Connect with us

Opinions

A summer to remember

Earthquakes, and hurricanes and resignations! Oh, my!

Published

on

September is here and another summer draws to a close. This has been an exciting one with interesting headlines written every day. On the political landscape since Memorial Day, Republican candidates for president have managed to outdo each other in saying inane things. All except Jon Huntsman, Jr., are bragging about who has a better way to deny civil and human rights to the LGBT community.

The president’s approval ratings have plunged and Standard and Poor’s downgraded U.S. credit based partly on our dysfunctional Congress. Financial instability has caused the stock market to gyrate wildly and many people are again thinking of putting off their retirement, at least those still working.

In Rehoboth Beach, D.C.’s gay summer getaway, a gay candidate for mayor lost but gay businessman Mark Hunker won a seat on the Commission. In Virginia, we celebrated the Democratic primary victory of Del. Adam Ebbin, who will most certainly be the first openly gay member of the Virginia State Senate. In Wisconsin, Democrats came up short in their effort to retake the Senate but did manage to recall two Republicans, no small feat, but how you spin that result depends on which party you support. Former Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold has said he will not try to reclaim his seat, leaving the primary field open for Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.). This will be a long, arduous and expensive campaign. Baldwin has a good shot at being the first out lesbian elected to the United States Senate. She would join other still closeted members of the LGBT community in that esteemed body and maybe give some of them the courage to come out.

We were also treated, if that is the appropriate word, to online semi-nude pictures of a congressman who was forced to resign and the announcement that the House of Representatives is ending its page program, well respected despite some problems with errant congressmen. We saw the passage of marriage equality in New York and the political realities of that event forcing the hand of Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley to push marriage equality so he can compete politically in 2016 with the hero of New York’s fight, Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Then there was the opening of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial on the Mall in Washington, D.C. While the official dedication was rained out we were reminded that while we have come a long way in securing the rights of African Americans there is still a long way to go in that fight and in the fight for full civil and human rights for the LGBT community. Jeffrey Richardson, director of the Mayor’s Office of GLBT Affairs, organized an LGBT remembrance of MLK in the Rayburn HOB and each speaker reminded us that we need to rededicate ourselves to King’s ideals. Then just this week, the Human Rights Campaign announced the resignation of Joe Solmonese and a planned search for a new president. While Solmonese’s tenure is viewed differently by many I think that all-in-all we will look back at the Solmonese era at HRC as a success for both the organization and our community. Being president of HRC is not a job for the weak of heart.

The weather kept making headlines as well. First it was hot, hot, hot and then the East Coast experienced an unusual 5.9 earthquake centered about 87 miles from D.C., followed by a massive hurricane that triggered the evacuation of many coastal communities, including Rehoboth Beach. Now we wait for the locusts. Some thought Pat Robertson or some other evangelical minister would say it was all retribution for gaining LGBT rights, instead some dumb rabbi in New York said it. Maybe Robertson’s not speaking up because the epicenter of the earthquake was in Eric Cantor’s (R-Va.) district, and he wouldn’t want to blame a Republican.

For many gays and lesbians on the East Coast, the last big weekend of the summer, Labor Day, will be spent in Provincetown, Fire Island or Rehoboth Beach. My choice is Rehoboth, weather permitting, with plenty of time spent on the Aqua deck. Rehoboth this summer saw the opening of a new Universal Gear store and toward the end of summer the opening of JAM, a new bistro from the owners of Eden.

So as summer 2011 comes to a close, it’s time to get out your checkbooks, as both the campaign and fundraising seasons are moving into full gear.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

Is Nigeria’s anti-LGBTQ crackdown only meant for the poor?

Wealth and fame can shield one from prosecution in the country

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

The Nigeria Police Force in Delta State a few weeks ago arrested more than 67 suspected gay men for attending an alleged gay wedding. Authorities received a tip, they interrogated those arrested and suspicions were cemented on the basis that some of these young men crossed-dressed. 

ā€œWe’re bringing this out to the world to note, especially Nigerians, that we’re in Africa and Nigeria. We cannot copy the Western world,ā€ Deputy Police Supt. Bright Edafe said. ā€œWe’re in Nigeria, and I can guarantee that the suspects will be charged to court.ā€ 

Although these young men have since been released, this situation in Nigeria underscores a glaring paradox: A country that boasts a growing number of queer celebrities — many of whom have embraced crossdressing as part of their persona — maintains harsh legal actions against less privileged queer youths who express their identities. This unequal treatment sends a damaging message to the broader queer community; perpetuating a cycle of discrimination, fear and inequality.

In a nation marked by its vibrant culture and diversity, Nigeria’s anti-gay laws stand as a stark contradiction to the principles of tolerance and inclusivity. These laws not only criminalize same-sex relationships, but have also given rise to a troubling disparity in their enforcement. It has disproportionately targeted the poor, transgender individuals and crossdressers, while seemingly ignoring high-profile celebrities who freely express their identities.

Bobrisky, one of Nigeria’s most popular crossdressers who built a large following off of this lifestyle, went on their social media to probe the arrested crossdressers for openly presenting that way. 

