Connect with us

National

Utah’s 1,300 gay weddings spark change in attitudes

Marriage equality in conservative state impacts public opinion, LDS Church

Published

on

Utah, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, marriage equality, gay news, Washington Blade
Utah, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, marriage equality, gay news, Washington Blade

Utahns rally in support of marriage equality. (Photo courtesy J Seth Anderson)

Although the 18-day period during which Utah allowed same-sex marriages has ended, observers say the visibility of gay couples marrying there made an indelible impression on one of the nation’s most conservative states.

Utah’s flirtation with marriage equality began on Dec. 20 when a district court ruled in favor of marriage, allowing more than 1,300 same-sex couples to marry in the state before the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay on the weddings pending appeal of the litigation.

Gov. Gary Herbert has said the state won’t recognize the same-sex marriages, but the federal government had pledged to view them as legitimate, and the events have shaken the state government, the view of state residents and even the Mormon Church.

Michael Ferguson, who wed his partner in Salt Lake City on Dec. 20 and became one-half of the first same-sex couple to marry in Utah, saw a sharp transition in support for marriage equality on social media in just two days of having marriage equality in Utah.

“I saw people who were posting some pretty horrible things about bestiality and pedophilia, and the slippery slope of world corruption, that’s going to ensue with same-sex marriages being solemnized in Utah,” Ferguson said. “Within two days of social dialogue, those same people were apologizing, and saying, ‘I can see that I was wrong and speaking from a place of ignorance, and I’m going to keep a more open-minded position in this conversation.'”

Mark Lawrence, director of the Utah-based Restore Our Humanity and the individual behind the marriage equality lawsuit, also noticed a distinct change in public opinion as the weddings took place.

“So many more people are, ‘OK, this is going to happen,” Lawrence said. “They’re coming around. They still may not agree with it, they still may not be happy with it, but I don’t think they see it anymore as the sky is falling and this is going to be the destruction of society.”

Evidence that attitudes have shifted on marriage equality in Utah is more than just anecdotal. Two new polls reveal significant growth in support for same-sex marriage in the state.

A new consumer poll made public on Sunday reveals that for the first time ever, a bare majority of Utah residents ā€” 51.3 percent ā€” support marriage rights for gay couples. In comparison, 43.7 percent oppose legal relationship recognition.

David Baker, a Mormon and gay D.C. activist, ran the poll over the course of last week using Googleā€™s digital platform system, which is deemed an accurate method of polling by statisticians.

Baker said he “absolutely” believes the events in Utah in the past few weeks ā€” especially Herbert’s decision not to recognize the marriages performed in the state ā€” has had an impact on the perception of marriage equality in the state.

“I feel that Gov. Herbert’s decision to continue to put the rights of LGBT couples, who are legally married in the state of Utah, in a legal limbo has caused Utahns to face this issue that they may not have thought of before in the same context of legal rights for LGBT couples,” Baker said.

The results of Baker’s latest poll are along the lines of a poll published Tuesday by the Salt Lake Tribune that found Utah residents are now evenly split on whether same-sex couples in Utah should be allowed to marry ā€” 48 percent were for it and 48 percent against it ā€” and nearly three-fourths said same-sex couples should be allowed to have civil unions.

It’s hard to say that new support for marriage equality in Utah is the result of people seeing firsthand same-sex marriages happening in the state because no other data exists immediately before the weddings took place. However, the findings assert strong support for gay nuptials never before seen in the state.

Perhaps the most visible demonstration of this support for same-sex marriage came on Friday ā€” coincidentally the day U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Obama administration would recognize the same-sex marriages ā€” when an estimated 1,500 people rallied in Salt Lake City to urge Herbert to drop his appeal before the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Among the speakers was a 12-year-old boy, Riley Hackford-Peer, who said seeing his lesbian moms being able to marry in Utah was the second-happiest day of his life ā€” right after the birth of his younger brother ā€” and “felt like fireworks bursting in my heart.”

“Some people do not believe that I’m from a loving family because my moms are gay; they are wrong,” Riley said to applause. “I love my moms, and my moms love me and my brother, unconditionally.”

Troy Williams, a Salt Lake City gay activist and one of the organizers of the rally, said the event was intended to build off online petitions at Moveon.org calling on Herbert to let the court ruling stand in favor of marriage equality in Utah. At the time of the rally, the petitions had a total of 58,000 signatures.

