Connect with us

National

Tea Party focus doesn’t include LGBT issues

Jobs, spending are priorities for nascent movement

Published

on

The Tea Party is making headlines for energizing the Republican Party base and ousting incumbent GOP lawmakers from Congress, but some observers say the movement is having limited impact on LGBT issues.

The movement is focused on economic issues and limited government rather than anti-gay rhetoric in its bid for growth and acceptance.

Michael Cole, a Human Rights Campaign spokesperson, said the Tea Party movement has “taken a lot of the wind out of the LGBT demagoguery sails.”

“Their relentless focus on economic issues has really taken a lot of the attention away from some of the attacks on LGBT people that we usually see from elements of the conservative movement,” he said.

Cole acknowledged the Tea Party may have anti-gay extremists in its ranks, recalling how tea partiers reportedly called Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) anti-gay epithets during a March rally at the U.S. Capitol, but maintained members of the movement have been reticent to address social issues.

“You don’t see as much rhetoric around choice or LGBT issues or some of the other things as you do around taxes and the deficit and health care and things like that,” he said.

Jimmy LaSalvia, executive director of GOProud, a gay conservative group, also maintained the focus of the Tea Party is on economic issues and not blocking the advancement of LGBT issues in Congress.

“The focus of the Tea Party is on fiscal issues and the growth of government, and their influence on Congress is to get Congress focused on those issues,” LaSalvia said. “And so, I think, if it’s having any influence on Congress, it’s telling Capitol Hill to wake up and quit spending all the money.”

But the perception that the Tea Party isn’t relevant to LGBT issues isn’t universal.

Michael Mitchell, executive director of the National Stonewall Democrats, characterized the Tea Party as the reincarnation of previous anti-gay movements.

“There is, indeed, a very conservative movement out there that is finding a voice and turning some races, but I believe it’s the same anti-equality, anti-gay elements that have been roadblocks and are going to be roadblocks for us,” Mitchell said.

Mitchell said he fears what will happen to LGBT issues if leaders from the Tea Party movement are elected to public office.

“I think if these Tea Party folks are in power – Sarah Palin, for example, if she were to somehow get back into power – believe me, our issues are not going to be anywhere near their agenda at all,” he said.

The fallout of recent Republican primaries suggests that LGBT issues may in fact be playing a role in how in the Tea Party is shaping national elections.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) was trailing in her bid to retain the Republican nomination following a primary last week that as of Blade deadline was too close to call.

Murkowski’s Tea Party opponent in the primary, Joe Miller, led the senator by 1,688 votes on Tuesday. The Alaska Division of Elections was set to count this week 15,272 absentee, questioned and early ballots as part of at least 25,500 uncounted ballots, according to the Associated Press.

Known in some circles as a moderate Republican, Murkowski was among four GOP senators to vote for cloture on attaching hate crimes protection legislation to the Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Authorization Act.

Miller, on the other hand, has on his campaign website a letter explaining his opposition to hate crimes laws because he says they violate First Amendment rights. The letter criticizes Murkowski for her vote for the measure.

“At the time of Senator Murkowski’s vote to expand hate crimes into the realm of sexual orientation, the latest FBI statistics at her disposal relating to crimes of bias motivated by sexual orientation reported exactly ONE case in all of Alaska,” writes Miller.

In Arizona, some observers believe the Tea Party also had an impact on moving Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to become the most vocal opponent in the U.S. Senate of repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” as he faced a primary challenge from J.D. Hayworth.

McCain has threatened to filibuster the fiscal year 2011 defense authorization bill based on the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal language and has spoken out against repeal in committee hearings. Before lawmakers broke for August recess, McCain objected to bringing the defense bill to the floor because of the repeal language.

The senator’s opposition to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal may have paid off in his primary last week. He trounced Hayworth in the Republican primary by securing 56 percent of the vote.

There is much debate about the Tea Party’s role in the aftermath of those campaigns.

LaSalvia maintained that Murkowski’s situation isn’t the result of her hate crimes vote because of her positions on government spending.

“She wasn’t voted out because she voted for hate crimes; she was voted out because she’s a porker,” LaSalvia said. “That’s a stretch to look at any race and draw a gay connection to really any race like that. The election cycle is shaping up to be an election about jobs, the economy and spending.”

Cole also said he didn’t think hate crimes legislation played a significant role in the Alaska primary.

“If you just look at the reporting afterwards analyzing the race, it was all about these sort of economic issues and these homegrown things,” he said. “Her vote on hate crimes I just never heard once brought up.”

As for McCain, Cole cautioned against making too much of his opposition to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal.

“John McCain had to move to the right on his primary challenge, but I think his primary shift was on immigration,” Cole said. “Certainly, he was never a fan of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal, and he increased his rhetoric faced from the threat with his right, but I think that those sorts of instances are exceptions rather than the rule for the way that these campaigns have been fought.”

Another example suggests that the Tea Party movement is throwing out incumbent Republicans regardless of their views on LGBT issues.

Sen. Robert Bennett (R-Utah), who was unable to secure the Republican nomination in May after finishing third in the second round of balloting at the Utah Republican Convention, has a strong anti-gay record this Congress.

In March, the Senate defeated the senator’s attempt to amend health care reform legislation to include a provision calling for a vote on same-sex marriage in D.C. Additionally, late last year, Bennett was the sole committee vote against reporting out the Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act to the Senate floor.

LaSalvia said Bennett’s loss of the Republican nomination even with this record underscores the Tea Party is focused on economic issues rather than social issues.

“Bob Bennett got voted out because he’s been part of the problem,” he said. “He’s been in Congress a long time and spent a lot of money and hasn’t stood up to change things.”

LaSalvia noted that Bennett’s vote for the bank bailout as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program was among the actions that frustrated Republican voters.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Bill

    September 2, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    I wish the Blade would stop giving GOPRound any press at all. They are an organization of two — yes, two people — who have found a way to self-aggrandize and to support issues irrelevant to our community.

  2. Stan J

    September 3, 2010 at 1:03 am

    Were nice guys for the most part.

    Until we get power. And then we’ll further consolidate power by falling in line with the talibangelical republican base.

    Yes, there are Libertarians, which is what the tea party mainstream position is about. Which btw includes abolishing social security, medicare, medicaid etc etc.

    This is the side of the repubs motivated by greed, and lack of any belief in our collective responsibility for each other, particularly in our old age.

    And the other side – well thats the people whose southern bible culture gave us slavery, the KKK and segregation. Who are motivated by religious hatred. The two pieces of the republican party.

    And remember the Family Research Council – who called for the jailing of gays. One of their nutcase leaders, is an obvious gay person filled with self hatred. The other is a Baptist minister, though he doesn’t bragg about it – the type of people I mentioned re slavery, the KKK, and segregation.

  3. David Hart

    September 3, 2010 at 10:07 am

    This really is infuriating nonsense. The Tea Party Caucus is led by Bachmann who is an anti-gay extremist. At least two of the TP senate candidates (Angle and Paul) are Reconstructionist Christians. As for Joe Miller, his issues statement reads like religious right code: “I am unequivocally pro-life and life must be protected from the moment of conception to the time of natural death. The family is the foundation of a free society.” Moreover, he is endorsed by Huckabee.

    While I agree that there are issues other than those affecting our community, I find it very troubling that GOProud is willing to advance the careers of people who hate us.

  4. Kurtis

    September 3, 2010 at 11:26 am

    There are many issues that the Tea Party folks avoid becoming mired in, not just LGBT to say there are only two people supporting GOProud shows a lack of knowledge.

  5. Gabino Cuevas

    September 3, 2010 at 11:53 am

    Bill – maybe the problem is with people like you that refer to “our community”. My community is AMERICANS. I don’t view my entire being as a gay. I am a gay man, but that is only a small part of my whole being. I am also conservative by nature and upbringing. I am Catholic, I am Cuban born, and I am ALL FLORIDA GATOR! LOL. I am against hate crimes legislation because it criminalizes THOUGHT. Go ahead and punish the crime – what does it matter what I scream out while committing the crime? Murder is murder. Maybe the problem is with liberal judges releasing hardened criminals back out into the streets. Maybe people hate because of the general moral breakdown in this country. Thee are many things that affect us all as AMERICANS. Stop turning being gay into a profession.

    • Chris

      September 7, 2010 at 1:13 am

      Well HOLA Gabriel and while you’re against hate crimes legislation I’m against the fact that we in America still allow cubans to float on rafts here and allow them to stay giving them public assisitance et, at while Mexicans, and every other group from The Caribbean are treated like dirt and sent back unlike Cubans. Why should they get preferences? Can you explain that Mamacita?

  6. Alyson

    September 3, 2010 at 4:44 pm

    Gabino:

    LGBT people all over the country are being deprived of their civil rights in employment, housing, insurance, immigration, federal marriage benefits, and exposed to violent, sometimes fatal assaults. LGBT people are *targeted* for discrimination and violence–this is why we need to fight back. We are in an intense struggle right now with calculated hatred coming from all directions. The Tea Party is back-pedaling on public attacks right now because hatred is not pretty. You can count on it, Gabino, if we ignore the bigots and watch them get elected, your rights… since you are obviously “out”… could be taken away. Being LGBT is not a profession–for many it is a daily struggle for equal rights.

  7. Frankie James

    September 7, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    Give them time… if they are successful then watch out.

  8. Frankie James

    September 7, 2010 at 1:48 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National

More Americans personally know someone who’s transgender, non-binary: survey

42% know a trans person, 26% know someone using gender-neutral pronouns

Published

on

More Americans personally know a transgender person or someone who goes by gender-neutral pronouns, according to new data from the non-partisan Pew Research Center.

A survey found 42 percent of Americans know someone who’s transgender, who is up from 37 percent who said so in 2017. Although most Americans, 57 percent, still say they don’t know anyone who’s transgender, that’s down from 63 percent five years ago.

Similarly, 26 percent of Americans say they know someone who uses non-binary gender pronouns compared to the 18 percent in 2018 who said they knew someone uses pronouns such as “they” as opposed to “he” or “she.”

At the same time, comfort levels with using gender-neutral pronouns – as well as their opinions on whether someone’s gender can differ from the sex they were assigned at birth – has remained about the same. Half of Americans say they would be either very or somewhat comfortable using a gender-neutral pronoun to refer to someone if asked to do so, compared to 48 percent who say they would not be comfortable. The numbers, according to Pew Research, are basically unchanged since 2018.

The survey found profound differences by age, party, and education in knowing a transgender person or someone who goes by gender-neutral pronouns, although in both parties growing shares of Americans report knowing a person who’s transgender.

For Americans under age 30, some 53 percent say they know a transgender person, which is up from 44 percent in 2017. In the same age group, 46 percent of younger U.S. adults know someone who goes by gender-neutral pronouns, compared to 32 percent in 2018.

The Pew Research Center conducted the survey of 10,606 U.S. adults between June 14 and June 17. The survey is weighted to reflect the U.S. adult population in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education, and other categories, according to Pew Research.

Continue Reading

National

Louisiana lawmakers fail to overturn Edwards veto of Trans sports bill

Edwards further said that the bill was “mean” because it targets “the most emotionally fragile children in the state of Louisiana.”

Published

on

Louisiana Democratic Governor John Bel Edwards (Photo Credit: Official state portrait)

BATON ROUGE – Louisiana lawmakers failed to override Gov. John Bel Edwards’ (D) veto last month of a bill that would have barred trans girls and women from participating on athletic teams or in sporting events designated for girls or women at elementary, secondary and postsecondary schools.

The measure, Senate Bill 156 authored by Sen. Beth Mizell titled the ‘the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act,’ in the Governor’s eyes, “was a solution in search of a problem that simply does not exist in Louisiana,” Edwards said in his veto statement;

“As I have said repeatedly when asked about this bill, discrimination is not a Louisiana value, and this bill was a solution in search of a problem that simply does not exist in Louisiana. Even the author of the bill acknowledged throughout the legislative session that there wasn’t a single case where this was an issue. 

The Republican majority state House chamber failed to override the Governor’s veto after voting 68-30 to override it, according to the state legislature’s website.

The vote narrowly missed the 70-vote threshold needed in the lower chamber to override the veto.

Two-thirds of both the House and Senate must vote to override a governor’s veto, according to the local Baton Rouge newspaper The Advocate.

The Governor reacted to the news that his veto withstood Republican efforts to overturn it in a press conference Wednesday.

Edwards noted that in his view he had “rejected a play” that had no place in Louisiana. 

“I would rather the headlines going out from today be that Louisiana did what was right and best. We rejected a play out of a national playbook that just had no place in Louisiana. That bill wasn’t crafted for our state, I mean go read it and look at the arguments that were made. None of that applies here,” Edwards said.

He further said that the bill was “mean” because it targets “the most emotionally fragile children in the state of Louisiana.” 

“We have to be better than that,” Edwards said. “We have to be better than that.” 

 

Continue Reading

National

Federal court blocks West Virginia Law banning Trans youth sports

“It hurt that the State of West Virginia would try to block me from pursuing my dreams. I just want to play.”

Published

on

Becky Pepper-Jackson (Photo credit: ACLU/Raymond Thompson)


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia ruled Wednesday that 11-year-old Becky Pepper-Jackson must be allowed to try out for the girls’ cross-country and track teams at her school, blocking West Virginia from enforcing a law that bans transgender girls and women from participating in school sports. 

The ruling came in the lawsuit challenging the ban filed by Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of West Virginia, and Cooley LLP.

“I am excited to know that I will be able to try out for the girls’ cross-country team and follow in the running shoes of my family,” said Becky Pepper-Jackson, the plaintiff in the lawsuit. “It hurt that the State of West Virginia would try to block me from pursuing my dreams. I just want to play.”

West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice signed H.B. 3293 into law at the end of April. It was one of hundreds of anti-LGBTQ bills pushed in state legislatures across the country in 2021. During legislative debate, it was not endorsed by any mainstream sporting or health organizations. A similar law in Idaho was blocked by a federal court in 2020, and a federal court in Connecticut recently dismissed a challenge to policies that allow all girls, including girls who are transgender, to participate on girls’ sports teams. Legal challenges are underway against similar laws passed in other states.

The Supreme Court recently refused to disturb Gavin Grimm’s victory at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, where he prevailed in challenging his school’s anti-transgender discrimination against him. This decision — which is binding precedent in West Virginia federal court — said that federal law protects transgender students from discrimination in schools.

“This is great news for Becky, and while our work is not done yet, today’s ruling jibes with similar rulings in other courts across the country,” said Avatara Smith-Carrington, Tyron Garner Memorial Law Fellow, Lambda Legal. “It is our hope that courts recognize and address discrimination when they see it, and nowhere is it more visible than in these stark attacks against trans youth.”

“Becky — like all students — should have the opportunity to try out for a sports team and play with her peers,” said Josh Block, senior staff attorney with the ACLU LGBTQ & HIV Project. “We hope this also sends a message to other states to stop demonizing trans kids to score political points and to let these kids live their lives in peace.” 

“We’ve said all along this cruel legislation would not survive a legal challenge, and we’re encouraged by the court’s decision today,” said ACLU-WV Legal Director Loree Stark. “We hope trans kids throughout West Virginia who felt attacked and wronged by the passage of this legislation are feeling empowered by today’s news.”

“We are extremely gratified — for Becky, and for all trans youth — at the court’s recognition that the law and the facts clearly support treating people who are transgender fairly and equally. Discrimination has no place in schools or anywhere else,” said Kathleen Hartnett of Cooley LLP.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts

Popular