactly why this administration has put us in its crosshairs. This is a city that shuts down its streets for the Pride parade, Puerto Rican Day Parade, St. Patrick’s Day, and the Bud Billiken Parade. This is the Chicago I am raising my daughter in. The Republicans in Congress have decided that belief is the problem.

They have already passed a bill to pull federal funding from any school that affirms a transgender student’s identity without first notifying parents. They’re attempting to withhold funds from Chicago and other districts for programs that reverse generations of discrimination and disinvestment. They want to dismantle the Department of Education and have already passed a law to fund private religious schools with public dollars. Putting our school district under the lights of their circus is just one tactic in their political agenda.

I wanted my daughter to read, to do math, to graduate ready for whatever comes next, and find her place in the world. Every parent I know wants that. My daughter recently graduated. She got there because she had good teachers, she applied herself, and she never had to walk into school ashamed of who she was or afraid of what might happen. 

It matters to me that my daughter was in a district intentionally seeing to her safety, immigrant students’ sanctuary, and Black students’ success. What they see as a violation is really our city’s commitment to the dignity of all students

What they are running is not a parental rights agenda. It is a defunding agenda against parents, students, and educators who don’t subscribe to their beliefs, and Chicago is just the beginning.

Washington can hold all the hearings it wants, but they’ll never be able to erase children like my daughter. And I pray that our schools will never make children like her think twice before walking through those doors for the most formative years of their lives. Whether they attend a school district that supports them in holding their heads high or one that bends the knee to make them fearful instead is what this fight is actually all about. 


Mary Kay Devine is a Chicago resident.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Congratulations to Lewis George and all winners in D.C.’s primary

New mayor will have to navigate a hostile president

Published

on

(Washington Blade file image by Aram Varitan)

The primary is just about over and we are about to have a new mayor in D.C.

For the first time D.C. has ranked choice voting. Because of this, we don’t have a final winner for every race on election night. It will take a few days to declare some winners. I opposed ranked choice, and would rather see a run-off between the top two candidates, but the voters of D.C. spoke, so we have ranked choice.

Let me congratulate Janeese Lewis George, the apparent winner of the primary for mayor. Now it will be on to the general election where we can be close to 100% certain she will be the next mayor. I campaigned against her for a variety of reasons, and those reasons still hold. But she will have my support, and I congratulate her on her win. It is my hope she will become a good mayor for all the people of the District. That she will be a mayor we can all trust, and work with. That she will always speak up for the LGBTQ community, and speak out against anyone who wants to discriminate against us. Just as I hope she will actively fight antisemitism, Islamophobia, sexism, and racism. That she will fight for economic equality. So, again, I give her my full support at this time, trusting she will do all those things, because we all want only the best for all the people of the District. So, Janeese Lewis George, I salute you on your win, and wish you success.

In addition to a new mayor, we will have a new delegate to Congress, Robert White. I wish him well, and hope he will work to form the coalitions we will need if we are ever to get statehood. But also hope his first goal as we fight for that, will be to get us legislative and budget autonomy. Then we reelected Brian Schwalb as Attorney General, Phil Mendelson as Council Chair, and Zachary Parker as Council member for Ward 5. I hope they all continue the good work they have been doing. Then congratulations to Oye Owolewa for his win as Democratic Council member- at-Large. Then in the special election for Independent Council member-at-Large, Elissa Silverman reclaimed her seat. I hope those who endorsed her will fare better than I did when I previously endorsed her. I was nominated by the mayor for a seat on a board, and Ms. Silverman said she couldn’t participate in my committee review, or vote for me, as it would look bad for her as I had endorsed her. Figure that one out. Thankfully, the other 12 members of the Council had no problem confirming me. 

I hope the people in Ward 1 will get fair and equal representation, from former Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America chair, Aparna Raj, who apparently won that election. Congratulations also to Matthew Frumin, reelected in Ward 3, and Charles Allen, reelected in Ward 6. Then congratulations to my friend Phil Pannell, and all the others elected to Democratic Party posts. 

With the new members of the Council, and the new mayor, we can definitely anticipate some changes in how our government is run, and which issues will be a priority. I just hope considering the frustration we all feel with the felon in the White House, they will be able to hold in check some of their thoughts, understanding he can inflict pain, and has shown a willingness to do so, on the people of D.C., if he is challenged too fiercely, and too directly, especially true when the challenge comes from the mayor. He can, and will, react negatively, and we have seen that. The new mayor must know how to walk a tight rope, because it’s a skill she will need when dealing with the lying, racist, sexist, homophobic felon in the Oval Office. Disgusting or not, he will be around for the first two years of the new mayor’s term. I would rather see him in jail, but so be it. 

The new mayor and the Council will be working on some of the same issues that have been around for a number of years, and some new ones. They will still be fighting the rat problem, and I mean the animals, and then we look forward to the new RFK stadium, and the Commanders return to D.C. The team made certain promises, and it is up to the government to hold them accountable, including working with the community, building affordable housing, a new supermarket, and a host of other commitments. They must monitor hiring to ensure residents of D.C. are given all the opportunities possible, for jobs at every level on the various projects. 

Again, congratulations to all the winners. 


Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. 

Continue Reading

Letter-to-the-Editor

Primary Day is not the end of election season in D.C.

Ultra-local positions on November ballot; city’s future at stake

Published

on

The Stead Recreation Center polling place on June 16, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

Fellow citizens and voters in the District of Columbia!

Primary Day has passed. By now there should be some idea whom our new Congressional representative, mayor and members of the City Council may be. Hopefully Mr. Trump’s chest beating threats to take over the District resulted in more voters than ever sending a crystal-clear message to the White House.

Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 3, delivers the final decisions and requires every registered vote to cast final votes on the aforementioned positions. WAIT! There are other elected positions to fill.

The DC Board of Education will have candidates in Wards 1,3, 5, and 6. Finally, there are the ultra-local positions: all those running for the entire Advisory Neighbor Commissions in all eight wards. There are 345 Single Member Districts around the city representing around 2,000 neighbors.

Love your city and want to have a say in your area? Then consider running for the ANC. To learn more, check out www.oanc.dc.gov. 

Of course, also check out the DC Board of Elections at www.dcboe.org.

There might also be some initiatives/referenda to be decided on the November ballots. 

Do let the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund/Institute know if you are running either for the Board of Education or your local ANC at www.victoryfund.org.

Continue Reading

Popular