Connect with us

National

Senate panel advances two gay judicial nominees

McShane, Quinones reported out favorably by voice vote

Published

on

Nitza QuiƱones, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Washington Blade, gay news
Nitza QuiƱones, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Washington Blade, gay news

Nitza QuiƱones Alejandro nomination as a U.S. judge was approved by Senate panel (Image courtesy of the United States Senate)

Following a call from the White House to fill vacancies on the federal court, a Senate panel on Thursday approved two openly gay nominees to the floor en banc as part of a group of six pending appointments.

The Senate Judiciary Committee reported out by voice vote the nominations of Michael McShane, nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, and Nitza Quinones Alejandro, nominated for a seat U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Both nominees were named by President Obama in the previous Congress and renominated again at the start of this year.

McShane, whose nomination was recommended by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), has served on theĀ Multnomah CountyĀ Circuit CourtĀ since 1997, where he handles civil, criminal and family court cases.Ā If confirmed, he would be the first openly gay federal judge in Oregon.

Quinones, whose nomination was recommended by Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), serves as a judge on the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, where she has presided since 1991 over civil and criminal matters. A Puerto Rico native,Ā Quinones would be the firstĀ out lesbian Latina to serve as a federal judge.

The committee has advanced the nominees as the Obama administration is ramping up public pressure on the Senate to confirm judicial appointments.Ā On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney offered a three-slide presentation on vacancies remaining in the federal judiciary — notingĀ the average wait time for an Obama judicial nominee to get a floor vote is three to four times longer than it was during the Bush administration.

“This is a problem that needs to be resolved for the sake of our judicial system, for the sake of a carrying out of justice in our country in an expedited and deliberate manner,” Carney said.

It should be noted the committee votes onĀ Quinones andĀ McShane were scheduled before Carney offered his remarks on Tuesday during the White House briefing.

Carney particularly emphasized the importance of confirmingĀ Caitlin Halligan, another nominee,Ā to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. But the following day, Senate Republicans succeeded in filibustering the nomination. President Obama in a statement afterward said he was “deeply disappointed” because he believes Halligan is highly qualified for the role.

But earlier this week, the Senate confirmed by voice vote the nomination ofĀ Pamela Ki Mai Chen, a lesbian, for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. She’s the first openly gay Asian-American confirmed to the federal bench.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Hungary

JD Vance to travel to Hungary next week

Country’s elections to take place on April 12

Published

on

Vice President JD Vance speaks at CPAC on Feb. 20, 2024. He and his wife, Usha Vance, will travel to Hungary next week. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Vice President JD Vance and his wife, second lady Usha Vance, will visit Hungary next week.

An announcement the White House released on Thursday said the Vances will be in Budapest, the Hungarian capital, from April 7-8.

JD Vance ā€œwill hold bilateral meetings withā€ Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor OrbĆ”n. The announcement further indicates the vice president ā€œwill also deliver remarks on the rich partnership between the United States and Hungary.ā€

The Vances will travel to Hungary less than a week before the country’s parliamentary elections take place on April 12.

OrbƔn, who has been in office since 2010, and his Fidesz-KDNP coalition government have faced widespread criticism over its anti-LGBTQ crackdown.

The Associated Press notes polls indicate OrbƔn is trailing PƩter Magyar and his center-right Tisza party.

Continue Reading

The White House

Pam Bondi ousted as attorney general

Donald Trump announced firing on Thursday

Published

on

Now former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

President Donald Trump removed Attorney General Pam Bondi from her post Thursday, following growing criticism over how she and the Department of Justice handled a range of issues, including matters related to sex offender and Trump ally Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump announced Bondi’s removal on Truth Social, where he also said Todd Blanche will serve as acting head of the Justice Department.

ā€œPam Bondi is a great American patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my attorney general over the past year,ā€ Trump wrote on the platform. ā€œPam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown on crime across our country, with murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900.ā€

Trump was seen as recently as Wednesday with the now-former attorney general at a Supreme Court hearing on citizenship.

The decision contrasts with Trump’s previous public praise of Bondi, the 87th U.S. attorney general and former 37th attorney general of Florida, who served in that role from 2011-2019 before joining the Trump-Vance administration. He has frequently lauded her loyalty and said he speaks with her often. Bondi was also one of president’s defense lawyers during his first impeachment trial.

Privately, however, Trump had grown frustrated that Bondi was not ā€œmoving quickly enoughā€ to prosecute critics and political adversaries he wanted to face criminal charges, according to multiple sources. The New York Times reported that her inability to charge former FBI Director James B. Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James with any crimes is a large factor in the president’s choice to fire her from the government’s primary law enforcement agency.

The move comes as Trump has sought to minimize public turmoil within his administration, avoiding the perception of a revolving-door Cabinet that defined his first term.

Lee Zeldin, a former Republican congressman from New York who unsuccessfully ran for governor, has emerged as a leading contender to lead the Justice Department. He has been one of Trump’s most reliable allies.

ā€œHe’s our secret weapon,ā€ Trump said of Zeldin in February during a White House event promoting the coal industry, adding, ā€œHe’s getting those approvals done in record-setting time.ā€

Bondi has also growing faced scrutiny from Congress.

The House Oversight Committee recently subpoenaed her to testify about the department’s handling of certain files, where she declined to answer key questions during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing in February.

The Tampa native has a long history of opposing LGBTQ rights through her roles in government. As Florida attorney general, she fought against the legalization of same-sex marriage, arguing it would cause ā€œserious public harm,ā€ pushing forward a legal battle that cost taxpayers nearly half a million dollars. She also asked the Florida Supreme Court to overturn a lower court ruling that found the state’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional.

More recently, Bondi established a ā€œTitle IX Special Investigations Teamā€ within the Justice Department focused on restricting transgender women and girls from participating in women’s and girls’ sports teams and accessing facilities aligned with their gender identity. She also told Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to turn over the medical records of anyone under 19 who received gender-affirming care.

Her removal follows Trump’s decision last month to oust another controversial female Cabinet figure, Kristi Noem.

Continue Reading

The White House

VIDEO: Gay journalist detained for booing Trumps at ‘Chicago’ opening night

Eugene Ramirez booed first family at Kennedy Center

Published

on

Eugene Ramirez outside of the Kennedy Center after the ordeal, holding a First Amendment rights protest sign he found. (Photo courtesy of Eugene Ramirez)

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump attended the opening night of “Chicago” at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on Tuesday. They were greeted by a mix of cheers, applause, and some audible boos.

Among them was Eugene Ramirez, a gay Washington resident, who later shared his account of the night after being briefly detained by security for booing the president and giving a thumbs-down gesture — an expression of what many would call a textbook definition of constitutionally protected speech to criticize the government.

Ramirez attended the opening night performance with a group of friends, hoping to catch a final show before the center undergoes two years of major changes under Trump oversight. The musical, based on a 1926 play of the same name, has become synonymous with Broadway success.

With music by John Kander, lyrics by Fred Ebb, and a book by Ebb and Bob Fosse, “Chicago” has cemented itself as a cultural staple — known for its signature Fosse choreography, stripped-down staging, and sleek, campy aesthetic. The story follows Roxie Hart and Velma Kelly, women who murder their husbands but — with the help of the manipulative, charismatic, and narcissistic attorney Billy Flynn — walk away scot-free.

It remains the longest-running American musical in Broadway history, and its 2002 film adaptation famously won the Academy Award for Best Picture. On this night, however, the production also became the backdrop for a very modern moment of political protest.

ā€œI accompanied five friends to opening night of ‘Chicago’, as a way to enjoy a final performance in the Kennedy Center as we know it,ā€ Ramirez began to recount to the Washington Blade, describing the moment his group settled into their seats inside the ornate Opera House theater.

Just before the performance began, the twice impeached president and first lady appeared in the balcony box, drawing immediate attention from the audience below. Theatergoers stood, cheered, clapped, and waved, while Ramirez made a different choice.

While accounts of the crowd’s reaction have varied, Ramirez said his response was intentional, immediate, and within his rights. Moments after booing and giving a thumbs-down while recording on his iPhone, security intervened.

The video of Ramirez booing the Trump’s is here:

ā€œWithin moments, the director [of security] and another guard approached and escorted me to a side area where several other security guards were waiting,ā€ he said. ā€œI was detained until everyone was seated and the lights dimmed.ā€

As he was escorted away, Ramirez said his instincts as a journalist kicked in. A former lead anchor for Sinclair’s national evening news broadcast, he said the situation immediately felt off — or more aptly put — as if he could see the strings being pulled from someone attempting to control the narrative.

ā€œJournalism is a vocation, not just a job. I immediately knew there wasn’t just an uncomfortable interaction with security,ā€ he said. ā€œThe Kennedy Center is a federally funded cultural institution, and being questioned about speech related to the president in that setting felt like something the public should know about.ā€

Ramirez explained the difference between a standard visit by a public official and this performance: the president’s appearance wasn’t just ceremonial; it was very clearly a media moment.

ā€œThe White House press pool was there, and it was clear this was an effort to manage the president’s image in the media,ā€ Ramirez continued. ā€œThe irony was not lost on me that this was happening on opening night of ‘Chicago’, a musical about manipulating the press to shape public perception.ā€

According to Ramirez, the explanation he received from Kennedy Center Director of Safety and Security Karles C. Jackson Sr., was brief, but illuminating.

ā€œHe said, ā€˜they don’t want booing,’ and even called out my thumbs-down gesture. He never clarified who ā€˜they’ were, but whether it was the administration or the Kennedy Center, the distinction felt meaningless,ā€ he explained. ā€œMr. Jackson ultimately told me he was just trying to do his job, shook my hand, and allowed me to return to my seat once the lights dimmed and the overture started playing.ā€

Ramirez said he didn’t blame the guard individually, noting the broader context of the Kennedy Center’s uncertain future and the pressures staff were under.

ā€œWith the center closing in the coming months, some of these security guards being pressured to restrict our freedom of speech may only have a few weeks of work left.ā€

He believes the decision to remove him was driven less by disruption than optics, particularly given the presence of the press.

ā€œIt was very clearly about protection — whether protecting the president from visible dissent, or his image before the media present. There was no disruption as almost everyone was standing and reacting loudly to the arrival of the president and first lady, with cheers, applause, and hand gestures. The difference was that my reaction, unlike most, was negative.ā€

Drawing on his experience covering public officials, Ramirez said the incident felt more about controlling perception than security.

ā€œUsually, law enforcement may monitor or intervene if there’s a disruption, but here there was no disruption at all. Simply expressing dissent in a public, cultural space drew the attention of security. It made it feel less like a matter of decorum and more like an effort to control the narrative around the president,ā€ he said. ā€œIt’s about what happens when dissent is treated as disruption rather than a right.ā€

ā€œThe show hadn’t started. I threatened no one. Billy Flynn would have approved of the optics. The rest of us should be paying attention.ā€

Ramirez framed the incident as part of a broader constitutional concern, one that is plaguing the Trump-Vance administration as they continue to reject rules and normalcy set forth by other reserved presidents.

ā€œBeing singled out by security at a federally funded institution for expressing dissent shouldn’t be brushed off; it undermines the First Amendment,ā€ he said, looking at it slightly distanced from it now. ā€œBeing of Cuban heritage, and a journalist, it’s a right I’m not willing to give up readily.ā€

ā€œPublicly funded cultural institutions should allow visible dissent, even in politically charged moments,ā€ he added. ā€œOf course, I understand the need to manage disruptions during a performance, but that was not the case here.ā€

The themes of “Chicago”, a long-running satire about media manipulation and public perception, added another layer of irony to the experience, Ramirez explained.

ā€œThe satire truly leapt off the stage! A show about controlling the narrative, manipulating the press, and covering up truths by leaning on showmanship and distractions. The show is decades old, but could’ve been written today. We’re being razzle-dazzled daily and it’s getting harder to tell fact from fiction, no matter where you get your news.ā€

He, being gay, also acknowledged how hard it must have been for the performers on stage, assuming that at least some in the cast were also members of the LGBTQ community — and artists — two things Trump doesn’t always get along with.

ā€œIt was not lost on me that many of the actors on that stage, that the president and first lady presumably applauded, are members of the LGBTQ community which this administration has rolled back protections for under the guise of religious liberty and free speech, resulting in blatant discrimination.ā€

He pointed to a particular number that felt surreal given the circumstances.

ā€œIts ā€˜Razzle Dazzle’ number celebrates keeping audiences off balance; at its climax, a massive American flag descends as the song celebrates blinding audiences to what is real. Watching that scene after being detained for a thumbs-down was surreal.ā€

Ramirez said the show’s closing lines were especially sharp given the presidential audience and what he just experienced.

ā€œAt the end of the show,

Velma says: ā€˜You know, a lot of people have lost faith in America.’

Roxie replies: ā€˜And for what America stands for.’

Velma: ā€˜But we are the living examples of what a wonderful country this is.’

Roxie: ā€˜So we’d just like to say thank you and God bless you.’

They had both just gotten away with murder!ā€

His closing lines, however, were a bit more pointed than ā€œscintillating sinnersā€ Roxie Hart and Velma Kelly’s were in the show.

ā€œDemocracy only works when citizens are allowed to boo,ā€ he said. ā€œTuesday night at the Kennedy Center, ‘Chicago’ made that point better than I ever could.ā€

The Blade reached out to the Kennedy Center but did not receive a comment back.

Continue Reading

Popular