Africa
Anti-LGBTQ crackdown worsens in Tanzania
Muharami Hassan Nayonga this year received 30-year prison sentence for anal sex
Less than two months after Muharami Hassan Nayonga received a 30-year prison sentence for engaging in anal sex, the Tanzanian government is seemingly intensifying its crackdown on the country’s LGBTQ and intersex community.
Nayonga’s case is not the first of its kind in the East African country. Several LGBTQ and intersex people often find themselves in a similar situation, but their cases do not make headlines because of opposition to LGBTQ and intersex rights in the country.
Police in 2018 raided a party and arrested 10 men on suspicion they were gay.
“LGBTQI+ individuals cannot freely assemble, associate or express themselves publicly out of fear of identification, arrest, and discrimination or violence by police or family members,” reads the U.S. State Department’s 2022 human rights report.
LGBT Voice Tanzania, an LGBTQ and intersex rights organization in the country, says LGBTQ and intersex people who are currently behind bars face very harsh treatment from law enforcement officials.
“Unfortunately, life for LGBTQIA people in Tanzania has only become more difficult because of the backwards leaders. These politicians have created a nightmare for all of us, simply for expressing our identity. They have stripped us of our Constitutionally protected freedoms,” said LGBT Voice Tanzania. “The pain and agony of the LGBTQIA people suffering in police custody in Tanzania is not just their own but is felt by the entire LGBTQIA community.”
The advocacy group further noted Tanzania is among the unfriendliest countries for those who identify as LGBTQ or intersex, with harsh penal laws and entrenched community and institutional bias and discrimination.
Millions of LGBTQ and intersex people in Tanzania also lack access to quality health care that includes HIV prevention, treatment and support, because of prejudice based on gender identity and sexual orientation. There is also an unprecedented increase in street drug use, and sex work to buy them, among LGBTQ and intersex youth who have been kicked out of their homes.
The crackdown in Tanzania is also being fueled by what is happening in Uganda, Kenya and neighboring countries. (Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni in May signed his country’s Anti-Homosexuality Act that contains a death penalty provision for “aggravated homosexuality.” Kenyan lawmakers have proposed a similar measure.)
Some Tanzanian legislators are also pushing for a new anti-homosexuality law that would impose harsher penalties for those who enter into same-sex relationships. These lawmakers and religious leaders have argued such a statute would help ensure the promotion of so-called African values among young people and will ensure the country’s cultural heritage is protected.
Festo Sanga, an MP who represents Makete, said half of the country’s lawmakers would identify as LGBTQ or intersex in five decades if the bill does not become law quickly.
“We need to act now for the future of the country. In 50 years to come, we may find ourselves with leaders of the same nature, in fact, it won’t just stop there in the Parliament, but we may find them in mosques and churches as imams and priests,” said Sanga. “Let’s act now, we shouldn’t wait, this isn’t African culture, it is neither our morals nor our values, our holy books, the Quran and the Bible, both reject it. We need to protect our children, because if we fail now, then we are going to have gay leaders.”
The prospective anti-homosexuality bill, which is set to include the death penalty has not yet been formally debated in Parliament.
Consensual same-sex sexual relations are already criminalized in Tanzania under Section 154 of Chapter 16 of the country’s Criminal Code that addresses “unnatural offenses.” Those who are convicted of violating the law face between 30 years and life in prison.
Senegal
Senegalese lawmakers approve bill to further criminalize homosexuality
A dozen men arrested in February for ‘unnatural acts’
Senegalese lawmakers on Wednesday approved a bill that would further criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations in the country.
The Associated Press notes the measure that Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko introduced in February would increase the penalty for anyone convicted of engaging in consensual same-sex sexual relations from one to five years in prison to five to 10 years. The AP further indicates the bill would prohibit the “promotion” or “financing” of homosexuality in the country.
The bill passed with near unanimous support. Only three of 135 MPs abstained.
President Bassirou Diomaye Faye is expected to sign the measure.
The National Assembly in 2021 rejected a bill that would have further criminalized homosexuality in Senegal.
Senegalese police last month arrested a dozen men and charged them with committing “unnatural acts.”
Volker Türk, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, in a statement described the bill as “deeply worrying.”
“It flies in the face of the sacrosanct human rights we all enjoy: the rights to respect, dignity, privacy, equality and freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly,” he said.
Türk also urged Faye not to sign the bill.
“I urge the president not to sign this harmful law into effect, and for authorities to repeal the existing discriminatory law and to uphold the human rights of all in Senegal, without discrimination,” said Türk.
Uganda
Ugandan activist named Charles F. Kettering Foundation fellow
Clare Byarugaba founded PFLAG-Uganda
The Charles F. Kettering Foundation has named a prominent Ugandan LGBTQ activist as one of its 2026 fellows.
Clare Byarugaba, founder of PFLAG-Uganda, is one of the foundation’s five 2026 Global Fellows.
Byarugaba, among other things, has been a vocal critic of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act. Byarugaba in 2024 met with Pope Francis — who criticized criminalization laws during his papacy — at the Vatican.
The foundation on its website says it “is dedicated to bringing research and people together to make the promise of democracy real for everyone, everywhere.”
“Clare is the kind of hero who rushes toward the emergency to help,” said PFLAG CEO Brian K. Bond in a Feb. 27 statement to the Washington Blade. “She founded PFLAG-Uganda as the country pushed to criminalize homosexuality and those who support LGBTQ+ people. Yet, she never hesitated in her courage, telling us that families wanted to organize to keep their LGBTQ+ loved ones safe, and PFLAG was the way to do it. Clare Byarugaba not only deserves this honor, but she will use her compassion and experience to teach the world about LGBTQ+ advocacy as a Kettering Global Fellow.”
Africa
LGBTQ groups question US health agreements with African countries
Community could face further exclusion, government-sanctioned discrimination
Some queer rights organizations have expressed concern that health agreements between the U.S. and more than a dozen African countries will open the door to further exclusion and government-sanctioned discrimination.
The Trump-Vance administration since December has signed five-year agreements with Kenya, Uganda, and other nations that are worth a total of $1.6 billion.
Kenyan and Ugandan advocacy groups note the U.S. funding shift from NGO-led to a government-to-government model poses serious risks to LGBTQ people and other vulnerable populations in accessing healthcare due to existing discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Uganda Minority Shelters Consortium, Let’s Walk Uganda, the Kenya Human Rights Commission, and the Center for Minority Rights and Strategic Litigation note the agreements’ silence on vulnerable populations in accessing health care threatens their safety, privacy, and confidentiality.
“Many LGBTQ persons previously accessed HIV prevention and treatment, sexual and reproductive health services, mental health support, and psychosocial care through specialized clinics supported by NGOs and partners such as USAID (the U.S. Agency for International Development) or PEPFAR,” Let’s Walk Uganda Executive Director Edward Mutebi told Washington Blade.
He noted such specialized clinics, including the Let’s Walk Medical Center, are trusted facilities for providing stigma-free services by health workers who are sensitized to queer issues.
“Under this new model that sidelines NGOs and Drop-in Centers (DICs), there is a high-risk of these populations being forced into public health facilities where stigma, discrimination, and fear of exposure are prevalent to discourage our community members from seeking care altogether, leading to late testing and treatment,” Mutebi said. “For LGBTQ persons already living under criminalization and heightened surveillance, the loss of community-based service delivery is not just an access issue; it is a full-blown safety issue.”
Uganda Minority Shelters Consortium Coordinator John Grace said it is “deeply troubling” for the Trump-Vance administration to sideline NGOs, which he maintains have been “critical lifelines” for marginalized communities through their specialized clinics funded by donors like the Global Fund and USAID.
USAID officially shut down on July 1, 2025, after the White House dismantled it.
Grace notes the government-to-government funding framework will impact clinics that specifically serve the LGBTQ community, noting their patients will have to turn to public systems that remain inaccessible or hostile to them.
“UMSC is concerned that the Ugandan government, under this new arrangement, may lack both the political will and institutional safeguards to equitably serve these populations,” Grace said. “Without civil society participation, there is a real danger of invisibility and neglect.”
Grace also said the absence of accountability mechanisms or civil society oversight in the U.S. agreement, which Uganda signed on Dec. 10, would increase state-led discrimination in allocating health resources.
Center for Minority Rights and Strategic Litigation Legal Manager Michael Kioko notes the U.S. agreement with Kenya, signed on Dec. 4, will help sustain the country’s health sector, but it has a non-binding provision that allows Washington to withdraw or withhold the funding at any time without legal consequences. He said it could affect key health institutions’ long-term planning for specialized facilities for targeted populations whose independent operations are at stake from NGOS the new agreement sidelines.
“The agreement does not provide any assurance that so-called non-core services, such as PrEP, PEP, condoms, lubricants, targeted HIV testing, and STI prevention will be funded, especially given the Trump administration’s known opposition to funding these services for key populations,” Kioko said.
He adds the agreement’s exclusionary structure could further impact NGO-run clinics for key populations that have already closed or scaled down due to loss of the U.S. funding last year, thus reversing hard-won gains in HIV prevention and treatment.
“The socio-political implications are also dire,” Kioko said. “The agreement could be weaponized to incite discrimination and other LGBTQ-related health issues by anti-LGBTQ voices in the parliament who had called for the re-authorization of the U.S. funding (PEPFAR) funding in 2024, as a political mileage in the campaign trail.”
Even as the agreement fails to safeguard specialized facilities for key populations, the Kenya Human Rights Commission states continued access to healthcare services in public facilities will depend on the government’s commitment to maintain confidentiality, stigma-sensitive care, and targeted outreach mechanisms.
“The agreement requires compliance with applicable U.S. laws and foreign assistance policies, including restrictions such as the Helms Amendment on abortion funding,” the Kenya Human Rights Commission said in response to the Blade. “More broadly, funded activities must align with U.S. executive policy directives in force at the time. In the current U.S. context, where executive actions have narrowed gender recognition and reduced certain transgender protections, there is a foreseeable risk that funding priorities may shift.”
Just seven days after Kenya and the U.S. signed the agreement, the country’s High Court on Dec. 11 suspended its implementation after two petitioners challenged its legality on grounds that it was negotiated in secrecy, lacks proper parliamentary approval, and violates Kenyans’ data privacy when their medical information is shared with America.
The agreement the U.S. and Uganda signed has not been challenged.
-
Health4 days agoToo afraid to leave home: ICE’s toll on Latino HIV care
-
Movies4 days agoIntense doc offers transcendent treatment of queer fetish pioneer
-
The White House3 days agoTrump will refuse to sign voting bill without anti-trans provisions
-
Colombia4 days agoClaudia López wins primary in Colombian presidential race
