Connect with us

News

Spicer hints at coming action on anti-LGBT ‘religious freedom’ order

Trump transition official says directive being redrafted and coming soon

Published

on

Sean Spicer, gay news, Washington Blade

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer says he expects something on a “religious freedom” executive order.

Amid renewed concerns President Trump would sign a “religious order” undermining LGBT rights, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday he expects the administration would soon “have something.”

Spicer made the remarks in response to a question from the Daily Signal, an arm of the anti-LGBT Heritage Foundation, on whether the order is still coming and whether it would extend beyond the Johnson Amendment, a law Trump has pledged to repeal barring churches from making political endorsements.

“I think we’ve discussed executive orders in the past, and for the most part, we’re not going to get into discussing what may or may not come until we’re ready to announce it,” Spicer replied. “So, I’m sure as we move forward we’ll have something.”

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the “something” to which Spicer was referring was an actual executive order or a statement on a policy position for the way forward.

Although Trump initially passed up the opportunity to sign a proposed anti-LGBT “religious freedom” executive order at the time of the National Prayer Breakfast during the start of the administration, a recent report in The Huffington Post raised concerns a different order will come soon.

The report quotes Ken Blackwell, a senior fellow at the anti-LGBT Family Research Council who oversaw domestic policy for the Trump transition team, from an interview he had with Sirius XM’s Michelangelo Signorile in which Blackwell says the order is being redrafted and on the way.

ā€œIn the final analysis, what we want is an executive order that will meet the scrutiny of the judicial process,ā€ Blackwell is quoted as saying. ā€œIf there is no executive order, that will disappoint [social conservatives]. But a good executive order will not. So weā€™re still in the process.ā€

Blackwell reportedly said the former director of Family Research Councilā€™s Center for Religious Liberty, Ken Klukowski, had ā€œactually structuredā€ the initial draft order as a legal adviser to Trumpā€™s transition team and is now one of the lawyers ā€œin the process of redrafting it.” Klukowski is now a senior attorney at the Liberty First Institute and a contributor toĀ Breitbart, a conservative website.

The ā€œanchor conceptā€ of the order, Blackwell is quoted as saying, is a directive allowing people in the course of business to refuse services to LGBT people out of religious objections.

ā€œI think small business owners who hold a religious belief that traditional marriage is between one man and one woman should not have their religious liberty trampled upon,ā€ he explained. ā€œI would imagine that that will be, strongly and clearly, the anchor concept [of the order].ā€

No federal law prohibits discrimination in public accommodations on the basis of gender, sexual orientation or gender identity and an executive order like this would send a signal to individuals they should feel free to discriminate. A federal “religious freedom” executive order wouldn’t preempt state laws barring anti-LGBT discrimination.

Klukowski is also quoted in the Huffington Post article as saying he’s ā€œnot at liberty to speak aboutā€ the order specifically, but nonetheless expressed confidence Trump would act to protect religious freedom both through judicial appointments and possibly administrative actions.

ā€œAnd Iā€™m confident,ā€ Klukowski reportedly said, ā€œthat the president is showing ā€• much to the shock of many establishment people who said, ā€˜Thereā€™s no way thisā€™ll happenā€™ ā€• that he keeps his promises, even when theyā€™re things that an establishment player would never do. And Iā€™m confident that heā€™s going to keep his promise when it comes to protection of religious liberty as well.ā€

Last month, a draft executive order began circulating among federal advocacy groups that would allow persons and religious organizations ā€” broadly defined to include for-profit companies ā€” to discriminate on the basis of religious objections to same-sex marriage, premarital sex, abortion and transgender identity.

At the time, the White House downplayed the draft executive order and said Trump wouldn’t sign it ā€” at least for the time being. Media reports circulated that Ivanka Trump and Jared Kuskner convinced Trump not to sign the “religious freedom” order and the president wasn’t ever seriously considering doing so.

The White House issued a statement saying Trump would preserve the Obama-era order against workplace discrimination among federal contractors and is “respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights.” That pledge of support was undermined after the administration later rescinded guidance protecting transgender students from discrimination at schools.

Olivia Dalton, the Human Rights Campaign’s senior vice president for communications and marketing, said renewed plans for an anti-LGBT “religious freedom” order shouldn’t come as a surprise.

“Donald Trump and Mike Pence have repeatedly threatened the LGBTQ community, and by their own admission this ‘license to discriminate’ order has been circulating for weeks,” Dalton said. “No one should be surprised — their despicable attack on transgender kids last week showed just how low they’re willing to go.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

West Virginia

Appeals court strikes down W.Va. transgender athlete ban

Ruling finds law violates studentsā€™ constitutional rights, Title IX

Published

on

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on April 16, 2024, blocked West Virginiaā€™s ban on transgender athletes, finding the law violates trans studentsā€™ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution. The ban was challenged by Becky Pepper-Jackson (pictured) a 13-year-old trans student athlete from West Virginia. (Photo courtesy of Billy Wolfe/ACLU)

BY LORI KERSEYĀ | The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down West Virginiaā€™s ban on transgender athletes, finding the law violates trans studentsā€™ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution and Title IX, a federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on sex in education programs.

The case, B.P.J. vs. the West Virginia Board of Education, was filed in May 2021 on behalf of Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 13-year-old trans middle school student and track athlete who would be barred from participating if the ban is upheld. Pepper-Jackson is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia and Lambda Legal.

In April 2021, West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice signed into law a bill prohibiting trans women and girls in the state from participating in sports that align with their gender identity. The U.S. Court of Appeals in February 2023 blocked the state from removing Pepper-Jackson from her schoolā€™s track and field team as legal advocates appealed a lower courtā€™s ruling upholding the ban. 

In Tuesdayā€™s ruling, Judge Toby Heytens wrote that offering Pepper-Jackson the ā€œchoiceā€ between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is not a real choice.

ā€œThe defendants cannot expect that B.P.J. will countermand her social transition, her medical treatment, and all the work she has done with her schools, teachers and coaches for nearly half her life by introducing herself to teammates, coaches and even opponents as a boy,ā€ the judge wrote. 

ā€œBy participating on boys teams, B.P.J. would be sharing the field with boys who are larger, stronger, and faster than her because of the elevated levels of circulating testosterone she lacks,ā€ he wrote. ā€œThe Act thus exposes B.P.J. to the very harms Title IX is meant to prevent by effectively ā€˜exclud[ing]ā€™ her from ā€˜participation inā€™ all non-coed sports entirely.ā€

In a statement Tuesday, Joshua Block, senior staff attorney for the ACLUā€™s LGBTQ and HIV Project, called the courtā€™s ruling ā€œa tremendous victory for our client, transgender West Virginians and the freedom of all youth to play as who they are.ā€

ā€œIt also continues a string of federal courts ruling against bans on the participation of transgender athletes and in favor of their equal participation as the gender they know themselves to be,ā€ Block wrote. ā€œThis case is fundamentally about the equality of transgender youth in our schools and our communities and weā€™re thankful the 4th Circuit agreed.ā€ 

ā€œWe hope todayā€™s ruling sends a message of hope to the trans youth of West Virginia,ā€ Aubrey Sparks, legal director of the ACLU of West Virginia, said in the statement. ā€œAnd a message of warning to politicians who continue to dehumanize this vulnerable population.ā€

West Virginia is one of 21 states that have banned trans student-athletes over the last three years, according to the ACLU. 

In a statement Tuesday, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey vowed to defend the ban and said he is ā€œdeeply disappointedā€ in the decision. 

ā€œThe Save Womenā€™s Sports Act is ā€˜constitutionally permissibleā€™ and the law complies with Title IX,ā€ Morrisey said. ā€œI will keep fighting to safeguard Title IX. We must keep working to protect womenā€™s sports so that womenā€™s safety is secured and girls have a truly fair playing field. We know the law is correct and will use every available tool to defend it.ā€

******************************************************************************************

Lori Kersey

Lori Kersey is a reporter with a decade of experience reporting in West Virginia. She covers state government for West Virginia Watch.

******************************************************************************************

The preceding article was previously published by the West Virginia Watch and is republished with permission.

Nonprofit, nonpartisan, independent journalism not hidden behind a paywall. Mountaineers are always free, and so is West Virginia Watch.

West Virginia Watch is part of States Newsroom, the nationā€™s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

Continue Reading

News

News is Out, Word In Black and Comcast NBCUniversalĀ welcomes 16 journalism fellows to cover Black and LGBTQ+ communities

The fellows will receive best practices, learnings and mentorship from journalists and media professionals at News is Out, Word In Black and NBCUniversal.

Published

on

Today, News is Out and Word In Black, together announced the 16 fellows selected for The Digital Equity Local Voices Lab, a new initiative powered by Comcast NBCUniversal to place journalists at 16 Black and LGBTQ+ serving news publications across the country. During the year-long fellowship, the group will receive the training and resources needed to tell stories within marginalized communities through media and technology and celebrate the work being done by Black and LGBTQ+ leaders in their communities.

ā€œThrough Project UP, we are proud to donate $1 million to launch this unique, first-of-its-kind program that will support coverage of Black and LGBTQ+ topics in the media as well as emerging journalists with a passion for reporting on issues of importance to these communities,ā€ said Dalila Wilson-Scott, EVP and Chief Diversity Officer, Comcast Corporation and President, Comcast NBCUniversal Foundation.

ā€œComcast is one of the earliest corporate leaders in LGBTQ+ inclusion, so it should come as no surprise that they understand the value of local LGBTQ+ media,ā€ said Mark Segal, founder of the Philadelphia Gay News and member of News is Out. ā€œTheir investment in our growth is also an investment in the future leadership of LGBT media and intersectional LGBTQ+ media.ā€

The fellows will receive best practices, learnings and mentorship from journalists and media professionals at News is Out, Word In Black and NBCUniversal.Ā In addition, they will report on stories of Black and LGBTQ+ entrepreneurs and creatives in their communities, share training and resources on using technology more in their daily lives, report on policy related to technological access and connectivity, and share the work being done to advance digital equity.

ā€œI am excited to be a part of a fellowship that is specifically geared toward the promotion of diversity, inclusivity and intersectionality,ā€ said Davi B. Ulloa-Estrada, News is Out and Philadelphia Gay News fellow. ā€œWe are missing such crucial and different perspectives on world issues, so I look forward to being a part of this project.ā€

ā€œThis fellowship program is the epitome of what journalism means to me ā€“ using innovation and creativity to fuel a passion for multimedia storytelling and uplift the voice and perspective of the overlooked,ā€ said Word In Black and Washington Informer fellow, Jada Ingleton. ā€œIt means so much to know that Iā€™ll be in a position to produce stories that could enact change and affect lives the same way generations of journalists impacted mine.ā€Ā 

The Local Media Foundation (LMF) is managing the fellowship and Lab and facilitating content creation to reach diverse audiences between the 16 publishers, Comcast NBCUniversal andĀ NBCU Academy. Word In Black and News is Out are collaboratives that were launched by LMF.Ā 

The 16 fellows are:

In February, the three organizations announced the launch of The Digital Equity Local Voices Lab and application period. The Lab is part of Project UP, Comcastā€™s $1 billion initiative to connect people to the Internet and advance digital equity and economic mobility through programs and community partnerships that open doors for the next generation of innovators, entrepreneurs, storytellers, and creators across Comcast, NBCUniversal, and Sky.

Continue Reading

India

Indian political parties for the first time include LGBTQ rights in election platforms

Voters will begin to cast ballots on April 19

Published

on

(Photo by Rahul Sapra via Bigstock)

The world’s largest democratic exercise will begin in India on April 19 as citizens begin to cast their votes in the country’s election.

This year’s election is different because national level political parties for the first time are promising to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples as part of their election platforms. 

The Indian National Congress, one of India’s oldest political parties, promised after wide consultation that it would introduce a bill that would recognize civil unions between couples who are part of the LGBTQ community. The party, which has governed India for the majority of the period since independence from the U.K. in 1947, has refrained from taking a stance on laws that include Section 377, which criminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations.

Then-Health Minister Gulam Nabi Azad in 2011 when the INC was in power said homosexuality is a disease. He made the controversial comment while speaking at an HIV/AIDS conference in New Delhi, the Indian capital.

“Unfortunately, this disease has come to our country too,” said Azad. “Where a man has sex with another man, which is completely unnatural and should not happen but does.”

When the Delhi High Court was hearing the Naz Foundation case, the Home Affairs Ministry opposed the striking down of Section 377 based on its belief that homosexuality cannot be morally condoned. The INC never struck down Section 377, which criminalized homosexuality, in parliament.

A 5-judge panel on the Supreme Court on Sept. 6, 2018, decriminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations.

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) on April 4 unveiled its platform with a range of socialist commitments, including support for LGBTQ rights. Among these pledges is to amend the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019 to address community concerns and ensure legal recognition and protection for same-sex couples akin to marriage. 

The platform also outlined plans to introduce a bill similar to the Special Marriage Act of 1954, which allows partners to be listed as dependents and facilitating like inheritance, alimony in the event of divorce and other issues. The party further pledged to enact a comprehensive anti-discriminatory bill that would include LGBTQ people, ensure quotas in educational institutions and implement horizontal reservations in employment.Ā 

Addressing the issue of crimes against LGBTQ people, the platform promised to treat such offenses on par with crimes against heterosexuals. The platform also calls for tackling bullying, violence and harassment of gender non-conforming and LGBTQ people in educational settings, enforcing anti-hazing policies and combating hazing based on sexual orientation and gender identity. 

The platform further touched issues related to transition and informed consent.

The Special Marriage Act of 1954 is a law that provides for civil unions among Indians and Indian nationals who live abroad, regardless of the religion or faith followed by either party. This law enables people from two different religious backgrounds to enter into marriage. Parliament in 2019 passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act that extended rights to trans people.

Brinda Karat, a former member of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian Parliament, andĀ leaderĀ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), spoke with the Washington Blade and said the current government has homophobic ideas that are not acceptable to the party.

The ruling government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi is striving to secure more than 400 parliament seats in the upcoming election, aiming for a substantial majority. 

Various polls conducted by Indian news organizations indicate a probable victory for the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. In response to the BJP’s dominance, Congress and several national and regional parties have joined forces as the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance. 

This alliance comprises 26 opposition political parties. Despite its formation, however, there is no clear coalition strategy in place and only two parties have included LGBTQ-specific policies in their election platforms. 

The Blade reached out to Congress’ spokesperson for comment, but has not received a response. The BJP also did not respond to a request for comment.

The party has yet to release its election platform. 

Ankush Kumar is a reporter who has covered many stories for Washington and Los Angeles Blades from Iran, India and Singapore. He recently reported for the Daily Beast. He can be reached at [email protected]. He is on Twitter at @mohitkopinion. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular