Connect with us

Opinions

Have both parties learned the wrong mid-term lesson?

Dominant moderate, independent voters may feel ignored in 2020 race

Published

on

centrist voters, gay news, Washington Blade

Dominant moderate, independent voters may feel ignored in the 2020 race.

Last month’s midterm election produced the sort of split-decision satisfying few.

Democrats, eager for a dramatic shift that didn’t come in early results but improved for national races after mail-in and absentee ballots were counted and close contests were eventually decided, turned off the television on election night and went to sleep without fanfare or celebration.

In the end, though, Democrats had their best national midterm performance for U.S. House seats in more than four decades.

Republicans took solace that, even while losing the House as expected, they expanded their margin in the Senate as also anticipated. The GOP additionally won marquee races in several high-profile states that were hotly contested, and generally performed according to pre-election polling and predictions despite losing support in suburban areas and among women.

Both major political parties, however, are likely to take away the wrong lessons.

A desire for a modest and moderating corrective adjustment guides those favoring back-and-forth shifts and results from low ideological loyalties, weak political affiliations, and centrist beliefs. Neither party seems inclined to accommodate those voters.

Self-identified independents with scant affinity or strong allegiance for either party, now a large and growing plurality of voters who actually decide national elections, tilted Democratic this time and backed a divided government. There’s no guarantee they’ll go all-in with one party again after doing so in 2016.

The mixed midterm outcome was the result of a standard “swing” to the opposition party rather than a massive “wave” Democrats hoped for and Republicans feared. Voter participation soared, a welcome change from the usually low off-year turnout, but was due to both parties exceeding ground-game expectations.

While total votes for Democrats were more than eight points higher than the Republican tally nationwide, the left continues to see its votes hyper-concentrated in specific areas, predominantly urban, where the largess is largely worthless. Gerrymandered districts, benefiting both sides depending on region, currently produce a notable edge for Republicans in House seats and many state legislatures. Key to future Democratic gains is the enhanced opportunity to favorably re-jigger district maps in states newly controlled by the party following the decennial census, adding future guaranteed wins.

In addition to reversing their fortunes in the House, Democrats also began to claw back some of the more than 1,100 state legislative seats throughout the country lost to Republicans during the Obama administration, re-capturing about one-third of them. Those wins, along with retaking some governorships, will be important to the party as it works to rebuild a localized political infrastructure and develop a “farm team” of elected officials to advance up the electoral ranks.

Early prognostications regarding the 2020 presidential contest are already proliferating, producing projections for a surprisingly competitive race. The upper industrial Midwest may again decide the outcome.

Nothing is certain, of course, and will ultimately depend on whom the two major parties each nominate and whether there is a strong independent competitor.

The 2020 presidential race will be arduous for candidates and voters alike. As many as 46 potential Democratic nomination contenders have expressed interest in competing, and a large number will ultimately share a super-sized debate stage. It could prove to be a mind-numbing blur.

No one knows whether President Trump will avoid indictment, impeachment or removal during the remainder of his first term, but chances are good he will – and again be nominated, should he seek to be, by a Republican Party he now controls. Whether sufficient voters in a split-screen nation can continue to countenance his primitive political style, renegade personal manner, and controversial positions remains to be seen.

The danger for the ascendant Democrats is mistakenly fantasizing that lurching further toward the extreme left by espousing economic proposals and other policies unacceptable to centrist voters provides a path to victory.

The political party or insurgent candidate failing to appeal to now-alienated and then-exasperated moderate and independent voters is likely destined to lose.

 

Mark Lee is a long-time entrepreneur and community business advocate. Follow on Twitter: @MarkLeeDC. Reach him at [email protected].

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Letter-to-the-Editor

Primary Day is not the end of election season in D.C.

Ultra-local positions on November ballot; city’s future at stake

Published

on

The Stead Recreation Center polling place on June 16, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

Fellow citizens and voters in the District of Columbia!

Primary Day has passed. By now there should be some idea whom our new Congressional representative, mayor and members of the City Council may be. Hopefully Mr. Trump’s chest beating threats to take over the District resulted in more voters than ever sending a crystal-clear message to the White House.

Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 3, delivers the final decisions and requires every registered vote to cast final votes on the aforementioned positions. WAIT! There are other elected positions to fill.

The DC Board of Education will have candidates in Wards 1,3, 5, and 6. Finally, there are the ultra-local positions: all those running for the entire Advisory Neighbor Commissions in all eight wards. There are 345 Single Member Districts around the city representing around 2,000 neighbors.

Love your city and want to have a say in your area? Then consider running for the ANC. To learn more, check out www.oanc.dc.gov. 

Of course, also check out the DC Board of Elections at www.dcboe.org.

There might also be some initiatives/referenda to be decided on the November ballots. 

Do let the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund/Institute know if you are running either for the Board of Education or your local ANC at www.victoryfund.org.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Corporate LGBTQ Pride 2026 on life support

A rainbow washout as marketing dollars disappear

Published

on

(Photo by insidestudio/Bigstock)

Terrified of becoming targets of right wing media and activists, businesses and brands are fleeing Pride support in 2026. The fear of boycotts and retribution have seen Pride sponsorships plummet to previously unseen levels. Further, there is now a complete corporate reevaluation of marketing and advertising activities in the LGBTQ consumer sector writ large. 

No more rainbow washing. For the past 30 years, corporations have literally wrapped their brands in rainbow colored monikers during the month of June. This practice, know as “rainbow washing,” sought to ingratiate companies with the over $1 trillion LGBTQ consumer segment. From rainbow filled Oreos to rainbow wrapped Burger King Whoppers, brands actively engaged in developing relationships with this coveted consumer. Now, it’s considered taboo. 

No more multi-million dollar beer sponsorships in the aftermath of the Bud Light disaster. For the first time since the over 100 Pride festivals accepted marketing opportunities, major brands including Bud Light, Miller and Corona have decided that reputational risk, boycotts and the like are more dangerous than the commercial reward. Their non-participation and the significance of this loss cannot be overstated. 

When right-wing bloviators co-opted the meaning of the word woke, they turned a positive definition into a pejorative. Now, corporations and brands are petrified of being labeled as woke, and in turn, are curtailing marketing outreach to niche consumer segments, LGBTQ included.

Anti-woke legislation has now appeared in a multitude of states, primarily around transgender issues. Bathroom bills, as they are known, are ubiquitous. Boys playing in girls sports,is portrayed as a national emergency.  These issues are a constant presence on social media as well as at every level of government, and have had a major impact on LGBTQ-related corporate activities.

But perhaps most devastating, is the federal government effort to enact elements of the right-wing’s Project 2025 agenda, seeking to eradicate DEI at every level. Companies, universities, and nearly all institutions that previously championed diversity, equity, and inclusion, have rapidly and radically disbanded and defunded all DEI efforts and activities within their organizations. Discontinuing supplier diversity initiatives, defunding support for internal ERG’s (employee resource groups), and decamping from participation in HRC’s (Human Rights Campaign) Equality Index. Importantly, this index is considered  the gold standard for corporate DEI evaluation, and its repudiation is having a profound effect on corporate behavior.  

DEI is now in the ICU on life support, with little chance of resuscitation. Companies that once embraced DEI have retreated in fear, in spite of critical positive facts. In 2023, McKinsey and Company, no bastion of liberalism stated, “that for five years, our research has shown a positive, statistically significant correlation between company financial outperformance and diversity, on the dimensions of both gender and ethnicity.”

What happens next is unknown. We have entered uncharted territory where the confluence of so many factors is having negative effects. June 2026 has seen many companies severely curtail or fully exit partnerships with Pride organizations and LGBTQ marketing programs in general, citing among other things, economic concerns. However, no company can honestly deny that overall fear and the increasingly hostile climate for DEI and LGBTQ issues have prompted brands to rethink their overall support and initiatives. This, despite pressure from stakeholders and shareholders, and vital employee recruitment and retention efforts. 

Political winds have outcomes. It would be naïve to think that there might be an immediate rethinking should the Congress or presidency change parties. Business cycles, though more agile than government, take longer to work through. Years, not months. So just as quickly as “rainbow washing” has come to a precipitous end, so too is the arrival and reckoning with the blistering Rainbow Washout.


Andrew A. Isen is the founder and president of WinMark Concepts, a D.C.-based marketing and communications firm. For 35 years, WinMark has been advising companies and brands on defining and developing effective LGBTQ business strategies. 

Continue Reading

Opinions

Cowardly corporations abandon LGBTQ America

Execs are hiding in the closet this Pride season. Should we ever welcome them back?

Published

on

(Photo by Meni Photos/Bigstock)

I had a thought provoking conversation with Billy Porter over Memorial Day weekend. The talented and opinionated star asked me how things were going at the Blade and in D.C. given the current administration in the White House.

It was a loaded question. The short answer is that things in D.C. are pretty terrible these days — the economy is down, inflation and gas prices are up; small businesses and non-profits are struggling amid widespread government funding cuts; and, yes, media outlets large and small are also feeling the pinch. Even the aesthetics of our once beautiful city are suffering (see the White House lawn).

For queer-identified businesses, the news is worse, as major corporations across the country have reduced or eliminated support for anything deemed “DEI,” which includes LGBTQ causes and support for Pride celebrations. 

When I explained all of this to Porter, he replied with a quick and definitive comment that has left me thinking for weeks: “And when the pendulum swings back, don’t let those companies back in. Ever.”

There are certainly some big companies that continue to live their values and stand by the LGBTQ community — Absolut, Marriott, Walmart, Coca-Cola. But so many others have abandoned us at a challenging time — Target, Bud Light (and most beer brands), PepsiCo, Accenture, among a long list.

There’s a lot of cynicism about so-called “rainbow capitalism,” or the practice of companies profiting off of the LGBTQ community especially during Pride month. We’ve seen all sorts of silly pandering in recent years — rainbow Oreos and Doritos come to mind.

But corporate America has frequently been called upon to play an important role in advancing equality. From implementing inclusive and affirming hiring and workplace practices (especially in places lacking legal protections) to using their influence to advance public policy, our corporate allies have helped us in myriad ways. To suggest we don’t need them ignores the many accomplishments corporate leaders have made on our behalf. They stepped up to fight bathroom bills in North Carolina and they successfully blunted Mike Pence’s notorious “license to discriminate” law in Indiana.

That was then. Fast forward to 2026 and under pressure from the corrupt Trump administration, our former corporate allies have run for cover. They are cowards. Their cynical abandonment of the LGBTQ community has grave consequences. New York City Pride ran $800,000 short last year after major sponsors like Mastercard and Nissan pulled out, according to a recent report in the Wall Street Journal. San Francisco Pride fell $300,000 in debt last year when Anheuser-Busch and others pulled out, the Journal noted. Phoenix Pride has filed for bankruptcy. There will be many other casualties. 

The topic of how to respond if and when the pendulum swings back is a popular one right now in the LGBTQ movement. Do we replace corporate sponsorship dollars with grants and individual donations? That’s easier said than done. Do we take their money and forgive these transgressions? Or do we follow Porter’s advice and tell them to fuck off? 

Nonprofits, Pride organizations, and queer media outlets like the Blade have some thinking to do about this. No one is in business to turn away sponsors and ad dollars. But we have a responsibility to our customers, readers, and community to operate ethically. An ad in the Blade carries a lot more subtext and meaning than an ad in the Washington Post. 

To those companies and executives hiding in the closet this Pride season: Shame on you. To the companies standing with us: Our sincere gratitude. Our community’s memory is long and we will not forget those who resisted Trump’s anti-DEI crusade to stand on the right side of history.


Kevin Naff is editor of the Washington Blade. Reach him at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Popular