Connect with us

Opinions

Small businesses cheer White House regulatory order

New policy restricting federal regulations welcomed by enterprise

Published

on

The White House, gay news, Washington Blade
The White House

(Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

President Trump fulfilled a significant campaign pledge on Monday when he signed an executive order referred to as a “one in, two out” policy on new federal regulations.

Requiring “that for every new federal regulation proposed, two must be revoked,” this directive is not as simplistic as summarized. The order targets regulatory costs and not merely the number of individual regulations, and would additionally establish a cost cap on new regulatory mandates. Under the order, any new regulation must be “offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”

The business community, and smaller enterprise in particular, widely cheered this reform measure and welcomed the priority Trump conveyed to it by acting expeditiously. He had promised only to do so within the first 100 days of his administration.

D.C. was represented at the White House ceremony by Casey Patten of Taylor Gourmet, co-founder of the popular local hoagie eatery with multiple locations open in, or planned for, D.C.’s most prominent and newly developing areas. Patten also attended a meeting with Trump and his executive staff detailing the presidential directive prior to its signing.

The Obama administration was notorious for promulgating a bevy of extensive new rulemaking, including a big batch while headed out the door, which businesses decried as costly burdens hindering growth and employment. Trump, however, was quick to point out, “This is a knock on many presidents preceding me. It got particularly bad in the last eight years, but … it’s a knock on many.”

The president’s initiative mirrors regulatory restrictions in both the U.K. and Canada. Canada’s “One-for-One Rule” applies to the direct costs of the administrative burden for businesses, while the U.K.’s “One-in, Three-Out” requirement assesses all new net regulatory cost implications. Australia has also instituted similar cost-weighing accountability.

Implementation will prove complex and complicated. Imposing a required assessment balancing business costs, however, will inject much-needed discipline in government rulemaking. Forcing an evaluation among bureaucrats followed by public analysis of the financial impact of new rules and administrative requirements will lead to more cost-effective policies.

A “pay as you go” philosophy and commonsense attitude factoring for economic effects of the constant churn of red tape will demand guidelines for creating regulatory balance. Benefit-versus-cost review standards and creating specific regulatory reduction targets – across multiple agencies – will be imperative.

An applicability threshold determination, such as any regulation with an economic impact of $100 million or more, is essential. Capturing an overly broad range of regulations could overwhelm any evaluation system, but tackling too small a range of regulations could produce insufficient business burden reduction.

Any offset requirement will itself tend to curtail the current gusher of new regulations to a reasonable and responsible level. To get there, a conscientious true-cost assessment will be required – inevitably prompting reluctance and resistance by anti-enterprise extremists.

Big government types, of course, will conjure up images of planes falling from the sky and gangrenous slabs of meat littering grocery shelves. What they intentionally overlook, and likely don’t understand, is that most government marketplace interventions have little to do with actual public health and safety, and appropriate limited exceptions in those areas are easily accommodated.

The no-regulation-is-ever-too-onerous adherents possess little ability or, worse, willingness to assess the negative business operating implications and deleterious economic effects of over-regulation. Ensuring accurate and independent assessment of regulatory costs, perhaps by non-governmental sources, may become requisite.

As one Washington small business owner operating several long-popular and highly successful neighborhood restaurants recently proffered in retort to a D.C. Council member pushing for more local business restrictions and legislative rules at a community meeting, “the only new job I’ve been able to create is for an office administrator to cope with the mounting pile of reporting requirements for all the new regulations you keep sending our way.”

It’s a lot to hope, but D.C. should likewise adopt this new sensible national standard.

Mark Lee is a long-time entrepreneur and community business advocate. Follow on Twitter: @MarkLeeDC. Reach him at [email protected].

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Opinions

Why you should celebrate pride with a musical about GenderCannibalism?

Rose: You Are What You Eat, through June 23 at Woolly Mammoth.

Published

on

Photo courtesy of Woolly Mammoth.