ā€œI strongly believe you guys can learn from those A-list,ā€ they wrote. ā€œFirstly, there’s a law passed against you guys that you can’t marry yourselves in this country, why the hell did you call yourselves together to organize a wedding?ā€

ā€œThat is the dumbest news I have ever read this week. You all deserve how you all were treated, sad truth. If you feel you are in love with your partner and you want to be together, why not relocate to where you are welcome,ā€ they continued. 

One would think that they were able to make comments like this because they didn’t crossdress; but when you have enough financial and social privilege to wriggle your way out of situations for which your counterparts would otherwise be prosecuted, you would think that the law doesn’t apply to you. 

Then-President Goodluck Jonathan in February 2014 passed the Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act, which legalized the prosecution of anyone who shows sexual relations with the same sex. Nigerian MPs in April 2022 pushed to update the SSMPA with a bill that would essentially criminalize crossdressers and force them to face six months in prison, or pay a fine of $1,200. 

The measure has yet to become law.

This targeting of transgender people and crossdressers by the Nigerian government is a distressing reality. These individuals often find themselves marginalized, not just socially, but also legally. Raids, arrests and harassment are commonplace for them, making it a daily struggle to live authentically. In a nation where gender expression should be celebrated as a testament to its cultural diversity, it is disheartening to witness these citizens ostracized and penalized for embracing their true selves.

On the other hand, the celebrities who have made crossdressing a part of their public image appear to exist in a different realm. They enjoy a level of visibility and fame that grants them an element of protection. Whether it’s due to their financial resources or their connections, they often escape the legal consequences that ordinary queer Nigerians face. This glaring contrast between the treatment of high-profile celebrities and everyday individuals exposes the systemic inequalities that persist in Nigeria’s legal system.

The implications of this disparity are profound. It sends a troubling message that wealth and fame can shield one from persecution, while those without such privileges bear the brunt of discriminatory laws. This perpetuates a culture of fear and silence among the less privileged queer community, preventing them from fully expressing their identities and participating in society without the constant threat of persecution.

Nigeria must engage in a profound societal dialogue surrounding the unequal treatment of its queer citizens to address this issue. It is crucial to question the legitimacy of laws that infringe upon the fundamental human rights of individuals based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. By sparking these meaningful conversations, we can begin to dismantle the harmful stereotypes and prejudices that fuel this disparity in treatment.

Nigeria’s anti-gay laws not only defy the principles of tolerance and inclusivity, but also expose a disconcerting imbalance in their enforcement. The stark contrast between the leniency shown to high-profile celebrities who embrace crossdressing and the harsh legal actions taken against less privileged queer youths sends a damaging message to the broader queer community. It is time for Nigeria to address this injustice, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society where all its citizens can embrace their identities without fear of persecution.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Medicaid cuts will lead to an uptick in STIs

Move threatens progress to end HIV epidemic

Published

on

We have come a long way from the days when HIV was an almost certain death sentence. But our work is far from over. The COVID-19 pandemic led to an uptick in rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, and low-income communities, LGBTQ+ communities, and communities of color continue to be impacted at alarming and disproportionately high rates.

These communities are also more likely to be served by Medicaid. Medicaid is the largest source of insurance coverage for people living with HIV in the United States, covering an estimated 40 percent of nonelderly adults with HIV, and Medicaid accounted for 45 percent of all federal HIV spending in 2022. During September, Sexual Health Awareness Month, it is worth examining the crucial ways Medicaid works to keep people healthy — and what threatens our progress today.

In recent weeks, we have seen a troubling trend develop. Five million Americans have been removed from Medicaid rolls, and many millions more are on the verge of losing coverage as a result of the Medicaid enrollment cuts. This represents the single greatest threat to our progress toward ending the HIV epidemic in years.   

During the pandemic, Medicaid enrollment grew by an estimated 20 million people, contributing to the uninsured rate dropping to the lowest level on record in early 2022. But, after a three-year period during which states provided continuous enrollment in exchange for enhanced federal funding, some states resumed dis-enrolling people from Medicaid on April 1. A recent KFF survey found that 17 million people could lose Medicaid coverage as a result of this process, referred to as the Medicaid ā€œunwinding.ā€

Many states are not doing enough to ensure that Medicaid-eligible residents don’t lose their coverage. While some have been removed from the rolls because they are newly ineligible, procedural issues account for 74 percent of people losing coverage. An unacceptably high number of FloridaTexas, and Virginia residents who are still eligible for Medicaid are losing coverage because of procedural reasons, such as failing to confirm proof of income or household size.

Our goal should be to ensure that no one who qualifies for Medicaid loses their coverage. The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) gave states the option to use a 12-month grace period, along with other flexibilities, to prepare for the unwinding and make sure residents had what they needed to recertify. So why are some states so eager to remove their residents from Medicaid rolls?

New York, on the other hand, has made equity a cornerstone of recertification work and provides a template for what states can do to help their residents remain covered. The state maximizes the flexibilities offered by CMS and works directly with providers, health plans, and recipients to minimize procedural disenrollments and ensure that people retain health care coverage, either through Medicaid, the state’s health exchange, or private insurance. New York is among the nation’s top-performing states in terms of call center wait times, call drop rates, and average time it takes to make an eligibility determination, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. New York’s call center is also able to produce materials in 26 languages. In June 2023 alone, New York State certified renewals for more than 400,000 residents.

At Amida Care in New York, we know firsthand that gaps in care for people living with or placed at elevated risk of contracting HIV can be especially devastating. When people lose access to PrEP medication to prevent HIV, they are left vulnerable to contracting HIV, and when people living with HIV lose access to antiretroviral therapy, they risk becoming seriously ill and transmitting HIV to others. We support and guide our members through the recertification process with dedicated outreach efforts that include phone calls, mailings, text messages, and home visits to limit loss of coverage and interruptions in life-saving treatments. 

We cannot begin to address health inequity or end the HIV epidemic without strengthening Medicaid. The recent moves by some states to strip their residents of Medicaid coverage will undermine the progress we’ve made.

Doug Wirth is president and CEO of Amida Care, a Medicaid Special Needs Health Plan for people affected by HIV.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Jann Wenner’s racist, sexist take on musicians isn’t surprising

New book ā€˜The Masters’ excludes Black, women pioneers

Published

on

Jann Wenner (Screen capture via CBS Mornings YouTube)

I enjoyed sharing my birthday with Bruce Springsteen, until I read the bigoted remarks made by his friend Jann Wenner in a recent New York Times interview.

Then I wasn’t so glad to have the same b-day as Bruce.

Springsteen didn’t make the comments. I’m a fan of his music. But, as I write this, Springsteen, as well as some of Wenner’s other friends, hasn’t spoken out against Wenner’s hurtful comments.

As the saying goes: Some gifts keep on giving. Wenner, who was removed from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation board after making sexist and racist remarks in a Sept. 15 interview with the Times, keeps on giving. But what’s he’s giving isn’t a gift. Not to Black people, women, music lovers, or queer folk.

Wenner’s one of us. He’s gay. 

I’m fine with his sexuality, but you’d hope that Wenner, for decades a gatekeeper of music and culture, would be a source of queer pride. But, that’s not the case with Wenner, a co-founder of the Rock the Roll Hall of Fame.

The fallout from Wenner’s Times interview is a needed wake-up call for queers.

Too often, we give ourselves a pass. We believe that because we live with homophobia, bi-erasure and transphobia, we know the score. That we’re not sexist, racist, ageist, ableist – we’re free of prejudice. Paragons of virtue.

Wenner, with his demeaning comments, is, I hope, getting us (especially, we who are Boomers) to look in the mirror. To check ourselves (as we examine our dogs for ticks) for our own prejudices, and for our virtue-signaling.

The controversy around Wenner began when he sat for the interview with David Marchese of the Times on Sept. 15 to promote his new book ā€œThe Masters,ā€ released by Little Brown and Company on Sept. 26.

ā€œThe Mastersā€ is a compilation of seven interviews that Wenner conducted with acclaimed musicians who are (or were before their death) his friends: Bob Dylan, John Lennon, Mick Jagger, Pete Townshend, Jerry Garcia, Bono, and Springsteen. All of the interviewees are white, male and Boomers.

ā€œThat there are no women or Black musicians in this collection is obvious,ā€ Wenner writes, according to Kirkus Reviews, in ā€œThe Masters.ā€ ā€œThis is reflective of the prejudices and practices of the times.ā€

It’s hard to describe how bigoted and absurd this is. As many have noted, rock ā€˜n’ roll was invented by Black people.

You have to wonder what Wenner was thinking. Had he never heard of Jimi Hendrix or Janis Joplin? Stevie Wonder? Joni Mitchell? Madonna?

Though too much racism and sexism exist today, the culture has gotten somewhat better. Attitudes have evolved. We’ve become more aware of our biases. 

Unfortunately, this isn’t so for Wenner. Marchese asked Wenner why every musician he talked with in ā€œThe Mastersā€ is white and male. ā€œInsofar as the women,ā€ Wenner responded, ā€œjust none of them were as articulate enough on this intellectual level.ā€

When pressed by Marchese, who wondered how he could say Joni Mitchell wasn’t ā€œarticulate enough,ā€ Wenner said, ā€œJoni was not a philosopher of rock ā€˜n’ roll.ā€

ā€œI mean, they just didn’t articulate at that level,ā€ Wenner said of Black musicians.

Reading the interview, I wondered if he’d read Rolling Stone, the magazine he edited for decades. Had he missed the covers with Melissa Etheridge, Joplin, and Tina Turner (to name a few of the women and Black artists featured on the magazine’s cover)?

Sadly, Wenner’s condescending, racist and sexist take on Black and women musicians isn’t surprising. Often, people with power (rich white men) believe they’re smarter, more talented, and more entitled to be cultural gatekeepers than those from marginalized groups. They’re convinced they’re more talented and ā€œarticulateā€ than those who don’t have power. 

Forget ā€œThe Masters.ā€ Check out Etheridge’s new memoir ā€œTalking to My Angels.ā€ That’s a good read.

Kathi Wolfe, a writer and a poet, is a regular contributor to the Blade.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular