Connect with us

National

Pelosi foresees ‘Don’t Ask’ end by year’s end

Speaker wants Obama to end policy administratively

Published

on

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi spoke at the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund Awards Gala (Blade photo by Michael Key)

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday reiterated her prediction that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” would be a memory by the year’s end — despite the failure of the Senate last week to move forward with repeal legislation — as she maintained the president has the ability to stop troop discharges without a change in law.

Asked by a reporter whether she’s spoken with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) about the Senate taking another shot at “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Pelosi replied, “That will be gone by executive — that will happen with or without Congress.”

“I don’t think it has to depend on whether it passes the Senate,” she continued. “The process will work its way through and the president will make his pronouncement.”

The speaker spoke to reporters after she gave a speech at the Gay & Lesbian Leadership Awards at the W Hotel, which was hosted by the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund.

During her speech, Pelosi made similar assurances and promised that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” will be “gone by the end of the year.”

“Some are here tonight who serve in the military,” she said. “God bless you for your courage and your patriotism. … But because of courage of some of them, this will be gone by the end of the year.”

Pelosi previously predicted in May that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” would be “a memory” by the end of this year during an interview with the Hill newspaper.

Speaking to reporters, Pelosi said Congress got the ball rollingĀ on repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” to get lawmakers on record on the issue and so the change would be “in statute and all of that.”

The House in May passed an amendment that would repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”Ā as part ofĀ theĀ fiscal year 2011 defense authorization bill.

“But even the bill that we passed said that it was contingent upon the recommendation of the president’s … review,” she said. “The only difference would be statute versus the president [making a policy change.]”

Pressed on whether she thinks the executive branch would ultimately be responsible for ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Pelosi replied, “That’s where it was anyway.”

“Others wanted to have more, so we tried to do more,” she said. “We’ll work very closely to try to see what happens after the election.”

Pelosi has previously said President Obama can issue an executive order to stop discharges under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” without action from Congress.

Supporters of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal have been calling on Obama since the beginning of his administration to issue an order to stop the discharges under the law, but the president hasn’t taken such action.

Asked whether she would call on Obama to issue an order to end “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Pelosi replied, “That is the unfolding that we will see.”

“I’m very pleased with the course that the president’s on, but I think that they we shouldn’t be discharging people until that happens — so that, we have a little separation of — in terms of policy on that,” Pelosi said.

Pelosi added House members who support “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal were “very disappointed” the Senate didn’t have sufficient votes to end a filibuster on moving forward with legislation that would end the law.

“In the Senate, the Republicans held up the bill entirely so it couldn’t even be considered, so it was very disappointing,” she said. “They went really out of their way to try to block this.”

Pelosi also reiterated her position that the Employment Non-Discrimination Act wouldn’t see a House vote until legislative action is complete on repealing the 1993 law barring open service in the U.S. military.

“I told everyone that right from the start — that if we want to go down the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ route, then we’d have to put ENDA in a different place,” she said.

Pelosi said initial plans for the 111th Congress were to take on hate crimes protections legislation followed by ENDA and then “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” But she said the House ended up acting on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” first before ENDA because there was “a lot of enthusiasm about changing the order.”

During her speech, Pelosi maintained the importance of the mid-term elections and said “the fabric of our middle class and strength of our democracy” is at stake.

Pelosi added that the election results will also “accelerate the pace of passing ENDA or set us back.”

The speaker said she believes the votes are in the U.S. House to pass ENDA, but expressed concern about a motion to recommit that could derail the bill.

The motionĀ to recommit is a legislative manuever that opponents of ENDA could use to scuttle the bill when it comes to the House floor.

“I think we have the votes for it, but we have to resist the motion to recommit,”Ā Pelosi said. “We can’t pass the bill unless we can resist all of the bad things that they could do to the bill along the way.”

Also speaking at the event were gay Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.).

During his speech, Frank emphasized the importance of keeping a Democratic majority in the next Congress and questioned those who would criticize lawmakers who support LGBT rights for the lack of progress on pro-LGBT bills.

“I understand people being unhappy about that,” he said. “What I do not understand is people who think that the way to respond to the fact that we weren’t able to get things done is further to empower the people who kept us from getting them done.”

Frank urged attendees to “bitch and fight” all the way to the polls to re-elect a Democratic majority in the U.S. House because Pelosi has been such a strong supporter of LGBT rights.

“Neither Tammy, nor I, nor anybody else has ever had to ask for her to support us,” Frank said. “We take that for granted and she has been the been the single most important public official in the history of the United States to be fully committed to our agenda not just as a matter of support, but as matter of her own personal involvement.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

National

LGBTQ asylum seeker ‘forcibly removed’ from US, sent to El Salvador

Immigrant Defenders Law Center represents Venezuelan national

Published

on

The Salvadoran capital of El Salvador from El BoquerĆ³n Volcano in 2023. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

An immigrant rights group that represents an LGBTQ asylum seeker from Venezuela says the Trump-Vance administration on March 15 “forcibly removed” him from the U.S. and sent him to El Salvador.

Immigrant Defenders Law Center Litigation and Advocacy Director Alvaro M. Huerta during a telephone interview with the Washington Blade on Tuesday said officials with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection alleged his organization’s client was a member of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuela-based gang, because of his tattoos and no other information.

“It’s very flimsy,” said Huerta. “These are the types of tattoos that any artist in New York City or Los Angeles would have. It’s nothing that makes him a gang member.”

The White House on Feb. 20 designated Tren de Aragua an “international terrorist organization.”

President Donald Trump on March 15 invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which the Associated Press notes allows the U.S. to deport “noncitizens without any legal recourse.”

“I proclaim that all Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of TdA (Tren de Aragua), are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States are liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies,” said Trump in a proclamation that announced his invocation of the 18th century law.

The asylum seeker ā€” who the Immigrant Defenders Law Center has not identified by name because he is “in danger” ā€” is among the hundreds of Venezuelans who the U.S. sent to El Salvador on March 15.

Chief Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked the deportations. The AP notes the flights were already in the air when Boasberg issued his ruling.

Huerta said U.S. officials on Monday confirmed the asylum seeker is “indeed in El Salvador.” He told the Blade it remains unclear whether the asylum seeker is in the country’s Terrorism Confinement Center, a maximum-security prison known by the Spanish acronym CECOT.

‘We couldn’t find him’

Huerta said the Immigrant Defenders Law Center client fled Venezuela and asked for asylum in the U.S.

The asylum seeker, according to Huerta, passed a “credible fear interview” that determines whether an asylum claim is valid. Huerta said U.S. officials detained the asylum seeker last year when he returned to the country from the Mexican border city of Tijuana.

Huerta told the Blade the asylum seeker was supposed to appear before an immigration judge on March 13.

“We couldn’t find him,” said Huerta.

He noted speculation over whether Trump was about to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, and the Immigrant Defenders Law Center “started getting concerned that maybe he was caught up in this situation.”

“He’s an LGBT individual who is an artist in Venezuela,” said Huerta.

Neither ICE nor CBP have responded to the Blade’s request for comment.

Huerta said it is “hard to say” whether the asylum seeker has any legal recourse.

“He still has an ongoing case in immigration court here,” said Huerta, noting the asylum seeker’s attorney was in court on Monday, and has another hearing in two weeks. “Presumably they should have to allow him to appear, at least virtually, for court because he still has these cases.”

Huerta noted the U.S. since Trump took office has deported hundreds of migrants to Panama; officials in the Central American country have released dozens of them from detention. Migrants sent to the GuantƔnamo Bay naval base in Cuba have returned to detention facilities in the U.S.

“Something where the government, kind of unliterally, can just say that someone is a gang member based on tattoos, without any offer of proof, without having to go to court to say that and then take them externally to what effectively a prison state (El Salvador), it certainly is completely just different than what we’ve seen,” Huerta told the Blade.

Huerta also spoke about the Trump-Vance administration’s overall immigration policy.

“The Trump administration knows exactly what they’re doing when it comes to scapegoating immigrants, scapegoating asylees,” he said. “They have a population that, in many ways, is politically powerless, but in many other ways, is politically powerful because they have other folks standing behind them as well, but they’re an easy punching bag.”

“They can use this specter of we’re just deporting criminals, even though they’re the ones who are saying that they’re criminal, they’re not necessarily proving that,” added Huerta. “They feel like they can really take that fight and run with it, and they’re testing the bounds of what they can get away with inside and outside of the courtroom.”

Continue Reading

National

Kennedy Center official slams Harvey Fiersteinā€™s ban claim as ā€˜total lieā€™

Grenell invites iconic gay actor to perform ā€˜Hairsprayā€™

Published

on

Richard Grenell, president and interim executive director of the John F. Kennedy Center, denies that actor Harvey Fierstein was banned from the venue. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Richard Grenell, who was appointed president and interim executive director of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts by President Trump, pushed back against Harvey Fiersteinā€™s claim of being banned from the Kennedy Center, calling it ā€œa total lieā€ in a new X post.

On Wednesday, gay icon and Tony Award-winning actor Harvey Fierstein posted on Instagram, claiming to have been ā€œbanned from THE KENNEDY CENTER.ā€ In the post, Fierstein shared a picture of himself walking in the 1979 Christopher Street Liberation Day parade alongside LGBTQ rights activist Marsha P. Johnson. In the caption, he alleged that Trumpā€™s takeover of the Kennedy Center was the reason for his ban, calling it an attack on free speech and a threat to democracy.

The Blade emailed the Kennedy Centerā€™s public relations team, seeking confirmation of Fiersteinā€™s claim and an official statement from the cultural center. More than an hour later, in a separate email that did not directly address the original request, Brendan Padgett, the Kennedy Centerā€™s director of Public Relations, responded with a link to a post on his boss Grenellā€™s X account.

ā€œMaking sure you saw this,ā€ Padgettā€™s email read, followed by a link to Grenellā€™s post.

ā€œHey, @HarveyFierstein This is a total lie,ā€ Grenell wrote in the post. ā€œWhoever told you this (because you obviously didnā€™t do your own research) should be fired from your team for purposefully making you look foolish.ā€

Grenellā€™s post, uploaded the morning after Fiersteinā€™s initial claim, included screenshots of Fiersteinā€™s Instagram post. Grenell went on to assert that, like Fierstein, he had been a fighter ā€œfor equality for decades,ā€ citing his position as the first openly gay member of a U.S. presidentā€™s Cabinet as proof. (Grenell was never confirmed by the Senate; the first openly gay Senate-confirmed Cabinet official is Pete Buttigieg, former Secretary of Transportation.)

ā€œYou arenā€™t banned,ā€ Grenell continued. ā€œIn fact, come do Hairspray or La Cage here at the Kennedy Center. This is your personal invite. Letā€™s meetā€”if, however, you can handle diverse opinions and want to be inclusive of everyone, that is.ā€

The Washington Blade reached out to both Harvey Fierstein and Brendan Padgett for comment on the ongoing situation. Padgett responded, stating, ā€œNo comment aside from the Kennedy Center Presidentā€™s post.ā€ Fierstein has yet to respond.

Continue Reading

National

Trump administration considering closing HIV prevention agency: reports

Sources say funding cuts possible for CDC

Published

on

Reports have emerged that President Trumpā€™s HHS plans to cut HIV prevention efforts, rolling back a program he initiated in his first term. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The Department of Health and Human Services is considering closing the HIV Prevention Division of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and transferring some of its programs to a different agency, according to a report by the New York Times.

The Times and Politico cited government sources who spoke on condition of not being identified as saying plans under consideration from the administration also call for possible funding cuts in the domestic HIV prevention program following funding cuts already put in place for foreign U.S. HIV programs.

ā€œItā€™s not 100 percent going to happen, but 100 percent being discussed,ā€ the Times quoted one of the sources as saying.

News of the possible shutdown of the HIV Prevention Division and possible cuts in HIV prevention funds prompted 13 of the nationā€™s leading LGBTQ, HIV, and health organizations to release a joint statement on March19 condemning what they said could result in a ā€œdevastating effectā€ on the nationā€™s progress in fighting AIDS.

Among the organizations signing on to the joint statement were D.C.ā€™s Whitman-Walker Health and the Los Angeles LGBT Center.

Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV+ Hepatitis Policy Institute, which opposes funding cuts or curtailment in domestic AIDS programs, points out in a separate statement that it was President Trump during his first term in office who put in place the HIV EpidemicĀ Initiative, which calls for ending the HIV epidemic in the U.S. by 2030.

That initiative, which Trump announced in his 2019 State of the Union address, is credited with having reduced new HIV infections nationwide by 30 percent in adolescents and young adults, and by about 10 percent in most other groups, according to the Times report on possible plans to scale back the program.

In a statement released to Politico, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said, ā€œHHS is following the Administrationā€™s guidance and taking a careful look at all divisions to see where there is overlap that could be streamlined to support the Presidentā€™s broader efforts to restructure the federal government.ā€

ā€œNo final decision on streamlining CDCā€™s HIV Prevention Division has been made,ā€ Nixon said in his statement. 

ā€œAn effort to defund HIV prevention by this administration would set us back decades, cost innocent people their lives and cost taxpayers millions,ā€ said Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nationā€™s largest LGBTQ advocacy organization, in a March 19 statement.

ā€œThe LGBTQ+ community still carries the scars of the government negligence and mass death of the HIV/AIDS epidemic,ā€  Robinson said. ā€œWe should be doubling down on our investment to end the HIV epidemic once and for all, not regressing to the days of funeral services and a virus running rampant,ā€ she said. 

ā€œWe are outraged and deeply alarmed by the Trump administrationā€™s reckless moves to defund and de-prioritize HIV prevention,ā€ the statement released by the 13 organizations says. ā€œThese abrupt and incomprehensible possible cuts threaten to reverse decades of progress, exposing our nation to a resurgence of a preventable disease with devastating and avoidable human and financial costs,ā€ the statement says.  

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular