National
Carney: No updates on ENDA executive order, marriage
W.H. press sec’y unaware of discussion on directive against LGBT job bias
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney was tight-lipped on Tuesday when reporters pressed him for updates on President Obama’s views on an executive order barring LGBT job bias and same-sex marriage.
During a news conference, Carney said under questioning from the Washington Blade that he was unaware of any talks when asked if internal discussion followed Sen. Tom Harkin’s (D-Iowa) recent endorsement of an executive order protecting LGBT people against workforce discrimination.
“Not that I’m aware of,” Carney said. “I don’t have anything new for you on that.”
Earlier this month, Harkin came out in favor of an executive order that would mandate that the federal government only contract with companies that have policies protecting their LGBT employees from workplace discrimination. As chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee, Harkin is the leading Senate Democrat on labor issues.
Harkin joined Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.), a gay lawmaker and member of the House Committee on Education & the Workforce, and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act in the Senate, who have also expressed support for this measure.
Asked whether the president takes heed when someone when like Harkin calls on the president to take action, Carney said Obama welcomes input from the senator but has no information on the potential executive order. The Iowa senator helped build momentum for Obama’s presidential bid in 2007 by inviting him to the 30th Annual Steak Fry; a major event for potential presidential candidates in the Iowa caucus process.
“I’m sure that the president always wants to hear what Sen. Harkin has to say on a variety of issues, but I don’t have anything for you on that particular one,” Carney said.
An executive order barring government contractors from job discrimination against LGBT people has been seen as an interim alternative to ENDA passage while Republicans are in control of the House and progress on the measure in the lower chamber of Congress is unlikely. The White House hasn’t said one way or the other whether Obama would be open to issuing such a directive.
Similarly, Carney said he had nothing to offer when another reporter asked why Obama has yet to come out in support of same-sex marriage. Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher said during his questioning that a reasonable person would conclude, given the president’s recent statements and actions, that Obama in fact favors marriage equality although he has yet to articulate this belief.
“The president has said in the past what his position is,” Carney replied. “It hasn’t changed. If it changes I’m sure he’ll let you all know.”
Obama has called for legislative repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriage. In February, the president announced that he determined DOMA was unconstitutional and that he would no longer defend the anti-gay statute against litigation in court.
Despite this opposition to DOMA, the president has yet to come out in support of marriage rights for gay couples. Obama has suggested his position could “evolve” on the issue, but he’s yet to make an endorsement for marriage equality.
Pressed by Mediaite on this potential evolution to reach support of same-sex marriage would come to an end, Carney replied, “I have no update on that.”
A partial transcript of the LGBT-related Q&A with Carney and reporters follows:
Mediaite: And my second question, based on his what he said and his actions, I think a reasonable person can conclude that President Obama believes in the right of gay couples to marry. So why hasn’t he come out and said that?
Jay Carney: The president has said in the past what his position is. It hasn’t changed. And if it changes, I’m sure he’ll let you all know.
Mediaite: The last time we checked, he said it was evolving.
Carney: And that’s — I have no update for you on that.
…
Washington Blade: Jay, earlier this month Sen. Tom Harkin endorsed the idea of the president issuing an executive order mandating that the federal government only contract with companies that have non-discrimination policies for their gay and transgender workers. Harkin joins Senator Jeff Merkley and Colorado Congressman Jared Polis who also said they welcome this order from the president. In the wake of these endorsements, is there any consideration at all in the administration to issuing this directive?
Carney: Not that I’m aware of. I don’t have anything new for you on that.
Washington Blade: But does the president take heed when someone like Tom Harkin, who helped the president out early on during his White House bid in 2008, does the president take heed when Tom Harkin calls on the President to issue such an order like that?
Carney: Well, I’m sure that the President always wants to hear what Sen. Harkin has to say on a variety of issues, but I don’t have anything for you on that particular one.
U.S. Military/Pentagon
Federal appeals court rules White House illegally banned trans troops
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says Pentagon will appeal to SCOTUS
A panel of federal appeals court judges ruled that President Donald Trump’s policy banning transgender troops likely violates their constitutional rights.
The three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled 2-1 that Trump’s Executive Order 14183, also known as “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness,” was created with the intent to exclude people from the military based on their gender identity.
The policy argues that trans people are inherently incapable of meeting the military’s “high standards of readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity,” citing a history of or signs of gender dysphoria as the cause. According to the Defense Department, this creates “medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on [an] individual.”
The policy states that, regardless of the physical or intellectual capabilities of each applicant, it views trans military applicants as a monolith, considering them less qualified than their cisgender peers.
Despite the panel’s majority opinion issued on Monday, the first day of Pride Month, the ban remains in effect. The U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Pentagon to enforce the policy last year and will continue to allow it to remain in place as litigation proceeds.
The panel’s new ruling will prevent the military from discharging current service members named in the lawsuit, but it does not allow new transrecruits to join.
The policy “appears to be driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group: persons who identify as transgender,” Judge Robert Wilkins, a Democratic appointee of President Barack Obama wrote for the majority.
Judge Justin Walker, the author of the dissenting opinion and a Republican Trump appointee, argued that the authority to determine military policy does not rest with the courts. Instead, he wrote, the Constitution grants that power to Congress through legislation and to the president as commander in chief of the armed forces.
“We have neither the expertise nor the authority to decide whether the military can exclude the plaintiffs from its ranks. The Constitution assigns that authority to Congress and the commander-in-chief,” Walker wrote.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated that an appeal is in the works, posting, “See you at SCOTUS” on X on Monday in response to the ruling.
Jennifer Levi, senior director of transgender and queer rights at GLAD Law, which has led the litigation since last November, applauded the decision.
“Today’s decision is a powerful vindication of the plaintiffs’ extraordinary courage and unwavering commitment to their country,” Levi said.
The Washington Blade spoke with Second Lt. Nicolas (Nic) Talbott of the U.S. Army, the lead plaintiff in the case, and Levi from GLAD Law back in November.
While discussing the case and his experiences as a trans service member, Talbott said his identity is an asset rather than a hindrance, particularly when it comes to identifying problems and finding solutions, regardless of what others may think or say.
“Being transgender is not some sad thing that people go through,” Talbott told the Blade. “This is something that has taken years and years and years of dedication and discipline and research and ups and downs to get to the point where I am today … my ability to transition was essential to getting me to that point where I am today.”
He also discussed the impact of removing qualified and dedicated service members from the military, arguing that the consequences will be felt long after Trump leaves office.
“When we’re losing thousands of those qualified, experienced individuals … those are seats that are not just going to be able to be filled by anybody,” he said. “[That’s] military training that’s not going to be able to be replaced for years and years to come.”
“Every person who puts on the uniform is expected to make a tremendous amount of sacrifice,” Talbott said. “Who I am under this uniform should have no bearing on that … We shouldn’t be picking and choosing which veterans are worthy of our thanks on that day.”
Levi characterized the policy as overtly cruel and legally indefensible to the Blade.
“This policy and its rollout is even more cruel than the first in a number of ways,” Levi explained. “For one, the policy itself says that transgender people are dishonest, untrustworthy and undisciplined, which is deeply offensive and degrading and demeaning.”
She also argued that the administration’s cost justification is flawed, saying that removing and replacing trans service members is more expensive than retaining them.
“There’s no legitimate justification relating to cost … it is far more expensive to both purge the military of people who are serving and also to replace people … than to provide the minuscule amount of costs for medications other service members routinely get.”
National
Results from key Tuesday primary races
State officials in California had not called the governor’s race as of Wednesday morning but Republican Steve Hilton and Democrat Xavier Becerra appear likely to advance to the general election.
The race for governor has been scrambled several times after Kamala Harris opted not to run, Rep. Eric Swalwell dropped out after sexual misconduct allegations surfaced, and Rep. Katie Porter’s campaign fizzled. Becerra would be the state’s first Latino governor since 1875 if elected. Hilton was endorsed by President Trump.
In the Los Angeles mayor’s race, the AP declared that incumbent Mayor Karen Bass will advance to the Nov. 3 runoff while former reality TV star Spencer Pratt and LA Council member Nithya Raman were competing for second place. California is notoriously slow in counting ballots and only about half of the results were available by Wednesday morning.
In San Francisco, Democratic State Sen. Scott Wiener advanced to the general election in November, besting Supervisor Connie Chan, who was endorsed by House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi is retiring from Congress after nearly 40 years in the House.
In Iowa, Democratic state Rep. Josh Turek won the primary for an open U.S. Senate seat, defeating state Sen. Zach Wahls. Turek will face Rep. Ashley Hinson, who won the GOP primary with President Donald Trump’s endorsement, in the general election.
The Iowa seat is open because Sen. Joni Ernst (R) decided not to seek re-election. The primary was closely watched by LGBTQ advocates because Wahls rose to national prominence after a speech he made defending marriage equality went viral in 2011. Wahls was raised by a lesbian couple.
National
White House Correspondents’ Dinner rescheduled after shooting
‘We will not allow an act of violence to have the last word’
The White House Correspondents’ Association announced on Tuesday that it has rescheduled its annual dinner for July 24 after the April event was halted when gunshots rang out at the Washington Hilton.
Cole Allen, 31, is charged with the attempted assassination of President Trump, who was in the ballroom at the time of the incident. One Secret Service officer was wounded in the attack. Officers stopped Allen before he could enter the ballroom where 2,500 journalists and politicos were having dinner and waiting for Trump to speak. It was Trump’s first time attending as president.
“We will not allow an act of violence to have the last word, especially during a year when we are reflecting on the 250th anniversary of America and everything we stand for,” said WHCA President Weijia Jiang in a statement to members.
She did not announce further details, including venue and ticketing.
Washington Blade White House reporter Joe Reberkenny was in the audience when shots were fired and reported live on social media from the scene.
This post will be updated as more details are announced.

