Connect with us

homepage news

Less than 3 percent of U.S. identifies as LGB: report

LGB people more likely to consume five or more alcoholic drinks a day; gay men more inclined to exercise



The U.S. Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, atient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obamacare, Gay News, Washington Blade
The U.S. Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obamacare, Gay News, Washington Blade, report

A new report from HHS finds that fewer than three percent of people identify as LGB. (Image public domain)

A new report from the Department of Health & Human Services has found that less than three percent of the U.S. population publicly identifies as gay, lesbian or bisexual.

The report from the Centers for Disease Control, which was made public on Tuesday, found that 1.6 percent of Americans identify as gay or lesbian and 0.7 percent identify as bisexual. Those numbers mean 2.3 percent of the population identifies as LGB.

Meanwhile, 96.6 percent of the population identify as straight and the remaining 1.1 percent identify as “something else” or stated “I don’t know the answer.” No data was collected on identification based on gender identity or transgender status.

The information was based on data from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey, which for the first time in its 57-year history last year included questions related to sexual orientation.

According to the report, the addition of survey questions related to sexual orientation should help meet the Healthy People 2020 goals identified by HHS in addition to health objectives related to LGBT people.

“NHIS includes a wide range of survey questions on health, the addition of questions on sexual orientation will facilitate many opportunities for future researchers to examine health among sexual minority populations using a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults,” the report states.

Using the information, the report makes some comparisons between the LGB and the straight population. For example, a higher percentage of women 18–64 who identify as bisexual had experienced serious psychological distress compared to straight women. Moreover, among men 18–64, a higher percentage of those who identify as gay or bisexual have received tests for HIV compared with those who identify as straight.

The report also finds that alcohol and cigarette consumption is higher among people who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual than it is for straight people. Among the findings: 33 percent of gay and lesbian people consumed five or more alcoholic beverages in a single day, compared to 22.3 percent of straight people and 39.5 percent of bisexual people.

Among men, the report also found a higher percentage met federal guidelines for aerobic physical activity. Among gay men, 63.5 percent of respondents met that standard as opposed to 53.7 percent of straight men and 53.3 percent of bisexual men.

A spokesperson at HHS deferred questions on the report to CDC, which didn’t immediately respond to the Washington Blade’s request for comment.

The percentage of those who identify as gay in the report is smaller than the commonly held belief that 10 percent of all people are gay, but the report’s findings are along the lines of a 2011 study from the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles. That report found that 1.7 percent of the population identifies as gay or lesbian and 1.8 percent of the population identifies as bisexual. An estimated 700,000 transgender people live in the United States, the report found.

Gary Gates, a distinguished scholar at the Williams Institute, said the new CDC report is a “milestone” for its inclusion of sexual orientation questions and is on par with the result of existing surveys.

“Without question, these data will provide an important resource to help us to better understand the health needs of LGB Americans and identify possible health disparities associated with sexual orientation,” Gates said.

The report was the result of an announcement from former Secretary of Health & Human Services Kathleen Sebelius in 2011 that her department would begin collecting LGBT data as part of federal health surveys. At the time, Sebelius predicted that questions on sexual orientation would begin in 2013, but made no similar forecast for questions based on gender identity, saying more time was needed to consider the appropriate questions for that category.

The transgender director of the Network for LGBT Health Equity at CenterLink, who goes by the moniker Scout, said it’s time for federal health surveys to include questions on gender identity.

“It’s frustrating that sexual identity data collection is taking off while gender identity is still stalled,” Scout said. “These new data will unleash a wave of articles and research projects and health interventions — all for LGB people, not T. We wouldn’t stand for this exclusion on ENDA, I’m not sure why we’re tolerating it for our health. The feds admit they aren’t even testing T measures, why aren’t we demanding this be fixed?”

The Williams Institute’s Gates also shared the view that gender identity questions should be included in the federal health surveys.

“Full LGBT inclusion in these data will not come until the survey also includes a measurement of gender identity,” Gates said. “I encourage HHS to prioritize the development of a gender identity measure for inclusion on the NHIS in future surveys.”

Continue Reading


  1. Paul Drapiewski

    July 16, 2014 at 1:08 am

    I just don;t believe everyone who is gay that is asked that question is going to say so. I am not sure I would and I am pretty out.

  2. El Dorado

    July 15, 2014 at 9:21 pm

    Some of us aren’t comfortable being honest about our sexuality for phone surveys. I don’t really like the government knowing my sexuality despite all the GLBT gains let alone keeping it in a database. To me there is a time and a place to be out but I don’t need people I don’t know being aware of my business.

    I was given a city health survey last year, and when asked what my sexuality was, I said I didn’t want to answer. Why should they know my sexuality when I don’t even know who I’m talking to on the phone?

  3. William P.

    July 15, 2014 at 9:53 pm

    I too have avoided the question in telephone surveys. Living in a southern state, I cling to caution. I’m out to friends and family, but one never knows the creditability of those calling. I live close to the American Family Association who is known for devious tactics of outing people. And it’s also a state, like many others, where one can be fired from their job if they are gay. So, yes, the survey can’t possibly be a true count.

  4. Anonymous

    July 16, 2014 at 9:11 am

    Hi. Here ❤WomenLookingForCouples. C o m ❤ A Serious dating site for bisexual & lesbian singles seeking relationships, friendships, dating ,love and more. Date an ideal bisexual & lesbian people can be easier! Come to join us. My dear friends, if you are looking for bisexual women and men , couples ,single ,you can find your love at the dating site .

  5. brians ions

    July 16, 2014 at 6:18 am

    “Without question, these data will provide an important resource to help us to better understand the health needs of LGB Americans and identify possible health disparities associated with sexual orientation,” Gates said.
    ‘Just trust us. Your government knows what’s best for you. We’re Democrats after all.’
    I respectfully call a BULLPUCKY ALERT! on Obama’s HHS and Williams.
    Most LGBT folks will rightfully lie as they wisely ought not yet trust any Obama Administration telephone survey demanding to know their sexual orientation. LGBT honesty and a federal breach of such ‘private’ information could hurt many respondents.
    It remains a disgraceful fact that President Obama has not even stopped workplace anti-LGBT discrimination and firings funded by federal contractor dollars– over which the Prez is titular CEO. His WH Press Secretary has been dodging questions for weeks about a rumored Obama religious exemption loophole for his twice-promised federal ENDA EO.
    That ENDA EO loophole– urged by and for anti-LGBT bigots posing themselves as devotees of Pelosi’s ‘conscience-clause’– seeks to dilute to waste water Obama’s twice-promised federal ENDA EO.
    C’mon! Seriously? 
    LGBTs are suppose to trust a phone call from the same Obama Administration that can’t flatly deny such ENDA loophole hypocrisy? We should trust a HHS telephone survey-taker with information that could adversely affect our LGBT loved ones’ employment and financial security– maybe forever?
    BTW, would that HHS survey-taker be a federal contractor employee– still encouraged to look the other way in the face of anti-LGBT workplace discrimination?
    No sir. Uh, uh, Williams Institute. I think there are a whole lot of questions that have apparently been dismissed– or maybe not recognized at all– by your distinguished scholars.
    What exactly is Williams and HHS going to “better understand” about the “health needs of LGB Americans” if the HHS survey count of LGBs is so obviously wildly skewed to underreporting of the LGB population?
    And wouldn’t any conclusions drawn by such a sham federal government survey also be deeply flawed?

  6. Brian Keith Brown

    July 16, 2014 at 11:23 am

    As long as gay people can get fired from their jobs,who is asking the questions and how is it worded,

  7. Brian Keith Brown

    July 16, 2014 at 11:23 am

    As long as gay people can get fired from their jobs,who is asking the questions and how is it worded,

  8. Teddy Basham-Witherington

    July 16, 2014 at 4:30 pm

    Key word here is "identify" many more folks engage/have engaged in same-gender sexual relations and/or are physically/emotionally attracted to the same gender. They may also be attracted to different genders. As noted, the study is a step in the right direction, but the lack of enquiry regarding gender identity means no conclusions can be drawn on that score. If this "health" survey was identified as such to respondents, the denial factor was probably also in play.

  9. Daniel

    July 17, 2014 at 6:23 am

    It’d be interesting to know how many Americans would identify if the federal government actually included sexual orientation in the national Civil Rights Act. Until comprehensive human rights protection is afforded by the federal government, instead of failing to protect or violating human rights, then the target group rightfully has a reason to distrust any inquiry by any federal government agency.

  10. Ron Donaghe

    July 17, 2014 at 2:57 pm

    So this means that only three families out of a hundred have gay people as members of the family? I don't think so. There are at least three gay people in my own family (including relatives). The key word here in this report is those that "identify" as LGB. The other 96 percent contain LGB people that don't admit to it.

  11. John Simpson

    July 17, 2014 at 7:37 pm

    No way in hell do I buy these numbers. Hell half of married men are trying to get laid by a gay guy! I didn't take this survey, so are we not included in the percentage? None of my friends were included…..bogus. I bet it's closer to 15%.

  12. John Simpson

    July 17, 2014 at 7:37 pm

    No way in hell do I buy these numbers. Hell half of married men are trying to get laid by a gay guy! I didn't take this survey, so are we not included in the percentage? None of my friends were included…..bogus. I bet it's closer to 15%.

  13. Rob Lipsey

    July 17, 2014 at 7:45 pm

    I would even say higher because you are right about the married men.

  14. John Simpson

    July 17, 2014 at 8:28 pm

    Oh I know Rob….I've been propositioned at formal affairs where the man's wife is six feet away!!

  15. R Kent Fordyce

    July 18, 2014 at 1:35 am

    Do you really believe that people would admit on a government survey or document that they were not straight? Are you normal? I'm normal.

  16. Alice DSouza

    July 19, 2014 at 1:30 am

    I don't believe these numbers at all.

  17. Margery R Brown

    July 19, 2014 at 3:28 am

    Did you ever know anyone who took this survey? It's conducted by Census takers. For this health survey, they interviewed <35,00 people.They missed San Francisco, New York, Miami & Wash DC. They must have hit the rural trails in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming.

  18. Ken Miller

    July 20, 2014 at 5:02 am

    who cares

  19. AE Webb

    July 23, 2014 at 3:02 pm

    Not all men who have sex with men (MSM) are GAY. Being gay includes emotional attraction as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

homepage news

Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead

No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise



Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.

Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.

In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.

If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.

“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”

The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.

Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”

“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process.  We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.

“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”

A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.

Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”

Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.

The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.

“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”

Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.

For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.

Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”

“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”

But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.

No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.

Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.

“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”

Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.

Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.

Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.

To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.

A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.

“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”

But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. bill to ban LGBTQ panic defense delayed by Capitol security

Delivery of bill to Congress was held up due to protocols related to Jan. 6 riots



New fencing around the Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented some D.C. bills from being delivered to the Hill for a required congressional review. (Blade file photo by Michael K. Lavers)

A bill approved unanimously last December by the D.C. Council to ban the so-called LGBTQ panic defense has been delayed from taking effect as a city law because the fence installed around the U.S. Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented the law from being delivered to Congress.

According to Eric Salmi, communications director for D.C. Council member Charles Allen (D-Ward 6), who guided the bill through the Council’s legislative process, all bills approved by the Council and signed by the D.C. mayor must be hand-delivered to Congress for a required congressional review.

“What happened was when the Capitol fence went up after the January insurrection, it created an issue where we physically could not deliver laws to Congress per the congressional review period,” Salmi told the Washington Blade.

Among the bills that could not immediately be delivered to Congress was the Bella Evangelista and Tony Hunter Panic Defense Prohibition and Hate Crimes Response Amendment Act of 2020, which was approved by the Council on a second and final vote on Dec. 15.

Between the time the bill was signed by Mayor Muriel Bowser and published in the D.C. Register under procedural requirements for all bills, it was not ready to be transmitted to Congress until Feb. 16, the Council’s legislative record for the bill shows.

Salmi said the impasse in delivering the bill to Congress due to the security fence prevented the bill from reaching Congress on that date and prevented the mandatory 60-day congressional review period for this bill from beginning at that time. He noted that most bills require a 30 legislative day review by Congress.

But the Evangelista-Hunter bill, named after a transgender woman and a gay man who died in violent attacks by perpetrators who attempted to use the trans and gay panic defense, includes a law enforcement related provision that under the city’s Home Rule Charter passed by Congress in the early 1970s requires a 60-day congressional review.

“There is a chance it goes into effect any day now, just given the timeline is close to being up,” Salmi said on Tuesday. “I don’t know the exact date it was delivered, but I do know the countdown is on,” said Salmi, who added, “I would expect any day now it should go into effect and there’s nothing stopping it other than an insurrection in January.”

If the delivery to Congress had not been delayed, the D.C. Council’s legislative office estimated the congressional review would have been completed by May 12.

A congressional source who spoke on condition of being identified only as a senior Democratic aide, said the holdup of D.C. bills because of the Capitol fence has been corrected.

“The House found an immediate workaround, when this issue first arose after the Jan. 6 insurrection,” the aide said.

“This is yet another reason why D.C. Council bills should not be subject to a congressional review period and why we need to grant D.C. statehood,” the aide said.

The aide added that while no disapproval resolution had been introduced in Congress to overturn the D.C. Evangelista-Hunter bill, House Democrats would have defeated such a resolution.

“House Democrats support D.C. home rule, statehood, and LGBTQ rights,” said the aide.

LGBTQ rights advocates have argued that a ban on using a gay or transgender panic defense in criminal trials is needed to prevent defense attorneys from inappropriately asking juries to find that a victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity or expression is to blame for a defendant’s criminal act, including murder.

Some attorneys have argued that their clients “panicked” after discovering the person against whom they committed a violent crime was gay or transgender, prompting them to act in a way they believed to be a form of self-defense.

In addition to its provision banning the LGBTQ panic defense, the Evangelista-Hunter bill includes a separate provision that strengthens the city’s existing hate crimes law by clarifying that hatred need not be the sole motivating factor for an underlying crime such as assault, murder, or threats to be prosecuted as a hate crime.

LGBTQ supportive prosecutors have said the clarification was needed because it is often difficult to prove to a jury that hatred is the only motive behind a violent crime. The prosecutors noted that juries have found defendants not guilty of committing a hate crime on grounds that they believed other motives were involved in a particular crime after defense lawyers argued that the law required “hate” to be the only motive in order to find someone guilty of a hate crime.

Salmi noted that while the hate crime clarification and panic defense prohibition provisions of the Evangelista-Hunter bill will become law as soon as the congressional review is completed, yet another provision in the bill will not become law after the congressional review because there are insufficient funds in the D.C. budget to cover the costs of implementing the provision.

The provision gives the D.C. Office of Human Rights and the Office of the D.C. Attorney General authority to investigate hate related discrimination at places of public accommodation. Salmi said the provision expands protections against discrimination to include web-based retailers or online delivery services that are not physically located in D.C.

“That is subject to appropriations,” Salmi said. “And until it is funded in the upcoming budget it cannot be legally enforced.”

He said that at Council member Allen’s request, the Council added language to the bill that ensures that all other provisions of the legislation that do not require additional funding – including the ban on use of the LGBTQ panic defense and the provision clarifying that hatred doesn’t have to be the sole motive for a hate crime – will take effect as soon as the congressional approval process is completed.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. man charged with 2020 anti-gay death threat rearrested

Defendant implicated in three anti-LGBTQ incidents since 2011



shooting, DC Eagle, assault, hate crime, anti-gay attack, police discrimination, sex police, Sisson, gay news, Washington Blade

A D.C. man arrested in August 2020 for allegedly threatening to kill a gay man outside the victim’s apartment in the city’s Adams Morgan neighborhood and who was released while awaiting trial was arrested again two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill another man in an unrelated incident.

D.C. Superior Court records show that Jalal Malki, who was 37 at the time of his 2020 arrest on a charge of bias-related attempts to do bodily harm against the gay man, was charged on May 4, 2021 with unlawful entry, simple assault, threats to kidnap and injure a person, and attempted possession of a prohibited weapon against the owner of a vacant house at 4412 Georgia Ave., N.W.

Court charging documents state that Malki was allegedly staying at the house without permission as a squatter. An arrest affidavit filed in court by D.C. police says Malki allegedly threatened to kill the man who owns the house shortly after the man arrived at the house while Malki was inside.

According to the affidavit, Malki walked up to the owner of the house while the owner was sitting in his car after having called police and told him, “If you come back here, I’m going to kill you.” While making that threat Malki displayed what appeared to be a gun in his waistband, but which was later found to be a toy gun, the affidavit says.

Malki then walked back inside the house minutes before police arrived and arrested him. Court records show that similar to the court proceedings following his 2020 arrest for threatening the gay man, a judge in the latest case ordered Malki released while awaiting trial. In both cases, the judge ordered him to stay away from the two men he allegedly threatened to kill.

An arrest affidavit filed by D.C. police in the 2020 case states that Malki allegedly made the threats inside an apartment building where the victim lived on the 2300 block of Champlain Street, N.W. It says Malki was living in a nearby building but often visited the building where the victim lived.

“Victim 1 continued to state during an interview that it was not the first time that Defendant 1 had made threats to him, but this time Defendant 1 stated that if he caught him outside, he would ‘fucking kill him.’” the affidavit says. It quotes the victim as saying during this time Malki repeatedly called the victim a “fucking faggot.”

The affidavit, prepared by the arresting officers, says that after the officers arrested Malki and were leading him to a police transport vehicle to be booked for the arrest, he expressed an “excited utterance” that he was “in disbelief that officers sided with the ‘fucking faggot.’”

Court records show that Malki is scheduled to appear in court on June 4 for a status hearing for both the 2020 arrest and the arrest two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill the owner of the house in which police say he was illegally squatting.

Superior Court records show that Malki had been arrested three times between 2011 and 2015 in cases unrelated to the 2021 and 2020 cases for allegedly also making threats of violence against people. Two of the cases appear to be LGBTQ related, but prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office did not list the cases as hate crimes.

In the first of the three cases, filed in July 2011, Malki allegedly shoved a man inside Dupont Circle and threatened to kill him after asking the man why he was wearing a purple shirt.

“Victim 1 believes the assault occurred because Suspect 1 believes Victim 1 is a homosexual,” the police arrest affidavit says.

Court records show prosecutors charged Malki with simple assault and threats to do bodily harm in the case. But the court records show that on Sept. 13, 2011, D.C. Superior Court Judge Stephen F. Eilperin found Malki not guilty on both charges following a non-jury trial.

The online court records do not state why the judge rendered a not guilty verdict. With the courthouse currently closed to the public and the press due to COVID-related restrictions, the Washington Blade couldn’t immediately obtain the records to determine the judge’s reason for the verdict.

In the second case, court records show Malki was arrested by D.C. police outside the Townhouse Tavern bar and restaurant at 1637 R St., N.W. on Nov. 7, 2012 for allegedly threatening one or more people with a knife after employees ordered Malki to leave the establishment for “disorderly behavior.”

At the time, the Townhouse Tavern was located next door to the gay nightclub Cobalt, which before going out of business two years ago, was located at the corner of 17th and R Streets, N.W.

The police arrest affidavit in the case says Malki allegedly pointed a knife in a threatening way at two of the tavern’s employees who blocked his path when he attempted to re-enter the tavern. The affidavit says he was initially charged by D.C. police with assault with a dangerous weapon – knife. Court records, however, show that prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office lowered the charges to two counts of simple assault. The records show that on Jan. 15, 2013, Malki pleaded guilty to the two charges as part of a plea bargain arrangement.

The records show that Judge Marissa Demeo on that same day issued a sentence of 30 days for each of the two charges but suspended all 30 days for both counts. She then sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for both charges and ordered that he undergo alcohol and drug testing and undergo treatment if appropriate.

In the third case prior to the 2020 and 2021 cases, court records show Malki was arrested outside the Cobalt gay nightclub on March 14, 2015 on multiple counts of simple assault, attempted assault with a dangerous weapon – knife, possession of a prohibited weapon – knife, and unlawful entry.

The arrest affidavit says an altercation started on the sidewalk outside the bar when for unknown reasons, Malki grabbed a female customer who was outside smoking and attempted to pull her toward him. When her female friend came to her aid, Malki allegedly got “aggressive” by threatening the woman and “removed what appeared to be a knife from an unknown location” and pointed it at the woman’s friend in a threatening way, the affidavit says.

It says a Cobalt employee minutes later ordered Malki to leave the area and he appeared to do so. But others noticed that he walked toward another entrance door to Cobalt and attempted to enter the establishment knowing he had been ordered not to return because of previous problems with his behavior, the affidavit says. When he attempted to push away another employee to force his way into Cobalt, Malki fell to the ground during a scuffle and other employees held him on the ground while someone else called D.C. police.

Court records show that similar to all of Malki’s arrests, a judge released him while awaiting trial and ordered him to stay away from Cobalt and all of those he was charged with threatening and assaulting.

The records show that on Sept. 18, 2015, Malki agreed to a plea bargain offer by prosecutors in which all except two of the charges – attempted possession of a prohibited weapon and simple assault – were dropped. Judge Alfred S. Irving Jr. on Oct. 2, 2015 sentenced Malki to 60 days of incarnation for each of the two charges but suspended all but five days, which he allowed Malki to serve on weekends, the court records show.

The judge ordered that the two five-day jail terms could be served concurrently, meaning just five days total would be served, according to court records. The records also show that Judge Irving sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for each of the two counts and ordered that he enter an alcohol treatment program and stay away from Cobalt.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts