The lack of ethical behavior on the part of some D.C. City Council members cries out for its members to clean up their act and enact a serious ethics law.
There has always been the hint of inappropriateness with their Constituent Service Funds, so it’s time to abolish them. Instead of doling out unregulated cash from what are in essence slush funds, Council members should be able to share information with constituents on where they can go to get help — whether it’s a city agency, non-profit or local faith-based organization.
The District has limited options to rid itself of politicians charged with a crime but not convicted. In the case of Council member Harry Thomas, Jr. we are in the same position as the Prince George’s County Council was with Leslie Johnson. Until she was convicted of a felony they couldn’t force her resignation. They did what our Council has done to Thomas, namely stripping him of his committee chairmanship and marginalizing him. Unfortunately that hurts the people he represents so you would think he would step aside in their interest. But since that can’t be forced, it could take the people of Ward 5 rising up against him. Some other Council members are under a cloud as well, which makes it difficult for them to speak out against Thomas.
It’s time we rethink the job of Council member and make it a full-time position. Council members work hard and have the responsibility of both city and state legislators in one office. Those doing their jobs well work many hours and are responsive to their constituents. But there have always been conflicts of interest with their second jobs. Some work for consulting firms or law firms whose clients have interests in the District. They may be as honest as the day is long but those conflicts are there, even if only in appearance.
For full-time service we could raise the salary to $150,000 and be assured that many highly qualified people would run for the job. They may not want to stay for 20 years if they feel they need more money for their families but that wouldn’t be such a bad thing. It would truly be public service.
The ethics issues are getting in the way of highlighting some of the positive things that the Council and the administration are accomplishing. The outstanding issues with the mayor’s campaign aren’t helping the situation either. Some of our local newspapers and columnists find it more interesting to report on the ethics problems than on the work that is being done. I am not blaming them for the problems or making excuses for anyone, but more balanced reporting and editorials, highlighting both the good and the bad, would be helpful for residents.
Mayor Gray released a report on the first 200 days of his administration and there are some really positive things happening. Many have been glossed over as not headline worthy or relegated to the inside pages while ethical lapses are on page one. Maybe they could share page one. Noteworthy accomplishments include a Republican congressional
committee chair saying he wants to work with Mayor Gray to move forward on additional budget autonomy for the District.
Then there is the smooth operation of the 14,000-strong summer youth employment program; the Ward 8 citizen summit that attracted more than 600 attendees; the continued forward movement on education reform that now includes working with charter schools, which serve 39 percent of the District’s children; and breaking ground on City Center with potentially 1,350 temporary construction jobs and 3,500 permanent jobs. Add to that securing Grad School USA as a permanent tenant at The Wharf in Southwest, the new HIV/AIDS Commission, and submitting and passing a fiscally and structurally sound and balanced budget. Not too shabby for the first six months.
The administration and the Council have shown a renewed focus on hate crimes and domestic violence issues, and have begun to insist that the police chief work with the LGBT community.
Ethics violators, wherever and whoever they are, must feel the bright light of public scrutiny and crimes must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But at the same time, the work of government goes on and we must report on the issues facing all communities, and on administration and Council successes in dealing with them, by shining that same bright light there.