Connect with us

News

Second USAID-backed training in Colombia scheduled

Four-day gathering to take place in Cartagena from Aug. 28-Sept. 1.

Published

on

Wilson CastaƱera, Colombia, Caribe Afirmativo, gay news, Washington Blade

Wilson CastaƱera, Colombia, Caribe Afirmativo, gay news, Washington Blade

Wilson CastaƱeda of the Colombian LBGT advocacy group Caribe Afirmativo. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

The Gay and Lesbian Victory Institute next month will conduct its second training in Colombia that is designed to teach LGBT advocates how to become involved in their country’s political process.

An invitation sent to the Washington Blade on Monday said the Gay and Lesbian Victory Institute, along with Caribe Afirmativo, an LGBT advocacy group that works in cities along Colombia’s Caribbean coastline, and Colombia Diversa, a national LGBT rights organization based in BogotĆ”, the country’s capital, will conduct the training in Cartagena from Aug. 28-Sept. 1.

Running for political office, implementing an effective media strategy and connecting with voters are among the topics that will be discussed during the four day-gathering. A public event with openly LGBT politicians and elected officials is also expected to take place.

ā€œThe strengthening of the capacities of LGBT leaders who seek to rise to public office is essential to solidify the advances towards complete equality in Colombia,ā€ the invitation reads.

The Cartagena gathering will take place roughly three months after 30 LGBT advocates from across Colombia attended a training in BogotĆ” that the Gay and Lesbian Victory Institute, Caribe Afirmativo and Colombia Diversa co-sponsored.

The BogotĆ” training was the first of the LGBT Global Development Partnership, a USAID-backed public private partnership designed to promote LGBT rights around the world, to take place. The Gay and Lesbian Victory Institute, the Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice, the Swedish International Development Corporation Agency, the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law and other groups will contribute $11 million over the next four years to LGBT advocacy groups in Colombia, Ecuador and other developing countries.

The Cartagena training will also take place slightly more than two months after gays and lesbians began to petition registrars and judges to legally recognize their relationships.

Colombia’s Constitutional Court in 2011 ruled same-sex couples could legally register their relationship in two years if the country’s lawmakers did not pass a bill that would extend to them the same benefits heterosexuals receive through marriage.

Colombian lawmakers in April overwhelmingly rejected a bill that would have extended marriage rights to gays and lesbians. The court’s June 20 deadline passed amid confusion as to whether gays and lesbians could actually tie the knot in the South American country because the Constitutional Court’s decision did not include the word ā€œmarriage.ā€

Several notaries said they would allow same-sex couples to enter into a ā€œsolemn contractā€ that is similar to an agreement into which two people enter whey they purchase a home together, as opposed to a civil marriage. A BogotĆ” judge last week said a gay couple could tie the knot in a ceremony that is scheduled to take place on July 24.

Advocate: LGBT advocates can learn from their U.S. counterparts

Caribe Afirmativo Director Wilson CastaƱeda Castro, who visited the United States in April with a group of other Colombian LGBT rights advocates on a State Department-sponsored trip, told the Blade during an interview at the BogotƔ training that he feels his fellow activists can continue to learn from their American counterparts.

ā€œIn Colombia the LGBT community remains one of the most marginalized communities,ā€ he said. ā€œThe U.S. visit allowed us to see first-hand experiences, situations, specific examples of people and institutions and organizations. We can take some of what we experienced [there] and apply it here in Colombia.ā€

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

U.S. Military/Pentagon

Pentagon expands testosterone screening as trans troops face hormone therapy restrictions

Defense Department says updated guidelines to be issued shortly

Published

on

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The Pentagon has announced that new clinical guidance will be released establishing mandatory testosterone deficiency screening for active-duty and reserve cisgender male service members ages 30 and older, advancing a policy that expands hormone-related care for cisgender troops.

The Defense Department said the existing clinical guidelines, which are not currently available on the Defense Health Agency’s website, are being updated and that the final guidance will be issued shortly.

The announcement comes amid a wave of anti-transgender policies from both the DoD and the Trump-Vance administration, which continue to prohibit trans men from receiving the same treatment.

Under the forthcoming guidance, men ages 30 and older will be forced to undergo testosterone blood tests as part of their medical care. Younger male service members will be tested if they request screening or if clinicians identify warning signs of low testosterone.

The new guidelines formalize a screening program Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced in July, when he said the Pentagon would begin testing service members to ensure that ā€œyou have the right testosterone levels to operate at your absolute best.ā€

ā€œTaking care of your long-term health means ensuring you remain strong, resilient, and capable — not just for your next deployment, but for the rest of your life, so you can thrive long after you take off the uniform,ā€ Hegseth said at the time.

The Defense Health Agency’s clinical guidance says the program is intended to address ā€œhormonal and energy-availability issues.ā€ Hegseth said in July that testosterone replacement therapy would remain voluntary for service members if treatment is recommended.

The Food and Drug Administration is also scheduled to hold a meeting later this month with experts to discuss the medical use of testosterone.

The Pentagon’s push to routinely test testosterone levels runs counter to current medical guidance, which generally recommends considering testosterone therapy only for men who have symptoms consistent with low testosterone and have documented low hormone levels on two separate blood tests.

Testosterone is a sex hormone naturally produced by people of all sexes. It plays a role in regulating muscle mass, bone density, and sex drive. Testosterone levels in men naturally decline with age and have been associated with symptoms including erectile dysfunction, low libido, mood changes and weight gain, although experts continue to debate when testosterone therapy is medically appropriate.

The policy has drawn scrutiny from LGBTQ advocates because the Pentagon and Hegseth have simultaneously cited hormone therapy as part of the rationale for removing trans service members from the military.

Under President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order, ā€œPrioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness,ā€ the military has moved to bar trans people diagnosed with gender dysphoria from serving and has begun formal administrative separation proceedings against trans personnel.

The Pentagon continues to pursue implementation of the trans military ban as litigation over the policy proceeds. As a result, some trans service members have had their gender-affirming hormone therapy halted even as the Pentagon expands testosterone screening and potential treatment for cisgender service members.

SPARTA Pride, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization made up of trans service members, veterans and their allies, criticized the disparity to the Washington Blade when Hegseth first announced the screening program.

ā€œIf hormone therapy helps warfighters perform at their best, then it cannot simultaneously be used as evidence that transgender service members are unfit to serve,ā€ said Kara Corcoran, executive director of SPARTA Pride. ā€œThe same class of evidence-based medical treatment cannot be characterized as readiness-enhancing for one group and readiness-destroying for another.ā€

On June 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that trans service members already serving in the military could continue to do so while allowing the armed services to continue refusing to enlist new trans recruits.

The Blade reached out to the Pentagon when the testosterone screening program was first announced in July, asking why cisgender service members could receive testosterone therapy while transgender service members could not. The Pentagon did not respond.

Continue Reading

Switzerland

Swiss government backs nationwide conversion therapy ban

Several cantons have already prohibited widely discredited practice

Published

on

(Public domain photo)

The Swiss government has said it supports a nationwide ban on so-called conversion therapy.

The Swiss Broadcasting Corporation on its website notes the government officially announced its position in a report it published on Wednesday.

Neuchâtel in 2023 became the first Swiss canton to ban conversion therapy.

Lawmakers in Valais and Vaud have also prohibited the widely discredited practice in their respective cantons. Bern and Geneva are among the other cantons in which lawmakers have considered similar prohibitions.

The European Commission earlier this year said all European Union countries should ban conversion therapy.

Switzerland is not a member of the EU, but lawmakers in neighboring Germany in 2020 passed a law that prohibits conversion therapy for minors and for adults who have not consented to undergoing the widely discredited practice.

Several EU countries — Belgium, Cyprus, France, Malta, Norway, Portugal, and Spain — have banned conversion therapy outright.

The Dutch Senate in June approved a bill that would ban conversion therapy in the Netherlands. The lower house of the country’s parliament approved the measure in September 2025.

Greece in 2022 banned conversion therapy for minors.

Continue Reading

2026 Midterm Elections

Markey’s primary win deemed success for LGBTQ activists

Mass. lawmaker champions transgender rights

Published

on

U.S. Sen. Ed Markey speaks outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 13, 2026. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) clinched the Democratic seat for his reelection campaign in Massachusetts’s primary election on Tuesday.

Markey won the deep-blue state with 64.8 percent of the vote, according to NBC News, triumphing over Marine Corps combat veteran and Congressman Seth Moulton, who received 35.2 percent of the vote.

Massachusetts’s primary election, which determined which Democratic candidate will head to the polls to face off against the Republican challenger in November, is being considered a victory for LGBTQ-inclusive policy, as well as for a divisive pro-transgender rights candidate — both things Markey has become an outspoken champion of.

Markey has experience at multiple levels of government, from the state level, where he served three terms in the state House of Representatives, to his federal tenure, including 20 terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and is now serving his second term as a senator. He has become a fixture of a changing Democratic Party in one of the most consistently blue places in the U.S.

This primary — and much of the national discussion surrounding the Senate seat — focused a lot of campaigning power on fighting the growing sentiment, led mostly by Republicans, that the frustration many Americans feel lends itself to an anti-establishment and anti-incumbent attitude.

Markey ran his campaign using his past as a reflection of his commitment to constantly putting his best foot forward for Bay Staters — particularly with apprehension for issues younger and more progressive democrats have been righting for — including Green New Deal and ā€œMedicare for Allā€ while Moulton — who was also elected to federal office prior to this run — campaigned on being younger than Markey, arguing that he was not the same type of established politician.

Moulton also faced backlash for negative comments about trans athletes, sparking criticism for those who did want younger candidate but want for trans rights to be protected.

Markey’s track record of supporting the LGBTQ community is one of the most clear in federal politics, one that has garnered a ā€œ100 percent lifetime voting recordā€ on the Human Rights Campaign’s PAC politician review scorecard.

That list of Markey’s actions includes being a cosponsor of the Equality Act, driving landmark legislation to ensure federal protections for LGBTQ Americans, and being one of the most vocal proponents for trans rights in the federal government — specifically in multiple appropriations bills and in the National Defense Authorization Act. He was also the lead sponsor of the Transgender Health Care Access Act and the Transgender Bill of Rights resolution.

Markey first introduced the Transgender Bill of Rights in the Senate in 2023, where it ultimately failed to be brought to law. He reintroduced the legislation this year once again. This was a direct response to the attitude pushed by many conservatives after 2021, when the push to minimize trans rights started to become a key part of their cause and has been constantly propped up by the Trump-Vance administration.

“Massachusetts needs a senator who stands up and fights back, a senator who never forgets who they are fighting for,” Markey said during his victory speech. “That has been the mission of my life, and it always will be.”

Following the calling of the primary, a slew of LGBTQ organizations rallied behind Markey, many pushing his past as an asset that puts his money where his mouth is through advocating for legislation specifically protecting the LGBTQ community.

Tyler Hack, the executive director of the Christopher Street Project, an organization dedicated to pushing for legal protections for trans americans, released a statement following Markey’s win. Hack argued that putting forward such a staunchly pro-trans candidate is a win for the community, especially after endorsing him earlier this year.

“Tonight, anti-trans politics lost. Massachusetts rejected the idea that attacking transgender people is a shortcut to political power. Voters chose a different path: one where equality is not negotiable, cruelty is not courage, and transgender people do not have to disappear for Democrats to succeed.”

The Human Rights Campaign also endorsed him as a candidate earlier this year and issued a statement via its president, Kelley Robinson.

ā€œEd Markey has spent decades fighting for LGBTQ+ equality, for working people, and for a more livable world,ā€ Robinson said. ā€œHe knows why equality matters. He’s stood with us no matter what. We were proud to endorse him this year, and when a pro-equality majority takes back the Senate this fall, we will continue to count on him as a champion for our community.ā€

Markey is running for reelection against Republican John Deaton in November, where he is expected to win.

Continue Reading

Popular