Connect with us


Who has the access to speak truth to power?

Lawmakers need to hear from those who don’t work for them



Equality Matters’ Kerry Eleveld recently wrote an article titled, “Why Obama Keeps Winning Gay Battles But Losing The War,” that reminded me of so many politicians who don’t understand why not everyone is willing to show gratitude when they do what they consider to be a great job.

Politics is a great profession but the give and take between politician and voter is usually one of both asking the question, “What have you done for me lately?”

This relationship is heightened today by the need to raise so much money to run a campaign. Using the president as an example in 2008 he raised record amounts based mostly on promises. There was very little record for people to go on but they were entranced by someone who promised an end to the gridlock in Washington and a change in the way things were done. They appreciated his commitment to end access by lobbyists and promises of many things to many groups including environmentalists, unions and the LGBT community.

These types of promises are made by politicians at every level of government and we invest in them for a better future. Then once they are elected there are always successes and failures. But what appears to have happened to the president is what often happens to politicians and that is once elected the range of people who can argue and debate issues with them narrows. Those who were once free to speak their mind when they were needed to help elect them, now find that they are either given jobs or special access and to keep those perks need to be more circumspect. Very few elected officials are comfortable being told they don’t understand something or that they are wrong.

Eleveld’s article refers to the fact there is no one in the White House close enough to President Obama to explain that he has raised the bar with his support of the LGBT community and now many look at what he has done as payback for money and support in the last election. They are asking for more and a commitment for the next four years if they are to show that kind of support again. I would think he is hearing the same thing from environmentalists, unions, women’s groups and other minorities who have seen mixed success on movement of their issues in his first two years and they may also feel there is no one close enough to him to explain what it is they expect to hear for the next term.

All politicians have the need to come back to those who elected them first and ask for more money and continued support. They also find they have to convince them and speak not only of what has been accomplished in the past but of what can be accomplished after the next election. In fighting for LGBT civil and human rights, Obama’s success has turned this into an issue taken up by the mainstream and everyone expects more in return for their money and their vote.

Now, if that sounds cynical it might well be, but after a lifetime working in and following politics and movements, cynical or not, it is reality. While the candidate always wants more money and another vote of confidence the voter wants more to be accomplished.

Eleveld wrote that senior presidential adviser Melody Barnes told a crowd at the Aspen Ideas Festival that, “The president acts on information and wants everyone to bring their perspective to the table. And so if he feels as though that hasn’t happened he will kind of march around the table to make sure that he’s got input from everyone.”

Unfortunately the reality is that “everyone” around that table works for him and wants to keep their job, which can make honesty and openness difficult.

The question I would ask any politician is this: How much time do you take to listen to good friends, trusted advisers and outside sources who don’t work for you? This is hard to do for any politician and I am sure even harder for a president.


Continue Reading


  1. laurelboy2

    July 7, 2011 at 5:51 pm

    Why does Peter get a seat at the table of comments/opinions almost every week? His tired writing and predictable analyses (if that’s what you want to call them) are stale. I encourage The Blade to seek out fresh and vibrant opinions and writing styles. If need be, why not auction off a dinner for 2 at a nice restaurant each week to new writers who submit thoughtful and creative articles worthy of publication?

  2. Peter Rosenstein

    July 8, 2011 at 6:47 am

    Clearly Laurelboy2 regularly has an issue with my column, Inside LGBT Washington, and doesn’t agree with my opinions and positions and feels he has something to say. It is possible he does. But when someone stays anonymous it makes it difficult to have a conversation or give credence to their comments. If his thoughts are worthwhile Laurelboy2 may want to “come out” to be heard. I know the Blade always welcomes viewpoints from all sources and under his real name Laurelboy2 may want to submit his.

    • Chris

      July 8, 2011 at 12:28 pm

      I agree with Laurelboy. Tired!

  3. laurelboy2

    July 8, 2011 at 11:03 am

    It’s not that I have an issue with your perspective (althought at times I do) that drives my point of view. It’s the repetitiveness at which you’re on the opinion page. It would be nice to hear from other people – not just the same person all the time. What if I tuned into Leno and he had Julia Roberts as his one and only guest? I’d switch channels and watch Letterman for someone different, less predictable, less repetitive, with new and fresh ideas to make me think. Or, what if you go to a toilet to cruise. If you see the same pair of shoes under the next stall, I’ll move to a different venue.

  4. Kevin

    July 8, 2011 at 12:32 pm

    Peter: very well said, and you’re right – this is a reality of the democratic system, but especially so when the chief executive in question mildly gets the issue, and seems willing to play ball to some extent on the politics. There is a big difference when you have a chief executive who really gets the issue, who has a zeal to his conviction (be it moral or political, no matter) and puts his strategic talents to good use (i.e. Andrew Cuomo). What is curious here is the Insider poll that was taken where even GOP insiders said opposing gay marriage is a demographic time bomb and most Dem insiders now think their party needs to actively support gay marriage. Aren’t there even people around Obama who can tell him flat out to realize pretty soon this issue could move faster than he is and he could get into a serious public bind, looking out of touch rather than on the leading edge (which was supposed to be his brand!)??? I worry about that. The Bush administration was a cesspool of yes men and loyalty trumping competence, and look as the results.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sondheim’s art will be with us for the ages

Iconic work explored sadness, rage, irony, and love of humanity



Stephen Sondheim (Screen capture via CBS)

“The only regret I have in life is giving you birth,” his mother wrote in a letter to Stephen Sondheim.

The only regret so many of us feel now is that Sondheim, the iconic composer and lyricist, died on Nov. 26 at his Roxbury, Conn. home at age 91.

He is survived by Jeffrey Romley, whom he married in 2017, and Walter Sondheim, a half-brother.

F. Richard Pappas, his lawyer and friend, told the New York Times that the cause of death was unknown, and that Sondheim had died suddenly. The day before he passed away, Sondheim celebrated Thanksgiving with friends, Pappas told the Times.

“Every day a little death,” Sondheim wrote in “A Little Night Music.”

This isn’t the case with the passing of Sondheim. Whether you’re a Broadway star or a tone-deaf aficionado like me, you’ll sorely miss Sondheim, who the Times aptly called “one of Broadway history’s songwriting titans.”

Like multitudes of his fans, I don’t remember a time in my life when a song from a Sondheim musical hasn’t been in my head.

When I was a child, my parents repeatedly played the cast album of “Gypsy,” the 1959 musical with music by Jule Styne, lyrics by Sondheim and book by Arthur Laurents. My folks loved the story of the show, which was loosely based on the life of the burlesque artist Gypsy Rose Lee. You haven’t lived until you’ve heard Ethel Merman belt out “Everything’s Coming Up Roses!” When I need to jumpstart my creative juices, I remember that “You Gotta Get a Gimmick.”

In college, I felt that “Company,” the 1970 musical with music and lyrics by Sondheim and book by George Furth, spoke to my generation. 

As was the case with Sondheim’s musicals, “Company” didn’t have a conventional plot, happy ending, or tidy resolution. It takes place during Bobby’s 35th birthday party. Bobby, who is single, is celebrating with his friends (straight, married couples). Bobby likes having friends but doesn’t want to get married.

Sondheim didn’t come out as gay until he was 40. Yet, even in the 1970s, it was hard not to think that Bobby in “Company” wasn’t gay.

Once you’ve heard Elaine Stritch sing “The Ladies Who Lunch” from “Company,” it becomes indelibly etched in your brain.

Who else but Sondheim could have written, “And here’s to the girls who play/smart-/Aren’t they a gas/Rushing to their classes in optical art,/Wishing it would pass/Another long exhausting day/Another thousand dollars/A matinee, a Pinter play/Perhaps a piece of Mahler’s/I’ll drink to that/And one for Mahler!”

In September, I, along with legions of other theater lovers, were thrilled when Sondheim told Stephen Colbert on “The Late Show,” that he was working with David Ives on a new musical called “Square One.”

In his musicals from “Follies” to “Sweeney Todd” to “Sunday in the Park with George,” Sondheim, through his lyrics and music, revealed the internal depths of his characters and the sadness, tenderness, bitterness, rage, irony, wit, and love of humanity. Sondheim’s wordplay was so brilliant that he did crossword puzzles for New York magazine.

Over his decades-long career, Sondheim won every award imaginable from the Pulitzer Prize for “Sunday in the Park with George” to the Presidential Medal of Freedom (awarded to him by President Barack Obama in 2015). He received more than a dozen Tony Awards for his Broadway musicals and revivals as well as a Tony Award for lifetime achievement in 2008.

Thankfully, Sondheim’s art will be with us for the ages.

A remake of “West Side Story,” directed by Steven Spielberg with a screenplay by Tony Kushner, premieres this month.

Sondheim is a character in the Netflix film “tick, tick BOOM!,” directed by Lin-Manuel Miranda. The movie is based on an autobiographical posthumous Jonathan Larson (the composer of “Rent”) musical. Sondheim is supportive of Larson’s work.

Thank you Stephen, for your art! R.I.P.

Kathi Wolfe, a writer and poet, is a regular contributor to the Blade.

Continue Reading


Publish trans employment stats

Not enough corporations that march in Pride are hiring non-binary staff



On Nov. 10, the top-tier consulting firm McKinsey published a report on discrimination toward trans people in the workplace. The report came out with numbers that we have all known true for a long time and lead to one conclusion: Trans people have a harder time finding jobs, holding them down, and advancing in their careers. 

Specifically, McKinsey cited the fact that cisgender people are twice as likely to be employed as trans people, and that more than half of trans employees are uncomfortable being out at work. Meanwhile, cisgender employees make 32% more than trans employees in the workplace, even if those trans employees hold the same positions or higher positions. 

On top of this, trans people are 2.4 times more likely to be working in the food and retail industries, which pay entry level wages that are much less than decent pay. 

These statistics are true based on a number of factors. For one, many trans people have a harder time passing at work, and people who don’t pass well face worse job prospects. (As a side note, on top of that, the study pointed to the fact that many trans people exert undue emotional and psychological energy into trying to pass really well and not be discriminated against, which takes a toll on their mental health.) 

So what is a concrete step that corporations can take to make the trans experience in the workplace better? It’s time that corporations step up their game by publishing and making transparent the number of trans employees that they actually hire. Such numbers can be published in any kind of company document: a pamphlet, online report, or even annual shareholder’s report. As it is, most corporations do not publish numbers on LGBT employees. 

“Rainbow capitalism” is a term we know all too well: major corporations and multinationals flaunting a rainbow and trans pride flag during the month of June, but seemingly doing little to hire more trans people or give back to the community during other months. 

Every corporation surely has the time and company-wide infrastructure to get statistics on their trans employees. All they need to do is implement a company-wide survey to new hires. This takes extremely little effort and time in the grand scheme of company workings. 

If major corporations like McKinsey, Bain, Deloitte, defense contractors, and hundreds of other huge companies published statistics on trans employees, they would be held accountable for their actions and words.

If these statistics were to be published today, we would probably find out that not enough corporations that march in Pride parades are hiring trans and gender nonconforming employees. 

Turning the numbers against corporations will ensure that these same corporations finally live up to their words about workplace inclusion and diversity. It won’t cure everything about the issue of being trans in the workplace, but it’s a step in the right direction. 

Isaac Amend (he/him/his) is a trans man and young professional in the D.C. area. He was featured on National Geographic’s ‘Gender Revolution’ in 2017 as a student at Yale University. Isaac is also on the board of the LGBT Democrats of Virginia. Find him on Instagram @isaacamend.

Continue Reading


Should we be scared of Omicron?

A reminder to stay vigilant against latest mutation



It’s Sunday of Thanksgiving weekend when I sit down to write this column. The craziness in the world continues but other than the scare of the new COVID mutation, which has been named Omicron, there isn’t one headline to grab attention. Instead, there are many, including some manufactured by the news media to gain viewers or sell papers. Some like the car rampaging through the Christmas parade is frightening but incidents like this seem to be happening all too often.  

The stock market went down 1,000 points on Friday because market players freaked out about the new COVID mutation coming out of South Africa. However that didn’t seem to stop people from spending their money on Black Friday. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) was again on the attack this time against fellow Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) accusing her of being a Muslim terrorist. She apologized, or pretended to, but again the Republican leadership wouldn’t condemn her statements. These things seemed to be grist for the news media with no one else unfortunately really voicing concern. 

Boebert’s comments were taken as old hat. They are disgusting, offensive, and dangerous, but as long as her constituents reelect her we will have to live with them. She is joined by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.),  Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.), and Paul Gosar  (R-Wyo.) who represent the worst in Congress and the worst of the American people. Yet again until their constituents throw them out we have to live with their stupidity and the absurdity of their being where they are. 

The new COVID mutation out of South Africa is potentially a game changer. But it will be important for scientists to look at this carefully to determine how quickly it spreads and whether or not the current vaccines will offer any protection against it. Countries around the world, including the United States, have quickly instituted travel bans for South Africans and those in countries surrounding it. The World Health Organization at this time has suggested this should not be done as it will have limited impact on its spreading and could have severe and detrimental economic impact on countries whose people are being banned. One thing we must learn from this is how important it is to ensure everyone all over the world has access to vaccines as we know the more people who are inoculated the harder it is for the virus to mutate. It is not time to panic yet and by Sunday there was some reporting this new mutation may not be any more difficult to deal with than the current ones and not lead to any more severe illness. The takeaway from all this is we need to keep vigilant, get vaccinated and get booster shots, and make sure we vaccinate our children. Continue to wear masks indoors and wash our hands. 

Now the other interesting stories last weekend were about what will happen in the Senate in the weeks leading up to the Christmas holidays. Remember the House of Representatives passed President Biden’s Build Back Better bill as a reconciliation measure, which means it can pass the Senate with a simple majority. That would mean every Democratic senator and the vice president. The focus is on two senators: Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Sinema (D-Ariz.). In reality we need to look at a number of others who will fight to either take out or put something into the bill the House passed. It is clear it will not pass in the current form and then it has to go back to the House again. 

Another issue that will be taken up is the debt ceiling. It may be a little easier than thought because as recently reported, “After taking a hard line and refusing to negotiate with Democrats during the last standoff over the debt limit, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is quietly looking for a way to get the issue resolved without another high-profile battle.” Then there is the budget and since none is passed Congress will have to pass another continuing resolution since the one they passed in September expires on Dec. 3. 

So for the next few weeks there will be a focus on the Senate to see what they do and how obstructionist Republicans want to be. Seems while things change, they somehow remain the same.

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts