Connect with us

News

Rep. Pressley seeks answers from HUD on anti-trans rule for homeless shelters

Secretary Carson had assured lawmakers no change would happen

Published

on

Ayanna Pressley, gay news, Washington Blade
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) seeks answers from HUD on the anti-trans rule at homeless shelters. (Photo public domain)

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) is leading a quartet of House Democrats in seeking answers from the Department of Housing & Urban Development over a proposed rollback in transgender non-discrimination protections at homeless shelters.

In a June 3 letter to Secretary of Housing & Urban Development Ben Carson, Pressley and the lawmakers denounce the proposed rule from HUD, which critics say will enable federally funded homeless shelters to turn away transgender people.

“This proposed rule released by HUD robs thousands of Americans from adequate shelter and safety and puts their lives at risk,” the lawmakers write.

The HUD proposal would undermine two Obama-era regulations prohibiting anti- LGBT discrimination in federally funded housing, including homeless shelters. The first regulation was put in place in 2012 by former HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan, the second clarified that rule applied to homeless shelters was and put in place in 2016 by former HUD Secretary Julian Castro, now a Democratic presidential candidate.

As noted in the letter, Carson had assured lawmakers he had no plans to change the regulations in the same week HUD proposed the rule change to undermine them.

“This announcement comes less than 24 hours after you testified before the House Financial Services Committee indicating that a revision to the Equal Access Rule was not being considered,” the lawmakers write. “In fact, you unequivocally stated for the record, ‘I’m not currently anticipating changing the rule.’ While we understand that you have since attempted to clarify your testimony in order to prevent members from ‘misinterpreting’ your statements, we remain concerned about the truthfulness and accuracy of your testimony before Congress while you were under oath.”

Joining Pressley in signing the letter are Reps. Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.), Suzan K. DelBene (D-Wash.), and Katie Hill (D-Calif.), who’s bisexual.

The HUD proposal would allow homeless shelters with sex-segregated facilities — such as bathrooms or shared sleeping quarters — to establish policy consistent with state and local laws in which operators consider a range of factors when determining where to place individuals looking to stay, including “religious beliefs.”

The letter seeks answers from HUD on issues related to the proposed rule by a deadline of June 17:

1. What was the timeline for developing and issuing the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)? 

2. When did the agency formally file the NPRM?

3. Which stakeholders (if any) were consulted during the development of and leading up to the announcement of the aforementioned proposed rule? 

4. Specifically, what role did you as secretary of the agency have in the development and approval of the proposed rule?

5. During your testimony before the committee, you claimed that 1-IUD has continued to enforce both the 2012 and 2016 Equal Access Rules.

a) How has the agency processed each of the complaints submitted to 1-IUD regarding anti-LGBTQ discrimination?

b) How many complaints of discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity have been submitted to and received by 1-IUD since 2017?

c) What were the outcomes of these complaints? 

d)  How many of these complaints were investigated?

e)  Were any of these complaints dismissed for being outside of the agency’s jurisdiction? If so, how many?

The letter comes on the heels of legislation introduced by Wexton seeking to block HUD from implementing the anti-trans rule change. Last month, the U.S. House approved the Equality Act, comprehensive legislation against anti-LGBT discrimination that would also prohibit discrimination against transgender people in homeless shelters.

The Washington Blade has placed a request in with HUD seeking comment on the letter.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Rehoboth Beach

Auction of Rehoboth’s Blue Moon canceled

Details on sale of iconic bar, restaurant not disclosed

Published

on

Rehoboth’s Blue Moon has apparently been sold but the buyer has not been disclosed. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The Blue Moon in Rehoboth Beach, Del., has been an iconic presence in the local LGBTQ community for four decades but its status remains murky after a sheriff’s auction of the property was abruptly called off on Tuesday.

The property was listed for sale in December. At that time, owner Tim Ragan told the Blade that he is committed to preserving its legacy as a gay-friendly space.

“We had no idea the interest this would create,” Ragan said in December. “I guess I was a little naive about that.”

Ragan explained that he and longtime partner Randy Haney were separating the real estate from the business. The two buildings associated with the sale were listed by Carrie Lingo at 35 Baltimore Ave., and include an apartment, the front restaurant (6,600 square feet with three floors and a basement), and a secondary building (roughly 1,800 square feet on two floors). They were listed for $4.5 million. 

The bar and restaurant business is being sold separately; the price was not publicly disclosed. 

But then, earlier this year, the Blue Moon real estate listing turned up on the Sussex County Sheriff’s Office auction site. The auction was slated for Tuesday, April 21 but hours before the sale, the listing changed to “active under contract” indicating that a buyer has been found but the sale is not yet final. As of Wednesday morning, the listing has been removed from the sheriff’s auction site.

Ragan didn’t respond to Blade inquiries about the auction. Back in December, he told the Blade, “It’s time to look for the next people who can continue the history of the Moon and cultivate the next chapter,” noting that he turns 70 this year. “We’re not panicked; we separated the building from the business. Some buyers can’t afford both.” 

The identity of the buyer was not disclosed, nor was the sale price. 

Continue Reading

Delaware

Delaware school district remains supportive after Trump attacks on trans students

Cape Henlopen has gender identity nondiscrimination policy

Published

on

President Trump’s Education Department rescinded agreements protecting the rights of trans students. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The Cape Henlopen School District in Delaware, one of five school districts in several states where the U.S. Department of Education earlier this month rescinded agreements protecting the rights of transgender students, says it will continue to provide a “safe and supportive learning environment” for all students.

 In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for the Cape Henlopen district sent the Washington Blade a short statement on its response to the federal Education Department’s action under orders from the Trump administration that ended what were called school district “resolution agreements” put in place under the administration of President Joe Biden.

Among other things, the federally initiated agreements required schools to train faculty on responding to a student’s preferred name and pronouns and to implement policies that allow transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity.

“The Cape Henlopen School District has received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights regarding the resolution agreement entered in March 2024,” the Cape Henlopen School District’s statement says. “As always, we are committed to providing a safe and supportive learning environment where all students can succeed,” it says.

“We will continue to work collaboratively to ensure our practices and programs support the well-being, growth, and achievement of every student in our District,” the statement concludes.

Although it did not respond specifically to the Trump-initiated action ending federal protections for trans students, a statement on the Cape Henlopen School District’s website says the district has a policy of non-discrimination based on a wide range of categories, including race, religion, creed, gender, and “sexual orientation or gender identity.”

The Trump administration’s latest action does not take away nondiscrimination policies put in place by school districts on their own.

The Cape Henlopen district is in Sussex County, a short distance from Rehoboth Beach, a Delaware resort town with many LGBTQ residents and summer visitors.

 The other school districts for which the U.S. education department ended the trans nondiscrimination agreements include the Delaware Valley School District in Pennsylvania, Sacramento City Unified School District in California, Fife School District in Washington State, and La Mesa Spring Valley School District also in California.

Kimberly Richey, the Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, said in a statement that the decision to terminate the school agreements highlighted the Trump administration’s efforts to prevent trans students from participating in girls’ and women’s sports teams and accessing shared locker rooms. 

“Today, the Trump administration is removing the unnecessary and unlawful burdens that prior administrations imposed on schools in its relentless pursuit of a radical transgender agenda,” she said in her statement.    

Shiwali Patel, an official with the National Women’s Law Center, said in a statement that the action removing protections for trans students would negatively impact all students.    

“There is absolutely no basis for what the Department of Education is doing, and it is unimaginably cruel,” she said. “Parents, teachers, and students need the Department to focus on addressing real harms on campuses instead of rolling back policies that keep all students safe.”  

Continue Reading

Virginia

Va. voters approve HRC-backed redistricting plan

10 of state’s 11 congressional districts now favor Democrats

Published

on

Virginia flag flies over the state Capitol. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Virginia voters on Tuesday narrowly approved a congressional redistricting plan ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

The referendum passed by a 51-48 vote margin.

Virginia’s last Census happened in 2020. The next time maps would have been redrawn was intended for 2030, but the referendum results allow for redistricting to happen this year, while allowing the standard district procedures to resume after the 2030 Census.

Many congressional maps have been redrawn since the Trump-Vance administration took office, adding seats for both Republicans and Democrats. Ten of 11 of Virginia’s congressional districts will now favor Democrats. 

The Human Rights Campaign PAC supported the referendum.

“Virginians made their voices heard today, rebuking Republicans’ attempts to stack the deck in their favor in the 2026 midterm elections and beyond,” said Human Rights Campaign PAC President Kelley Robinson in a statement. “This year, we’re going to take Congress back from the fringe extremists who have bent the knee to President Trump’s historically unpopular agenda at every turn.” 

“Virginians just put anti-equality, anti-democracy, and anti-freedom lawmakers on notice — together, we are fighting for a future where every single American’s vote matters and where every elected official must earn their constituents’ trust,” she added.

Continue Reading

Popular