“There’s so much excitement and energy right now,” Williams said. “Utah’s LGBT community is on fire and we are united like I have never seen before. There is such a sense of momentum and it was just happy coincidence that Friday morning Eric Holder announced the federal government would be acknowledging our marriages.”

Another institution showing signs of change ā€” albeit subtle ā€” is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which is headquartered in Utah and nearly six years ago led the fight against same-sex marriage when California’s Proposition 8 came on the ballot.

In a statement the church issued on Friday, it reaffirmed its opposition to same-sex marriage, warning church officers not to employ “their ecclesiastical authority to perform marriages between two people of the same sex” and forbidding the use of church property for same-sex marriages.

Still, a portion of the statement advises members of the church to treat everyone with respect.

ā€œWhile these matters will continue to evolve, we affirm that those who avail themselves of laws or court rulings authorizing same-sex marriage should not be treated disrespectfully,” the statement says. “The gospel of Jesus Christ teaches us to love and treat all people with kindness and civility ā€” even when we disagree.ā€

The words came the day after news broke that the Mormon Church wouldn’t file a friend-of-the-court brief in the Utah case seeking marriage equality now before the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ā€” a change in trajectory for the church after it joined the religious right in making filings before the U.S. Supreme Court when it considered Prop 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act.

Spencer Clark, executive director of Mormons for Equality, said the statement is notable because it could have come out when same-sex marriages started advancing throughout the country, but instead is happening now.

“But given the rapid spread of civil marriage equality over the past couple years it’s evident that the church has recognized that this is something that is not going away and with which they will have to co-exist,” Clark said. “The fact that this letter came out now, and not in 2001 or even 2004, is a tacit admission that the climate has incontrovertibly changed and that we as Mormons must confront reality.”

And there’s optimism going forward about the lawsuit. It’s pending before the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has pledged to consider the case on an expedited basis and is expected to render a decision this spring.

J. Seth Anderson, the other-half of the first gay couple married in Utah, said the short-lived nature of marriage equality in Utah demonstrates that the issue needs to be at the federal level and not left to the states.

“The states cannot be trusted to treat fairly, equally and lawfully their gay and lesbian citizens,” Anderson said. “There’s no statute in Utah law that allows the governor to select a group of marriage licenses and just declare them not recognized. It places Utah at the center of a very important national debate, and shows, I think, Utah digging its heels into keeping its position as a far right-wing rogue theocracy.”

The lawsuit may be the first to reach the U.S. Supreme Court among others seeking the court to find a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.

But Lawrence said he’s hoping the case ends with the Tenth Circuit ruling ā€” with no appeal by the state of Utah to the Supreme Court ā€” so that gay couples in Utah can continue marrying yet again as soon as possible.

“There are many people who want to this to go to SCOTUS, and if it does, we feel very strongly if we go to the Supreme Court this is going to be the end-all for the whole country,” Lawrence said. “That would be great, but I don’t want to keep our people in limbo for that long.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

National

Trans Lifeline CEO apologizes for botched online lottery to recruit hotline operators

Applicants compare debacle to ā€˜Hunger Games,ā€™ and Ticketmaster

Published

on

The CEO of Trans Lifeline ā€” kai alviar horton ā€” admitted on social media that their organization was not prepared for the number of applications it received.

Job hunters by the thousands expressed disappointment, frustration, and anger Wednesday over the process to submit online applications for three lucrative but challenging positions as remote telephone operators for the nationā€™s only transgender-led crisis hotline, Trans Lifeline. One applicant complained on Instagram that their experience was akin to ā€œThe Hunger Games.ā€Ā 

But it turns out, the odds were never in their favor. 

The CEO of the San Francisco-based nonprofit ā€” kai alviar horton, who joined Trans Lifeline in July 2024 and does not capitalize any letters in his name ā€” admitted on social media late Wednesday that their organization was not prepared for the sheer number of applications, which he said was anticipated to number 100, over 48 hours. 

ā€œWe know now that our impact has caused so many of you hurt and further distrust in us,ā€ horton wrote in the letter posted on Instagram, acknowledging that Trans Lifeline had endured ā€œmany storms of instability and harm.ā€Ā 

ā€œThe process we strived towards landed in ways that did not build accessibility,ā€ they wrote. ā€œThis process hurt you, and we are genuinely sorry. We are committed to learning to do better.ā€ 

The job posting still appears online at a portal called levels.fyi offering an annual salary of $63,000, ā€œgenerous paid time-off benefitsā€ and ā€œ100% employer-paid health care premiumsā€ as well as retirement benefits and more. Given that studies by the Williams Institute have shown the significant challenges trans people face in the workplace, from discrimination to harassment, especially in comparison to cisgender employees and candidates, Trans Lifelineā€™s offer was a beacon in the darkness to many.Ā 

ā€œYou know better than most how hard it is for trans people to get work, especially with decent pay,ā€ wrote @terfhunter420. ā€œI hope youā€™re reading the impact this application process has had on people here and consider making some big changes for your next batch of hiring. Something less like trying to score concert tickets on the radio.ā€

ā€œTo our surprise,ā€ horton wrote, ā€œwe received over 2,500 applications before the submission window even opened,ā€ which was at 1 p.m. EDT Wednesday. He said his team then ā€œdid our best to reach out to every single applicant to let them know to submit again within the window we outlined in the job posting.ā€ 

But when that window opened at 10 oā€™clock in San Francisco Wednesday, horton said his team was suddenly flooded with more than 1,200 submissions, ā€œin just the first five minutes.ā€

The instructions to apply noted that in addition to a resume, candidates had to also submit a five-minute long, detailed self-made video, in lieu of a cover letter. The site indicates this was intended to ā€œsimplify the process.ā€ But many frustrated candidates noted in their comments online that this particular requirement added a significant extra burden of time and energy, ā€œonly to have it all go to waste due to technical failures,ā€ wrote @astoldbyjae.Ā 

Adding insult to injury is that untold thousands of potential candidates are left to wonder if their submissions were even received or would ever be seen, given that the portal was set up to be limited to accepting no more than 100 submissions on the first day; When hit with more than ten times that many applications, many job hunters reported getting error messages, and shared the pain of that experience in the comments on hortonā€™s post. 

ā€œIā€™m heartsick myself right now,ā€ wrote @zorro_nova. ā€œI tried in that first minute only to get my own error message.ā€ Another wrote: ā€œI won’t lie I was definitely surprised to see how the hiring process was handled, it was almost like watching a Ticketmaster sale of a Taylor Swift concert more than a job listing.ā€ @mistersister2024 added: ā€œAs someone who made the 5-minute video, carefully edited it, and then didnā€™t even get to submit it, this process was very frustrating.ā€

ā€œWe were devastated,ā€ wrote @jennakjirsten. ā€œI think it was hard not even being able to submit the form, even if it had been one of a thousand. We also worry that by only accepting the quickest to apply, you may have missed out on some very qualified applicants.ā€

As of press time, horton has not responded to an inquiry by the Blade about what if anything they will do for candidates who received error messages, or exactly how many applications they have on hand. 

But in his online letter, horton did announce that so many submissions were received that to process them all, Trans Lifeline has postponed selection of candidates to be invited to interview for the three open positions until April 7, instead of March 24. 

He also revealed the org has just two employees dedicated to reviewing all the applications received on Wednesday.

ā€œShout out to the two trans people in hiring who have to read 3,000 applications individually or else they get canceled,ā€ wrote @jaki_riot. ā€œY’all some MVPs because the response to this situation feels a bit unreasonable.ā€

Several commenters praised horton for his apology and for their transparency. 

ā€œImo, Trans lifeline has done SO much to earn that benefit of the doubt,ā€ wrote @kingofyarn. ā€œAnd seeing the backlash made me sad, because it’s as if yā€™all haven’t worked incredibly hard to earn that trust. I love this heartfelt apology and of course, transparency with a strong moral code.ā€

As horton acknowledged in his letter, Trans Lifeline has survived crises before now. Founded in 2014, the nonprofitā€™s two founders left the organization two years later amid accusations of corruption. An internal investigation found ā€œthere had been significant spending of Trans Lifeline funds outside the scope of the current budgetā€ that ā€œran afoul of Trans Lifelineā€™s obligations to the 501(c)(3) tax laws.ā€ A report in December 2023 by PBS indicated a downturn in donations forced the nonprofit to reduce the number of hours the hotline was available and slash its budget.Ā 

At that time, PBS reported the organization employed as many as 45 people, with around 200 volunteers who help, according to Adam Callahan, director for the hotline program. Every hotline operator identifies as either trans or nonbinary. 

As of press time, the careers page on the Trans Lifeline site indicated ā€œStaff Hotline Operator applications are closed.ā€Ā 

ā€œWe are so grateful for the overwhelming interest in our Hotline Operator positionsā€”1,000 applications within the first two minutes! Thank you to each person who took the time to apply. Weā€™ve received a fantastic pool of candidates and have now closed the application process. We are working diligently to review the first 100 complete applications received and aim to notify everyone of their status by Friday, March 21st. If you have not heard from us, be assured we are still actively considering your application. Please keep an eye on your inbox for our email. We will respond to everyone who has applied. We appreciate your understanding and enthusiasm.ā€

Continue Reading

State Department

US withdraws from OAS LGBTI Core Group

Decision ‘in line with the president’s recent executive orders’

Published

on

The U.S. Embassy in El Salvador in 2023 hung and flew the Progress Pride flag. The U.S. has withdrawn from the Organization of American States' LGBTI Core Group. (Photo courtesy of the U.S. Embassy of El Salvador's Facebook page.)

A State Department spokesperson on Tuesday confirmed the U.S. has withdrawn from the Organization of American States’ LGBTI Core Group.

The U.S., along with Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Uruguay, co-founded the Core Group in 2016 during that year’s OAS General Assembly that took place in the Dominican Republic.

“We look forward to deepening our collaboration at the OAS on issues impacting LGBTI persons so as to enhance dialogue, cooperation, and the sharing of best practices at regional and multilateral levels, recognizing also the various efforts and developments undertaken by and in member states,” reads a joint statement the countries issued on June 15, 2016. “Furthermore, we encourage and welcome the participation of other interested OAS member states in the membership and activities of the Core Group.”

“We also look forward to collaborating with civil society organizations and other social actors as we seek to further shared goals,” it adds. “Our commitment in these areas is firm and will remain so.”

President Donald Trump since he took office on Jan. 20 has signed a number of executive orders that have specifically targeted the LGBTQ and intersex community. These include the ā€œDefending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Governmentā€ directive that, among other things, bans the State Department from issuing passports with ā€œXā€ gender markers.

A directive that Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued bans embassies and other U.S. diplomatic institutions from flying the Pride flag. (Former President Joe Biden in March 2024Ā signedĀ a government spending bill with a provision that banned Pride flags from flying over U.S. embassies.)

“In line with the presidentā€™s recent executive orders, we have withdrawn from the OAS LGBTI Core Group,” the State Department spokesperson told the Washington Blade.

The U.S. last month withdrew from the U.N. LGBTI Core Group, a group of U.N. member states that have pledged to support LGBTQ and intersex rights.

Continue Reading

State Department

Rubio: 83 percent of USAID contracts have been cancelled

State Department will administer remaining programs

Published

on

Secretary of State Marco Rubio during his confirmation hearing on Jan. 15, 2025. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday said 83 percent of U.S. Agency for International Development contracts have been cancelled.

“The 5,200 contracts that are now cancelled spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve, (and in some cases even harmed), the core national interests of the United States,” said Rubio on X.

Rubio added “the remaining 18 percent of programs we are keeping (approximately 1,000)” will “now be administered more effectively under the State Department.”

Rubio on Jan. 24Ā directedĀ State Department personnel to stop nearly all U.S. foreign aid spending for 90 days in response toĀ an executive orderĀ that President Donald Trump signed after his inauguration. The Washington Blade has previously reported programs in Kenya and other countries the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief funds have been forced to suspend services and even shut down because of a lack of U.S. funding, even though Rubio issued a waiver that allowed PEPFAR and other ā€œlife-saving humanitarian assistanceā€ programs to continue to operate during the freeze.

The Trump-Vance administration also moved to dismantle USAID.

A statement the White House issued on Feb. 3 said the organization ā€œhas been unaccountable to taxpayers as it funnels massive sums of money to the ridiculous ā€” and, in many cases, malicious ā€” pet projects of entrenched bureaucrats, with next-to-no oversight.ā€ The statement also contains examples of what it described as “waste and abuse” that included $2 million for “sex changes and ‘LGBT activism'” in Guatemala, $1.5 million to “advance diversity, equity and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities,” and $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.”

LGBTQ+ Victory Institute Executive Director Elliot Imse told the Blade last month his organization has lost around $600,000, which is two-thirds of its entire global program budget. Imse said the global LGBTQ rights movement is set to lose more than $50 million because of the suspension of U.S. aid.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular