Politics
Is a discharge petition ‘the only way’ to pass ENDA?
Gay lawyer who authored McCain-Feingold thinks so

Gay McCain-Feingold co-author Trevor Potter says a discharge petition is “the only way” to pass ENDA. (Photo courtesy of Caplin & Drysdale via Wikimedia Commons).
The gay co-author of the bipartisan campaign finance reform law known as McCain-Feingold says LGBT advocates could take a lesson from the way that measure passed into law — a discharge petition in the U.S. House — to advance the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
Trevor Potter, a Republican attorney with Caplin & Drysdale who specializes in political law, told the Washington Blade on Tuesday that a discharge petition is “the only way” to get ENDA passed while Republicans remain in control of the House.
“Given the House GOP leader’s opposition to ENDA, and resulting refusal to schedule it for a floor vote, the ONLY way to get it passed in the House is by way of a discharge petition,” Potter said via email. “If the petition gets close to 218 signatures, then the leadership will negotiate.”
Asked whether those words should be considered an endorsement of a discharge petition, Potter replied, “I’m not in the business of endorsing strategies — just commenting on them and analyzing them. I’m just a lawyer, not a political strategist.”
Successful discharge petitions in Congress in rare, but some supporters of ENDA — most prominently the LGBT group Freedom to Work — are seeking a discharge petition as a way to get around the issue of House Republican leadership withholding a floor vote on ENDA.
If 218 lawmakers sign the petition, ENDA would come to the floor regardless of what House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) have to say. That would mean in addition to the 178 sponsors of ENDA, 40 more lawmakers would have to sign the petition in the Republican-majority chamber.
The last successful discharge petition was in 2002: the House version of campaign finance legislation co-written by Potter that became known as the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
In addition to co-writing that law, Potter has a distinctive history as an openly gay person in support of McCain. He served as general counsel to the Arizona senator’s 2008 and 2000 presidential campaigns.
Asked whether he could see McCain voting in favor of ENDA, Potter declined to answer.
“Like all good lawyers, I don’t comment on my clients,” he said.
Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, said supporters of ENDA should take heed of Potter’s words as they look to pass the bill during the 113th Congress.
“Mr. Potter is way too modest,” Almeida said. “I understand that he basically co-wrote the McCain-Feingold legislation and was an author of the strategy to move it through both chambers of Congress. I’m impressed with the way they used the House ‘discharge petition’ to bring about the win on that legislation, and we should learn from their success as we push forward this year on ENDA.”
Still, Almeida cautioned against considering a discharge petition the “only way” to pass ENDA in the House and said other options are on the table.
“I don’t think a discharge petition is the only winning strategy, we might also choose to attach ENDA to another bill in the Senate, but the House discharge petition should definitely be on the table after we rack up a huge Senate vote total on ENDA this fall,” Almeida said. “If we all push hard, we could get to 60 Senate votes by September.”
Other LGBT groups and lawmakers who support ENDA aren’t overtly calling at this point for a discharge petition amid preparations for a full floor vote in the Senate in the months ahead.
Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, spoke broadly about supporting the right strategy to pass the bill when asked about the discharge petition.
“NCTE is interested in pursuing every possible option at the right time in the right way,” Keisling said.
Stacey Long, the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force director of public policy and government affairs, said the first matter at hand is success in the Senate before turning to the House.
“Our focus is building support for ENDA in the Senate and getting a floor vote done as soon as possible,”
Last week, Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin said he didn’t know whether a discharge petition would be appropriate for ENDA.
“I think as we get closer and as we make progress in the Senate, we’ll see, as we get closer, what the right strategies will be ultimately to get this done and work with the leadership, and work with Leader Reid and Chairman Harkin, who have been instrumental, and Sen. Merkley, who have been instrumental in getting us to where we are today,” Griffin said.
During the Netroots Nation conference in San Jose, Calif., last month, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) entertained the idea of a discharge petition to pass ENDA, but doubted the votes are there for passage.
“We can do discharge, but we don’t have enough votes to pass it,” Pelosi said. “So that means we have to have mobilization outside from some of our Republican friends, who should think that this is a form of discrimination that we should be getting rid of. But this is certainly the next order of business for us.”
And in an interview with the Blade in November, Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.), the gay lawmaker who’s the chief sponsor of ENDA in the House, said a discharge petition could be an option, but noted that legislation is rarely passed through that method.
“We can certainly file one,” Polis said. “Certainly in my time in Congress and long before it, there has never been a successful discharge petition … There certainly hasn’t been one in my time, or in the immediate past before my time.”
2026 Midterm Elections
Markey’s primary win deemed success for LGBTQ activists
Mass. lawmaker champions transgender rights
U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) clinched the Democratic seat for his reelection campaign in Massachusetts’s primary election on Tuesday.
Markey won the deep-blue state with 64.8 percent of the vote, according to NBC News, triumphing over Marine Corps combat veteran and Congressman Seth Moulton, who received 35.2 percent of the vote.
Massachusetts’s primary election, which determined which Democratic candidate will head to the polls to face off against the Republican challenger in November, is being considered a victory for LGBTQ-inclusive policy, as well as for a divisive pro-transgender rights candidate — both things Markey has become an outspoken champion of.
Markey has experience at multiple levels of government, from the state level, where he served three terms in the state House of Representatives, to his federal tenure, including 20 terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and is now serving his second term as a senator. He has become a fixture of a changing Democratic Party in one of the most consistently blue places in the U.S.
This primary — and much of the national discussion surrounding the Senate seat — focused a lot of campaigning power on fighting the growing sentiment, led mostly by Republicans, that the frustration many Americans feel lends itself to an anti-establishment and anti-incumbent attitude.
Markey ran his campaign using his past as a reflection of his commitment to constantly putting his best foot forward for Bay Staters — particularly with apprehension for issues younger and more progressive democrats have been righting for — including Green New Deal and “Medicare for All” while Moulton — who was also elected to federal office prior to this run — campaigned on being younger than Markey, arguing that he was not the same type of established politician.
Moulton also faced backlash for negative comments about trans athletes, sparking criticism for those who did want younger candidate but want for trans rights to be protected.
Markey’s track record of supporting the LGBTQ community is one of the most clear in federal politics, one that has garnered a “100 percent lifetime voting record” on the Human Rights Campaign’s PAC politician review scorecard.
That list of Markey’s actions includes being a cosponsor of the Equality Act, driving landmark legislation to ensure federal protections for LGBTQ Americans, and being one of the most vocal proponents for trans rights in the federal government — specifically in multiple appropriations bills and in the National Defense Authorization Act. He was also the lead sponsor of the Transgender Health Care Access Act and the Transgender Bill of Rights resolution.
Markey first introduced the Transgender Bill of Rights in the Senate in 2023, where it ultimately failed to be brought to law. He reintroduced the legislation this year once again. This was a direct response to the attitude pushed by many conservatives after 2021, when the push to minimize trans rights started to become a key part of their cause and has been constantly propped up by the Trump-Vance administration.
“Massachusetts needs a senator who stands up and fights back, a senator who never forgets who they are fighting for,” Markey said during his victory speech. “That has been the mission of my life, and it always will be.”
Following the calling of the primary, a slew of LGBTQ organizations rallied behind Markey, many pushing his past as an asset that puts his money where his mouth is through advocating for legislation specifically protecting the LGBTQ community.
Tyler Hack, the executive director of the Christopher Street Project, an organization dedicated to pushing for legal protections for trans americans, released a statement following Markey’s win. Hack argued that putting forward such a staunchly pro-trans candidate is a win for the community, especially after endorsing him earlier this year.
“Tonight, anti-trans politics lost. Massachusetts rejected the idea that attacking transgender people is a shortcut to political power. Voters chose a different path: one where equality is not negotiable, cruelty is not courage, and transgender people do not have to disappear for Democrats to succeed.”
The Human Rights Campaign also endorsed him as a candidate earlier this year and issued a statement via its president, Kelley Robinson.
“Ed Markey has spent decades fighting for LGBTQ+ equality, for working people, and for a more livable world,” Robinson said. “He knows why equality matters. He’s stood with us no matter what. We were proud to endorse him this year, and when a pro-equality majority takes back the Senate this fall, we will continue to count on him as a champion for our community.”
Markey is running for reelection against Republican John Deaton in November, where he is expected to win.
Congress
HRC president campaigns for Chris Pappas in NH
Gay congressman running to succeed retiring U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen
Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson on Sunday campaigned for U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) in New Hampshire.
Robinson traveled to Manchester, the state’s largest city, nine days before the Sept. 8 primary that will determine who will vie for retiring U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)’s seat.
We’re hitting the pavement across New Hampshire to fight for a freer, fairer future for everyone.
Glad to have Human Rights Campaign President @KelleyJRobinson join us for a canvass launch in Manchester today. pic.twitter.com/XWCEaQxy4o
— Chris Pappas (@ChrisPappasNH) August 30, 2026
Former U.S. Sen. John E. Sununu, who represented New Hampshire in the U.S. Senate from 2003-2009, will face off against former U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, who represented Massachusetts in the U.S. Senate from 2010-2013, in the Republican primary.
Karishma Manzur is among the Democrats challenging Pappas.
A poll the University of New Hampshire Survey Center released on Aug. 26 shows Sununu is ahead of Brown. The same survey shows Pappas ahead of Manzur and his other Democratic challengers.
The UNH Survey Center poll shows Sununu ahead of Pappas by a 45-43 percent margin if they were to face off in the general election. The margin of error is +/-2.1 percent.
Pappas would become the first openly gay man elected to the U.S. Senate if he were to win in November.
Congress
Chris Van Hollen says the Democratic Party needs change. Is he the one to lead it?
Senator is backing anti-establishment Democrats across the country
By LEE O. SANDERLIN | The Democratic Party is having something of an identity crisis — losing to President Donald Trump twice in three elections will do that.
Should the party embrace anti-establishment figures who espouse progressive policy ideas like Medicare for all and rhetoric about unrigging the economy for the 1 percent? Or should Democrats try to appeal to moderates who want to return to semi-normalcy in a time of political upheaval?
Although he’s been in Congress since 2002, with key leadership roles throughout his tenure, Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, 67, counts himself firmly in the anti-establishment camp.
The rest of this article can be found on the Baltimore Banner’s website.
-
Technology4 days agoE-INFOSOL leaders encourage youth to pursue tech careers
-
Books4 days agoNew book examines Trump cuts to LGBTQ healthcare
-
Theater3 days agoImmersive ‘Nation-State’ imagines a society free of authoritarianism
-
Poland3 days agoPoland begins to legally recognize same-sex marriages from other countries