Because when I came out as trans my aunt told me it was because I ate my twin in the womb…and that’s what the show is about

Because…remember that time when you decided to dress like exactly like your older sister; or you stole your mothers’ makeup or your brother’s tie; or you decided to dress up like Katherine Hepburn for halloween when you were (i dunno) 10; or you started to look eerily like your lover…..that’s all gender cannibalism

Because because because because because….” because if you know that song this was made for you…and if you don’t…it’s okay, we’ll work on it

Because you can probably find a cute date at the show irl instead of just swiping in your phone…think of theater as an in person dating app without as much drunkenness as the bar

Because maybe that cute date is me

Because you can sing along to music written by a bunch of queers from Philly and D.C. 

Because we are all so hungry and so so thirsty 

Because I guarantee you will leave feeling fed

Because cannibalism puns are tasty

Because it’s a comedy

Because there are pay-what-you-can tickets

Because it plays all of June

Because we are consuming gender all the time but rarely watching what and how we eat it 

Because it’s an anti-assimilationist endeavor: the corporations can’t co-opt “gender cannibalism” for pride month (but there is merchandise available at the show…)

Because it’s only 75 minutes

Because I dance around in tighty whities with socks on my hands

Because there is a free clothing swap and treats in the gallery next to the show

Because why not?

Because you will be cast as my Mother, and that’s the role of a lifetime (or at least my lifetime)

Because you won’t know what will happen; you can’t pause or rewind the show; you will be taking a risk; you will find it’s more than just entertainment; you will feel me talking right to you

Because I’ve been writing this show for 34 years and am finally ready to share it with you

Because I’ll be in the lobby afterwards to say hi, and receive hugs, stories, and phone numbers 

Because I made this piece for you, my dear deviants, trans folx, genderful ones and for the people that care for us. It is a good laugh and a good cry and meant as a gift, a way to end your day feeling loved, nourished and worthy

Because don’t you want to be nourished and reminded that you are loved and worthy? 

And frankly because art needs you to survive and you need art to thrive

Because I took the time to write this letter to you and you took the time to read it, and neither you nor I want to waste that investment

Because you won’t want to miss it

Get tickets to Rose: You Are What You Eat, playing through June 23rd.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Elon Musk is a danger to society

X has become a warped platform that spews anti-trans hate

Published

on

Elon Musk (Photo by shganti777/Bigstock)

Elon Musk is officially a danger to society. As of mid May of 2024, X.com, the platform formerly known as Twitter, has started banning accounts that use the word “cisgender” or “cis,” deriding it as a slur. For those who don’t know, “cisgender” refers to any person whose gender aligns with the genitalia they were assigned at birth. Erasing the word “cisgender” from tweets, or X.com remarks, ensures that gender nonconforming people can’t articulate the bigotry they feel in this world. 

Musk has been notorious for his transphobia. It didn’t just start in mid-May of this year. In June of 2023, during Pride month, Musk liked a bunch of transphobic tweets. For instance, he promoted the Matt Walsh documentary, “What is a Woman?”, which was a film in transmisogyny. 

Moreover, in July of 2022, Musk’s transgender teenage daughter sought separation from her father because he was hateful toward her and bullied her because of her gender identity. In December 2022, Musk tweeted “My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci,” mocking the words that transgender people need to enunciate who we are. This wasn’t the first time that Musk mocked pronouns. 

Musk is becoming increasingly dangerous toward trans people, especially as X.com takes on a new dimension — turning into a warped platform that spews conspiracy views, including right-wing thoughts that trans people shouldn’t exist, and other ultraconservative opinions. 

What adds heavy weight to the danger that Musk poses is the relative success of his companies and the wealth, measured in dollars, that he carries on his shoulders. SpaceX is valued at around $180 billion, and Tesla is worth approximately $571 billion. The more wealth Musk accumulates, the more power is attached to his transphobia. Already, he is consciously allowing employees within his companies to mock transgender people. Having a CEO who openly teases a marginalized population is a recipe for that company to tease said population as well. 

As a former small business owner, I’m actually a huge fan of Musk’s work. The billionaire is brilliant beyond belief, and, after being bullied in school in South Africa, earned degrees in physics and economics from the University of Pennsylvania. At one point, he was working so hard on one of his first startups that he often slept in the office and showered at a local YMCA. In interviews, it is clear that Musk borders, if not embodies, genius. His intellectual prowess is second to none. 

Additionally, the mogul has been open about his diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome and bipolar disorder. It’s impressive, to say the least, that Musk has racked up all of these accomplishments despite having these diseases of the mind and body. He has vocalized his use of ketamine therapy, for instance, in treating his bipolar, which is a ballsy move to make as CEO. 

Unfortunately, though, Musk just won’t stop with his transphobia. He is making X.com a non-democratic place for sponsored conspiratorial speech, and banning words is the farthest thing from freedom, which is a virtue he claims to embody. 

Many scholars of Elon have noted that he lives in a distorted reality, and I have to agree with that sentiment. Banning “cisgender” from X.com is certainly a distorted thing to do, and should be looked upon as a danger to society. 

Isaac Amend is a writer based in the D.C. area. With two poetry books out, he writes for the Blade and the Yale Daily News. He is a transgender man and was featured in National Geographic’s “Gender Revolution” documentary. He serves on the board of the LGBT Democrats of Virginia. Contact him at [email protected] or on Instagram at: @literatipapi

Continue Reading

Opinions

Mayor of Salisbury, Md. is the Grinch who stole Pride

Randolph Taylor masks his homophobia with cowardly ‘neutrality’ claim

Published

on

Randolph ‘The Grinch’ Taylor, mayor of Salisbury, Md.

Salisbury is a small town on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, probably best known for its university of about 7,000 undergraduate students. It’s also home to a robust and growing Pride celebration.

But this will mark the first time in five years that a Pride flag will not fly at city hall for Pride month, as the Blade reported last week.

“The administration’s position on the PFLAG kick-off is very simple,” Mayor Randolph Taylor said to the Blade. “That is, to be neutral. Neutrality is not to be interpreted as anything else but simply that — being neutral.“ (PFLAG has served as an organizer of Salisbury Pride events.)

Nicole Hollywood, an official with PFLAG Salisbury, told the Blade the group received an email from the city informing them of the change.

“We simply got an email saying that ‘we’re evaluating the use of city assets for cultural events,’ and ‘we don’t feel it’s appropriate moving forward to hang flags that represent special interest groups.’”

So Salisbury’s LGBTQ residents now constitute a “special interest group” rather than a minority community facing growing backlash, hatred, and discrimination in a rural part of the state? This lame, ham-handed excuse barely disguises the cowardice, homophobia, and transphobia at play here. No elected public official should be “neutral” when it comes to the rights, dignity, and equality of their constituents.

We are painfully aware of the growing influence of MAGA-inspired hate groups like the ironically named Moms for Liberty, that are working overtime to bully public officials into banning LGBTQ-themed books, pulling support for Pride events, and otherwise rendering our community invisible again. They want us back in the closet where we can’t disrupt their plans to establish a Christian theocracy. 

Mayor Taylor is merely the latest rube in a pathetic and long line of cowardly public officials to kowtow to this madness, inspired by their Dear Leader Donald Trump, a convicted felon who has validated the worst impulses and bigotry of Americans from coast to coast. What happened to leaders who lead? What happened to the Ronald Reagan Republicans who wanted the government out of our lives, embraced immigrants, and fought Russian aggression? Reagan couldn’t get elected dog catcher in the modern GOP.

But back to Taylor — the Grinch who stole Pride. He is the mayor of a small town and he has the cojones to match. Let’s hope the business community, including the influential local university, speaks out to denounce this hateful attack on Pride — because that’s precisely what it is. By shrinking the public spaces where LGBTQ people feel comfortable and safe, officials like Taylor are playing into the hands and the sick agenda of the MAGA crowd. When LGBTQ people are attacked and “othered,” our queer youth suffer and die. Shame on Mayor Taylor for caving to such hatred and betraying his LGBTQ constituents during the most important month of the year for our visibility. The good people and the LGBTQ residents of Salisbury deserve better.

Kevin Naff is editor of the Washington Blade. Reach him at [email protected].

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular